(Finally selling the rest of my farm... Pheww) I have complete mining rigs for sale. - 23 15 x Radeon 5970s capable of 650 Mhash/s at stock clocks ($200 each) - 10 9 x Radeon 6990s capable of 700 Mhash/s at stock clocks ($300 each) - 20 x PSU Corsair CMPSU-AX1200 1200W ($200 each) - 20 18 x Mobo MSI 890FXA-GD70 with 5 PCIe x16 slots ($120 each) - I include the CPUs & RAM for free with each mobo (AMD Sempron 140 2.7GHz + 2GB DDR3-1066). Edit: sold 1 5970 on Nov 3. Edit: sold 5 5970s on Nov 3. Edit: sold 1 6990 on Nov 4. Edit: sold 2 5970s on Nov 4. Edit: sold 2 mobos on Nov 4. Shipping is extra. I ship from Los Angeles. I very much prefer taking bitcoins as payment. Paypal or Dwolla only if you are really trusted. I am an old member in this community. I have sold to multiple forum members, and have a good rating on bitcoin-otc: http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=mrb_ I am a verified Paypal user. No PM, please email me: m.bevand at gmail.comI have all purchase receipts expect 2 (see below). The warranty is in theory not transferrable, but manufacturers don't always care if the name on the purchase receipt does not match the name of the person exercising the warranty: - all my 6990s were bought on Newegg or TigerDirect around May-Jun 2011 and have a 2 years warranty - 3 of my 5970s were bought on Newegg, they are still under warranty (2 years) - 2 of my 5970s were bought used from Ebay or the bitcoin forums, I have no purchase receipts to claim warranty. I believe their warranty period has expired anyway - 5 of my 5970s were bought OEM from Newegg on Aug 2011 and their warranty was 30 days and already expired: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814105001- 5 of my 5970s were bought OEM from Amazon on Aug 2011 from a reseller (UnityElectronics) who closed shop. The amazon.com product page now shows a generic 5970 page with no warranty info, so I don't think any kind of warranty still applies to them: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005ISV72Y/- PSUs have been purchased on Newegg or Amazon between Dec 2010 and Jul 2011, and have a 7 year warranty - mobos have been purchased on Newegg between Dec 2010 and Jul 2011, and have a 3 year warranty how much for 20 18 of the mobos, 20 of the psus, and 23 15 of the 5970s? stock is 1.05v presumably? |
|
|
|
|
the mitt romney that will protect us from the terrible secret of space
|
|
|
|
|
torg approves of macintosh
|
|
|
|
Couple questions guys, mining now about day (current uptime around 0,8 day) 104 shares, 4 orphane 4dead. Efficiency ~103-105%. Is that considered normal/good? Nothing to worry about? Like the pool, current confirming transactions this morning in 6 hours over 1,5btc  And my expected payout is still slowly rising  for comparison purposes, here is my share/stale/invalid rate on another pool: 45389/20/0 someone on a crap link with high ghash will have a negative impact on your # of orphans and DOA my pool @ 5.9.24.81 had an orphan rate in excess of 10% i got 5 in, but i dont know how to see if people are mining to my public node or not, but it looks nice, got alot of BTC in 6 hours today  |
|
|
|
Couple questions guys, mining now about day (current uptime around 0,8 day) 104 shares, 4 orphane 4dead. Efficiency ~103-105%. Is that considered normal/good? Nothing to worry about? Like the pool, current confirming transactions this morning in 6 hours over 1,5btc And my expected payout is still slowly rising for comparison purposes, here is my share/stale/invalid rate on another pool: 45389/20/0 someone on a crap link with high ghash will have a negative impact on your # of orphans and DOA my pool @ 5.9.24.81 had an orphan rate in excess of 10% |
|
|
|
|
how bizarre, someone that just registered a couple days ago, then someone from vietnam that had 2 posts prior to the four today
why would anyone mine at a 5% pps pool?
