نعم، قرأت الخبر منذ ساعات في مواقع أخرى و لم أجد الوقت لقراءة التفاصيل و التأكد من صحته. شكرا اخي اوميغا على تأكيده هنا.

بالتأكيد هذه تعتبر خطوة جيدة بل إلزامية لان الطريقة التي كان يتم بها شراء و بيع العملات الرقمية داخل منصة بايبال لا علاقة لها بابجديات عمل العملات الرقمية و ابسطها ان صاحب العملة لديه الحرية الكاملة في كيفية استعمالها و تحويلها.
إضافة إلى ذلك، هذه الخطوة ستدحض على الاقل الشكوك او تخوفات البعض من أن العملات الرقمية التي يشترونها و يتداول نها داخل المنصة غير مدعومة فعلا بعمليات حقيقية، اي ان بايبال لا تمتلك فعلا تلك العملات (هي مجرد شكوك لدى البعض لكنها تبقى شكوك مقبولة).

I asked you a clear question so, please, give me a clear answer. It is as simple as that.

I clearly asked you about the provably fair system/algorithm you use to determin the winner in your lottery game (you claim all your games are provably fair, right!) but your answer is a general explanation about how lottery games work as if we don't already know that!
Also, why is it possible to buy tickets with free credits which practically have no value? wouldn't this affect the chances of winning for players who buy tickets with real money?

This looks like an automated reply and it shows how unprofessional they are.
Did you check recently if the bug still exist and hasn't been fixed yet?
Some game providers choose not to respond to such messagges and play fool but they do fix the issue thinking that acknowledging it and that their codes are not perfect may harm their reputation and so they dont have to pay a bug bounty.

I think OP is talking about the warning message Electrum displays when the fee you are going to pay is too high compared to the amount to be sent. In this case, 2fa can't be the cause because Electrum will send the 2fa fee to trustedcoin as a second/extra output not as a transaction fee, hence the too high fee warning message will not be displayed.
I believe the problem is with the denomination as nc50lc suggested. Electrum uses mBTC as denomination by default and most likely OP entered the amount he wants to send in BTC.

Thanks for the great tool OP. This will help players to verify their games results on an independent third party verifier.
I tried to crosscheck the results I got from your website with results from other verifiers (RGBkey and provablyfair.meand they match. So, this tool works perfectly. I suggest you contact just-dice.com ad ask them to add your tool to their list of verifiers (there are already four of them).

On other verifiers, I noticed they ask for the hash of the server seed. I suggest you add this option too since it will help to confirm that the seed hash matches the seed.

You got us all confused here! This story doesn't match the story on the video you linked on OP. You said you have $50k on your lbc account (which is not a small amount btw) but the guy on the video has only $800.
In fact, I don't think you are the one who created the video because the guy on the video sounds like a native speaker.
So, please, tell us what happened exactly in your case. Did you upload your own ID, why your documents were rejected, can you post screenshots from your conversation with lbc support? (usually support lets you know why your documents got rejected).

And thank you for the quick reply, I hope you will fix this issue asap as it negatively affects the mobile users experience.

I have another question if you don't mind: you said that all your games are provably fair but what about the Crypto Raffle game?  It's not mentioned on your pf page and when you open the game there is no seed or seed hash or anything like that so I suppose it's not provably fair, right? How the winners are determined?

Welcome 7Slotz to bitcointalk!
Not sure if it's only me but am having problems playing the dice game on mobile. If I tap anywhere on the screen or try to scroll down or up, the game starts without tapping on the Play button! Fortunately it was just free credits. That would be frustrating if it was real money.
The mobile version of the website needs more work and improvement. It's not very responsive and a bit laggy.

^^
OP said he sent the coins to freewallet in 216. Back then, eth highest price was around $17, so the 17 eth he sent to freewallet were worth less than $290 (and probably even way less than that). Besides, the name of the service itself is a bit deceitful especially for newbies (just like blockchain.com).

OP, be cautious and do not trust random people especially newbies who will contact you telling you they can help or they know someone who can help!

