Which are?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.0

~68 sol per 1070 without CPU but it's locked to nicehash directly (not even to their awful ZEC pool) so it's crap.

That's that then.

What the hell is the difference between checkmarks and circles? Two figures and two colors just to represent simple 'yes' and 'no' states?

Whatever the case might be and as much I'd prefer a professional zcash fork without premine/tax and with slowstart, every single zcash fork starts with an increasing disadvantage.

And I wouldn't exactly use the name of this fork and the word 'professional' in the same sentence.



Just fork the active Zcash with a much lowered tax (~1%) and enjoy that coin instead of endless clones dilluting everything.

Their different ports probably have different difficulties associated with them.

ASICs - which are super good at what they do - get much bigger chunks of work to solve (higher difficulty) while CPUs and GPUs with the nicehash miner get smaller chunks of work to solve.

Too high difficulty means your miner will take a long time to solve shares which means you might not solve the work you've given before someone else finds a block so your work is pointless.

On the other hand, too low difficulty causes your miner to get small chunks of work which are too easy so your miner will bombard the pool with a bunch of solved shares, effectively DoS-ing it.

It's the laziest copypaste fork ever. I'm curious why c-cex added it even without a block explorer. That shit used to be mandatory.

Also, the no slow start part is kind of ridiculous. It's basically a delayed premine for people who made it and now pushing it.

Its distribution is probably worse than ZEC even with the 20% tax.

Of course they don't. Just look at the ann and the (lack of) logic behind removing the slow start.

There's not even a block explorer which used to be a requirement for exchanges to add crap.

Heh, it seems I mined all 87 blocks with a reward so far.



Hackers can do a better job. If you're dealing with a lot of wallets use a virtual machine or a sandbox to be sure.

Unless the payload is encrypted. Never trust online virus scanners.

I think it's expected to go down in price because of the combination of the increasing blockreward and the ridiculous 20% developer tax.


For example, let's just assume Zcash magically reaches a marketcap of $100mil overnight for simplicity's sake (for comparison Monero is at $85mil cap and Ethereum is at $933mil.

That would mean 1 ZEC would go for 1.14 BTC at block 20.000 where the blockreward reaches 12.5 ZEC. Not going to happen but bear with me.

At block 40.000 (~69 days from launch) with the same marketcap 1 ZEC would only go for 0.38 BTC.

One year from launch with the same marketcap and with a supply of 2.503.000 that would only be 0.057 BTC per 1 ZEC.


Basically, it was, and still is a terrible investment unless the price drops way down. And who knows how badly the ongoing 20% dev fee will get in the way of people getting interested in it in the first place. It might never reach $100mil cap.

Oh yeah, 10k DNET per masternode, I misunderstood you.

i7-6800k @ 4.2ghz about 35 h/s.

Sure it will get pumped eventually, but who knows. Even ZEC is risky, ZCL is even more riskier.

I'm not even sure why pools and even c-cex added it. It's the most effortless copy paste for ever.

And they cut out the ramp up period (from 20.000 to just 10 blocks) so the distribution is worse than ZEC with the tax.

Not sure why this coin got picked up by pools and even c-cex.

Amateur copy paste fork with no extra info or plans or anything.

Even the ramp up period got cut down from 20.000 blocks to 10 so distribution is, and will be even worse as ZEC with the 20% tax.

Your private Lbry mod does 300 Mh/s per 1070?

Epsylon3's 1.8.1 release does the same.

Why not.

Any ETA on launch?

As a correction, the masternode count is currently 1371, not 10k.

I also own a couple BTC's worth of DNET, most of it I mined and some of it I generated with masternodes and staking. But I'm not planning on selling any of it anytime soon.

I don't think the current 882 BTC marketcap with 47.6mil supply is where things will calm down. Long term this should be priced much higher imo. It's still pretty much flying under the radar.

Also, anyone can submit proposals to the network and masternode owners can vote on it which is awesome.

Well, no shit diff doesn't mean anything if hashrate also increases across the board but that's hardly the case so I fail to see your point.

For clarification, I respect every single nvidia dev I ever had the pleasure to come across and I certainly don't blame anyone (especially not djm) for their choice of distributing their work.

I was just simply pointing out that if maybe one or two devs would work together focusing on a fee based closed source miner, well then they could make a lot of money.

As much as I disagree with the 20% "tax" I don't think forks without it offer anything at all. Especially long term.

I strongly belive we should just fork the existing Zcash with a much lower dev fee. Maybe 0.5% instead of 20%.

Personally, I wouldn't even mind a longer than a 4 years of dev fee period as long as it's actually reasonable and most importantly it doesn't get in the way of proper distribution and decentralization.

I can't believe nvidia still doesn't have a dev like claymore. There's so much money to be made ever since Ethereum.

Difficulty already climbed to 135k instead of 80k and will probably reach 200k in the next couple of days because of his miner.