|
|
|
|
tried this again, about 7ghash on it, was getting some absurd orphan rate. out of ~60 shares, had 1 DOA and ~10 orphans. something is either wrong with the newest version or someone that has a high hash rate has a crap link to the hetzner datacenter
did you disable the queue in ur miner? phoenix miner by default has a queue size of 1 w/ the way p2pool is set up, someone with a shitty link can orphan a good amount of valid shares, just by hitting two in a row (ie, someone with 50ghash out of 300ghash total) |
|
|
|
|
tried this again, about 7ghash on it, was getting some absurd orphan rate. out of ~60 shares, had 1 DOA and ~10 orphans. something is either wrong with the newest version or someone that has a high hash rate has a crap link to the hetzner datacenter
|
|
|
|
If You are behind NAT then don't open incoming 8333 port (disable UPnP in bitcoin settings) and bitcoin will connect to max of 8 nodes. Just that simple, just that clean!
Thanks all for your numerous "Just that simple" solution. If you haven't noticed, I'm inquiring about a solution for the general public. The general public has their bitcoin client behind a NAT without a forwarded port and therefore only 8 connections. Those who know how to open a port know who to limit the bandwidth using an external program. But it would be neater to have it integrated in the client itself. The general public should not be using computers at all unless some miracle pills are found that can cure retardation. use netlimiter Net Limiter occupies NDIS driver interface and introduces additional problems. you can disable/enable the netlimiter drivers at will |
|
|
|
|
ok
yah, strange:
main.h:static const uint64 nMinDiskSpace = 52428800;
but I remember trying to put it on an 8GB RAM drive and it said I was low on space... so I just edited out the disk space checks entirely
|
|
|
|
If You are behind NAT then don't open incoming 8333 port (disable UPnP in bitcoin settings) and bitcoin will connect to max of 8 nodes. Just that simple, just that clean!
Thanks all for your numerous "Just that simple" solution. If you haven't noticed, I'm inquiring about a solution for the general public. The general public has their bitcoin client behind a NAT without a forwarded port and therefore only 8 connections. Those who know how to open a port know who to limit the bandwidth using an external program. But it would be neater to have it integrated in the client itself. pretty much. like i said a month or so ago in this thread, i use netlimiter there are also free utilities that will do the same thing for windows or you can use the QoS that comes with windows, I believe.. or should at least be on your router/DSL modem/whatever |
|
|
|
Please help me understand this:
Just started experimenting with samr7/oclvanityminer and have dedicated a 5850 to the task. According to the calculator, I'll earn a little over .11BTC per day with this card doing normal (non-vanity) mining.
It's currently hashing around 20.20 Mkey/s and working on this problem:
"1vanity" Reward: 0.079600 Value: 0.000323 BTC/MkeyHr.
So that's 0.000323 * 20.20 * 24 = 0.1565904 BTC, right? So I should be earning more than I would if I mined straight? But then they take 20 percent out first or does that figure already have the 20 percent taken out?
It also says 50% in 8.0h, I take that to mean there's a 50 percent chance it will find the solution in 8 hours. So approximately 100% (statistically) in 16 hours, that means the reward (0.796) for 16 hours average work? So 24/16 * 0.0796 BTC = 0.1194 BTC which is not close to 0.1565904 BTC. Where is my math failing?
Does my Mkey/s look reasonable for that card?
