Another pump thread for the eth scamcoin. Original poster even has an advertisement for some kind of ponzi scheme in sig, wonderful.
Its clearly not a scam coin if Microsoft is using it's blockchian for azure.  Dont be mad you missed the boat, I know its the only natural feeling, and trust me I know. I only got in at the 0.029-3 range. I was mad for missing out. Then I picked up my skirt, grabbed my balls and jumped in. Feels great.. You should try it man. Azure is way overrated, especially in these parts. Otherwise, yeah Eth will go way higher in the near future. |
|
|
|
Darknet currently has 368 masternodes. Edit: DARKNETCurrent Total supply: 14,555,501 DNET Needed for masternode: 10.000 DNET / 0.068 % of total supply / 0.10 BTC to obtain one / max MN?
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah, that would be quite lucrative for any dev selling it.
And the price would be far from 0.1 BTC... Of course. But that would actually worth it. |
|
|
|
980ti: 2,5GHASH 300W
750ti: 0.5GHASH (30W) (tdp/OC)
2x more bang for the buck with the 750ti, sp-modded kernals & configuration.
You should really know by now how much power a 750 Ti really uses. i need a private ethereum miner lol, with 10% increase
Oh yeah, that would be quite lucrative for any dev selling it. |
|
|
|
|
Masternode count jumped up to 348. Pretty nice.
|
|
|
|
|
This is great news for filthy bot users.
|
|
|
|
MN owners, what's your ballpark bandwidth usage in running your MN (assuming all "standard" parameters, not Tor relay, etc.)? Thanks.
Looking at a few of my nodes it's between 153 and 219 MB per day. You could probably lower it if you limit the maximum number of connected peers. |
|
|
|
|
Garza's Prime stakers and Paycoin was the worst for me.
And I usually hold coins that I mine way too long.
|
|
|
|
They removed solo mining from the wallet, so u cant point external rigs to solo mine from it. anyone remember what hack/workaround you had to do to mine to wallets that had broken daemons/solopool ??
Why would they do that? That would be retarded. |
|
|
|
Why are there unqualified masternodes, mine apparently is also unqualified? There should seriously be more in-depth guide for masternodes and other related items, it is going to be a must in the future. The setup guide is okay but it is seriously lacking troubleshooting completely which is necessary for this to grow. Imo.
There are pelnty of masternode guides for other coins which you can find in google. I want to remind you about this proposal. Even if you don't like it, please vote 'no' to show number of atcive masternode owners. But i think DNET POW should be decreased to keep the coin attractive to new investors. I am a miner and masternodes owner. I think constant supply during POW phase is bad for cryptocurrency. It leads to constant inflation and therefore fading of interest of investors.
My proposal for supply reduction during POW phase. It will decrease inflation, leaving enough coins for fair distribution. We will have total of 45 360 000 coins at the end of the POW phase instead of 64 800 000 coins (-19 440 000 coins).
Blocks 1 - 86 400 (56 days)
POW reward: 250 DNET
Total supply: 21 600 000
Blocks 86 401 - 172 800 (56 days)
POW reward: 175 DNET
Total supply: 36 720 000
Blocks 172 801 - 259 200 (56 days)
POW reward: 100 DNET
Total supply: 45 360 000
Blocks 259 200 +
POS
To vote in favor = "mnbudget vote eb800b00add41c506738592d8cc7de53c17bbfec4ca572b77c778632c57e2c3c yes"
To vote against = "mnbudget vote eb800b00add41c506738592d8cc7de53c17bbfec4ca572b77c778632c57e2c3c no"
(use 'vote-many' instead of 'vote' to vote using all your MN at once via controller wallet).
What about masternode payouts? |
|
|
|
|
Apparently the answer was 0.02122200 as per Poloniex. The stall in momentum caused some people to cash out at least partially but it's going up again and will probably do so at least for a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
"difficulty" : 0.00001526, "netmhashps" : 31805.39699591,  |
|
|
|
|
Everything is working fine except for the difficulty stat which shows an incorrect value:
"difficulty" : 0.00001526,
If it were really that low we'd be at block 2000 by this time.
|
|
|
|
connects to I2P from 4 nodes that are all hosted from the developer and they hide your IP. They call it the "Blackhole" tech.
So centralization. You're proud of a centralized solution, really? It's not my sollution, I'm just laughing at it. That is indeed pretty laughable. |
|
|
|
connects to I2P from 4 nodes that are all hosted from the developer and they hide your IP. They call it the "Blackhole" tech.
So centralization. You're proud of a centralized solution, really? |
|
|
|
it starts at block 100, read the ann. We did not instamine
Edited, sorry about that. And hopefully this is the last relaunch. Good luck. |
|
|
|
Great discussions guys. this proposal thing is pretty neat as I got a mn to play with. though it'd be interesting to see the implementation of the said system. looks like still a long ways to go, tho the feedback from dev is promising.
one questions tho, does the wallet have any coin control features to spend coins not tied to the masternodes? or does it automatically does that?
and is there way to delete or update proposals like the typo problem we had earlier?
What I did was that I have my masternodes working separately but I have all the masternode wallets (private keys) imported to a local non-masternode wallet, with the main 10k fees locked so I can "milk" the masternodes easily anytime. |
|
|
|
|
"blocks" : 151,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00001526,
"netmhashps" : 0.63516252,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"stakeinterest" : 3000000,
"testnet" : false
Another day, another Pepe relaunch.
|
|
|
|
Sp-mod decred private 1 is doing 600mhash @1405 core. 1.7.4 opensource is doing 550 on the same card and clock. Both compiled with cuda 7.5.
Only 0.1 btc guys
I get 1405 Mh/s per 970 and 495 Mh/s per 750 Ti with 1.7.4 with OC. I have no idea how others get 550. If I was mining Decred I might buy it but I'm not. Eth is much more profitable and uses about 15-20% less electricity. bathrobehero Try 64x not 86x you should get 512 mh/s. Thanks, tried that and I figured it out that I can get close to 500 Mh/s (still not over, with OC) if I only run 1 card. With more cards I assume I run into some kind of CPU bottleneck with a dualcore pentium even though it's only at about 27%. |
|
|
|
I only get 445 Mh/s per 750 Ti. What am I missing? Do I need a certain driver or cuda toolkit or something?
Edit: apparently I get close to 500 if I only use one card but with 6 cards and a dualcore Pentium G3240 I only get abou 445 per card.
I presume because the first round of blake is done on the CPU as per sp_ said.
It could be the CPU that is he bottleneck (you could check usage) but try increasing your pagefile size, assuming you're on Windows. 16GB pagefile with ~27% CPU usage but it's still slower than 1 card. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