You have two withdrawal requests pending for almost a month so I suppose you already contacted their support to inform them about this issue! What was their response, what did the guy on telegram tell you, can you quote him?
What I find à it strange is that your withdrawal request of 0.1 btc (which is higher than the two pending amounts combined) you made two days earlier got processed with no problems!

Yes, on Roobet, all players have to complete at least the level 1 verification by providing the following information: name, second name, date of birth, country of usual residence, and telephone number^*.
They have a deposit/withdraw threshold amount after which you will have to complete level 2 verification.
This doesn't mean if you are going to deposit/withdraw small amounts you can provide wrong information because they do crosscheck those information.

* https://roobet.com/aml-policy

Personally, I didn't use any antivirus or anti-malware for years and I didn't face any problem so far. My pc works just fine even I don't remember when was the last time I had to format it. However, I only open websites I trust and never download anything but the softwares I need and I make sure to download them from their official websites and update them regularly.
Using an anti-virus will certainly make your device safer but doesn't mean it will make it totally safe.

This is my own experience and I don't recommend you or anyone else to do the same, unless you are totally sure you know what you are doing.

When you open the Wallet Details tab then you enter the private key to view its details, bitaddress.org will generate both a "Bitcoin Address" and a "Bitcoin Address Compressed" which don't look alike (but generated from the same private key).
I believe this where the confusion comes from.
You only need the compressed bitcoin address on the right side. If you check it, you will find that it matches the address generated by the other wallet generator you used.

Do you mean only one word is missing? If you know the exact position of that word then finding the correct one shouldn't take more than a milliseconds using any automated tool. You can even do it manually.
If there are more than one word missing or you don't know the exact position then you can try FinderOuter as suggested above by BlackHatCoiner or BTCRecover (you can read about how it works and how to use it from here:https://btcrecover.readthedocs.io/en/latest/). For both tools, knowing one of the children private keys or addresses will help to speed up the recovery process.

Thanks for the update. Happy to hear you almost finished developing the platform and you will launch it soon.
My question is why don't you make the beta testing public or at least ask some forum members to help you with it. Many members here have great experience in this field and can be of great help. Their suggestions will surely help you to improve your product and to fix bugs (if there are any) before the official launch.

You said you created this thread to serve as a medium of communication but "communication goes both ways"  which is not the case here as far as I can see since you didn't reply to any of the comments above.

I watched the whole video where you kept saying you'll provide evidence to prove local bitcoins are scammers, but you didn't! Actually, what you presented proves you are at fault here.
The aim of taking a selfie holding your ID card is to confirm that the person using the account is really the account's owner, which you obviously failed to do.

Localbitcoins' ToS states clearly that you can't use someone else's account even if it's your wife:

Promotions and bonuses for new players is without a doubt a good strategy to attract new customers but if it's not coupled with a good and lucrative reward system for loyal players it won't work on the long run. New players who got attracted by a sign up bonus, for example, will leave as soon as they get that bonus, but a reward system will incentivize them to stay and play more.

When I read this I got excited thinking it's a new game they developed and added to their list of Gamdom Original games but, unfortunately, it appeared it's just another slot game provided by BigTimeGaming.
I am not saying the game isn't good, in fact I liked it and it reminds me of Big Bass Bonanza. It's just, I was expecting something more.. original!

This seems like a critical vulnerability! Any decent game provider (or any developer in general) is supposed to give your report the highest priority and will try to fix the bug or patch the vulnerability as soon as they know about its existence since it may result in severe financial loss for their customers (casinos).
I suppose those game providers get tons of emails every single day (many of them are spam) so make sure to send them a detailed report with a PoC to explain how the vulnerability you found can be exploited and its impact.
Instead of ignoring your messages, they should give you a reward.

I just tried to create a dummy account (hope they will not ban me for multi-accounting  ) to check this out and indeed, after filling in all the required information, I couldn't sign up. The Sign Up button is not working. I tried clearing the browser cash and tried a different browsers but nothing worked (tried with both Chrome and Firefox on Android).

Also, I noticed that there is no option to reset the password on the Log In page. I think they should add this feature in case a user (like me) forgets his account's password.