i get >20 on a 5830 running at 980/1025 1280x1024 |
|
|
|
To my knowledge CG miner is 20-30MH/s slower than Phoenix with the old SDK. Correct me if I'm wrong? I'm talking about GPUs from 6xxx and 5xxx series there is no question about what should be used with 7xxx cards. I should have put a 5xxx and 6xxx series cards in the topic, my fault. Maybe we should compare our results to see who can make the highest. I would say we should compare same GPUs with same frequencies. I will give you my results: Phoenix/phatk2 - VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false 5830 - 900/300MHz - 302Mh/s 5850 - 900/300MHz - 376MH/s 5870 - 900/300MHz - 418MH/sIf anyone can pull more MH/s on those frequencies please tell us how?  (I have chosen lower freq so everyone can test at this frequencies, this are my average results) Can you give more details about exactly what files you're using, or what SDK and/or driver package you downloaded? I'd like to be able to make an equal comparison with my 5830s, but I can't even find a copy of Phoenix 1.6.4, and I don't know what SDK you're using. I downloaded Catalyst 11.9, but that appears to come with SDK 2.5; if I can get the same files as you I'd be willing to do a fresh install of Windows to see if I can get those numbers. As it stands, I've been using latest drivers/SDK and Phoenix 2 (Phoenix 1.7.5 gets 1-2 less Mh/s), and I get around 315Mh/s at 980/1000 with VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false. If I put the memory clock down to 300mhz I get around 255Mh/s, if I do that and change my settings to yours I get around 272Mh/s, and if I change my settings to yours with the memory clock at 1000mhz I get around 287Mh/s. (edit: well, i already replied to this, but.. everything is pretty much the same except for dropping the mem clock a bit, when i run the cards at 1000 i increase mem clock to 199 for 128worksize, 299 for 256) well, you shouldn't be using latest drivers/SDK, they all require the high memory settings. i have a system with three 5830's, but for the last 3 or 4 months i've been running them at 1.063v instead of 1.163v (not for energy efficiency, since my elec is <7c/kwh, just from heat issues)... but at 1.063v, 925core, 180memory, 9 aggression, 128 worksize, they get a little over 290mhash.. that's in windows 7, 2.5sdk, and whatever driver is in catalyst 11.11 |
|
|
|
having a 7 digit ICQ number
My ICQ number was 4 digits (5xxx I can't remember exactly). mine is 6! 807657 oh, and why would you ever use Juno? netcom and many other ISPs were available way before Juno was... not to mention the ability to just freeload off of any university/govt installation in your area. in richardson, I could choose from UNT, UTA, and the super conducting supercollidor. on SSC you could even access their VAX machine, sscvx1.ssc.gov |
|
|
|
Only just tried this one seems simple and light weight to use and simple enough to use too. However no support for it no development (:
Someone needs to come out with a v3 and re create and bring life to it
i still use phoenix 1.7.5 with phoenix rising v1.3 from 5-31-11 |
|
|
|
Phoenix 2 is spamming the wrong password 10 times per second, just like Phoenix 1. Maybe you can fix that?
it'd have to be multiple instances for it to be 10 times per second one computer with 3 cards running w/ wrong settings could possibly do it (assuming it's not deliberate and just some guy running x instances of phoenix all on the same card) |
|
|
|
|
i had similar problem with 50% doa/stale rates on one computer (one i had got from someone else, all assembled, etc) on p2pool.... on other servers it was fine. anyway, in the network config the flow control was off. when i turned it on, it dropped to 1% or so like normal.
|
|
|
|
Thought I'd mention that the HHTT rate is based on the fee for the default 32 difficulty. It also should be rounded up (or displayed to more digits like Mt. Red's) as it is 0.00001594875. If you're mining PPS, you're probably trying to avoid too much variance... but I've seen people with 500mhash doing 256 difficulty shares, which pay 0.00001609125. If you have 5ghash+ you can do the 256's without much variance over a 24hr period. If you have 10ghash+ (or more), you could do the 512's or 1024's. The 1024's are 0.000016106504. (ed: imo, you should set it to 64, even if you're only running 300mhash, it's 1.5% vs 2%) |
|
|
|
|
blockchain has reported multiple triplemining and btc50 blocks as 'deepbit' blocks when it records my node as relaying them first (5.9.24.81). seems as if I got the 'deepbit' tag on myself.
most of the deepbit blocks will be relayed by 82.130.102.160, as it's my understanding that deepbit blocks the blockchain IPs
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
