and that's why you buy EVGA gold or Platinum ................................
I have a bunch of EVGA Supernova G2 1300W PSUs some of which are working perfectly fine for 3 years now. Silent and only slightly warm at 1kW load. There's a good reason why they sell these with 10 years of warranty. Some of their lower capacity (~500-650W) models are not that good though. A cheaper option would be to modify some server PSUs but that requires a bit of work which shouldn't be a problem for an electrical engineer.
|
|
|
You have a shit quality PSU if some fluctuation kills it. Its advertised capacity also doesn't have to do with its build quality and since you didn't mention any brand or model, just its capacity, I assume you went with a cheap one.
|
|
|
If two coins have the same address generation system then their private keys are the same.
So if you sent coinX to a coinY address then you should use your coinY private key and import that address to coinX - if you can.
If you don't know the private key for coinY (ABD in your example) then you're out of luck.
|
|
|
Could be a poor power supply or a faulty riser or simply dust causing weak connectivity to a card/cards.
Or too high overclock.
|
|
|
I has recently sold my setup and the gentleman that bought it has blown either 3 or 4 boards within 2 weeks... he said all in the same spot!!!! ( you can see the damage) the setup is as follows Asrock h81 pro btc ax1200 g1840 cpu 8gb ram 80gb ssd Gigabyte r9380 4gb cards non powered risers.
I had been runing this setup for over 6 months with no issues. Any ideas as to why he keeps blowing them? http://imgur.com/v9BLWGvThat's a weird spot to burn out but I'm just going to blindly say that your problem is probably coming from the risers. Use powered USB risers so the cards pull power straight from the PSU and not from the motherboard. See I thought soo too, but I used it for months with no issues like that Maybe the other guy overclocked the cards very heavily so they pulled more power. Or maybe he didn't connect the molex cables to the motherboard (which are not needed with powered risers).
|
|
|
I has recently sold my setup and the gentleman that bought it has blown either 3 or 4 boards within 2 weeks... he said all in the same spot!!!! ( you can see the damage) the setup is as follows Asrock h81 pro btc ax1200 g1840 cpu 8gb ram 80gb ssd Gigabyte r9380 4gb cards non powered risers.
I had been runing this setup for over 6 months with no issues. Any ideas as to why he keeps blowing them? http://imgur.com/v9BLWGvThat's a weird spot to burn out but I'm just going to blindly say that your problem is probably coming from the risers. Use powered USB risers so the cards pull power straight from the PSU and not from the motherboard.
|
|
|
No way.
Sure it would get pumped for a bit but there's no reason for that to work long term.
In fact, I strongly believe coins are much better off with unknown devs, Satoshi style. There's no reason to attach a personality to a coin whatsoever. And to open up the dev for possible attacks. If the code is great it doesn't matter who wrote it.
|
|
|
Seems like Bittrex is delisting UTC. UTC market is offline.
Valpe
True - seems Bittrex have delisted UTC Disabled BTC-UTC This market did not meet the volume requirements and is being evaluated for delisting on January 28th, 2017. I'll have a chat with Steven - but its clear we need another exchange. I am also talking with TIDEX.COM - a new exchange in testing at present. I have been testing recently. Asking to list UltraCoin and the UltraCoin WAVES Token. Its a very user friendly UI - similar to Poloniex. They may have a priority for Waves related coins so we might be attractive since we have a Community distributed WAVES token. It would give us another avenue to trade in/out of UltraCoin to other cryptos and tokens. Cheers - usukan Bittrex UpdateIts official - Bittrex has delisted UltraCoin - Ryan Hentz from Bittrex just confirmed via email. Best withdraw your UTC from Bittrex - they will probably shut down withdrawals from Bittrex in the near future. Cheers - usukan That sucks, I missed it. And we don't have any other exchange as far as I know.
|
|
|
Pool is working.
Blocks found, so its POW.
