Ray: @dooglus yeah, that's in the right direction. Except grey lines and such ruin it. I may as well do it myself, 5 mins would save me 0.15



dooglus: first blob is wrong color - but it's the concept I was going for, not the execution



cropped:



to suggest the grey lines:



Ray: I was thinking of "back-to-back" D's made up of connected red and green dots

like this?



oh, back-to-back D's can look like a cube?



transparent:



Note: I didn't use google images to find those circles. To prove it I am willing to rotate the circles by any angle you like.

Now that you're talking 50% of investor EV, what does that do to the Kelly calculation?

If they invest at "full Kelly" now, is that actually "2x Kelly" because their expected return is half of what it would be without commission? Or is the new commission structure taken into account in the Kelly calculations?

I like it, but you shouldn't be able to see a 1 and a 6 at the same time. Opposite faces sum to 7.

Using 101 does make the numbers work out nicely for some multipliers (factors of 2, 2, 5, 5), and less nicely for others (factors of 3, 3, 11). You can't offer a 3x or 11x payout bet, for instance, whereas using 1 to 100 you could.

Edit: and I meant to also suggest allowing the display to show more bets before scrolling. I want to be able to see more than just my last 20 bets. It might look good if the x axis was on something like a log scale, so the bets get closer together the older they are - then I get a rough impression of my entire history for the current session.

I think the visual aspect of the game would be better if it plotted your net profit rather than your current balance.

I just made a deposit, and it makes it look like I had a big win:



I'd rather deposits and withdrawals not affect the plot at all.

I asked him that on the reddit post:


I guess he's avoiding the question.

MoneyPot just told me:

  "Unconfirmed bits are added to your balance (ready to be spent) when they show up in one block"

That's a confusing way of writing it. When they show up in one block they aren't unconfirmed. It would be clearer to have it say something like:

  "Deposits require a single confirmation"

or words to that effect.

Edit: oh, also, https://www.moneypot.com/me/history/all has filters for "sends" and "receives", but "tips" don't show up there. Does there need to be a separate filter for tips? I see a few "receives", which look like tips to me, but none of the filters show the tip I recently received from dustdice Ray.

Thanks for the bounty. I found more, all on the FAQ page:

0. The menu says "FAQ's". Drop the apostrophe.

> The game generates a number between 1 and 100

1. But isn't it between 0 and 100, or between 1 and 101? I think there must be 101 different possible results, because the 'settings' page says:
  "Chance of winning: 50 in 101"
Where does that "in 101" come from if there aren't 101 different possible results?

Edit: yes, it's 0 to 100. I just rolled both:



> ... guessing correctly ... guessing correct ...

2. I prefer "correctly" over "correct" in this context. But you're using them both in the same paragraph. Decide whether you believe in adverbs or not and stick to it.

> Some times the house edge

3. "Sometimes" is one word.

> rounded to two decimal numbers the server accepts that bet and adjust the house edge to match it, this is in order to ...

4. "decimal places", not "decimal numbers"
5. needs a full stop or semicolon between "numbers" and "the server"
6. "adjusts" not "adjust"
7. full stop or semicolon instead of comma before "this is"

I deposited, but my balance still shows 0??

> MoneyPot is an app an app that uses MoneyPot

8. an app an app?
9. circular definition? what is MoneyPot? oh, it uses MoneyPot. do you mean DustDice uses MoneyPot?

> for all gambling services, this means your balance ...

10. "this means ..." is a new sentence

> It has no access to your money

11. is that actually true? I thought I had read that MP apps have access to whatever funds have been 'deposited' to them using the MP interface

Edit: I remember where I read it:



> All bets are placed against MoneyPot's bankroll, this allows ...

12. full stop instead of comma

> any casino to immediately support bettings against it.

13. "support bettings" sounds weird. suggest "place bets" instead

> start investing on the best investment on bitcoin casinos.

14. "investing in", not "on"
15. is it the best? I think the fees are quite a bit higher than most other places
16. "on bitcoin casinos" - "on" isn't the right word here I don't think, but am not sure what it is you're trying to say

Would you please stop spamming my email addresses.

I am not interested in your "service".

I have replied to your spam several times asking you to stop, but it continues.

The 'wallet details' tab of http://bitaddress.org/ can do that for you.

Was the work proposed in this thread?

If so, JoinMarket definitely qualifies.

I didn't post the updated chart where the balance goes to zero in a series of exponentially increasing losses.

Sites like walletexplorer.com and scorechain.com can 'cluster' addresses based on their blockchain history. Doing so suggests this digging isn't using Gox addresses.

No, that's just how TCP/IP works. When you connect to port 31174 on remote hosts, it uses a port on your end which probably won't be 31174, and will be different for each connection you make. The operating system assigns the local port number. You can probably tinker with configuration of the OS to tell it which range to use, but there's not really any need to do so.

I did end up forking the repository myself and contributing a fix for the "return address" bug, but I'm in no way affiliated with this project, and fear it will all end in tears.

The PHP code you started with was dreadful, and it isn't a whole lot better now. I've fixed a few significant bugs, but there are probably many remaining.

Please refrain from associating my name with this project in an attempt to give it feelings of legitimacy. I'm talking about things like:

Updated dig charts:

my-newt, get it?

Right after that 9-streak I hit another 9-streak:



It's uncanny how lucky I am when I bet single bits!

To be absolutely sure, go to the debug console and type 'getpeerinfo'.

It will show you a bunch of information about each peer you are connected to, including its "inbound" status. If any of them show "inbound: true" then you are accepting incoming connections, and everything is OK.

Hi Ray.

Congrats on taking over dustdice. I hope it works out well for you.

A couple of things:

1) I found a typo on the deposit popup:



Is there a bounty for little bug reports like that? My username is 'dooglus' if so.

2) It seems too easy to win :