do the right thing SP and look after your donators and fix and update the decred miner.
Yes. I will send out a fixed final version. Decred sp-mod #7 sendt to the 0.1BTC donators. Check your inboxes. decred+vanilla sendt to the 0.2BTC donators. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
WTS 16k BILL - 0.15 BTC, pm
|
|
|
|
|
You really like spamming question don't you?
Anyway, staking is not mining. Mining and staking are both minting methods though.
I think pure PoS is based on a fallacy and is a pointless gamble and while PoW has plenty of issues it's much better than PoS.
|
|
|
|
this is proof that people want to mine
What would make you think the opposite? |
|
|
|
|
The premine (840k) equals the first 28 hours of mining.
I'm in for now, let's see how this goes.
Edit: OC's in as well, nice!
|
|
|
|
|
Weird coin...
"blocks" : 33,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.05477056,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 100000000000,
"netmhashps" : 2.45039332,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"stakeinterest" : 4000000,
"testnet" : false
|
|
|
|
Would be nice if the devs would chip in on the issue.
Yes it would..  Sometimes it takes sometime to work out the issue. I am not saying this is the final fix, but go with me here as this works for myself and a few others we have tested this on; on wallet version 1.0.2.0; in your darknet.conf file located in your masternode; add this line; externalip=<put your masternode ip address here> save and do a sudo reboot then make sure your daemon is restarted and you should be good. If this isn't working for your, let us know, so we can continue to research the issue. please give it an hour or so to see if this works. Thanks EDIT: Also make sure you do a 'masternode start-alias <Mastnernode name> <your wallet pass phrase> Thank you for acknowledging the issue. But your workaround is not helpful for non-masternode wallets behind a firewall. And some people have their masternodes runnig with dynamic IPs. Also, the number of active masternodes (masternode count) is fluctuating quite heavily. I'm hoping you guys can track and fix the issue. Edit: I have two recently restarted (eg. 10 minutes ago) and synced wallets on the same block height showing different masternode counts (416 vs 426 at block 72338 with 8 peers connected each). |
|
|
|
|
Would be nice if the devs would chip in on the issue.
|
|
|
|
750ti CARDS MINE DECRED--
Sorry, it looks like I am wading into turbulent water. A 750ti card can mine ETH at about 5MH/s in Linux, or DECRED (DCR) at full speed on Linux or Windows. Right now, my Linux 750ti rig is mining DCR at 480MH/s per card with tpruvot CCminer v 1.7.4 . I am not sure what speed my 6x 750ti FTW rig will mine DCR because I haven't kept up with the DCR CCminer updates from sp_ , and the posted reports are not ringing true, or lining up, or consistant in any good way.
But if you run the numbers, my 750ti rig would be earning about the same mining ETH at 2/3 speed (5MH/s) or DCR at top speed (600MH/s??? per card). So, what is true? I could burn another image to a spare USB stick and switch to ETH, or stay with DCR and tpruvot, or send 0.1BTC for DCR/Vanilla deluxe edition to sp_ .
I am considering accepting donations for my Lubuntu/Genoil's CUDA Ethminer image, but I don't think it is bug free. It takes a 16GB stick, and is not fancy like other distributions (BAMT/KopiemTu/PIMP)
Any feedback is welcome. --scryptr
That's exactly right, 5 Mh/s of Eth and 600 Mh/s of Decred currently earns exactly the same amount ($1.36) per 750 Ti per day. (source: http://karldiab.com/EthereumMiningCalculator/ and http://decred-calc.cryptohub.info/) But Eth I think uses a tiny bit less electricity (it does on the 970). I'm not sure how fast the private Vanilla version is but with 1100 Mh/s you'd get about $0.85 per day currently. I don't care about Vanilla, there are several coins that are more profitable consistently (and all have decent wallets) and I'm certainly not going to buy the private miner. |
|
|
|
Wait a second, for decred donators decred #5 costs an additional 0.1 BTC?
It includes the optimized V-cash kernal. 13% faster One of my buyers have spread #4 all over the internet. With all due respect I don't care if you give a puppy with it but if you ask me it's pretty shitty that there's zero transparency and planning going on with your releases and so you just decide to bundle something else in and double the price tag of something we thought we already paid for and included further ompimizations. I'm not sure if you're serious or just curious how far you can go until people start sharing your private releases behind your back. Not that I would do that. I know that you can't quantify in advance how much speed you can get with your optimizations but please have some sort of transparent plan so we know what we can expect without surprises. |
|
|
|
|
Wait a second, for decred donators decred #5 costs an additional 0.1 BTC?
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday I resynced a bunch of my masternodes and almost all of them are stuck now with plenty of connections on a bunch of different blocks (71406, 71411, 71460, etc).
But masternode count is still high so I'm not sure if they will expire or actually working.
Both of my local non-masternode wallets also got stucked on different blocks and they're not receiving transactions unless I restart the wallet and it syncs the last few hours.
|
|
|
|
All my v1.0.2 masternodes are stuck at block 70751. But they continue to generate rewards.
mine stuck at different ones as well. I think its just a visual thing needs fixing tho It's definitely not just a visual issue. It's just takes time for masternode payments to stop. |
|
|
|
|
It's a 1.0.2 issue and not exclusive to mp-hosting.
Maybe there are some rogue nodes?
|
|
|
|
Having issues with wallet. No block source available. No active connections to the network. Tried two PCs, two different networks?
