I think it is too risky if I made a bitcoin address on your website, because you can see my private key,please answer,whether you can guarantee my private key, if I would try to make bitcoin address here?
They dont see your private key. Split key vanity allows them to do the heavy lifting without knowing your final private key. |
|
|
|
Cypto games.net has changed their signature campaign scheme from pay per post to fixed here's the detail This weeks payment has been processed. Transaction id: https://blockexplorer.com/tx/3075df13fc638b2a5e4dbfe512837c1d0d39fea8e19fd07991a9176fd5643377We decided to change counting method from pay per post to fixed weekly payment. Minimum posts per week is 25. Rates: Senior members: 0.036 BTC per week Hero members: 0.042 BTC per week Legendary: 0.045 BTC per week Bonuses: 0.02 BTC at the end of the month for our avatar 0.01 at the end of the month for our personal text All other rules stays the same, I will also update the OP of this thread. Shorena please change it  updated, thanks -> http://pastebin.com/B4MRvtfa |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the payment, will need some time to think about whether I want to switch to fixed payment.
|
|
|
|
Hey, i'm new to bitcoins and i really appreciate your help. So here's what happened. I had to send bitcoins for a game i want to buy. I did set transaction fee to 0.0005 BTC but i did not uncheck the "Send as zero-fee transaction if possible" box. I thought bt core will try sending bitcoins for free a few times and then send it with a fee but apparently that's not how it works. It's been ~24h now and from what i read in this forum it might never confirm because my fee is 0BTC  Is there anything i can do to get them back? Thank you for your help. Here's the transaction info: https://blockchain.info/tx/e3b13756536bdb6c9cced7a11f4eded688ad68b65b6002d3b5c2b0eba1f39bc2Shut down Bitcoin Core. Then wait a few days and check the block explorers for that transaction. Check multiple block explorers like blockchain.info, blocktrail.com, and blockcypher.com. After a few days the transaction should be dropped from the network and then you should be able to spend the Bitcoin again. AFAIK trikster will need to remove the TX from the wallet first with -zapwallettxes |
|
|
|
Why you upgraded on the first place , Blockchain new wallet is on Beta phase at the moment and it's not finished yet .
I'd recommend using Bitcoin core (the latest version 0.12.0 should allow you to download 2gb instead of the whole blockchain) so sync with the network shouldn't be an issue anymore .
You could also check BlockTrail wallet (available for both phone and web) , It may be buggy little bit though ,not sure how often it's getting updated .
Disclaimer: You still need to download the entire blockchain, you just dont need to keep it anymore if you enabling pruning. Its probably what OmegaStarScream, just wanted to make sure that is understood correctly. |
|
|
|
How to add nodes to cfg file to start my wallet working its on a Scrypt.
Sounds like an alt to me, which one? |
|
|
|
Surprised no one has mentioned the cloudminer.com campaign yet. ANN Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1382476.0Made the table (I was bored) [tr]
[td][i][color=green]A[/color][/i][/td][td]|[/td]
[td][url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1382476.0]Cloudminer.com[/url][/td][td]|[/td]
[td]post/week[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.00080[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]0.00080[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]x[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]10/w[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]50/w[/td][td]|[/td]
[td]N[/td][td]|[/td]
[/tr]
added, thanks -> http://pastebin.com/LnAE12Cw |
|
|
|
So these are vanity addresses? what's so special about them? You can generate almost any address if you have enough computing bower...
lol "computing bower..." nice sig count post. Pattern: 1GetLost Address: 1GeTLoSTmhPELeJftFk5zQLv7am9xKZ5Aq Privkey: 5JJZ5kJHaBSzj4eKNXmzSUoWhb1quyT2aBwnom398VHNchyk9dZ Vanity addresses are pretty cool  Hey buddy, Why did you put the Private key here ?? You could have used this address for yourself ! Sometimes the message is more subtle. 5JEQucPSqu7HnGS5fmU1oLs482DzLziao4XegjRtEXQCtY3zzqD How much time will it take for Pattern : 1koelen3 / 1koelen3btc I left it running for a night and it was like none done... What power will i need to get it? I cant give you a proper estimate now as I have a few VMs running I cant shut down for the next hours and they slow down the GPU. However "l" is not a valid base58 character, so you would need to use e.g. "L" or "1". If you dont care about the case 1koelen3 has a 50% chance at 15MKeys/s after 1.3hours. (I could make this for you if you want, rough estimate 0.0008 btc) With exact case 1koeLen3 has a 50% chance at 15MKeys/s after ~28 days. With exact case 1koe1en3 has a 50% chance at 15Mkeys/s after ~28 days. If could be either 1koeLen3 or 1koe1en3, but each with exact case you would have the time or need ~14 days. 1koelen3btc would take almost 4 years for a 50% chance at 15Mkeys/s, I didnt bother to check the exact cases. The times are roughly linear, so you can half them with twice the keys per second. |
|
|
|
So these are vanity addresses? what's so special about them? You can generate almost any address if you have enough computing bower...
