Requesting-Vod be prevented deleting posts Self Modded thread/Removed from DT

[onemorexmr]

"having sexual intercourse"... completely ALONE

well...at least thats honest ;-)

[1715261546]

1715261546

[1715261546]

1715261546

[1715261546]

1715261546

[cryptodevil]

He defrauded people out of money by conning them into paying for a service they did not receive.

Funny thing none of them are claiming that.

Is this something you have personally verified or are you just piling on top of others post?

Have you yourself ever traded with QS?
~BCX~

Again . . . The Fuck?

QS has already admitted to self-escrowing a number of deals. Stop trying to deflect from the issue.

Anyone else find it rather suspect that BCX keeps trying to down-play QS's proven and admitted fraud?

It is really not possible to say how many people would have felt differently at the time of the transaction. I cannot say that and neither can you, nor anyone else.

Oh lookie, more attempts to down-play the proven and admitted fraud.

It doesn't matter a jot whether you want to claim that nobody can say how people might have felt, the fact is you committed a fraudulent act and are, therefore, untrustworthy.

Stop trying to deflect from the issue.

[BitcoinEXpress]

Anyone else find it rather suspect that BCX keeps trying to down-play QS's proven and admitted fraud?

Hey retard,

If you're trying to intimate that I am QS you really are showing your newbieness ROFL...

I'm not trying to downplay anything.

Just pointing out the fact that everyone but the actual people that traded with QS are calling him a scammer.

Nothing more


~BCX~

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Hopefully everyone here realizes that "self-escrow" is a fictitious term, probably exclusive to this forum, where scammers abound.  You cannot be an escrow for yourself--a rational counterparty would refuse this, and concealing the "self-escrow" is just dishonest. 

It doesn't matter a whit if the people complaining here weren't directly involved in QS's trades.  It doesn't change the fact of his/her deception.  We're all discussing things, and perhaps those who were involved in the trades simply have yet to comment.  Eh?

[TheButterZone]

We're all discussing things, and perhaps those who were involved in the trades simply have yet to comment.  Eh?

They never will if they don't want to be SLAPP'd by their victimizer.

[CoinHopper]

I don't think there should even be an option for a self-managed thread.

But I don't believe Vod should be removed from DT, as he is a valuable scam buster xD

[DiamondCardz]

Funny thing none of them are claiming that.

Is this something you have personally verified or are you just piling on top of others post?

Have you yourself ever traded with QS?



~BCX~

Don't worry guys, if I stab someone three times in the stomach and they die a horrible death from internal bleeding, it's not against the law because the dead person didn't complain about being stabbed to death to the police. Right? Right??

[cryptodevil]

Anyone else find it rather suspect that BCX keeps trying to down-play QS's proven and admitted fraud?

Hey retard,

If you're trying to intimate that I am QS you really are showing your newbieness ROFL...

I didn't say that, you did. The fact that it is extremely suspect for anybody to be taking the same bullshit deflection attempt as QS suggests a motivation that isn't necessarily linked to sock-puppet accounts of QS. That is only one possible explanation.

I'm not trying to downplay anything.

~BCX~

Right, so simply claiming you're not trying to downplay anything is perfectly reasonable a response after having posted an 'observation' that is a deflection from the real issue of QS having fraudulently conned his customers. What other value would you like to insist the content of your post be taken as, if not to suggest the issue isn't serious or relevant unless defrauded customers are posting about it?

I did ask what amount of BTC you'd consider it reasonable to trade with when your trading partner is acting as the Escrow without your knowledge? It is, of course, a rhetorical question as it is asinine to suggest any amount of money is 'ok' to risk with a fraudulent escrow.

As has been said, self-Escrow is no Escrow at all.

[BitcoinEXpress]

Right, so simply claiming you're not trying to downplay anything is perfectly reasonable a response after having posted an 'observation' that is a deflection from the real issue of QS having fraudulently conned his customers. What other value would you like to insist the content of your post be taken as, if not to suggest the issue isn't serious or relevant unless defrauded customers are posting about it?

I did ask what amount of BTC you'd consider it reasonable to trade with when your trading partner is acting as the Escrow without your knowledge? It is, of course, a rhetorical question as it is asinine to suggest any amount of money is 'ok' to risk with a fraudulent escrow.

As has been said, self-Escrow is no Escrow at all.

So it appears that although quite grudgingly you're conceding that yes what QS did wasn't on the up and up, but really doesn't rise to level of life without prison either.

Which was my point all along.




