If you provide a Postal Address information in United States, you will earn a great advantage in trustworthiness over those exchange hold in Chile and Japan.
If they offer full transparency I think they have a really good shot at taking over the entire market. I don't understand those exchanges why the hell they want to hide the real world information of themselves, such as address, an official phone number, company registering information, etc, from the public. Don't they know these information support the confidence of the people who trade on the platform? Yeah, it isn't like I didn't do a full WHOIS on them when they first posted. If only there was a way to search forum posts.... hmm.... If only..... Then you'll find the address
|
|
|
Tradehill Last: 16.50
Yeah, love how everyone loses their minds. You're right, billyjoeallen, just a prime time to snatch up some bargains. How is it that all these people forget the market has 2-dollar swings or more, regularly? Amazing how short some memories are...
|
|
|
Dude, you're turning out to be a prime dickbag. This isn't a question of "wallet security", it's a problem of transaction fraud. Seeing as you couldn't come up with an answer, some others have come up with a partial solution. But there are still glaring holes in Bitcoin that will see it burn in an early grave if it ever hits the general population in its present form..
Uh oh, name-calling - let me get something to cry into. Transaction fraud discussions are in the forums too, you know, under the heading "bitcoin escrow". Of course, you'd know this if you had bothered to look. Do you research anything you talk about, ever? I'm quite sure by the time any of these problems are solved, it won't be because you posted a few hurried statements about bitcoin in your spare time. Either offer some kind of strategy yourself, learn about the complexities, or stay out of the way of those who will solve it for you.
|
|
|
Bonker doesn't like to read. All the answers are there, even if you refuse to look them up.
Guess its another troll-erday.
I guess TraderTimm doesn't like to write. Can you at least provide a link to a robust resolution? Because I haven't found one so far Given that there have been a bazillion posts about wallet security, the equivalence of bitcoin to cash and the attendant problems, I'm sure if you were able to do your own homework instead of monkey-hammering out your poorly researched opinions, you might be able to learn something. But I'm not holding my breath over it.
|
|
|
Hahah Horkabork, you are waaaaay more patient than I am I put his silly banner into adblock at the first opportunity.
|
|
|
Bonker doesn't like to read. All the answers are there, even if you refuse to look them up.
Guess its another troll-erday.
|
|
|
I have consistently stated we should see a price of $7-$9 not long after Mt. Gox opens.
Sorry, I don't have 'not long' marked on my clock. Could you be more specific?
|
|
|
Starting to see some signs of a cash out on TH...
I thought economists predicted things, not play-by-play commentary. So, 'professor', anything regarding the future? Don't worry, we won't be too rough on you, after all - economist is one of the few jobs where you can be wrong and still be employed.
|
|
|
Mt. Gox hack is only the surface of the problem right now....some fundamental problems (ie. lack of recourse to criminal activity) with the currency are contributing to the sell-off.
Don't forget half-assed theories. Those are completely related, too. I miss the old forums, before the wave of hysteria washed over it.
|
|
|
Not just keep it. He as the founder of the bitcoin system, have more responsibility than later adopters to make it widely adopted.
I think you need to start using twitter. Its the perfect medium for those with no attention span and even less content in their 'messages'.
|
|
|
It would be even better if people could possibly stop posting about Mt.Gox every 30 seconds. But then again, asking for restraint implies some kind of logical higher functions are present.
|
|
|
Wait a tick... You put more funds into Mt. Gox.
And now you are complaining because you can not get it all out?
No kidding, starting to feel sorry for Tux with all these 'bright lights' as customers.
|
|
|
Gotta love someone who thinks the forums are twitter thanking someone else for not 'trolling'. Let us know some other stuff, like what you are going to eat, the temperature of your refrigerator... You know, everything.
|
|
|
Cool, maybe these endless gox threads will die.
Sweet dreams!
|
|
|
I think we're going to see prices drop into the $7-$9 range.
Oh good, an economist. Let us know when your hindsight revision is out.
|
|
|
Tradehill Last: 16.50
*yawn*
|
|
|
You're talking about a market that can have 2-dollar or more daily swings.
But I guess its just another troll thread, carry on.
|
|
|
We need more Mt.Gox threads guys, I think you are falling behind.
Only a few more before the front discussion page will be nothing but Gox! (As if that was the only thing going on at the moment.)
|
|
|
I just wanted to +1 the OP / John Nagle.
If it helps - there have been people (me, e.g. but obviously also others, but I don't have their nick or posts atm) bringing up the same arguments (about lack of backing, ponzi nature, bubble look, no economy exists etc) BEFORE the 30$ => 10$ "pop".
I also recently posted the core problem of BTC again(i.e. someone has to keep propping the thing up with his own real world cash to continue the merry go round) in a thread that remained pretty much unaddressed.
Cool, so if we trade above 30 you're wrong? I'd just like to hear the qualifier of where your thesis falls apart.
|
|
|
|