lol "computing bower..." nice sig count post. Pattern: 1GetLost Address: 1GeTLoSTmhPELeJftFk5zQLv7am9xKZ5Aq Privkey: 5JJZ5kJHaBSzj4eKNXmzSUoWhb1quyT2aBwnom398VHNchyk9dZ Vanity addresses are pretty cool Hey buddy, Why did you put the Private key here ?? You could have used this address for yourself ! Sometimes the message is more subtle. 5JEQucPSqu7HnGS5fmU1oLs482DzLziao4XegjRtEXQCtY3zzqD |
|
|
|
Sorry I need to understand something here... as a noob 2mb blocks at current difficulty... takes twice as long to process No, finding a hash that meets the difficulty has nothing to do with the size of the block. Maybe cell phones can be adopted as node (just a thought)....
Sure, if you have a >200GiB/month data plan and >70GB free disk space. Not sure about the battery, but it would probably only last a few hours. |
|
|
|
What doyou mean? Blockchain is fairly simple and user friendly already. Just create an account and hit new wallet. There is also a mobile app.
Repeat after me, it will make your live with bitcoin and bitcointalk.org easier and less confusing: Blockchain.info is a service is a service is a service and not the blockchain! |
|
|
|
New addition !!!
Now you can get Address like : 1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxABCD
i.e your name would be at last in the address !!
Currently in BTCeta stage so only 4 characters allowed for 0.0001 BTC only !
If I may ask, what do you use - in terms of hardware - to generate the keys? |
|
|
|
i'm not 100% shure...
but it looks like all links aim to [Suspicious link removed])
it looks like if it comes really from bitcointalk.org
Looks like a phishing link to me. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This isZeke2345 from bitcointalk.org and today is 2016.03.11
Signing a message from my blockchain.info account.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1CKVafRACiTzjZjpLHVgfRj7PdT3df4bxE
IIgLdq9YnxaPy+x2wA3DAGuTjGklv76sV3AhSWABnp80EoBqakvFcpz4Mfeo0T/qLrCoAVT2oixqSm17VkF1sJQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Can some one confirm I did this right,will try another wallet later tonight. Well done, signature is valid according to bitcoin core 0.12 |
|
|
|
For some reason that file is larger than the one before and after it at 282KB. Weird. They grow over time, but dont get smaller for me. Maybe something is wrong with your file? 236K Sep 19 04:52 trust.txt.2015-09-19
242K Okt 17 04:52 trust.txt.2015-10-17
243K Okt 24 04:52 trust.txt.2015-10-24
243K Okt 31 03:52 trust.txt.2015-10-31
244K Nov 7 03:52 trust.txt.2015-11-07
245K Nov 14 03:52 trust.txt.2015-11-14
246K Nov 21 03:52 trust.txt.2015-11-21
248K Nov 28 03:52 trust.txt.2015-11-28
250K Dez 13 11:18 trust.txt.2015-12-13
253K Dez 19 03:52 trust.txt.2015-12-19
265K Dez 26 03:52 trust.txt.2015-12-26
255K Jan 2 03:52 trust.txt.2016-01-02
255K Jan 9 03:52 trust.txt.2016-01-09
259K Jan 16 03:52 trust.txt.2016-01-16
260K Jan 23 03:52 trust.txt.2016-01-23
261K Jan 30 03:52 trust.txt.2016-01-30
265K Feb 6 03:52 trust.txt.2016-02-06
265K Feb 13 03:52 trust.txt.2016-02-13
268K Feb 20 03:52 trust.txt.2016-02-20
270K Feb 27 03:52 trust.txt.2016-02-27
272K Mär 5 03:52 trust.txt.2016-03-05
or maybe its mine... $ diff trust.txt.2016-02-27.cyrus trust.txt.2016-02-27 | wc -l
221
$ diff trust.txt.2016-02-27.cyrus trust.txt.2016-02-27 | wc -w
358
|
|
|
|
I don't think it is possible to recognize the user wallet just from the address, Mostly the only way is recognizing a computer wallet from an online wallet by the fact that addresses are linked in PC wallets while they are not in online browser wallets.
Bullshit. Both types of wallets can prevent spend links. You can not i think, there is no direct linking and details about wallet in transaction details but the IP can provide some info....
TX have no obvious IPs. Is there a nest somewhere? |
|
|
|
-snip-
I will study better the English section Rules.
Maybe create a translation yourself if you think one is missing. mprep will likely link it same as the other translations at the end of this[1] post. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