~BCX~

[cryptodevil]

So it appears that although quite grudgingly you're conceding that yes what QS did wasn't on the up and up, but really doesn't rise to level of life without prison either.

Which was my point all along.

Firstly, I'm not conceding anything as I certainly have never implied that QS's fraudulent behaviour warranted life imprisonment without parole, which is what I assume you intended to type, and I doubt anybody else has, either.

Secondly, If that was, indeed, the 'point' of your original post then you have actually just conceded I was right to state that you were attempting to downplay the seriousness of the fraud by way of your reductio ad absurdum reference to life imprisonment as punishment. In claiming that a lack of complaint posts being made by his unwitting victims is somehow evidence of the 'lesser' seriousness of the crime you are showing that your 'point' was solely to downplay the seriousness of the crime.


Fact is the *only* reason the discussion of his proven and admitted fraudulent actions continue to warrant clarification and confirmation as to the evidencing of Quickseller's dishonesty is due to his personality-disorder-laden OCD rants against other members, along with his persistent attempts to deny the simple fact that his proven and admitted dishonesty renders him untrustworthy, ergo, he cannot complain about receiving negative trust for being proven and admittedly dishonest.

If he would shut the fuck up and show a little maturity about having been exposed as the deceitful and dishonest person he is then these type of whiny threads he keeps creating wouldn't invite continued 'clarification' of his deceit and dishonesty for others to better understand just how absurd and irrelevant his complaints are.

[DiamondCardz]

If he would shut the fuck up and show a little maturity about having been exposed as the deceitful and dishonest person he is then these type of whiny threads he keeps creating wouldn't invite continued 'clarification' of his deceit and dishonesty for others to better understand just how absurd and irrelevant his complaints are.

Yeah...I mean I respect Quickseller for what he's done before but now he's starting to just jump on the bandwagon of "blame Vod" people who just start this crap whenever they end up falling from favour in the eyes of the Bitcointalk community. It's really annoying to see this stuff over and over again, the only reason this one is a little more topical is because the OP used to be quite trusted.

[BitcoinEXpress]

If he would shut the fuck up and show a little maturity about having been exposed as the deceitful and dishonest person he is then these type of whiny threads he keeps creating wouldn't invite continued 'clarification' of his deceit and dishonesty for others to better understand just how absurd and irrelevant his complaints are.

Yeah...I mean I respect Quickseller for what he's done before but now he's starting to just jump on the bandwagon of "blame Vod" people who just start this crap whenever they end up falling from favour in the eyes of the Bitcointalk community. It's really annoying to see this stuff over and over again, the only reason this one is a little more topical is because the OP used to be quite trusted.

Who's blaming Vod?

I was just merely observing that QS may not be the mega-scammer people are saying.

Nothing more.


~BCX~

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

If he would shut the fuck up and show a little maturity about having been exposed as the deceitful and dishonest person he is then these type of whiny threads he keeps creating wouldn't invite continued 'clarification' of his deceit and dishonesty for others to better understand just how absurd and irrelevant his complaints are.

Yeah...I mean I respect Quickseller for what he's done before but now he's starting to just jump on the bandwagon of "blame Vod" people who just start this crap whenever they end up falling from favour in the eyes of the Bitcointalk community. It's really annoying to see this stuff over and over again, the only reason this one is a little more topical is because the OP used to be quite trusted.

Who's blaming Vod?

I was just merely observing that QS may not be the mega-scammer people are saying.

Nothing more.


~BCX~

I do believe the real question here is (and gentlemen please correct me if I'm wrong) who isn't blaming Vod?

[BitcoinEXpress]

I do believe the real question here is (and gentlemen please correct me if I'm wrong) who isn't blaming Vod?

I don't blame God for anything.

It's blasphemy.


~BCX~

[cryptodevil]

I blamed Vod once and he turned me into a newt.

I got better though.

[dooglus]

I blamed Vod once and he turned me into a newt.

I used to have a pet newt.

I called him "tiny".

Because he was my newt.

[suchmoon]

I blamed Vod once and he turned me into a newt.

I used to have a pet newt.

I called him "tiny".

Because he was my newt.

QS is right, this is all a massive conspiracy. Turns out cryptodevil is (or was?) dooglus' pet.

[dooglus]

QS is right, this is all a massive conspiracy. Turns out cryptodevil is (or was?) dooglus' pet.

my-newt, get it?

[Vod]

So, did everyone that Quickseller escrow-scammed get a refund, or was this yet another lie by him?