Add this to your conf file
addnode=31.6.30.115
addnode=217.240.107.120
addnode=109.172.55.170
addnode=68.104.0.118
addnode=24.104.248.48
addnode=67.3.92.178
addnode=86.122.138.192
addnode=76.105.204.52
addnode=74.132.6.75
addnode=173.30.131.78
addnode=68.7.186.217
addnode=188.230.158.70
addnode=162.213.154.31
addnode=173.245.148.70
addnode=151.80.206.104
addnode=24.254.142.135
addnode=74.132.6.75
addnode=67.225.110.88
addnode=104.200.151.6
addnode=37.187.129.166
addnode=75.86.207.37
addnode=82.210.172.238
addnode=109.201.154.180
addnode=75.102.135.212
addnode=178.33.209.212
addnode=94.22.185.125
addnode=212.112.119.140
addnode=98.108.241.238
addnode=115.186.110.172
addnode=199.7.156.129
addnode=2.220.147.216
addnode=81.191.41.44
addnode=52.11.97.205
addnode=85.1.100.186
addnode=92.77.76.244
addnode=73.237.212.111
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989
addnode=i6vpvzk2jxuqqs5f.onion:989
addnode=bgdhpb76fkbw5fmg.onion:989
addnode=gtlqzb5zbws5di7g.onion:989
addnode=f7j2m26rptm5f7af.onion:989
addnode=dnetzj6l4cvo2fxy.onion:989
addnode=s3v3n7xhqafg6sb7.onion:989
|
|
|
|
We spent months working
And no GUI wallet or even a detailed ann post huh? |
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what your point/question is.
Devs generally don't make coins just so they can mine them. They usually do mine it but it's not expected they will mine most coins.
And if 90% of the coins are mined by one individual that just means poor distribution due to lack of interest or closed doors (coin is not compeltely public) which means the coins is bad and people won't touch it.
If the dev has to mine his own coin in order to afford further development or because he just wants profit that coin shouldn't exist in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Yep I think time to advertise it as Dash2 on the main board. Change heading to darknet - dash 2 you can all own some of for 40 bucks or whatever a masternode is now.
This time everyone can mine it up. How much has been mined. I tried to mine it but seems there are some big miners already.
I can't make a profit from mining it so I just bought 20k of it for about 80 bucks. Not too bad to run 2 masternodes once i work out how to set them up on vps. Let's see how it goes.
The main thing I like about DNET (other than the lack of instamine) is that it doesn't have an identity crisis, it isn't trying to break away from its roots and it's actually proud to be associated with the dark net. Anyone reading this, feel free to pm me if you need any help with setting up a masternode. Not to be offensive in any form, but how can you consider a newly released DASH clone as a "DASH 2" project? With buying DASH, you buy into a long-term support from the developers who have invented/coded the features that DASH currently owns and they will most probably stick to their project meaning it's less risky than investing into the 22nd DASH/Bitcoin clone. With buying DNET you invest into something that is literally a clone of another project with no background knowledge on the developers or their past coding experience. Also about the identity crisis issue, DNET doesn't seem to have anything even closely related to darknets except it's name and cloning of anonymity features. I see that you are obviously invested and I am also against DASH's early instamine issues (and as disclaimer I don't own a single DASH nor do I plan to buy any), but luring people into a project with bullshit claims like "this is the new and better DASH" is just plain wrong. If the DNET developers were here to stay for 2+ years and would try to build groundbreaking anonymity and cryptocurrency features they wouldn't have started with cloning another project on a 1:1 basis. PS: I have 0 problems with the DNET project, but was randomly reading around and the noobtrap buzzwords were bothering me here. Don't take the term Dash 2 too seriously. Dash is an old, established coin and DNET is new so it's obviously not Dash 2 in a sense that it is its successor. But it is a Dash fork without the premine following Darkcoin's original idea (as far as I can tell at least) so given time and development it has the potential to close the gap to Dash in terms of success even though they will probably never be direct competitors unless DNET also rebrands itself to appear to be more mainstream. |
|
|
|
|
My main problem with premine is that it gives devs too much control because they own the majority (or close to it) of coins in the beginning.
And of course once they sell it in the beginning they are not motivated to keep improving the coin which is why so many premined coins were dumped and abandoned.
I think a dev fee is the best, where a small percentage of every block (~0.5%) automatically goes to a dev address.
|
|
|
|
I think it's a sleeper with a lot of potential. Granted, I own close to 40 masternodes out of 558 but still, I have to say it's quite lucrative.
Masternode rewards will decrease soon but as it stands, it currently takes 46 days to ROI with a masternode which is quite nice.
After the fix it will take 77 days to ROI with the current number of masternodes which keeps increasing every day. There's still time to safely get in and profit imo.
Looks like a fair version of Dash. I got a couple of masternodes just for fun. Dash2 - the redemption. Dash2 without the bullshit instamine. Interesting, but aside from enriching the devs primarily, there is no issue that affects the coin (Dash), right? I ask this honestly, as I don't fully understand the issues. Is there a big advantage to DNET over Dash? Dash was arguably the first of its kind which will always be valuable by some and oversimplifying things DNET can only be looked at just another fork (with another algo and no instamine). But Dash is, and forever will be plagued by its rocky start, meaning it was heavily instamined by a few people:  And on top of that Dash rebranded itself to appeal to the mainstream audience while DNET is proud to be used by everyone both on the clear and deep side of the web (as far as I know). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