It is PoW, but the premine is basically worth of 38 YEARS of mining. Anyone mining it should switch hobbies.
|
|
|
Aicoin is a community owned and operated pure PoS coin.
POW reward: 5 coins
Pick one. It's either PoW or pure PoS. Total Coins: 100.000.000 (100 MILLIONS) Premine Amount: (100 MILLIONS)
Total Coins: 100 mln
What, why? ... https://github.com/445789/AI/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L967So it is a PoW coin with 5 reward blocks with 100 million premined? What a load of bullshit.
|
|
|
I went onto freelancer and advertised this job. Does anyone have any advice on what I should look for and what I should charge? Thanks.. i'd probably be inclined to share it if I end up with a good product.
What I personally would find great (and haven't find an app or even website to do that) is if I could just enter a bunch of different altcoin addresses and the app would track their balance instead of having to manually just enter balances.
|
|
|
Pascal's diff is so high that even a flat 3x speed increase would not make it the best choice to mine.
|
|
|
I released it now for testing. scream when you find a block https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/pascal-spmod1Beta release for Solomining only. If you run with 2 threads (bat file) your hashrate is the displayed hashrate of the thread. multiply by 2 to get the gpu speed. Should be around 25% faster than the Klaust opensource miner. Use the example batfiles for optimal performance. (2 threads per gpu) If you use 2 threads you need to multiply the number of gpu's with 2 in the proxy. The minername needs to be 8 characters.
Tip some beers or buy some of my private kernels , and I might add some more speed in the kernel code later. Awesome! Any way to reduce CPU usage? In 6 card rigs with dualcore Pentium CPUs I only get 70-80% GPU usage if I use all cards (2 threads). And more threads make it worse.
|
|
|
=1 / (86400/Last 100 Blocks avg time (s))*(Your Hash rate (MH/s)/NET Hash rate (MH/s))
For me, (3600 MH/s) 1 block take 9,24 day long
= 1 / (86400/278,2)*(10332468/3600) = 9,24
I know, but I want to calculate how long to solve a block from the difficulty specifically, not nethashrate.
|
|
|
Anyone have any spare accounts available that they could part with? I could use one. Thanks!
3GhhbooMFNXbGbRS7TxoKtBZBu7foP2ovjYfvASawSY4s7XLUCPZ6GbvatBhwviyXEztHkTknYbd6Ae em6cu7vKsdBczHnj6v1xG1G
Thanks!
Sent one. How can I calculate how long it would take to find a block based on difficulty, such as 4209023508200000 or 9881855258560000?
Network Difficulty * 2^32 / hashrate = time in seconds to find a block Generally yes but not for this coin. what is the diff here? what value you get Block explorer target: 870746586 Nanopool reported block difficulty: 8332220672840000 For the same block.
|
|
|
Trying to sync from the fresh blockchain but I have 0-5 nodes randomly connecting and disconnecting with a bunch of Cannot fastforward chain because of missing data: and Block download stalled by x.x.x.x:8253; disconnecting. in debug.log.
And even with 5 active nodes I only get like 1 block in every 5 seconds and half the time all nodes are disconnected.
Wallet v0.1.1.0-g3fb0591-beta.
|
|
|
Anyone have any spare accounts available that they could part with? I could use one. Thanks!
3GhhbooMFNXbGbRS7TxoKtBZBu7foP2ovjYfvASawSY4s7XLUCPZ6GbvatBhwviyXEztHkTknYbd6Ae em6cu7vKsdBczHnj6v1xG1G
Thanks!
Sent one. How can I calculate how long it would take to find a block based on difficulty, such as 4209023508200000 or 9881855258560000?
Network Difficulty * 2^32 / hashrate = time in seconds to find a block Generally yes but not for this coin.
|
|
|
How can I calculate how long it would take to find a block based on difficulty, such as 4209023508200000 or 9881855258560000?
|
|
|
The 1080 uses GDDRX and not GDDR5 which can be worse for mining memory intensive algos like Eth.
|
|
|
|