 here's my projection for the next few days. sideways, till one day a whole bunch of retards find the reason they have been looking for to sell, we hit that 333$ target, and then up if for no other reason other then that 333$ is low considering how big my balls are. |
|
|
|
i'm catching up on news and such. and i read this: " bitcoin should be banned before it reaches widespread use in the country." and i was like  |
|
|
|
if we all buy now we can all sell back higher feel rich as price explodes and we be HODLING.  Adam, Have you heard the news? What do you think? Huge or so so? i'm a little annoyed that once again i'll have to make sure my cavirtex account is all good after this move.but this is pretty good news, i have a kraken account and have done all kinds of trading there. very good trading platform. low fees, stop loss orders, etc. I was holding off trading on there yet with this move I may test the platform. I do admit that I appreciate what they have to offer. i'm going to make my bot tie into their api, right now it's on quadriga. fun fun fun! its funny how coin setter bought virtex and now coinsetter is being bought by kraken   i guess we can expect kraken in the top 5 exchanges on http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/ after the dust settals. its going to be nice trading CAD/BTC on an exchange with more liquidity. |
|
|
|
if we all buy now we can all sell back higher feel rich as price explodes and we be HODLING. Adam, Have you heard the news? What do you think? Huge or so so? Happy New Year! We are starting 2016 with some fireworks of our own – Coinsetter is being acquired by Kraken, a premier bitcoin exchange. Read the formal public announcement here: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160119005459/enThis transition will bring huge upgrades to your account, offering domestic US deposit/withdrawal bank transfers, deeper order book liquidity, and improved margin trading. What will happen to my account(s)? On January 26, 2016, Coinsetter will temporarily halt trading and begin the safe migration of all accounts (and funds) to the Kraken platform. This process is expected to take just a few hours. Upon completion, you will be able to log in at www.kraken.com and immediately begin trading with any US dollar (USD) and bitcoin (XBT) funds that are in your Coinsetter account(s) at the time of migration. You will be able to deposit or withdraw bitcoin (XBT) immediately too. After a brief and seamless process to activate your account with SynapsePay, our trusted USD payment processor, you’ll be able to deposit and withdraw USD. Why is this good for me? This is outstanding news for Coinsetter clients. As a Kraken account holder, you will receive: Free domestic USD wire deposits through SynapsePay until March 1 (when the promotion ends, the deposit fee will be $5 flat) Domestic USD wire withdrawals will be $5 flat Low trading fees (via a maker taker model with fees ranging from 0% to 0.26%; read more at https://www.kraken.com/help/fees) Exchange options you have been demanding all along, such as advanced order types for setting profit targets or stops Trade 18 currency pairs, including 5 fiat currencies (USD, EUR, CAD, GBP, JPY) and multiple digital currencies (Ether, Litecoin, etc.) You’ll also get: Superior trading interface 24/7, high touch support including live chat Sophisticated API (documentation: https://www.kraken.com/help/api) iOS app for trading on the go The Coinsetter & Kraken teams i'm a little annoyed that once again i'll have to make sure my cavirtex account is all good after this move. but this is pretty good news, i have a kraken account and have done all kinds of trading there. very good trading platform. low fees, stop loss orders, etc. |
|
|
|
if we all buy now we can all sell back higher feel rich as price explodes and we be HODLING. |
|
|
|
|
Gavin Andresen is part of bitcoinclassic?
everything feels so fucked up right now.
best be buying ALL the bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
|
i forgot how funny this forum is.
|
|
|
|
they should support both for a while, and then discontinue SHA2 once most miners are running SHA3 machines
The point is to threaten/injure the miners corporations. You forkers can move on with coinbase/blockchain/KNCminer/MIT/bitpay. bubye  you forgot like 5000 other names but ok! buBye! |
|
|
|
FORK IT bitchez!  they should support both for a while, and then discontinue SHA2 once most miners are running SHA3 machines |
|
|
|
they'll be fine, it would be surprising to see them fuck up so bad that people choose to adopt a new dev team. ever thought of joining some dev dating website/app? yes, I have a bittrex account. |
|
|
|
they'll be fine, it would be surprising to see them fuck up so bad that people choose to adopt a new dev team. |
|
|
|
ideally we'd see a dev team backed by VC money step up, promising all kinds of good things for Bitcoin, starting with an easy to agree to block limit increases.
when it comes to bitcoins dev team i am completely indifferent, i don't really care who writes the code as long as they are competent.
the way i see it they don't really have any power, the world gets what the world wants.
best of luck to classic, and shame on core for being so fucking slow in the head.
Wtf giving away bitcoin to some VC...  Kids really need to stop reading the social media bullshit. VC Devs or Core Devs, they really have no choice but to write wtv the fuck we want them to write. the current situation shows how it's impossible for devs to go against our will  "Against our will".. Maybe it is not too late to give it to R3 bankster consortium?! It is not that core is slow, it is just that core cannot. As it will go with any other unaligned client/dev/fork. Anywa, what's the hurry? You really have to ph0rk bitcoin before the halving do you? there is a deadline. it not set in stone or anything, but at one point, the system will become slower and/or more expensive and getting everyone to agree to continue to use this increasingly broken system when alternative exists is going to be impossible. but as i keep saying, there is still time and it won't come to that... Oh fork you adam. Such bullshit you are buying, it is amazing you've been around here for more than 3 years and have not learn anything besides clueless cheerful thinking. Trusted bitcoiner my ass. HAHAHAHAHA oh you. |
|
|
|
There probably won't be a hard fork to classic.
By April, core will have implemented 2MB+ blocks, by then the incentive to switch to classic will be low.
this is a rumor worth buying. |
|
|
|
ideally we'd see a dev team backed by VC money step up, promising all kinds of good things for Bitcoin, starting with an easy to agree to block limit increases.
when it comes to bitcoins dev team i am completely indifferent, i don't really care who writes the code as long as they are competent.
the way i see it they don't really have any power, the world gets what the world wants.
best of luck to classic, and shame on core for being so fucking slow in the head.
Wtf giving away bitcoin to some VC... Kids really need to stop reading the social media bullshit. VC Devs or Core Devs, they really have no choice but to write wtv the fuck we want them to write. the current situation shows how it's impossible for devs to go against our will "Against our will".. Maybe it is not too late to give it to R3 bankster consortium?! It is not that core is slow, it is just that core cannot. As it will go with any other unaligned client/dev/fork. Anywa, what's the hurry? You really have to ph0rk bitcoin before the halving do you? there is a deadline. it not set in stone or anything, but at one point, the system will become slower and/or more expensive and getting everyone to agree to continue to use this increasingly broken system when alternative exists is going to be impossible. but as i keep saying, there is still time and it won't come to that... |
|
|
|
Core devs will act when they absolutely have to. Surely they won't risk losing out purely through ignorance & refusal to change.
its starting to feel like if they don't do somthing fast, their opinion will be irrelevant. they really need to commit to some kind of plan with a time frame at this point.
It sounds like you might not be very technical, and may have been misled by soundbites.
That's OK, the Core Team of Bitcoin is technical, and have discovered that a 2MB block limit would be an extreme blow to decentralization and censorship resistance. Verification time scales quadratically to size and there is no known or conceived way to stop someone from making a 2MB block that will take 10 minutes to verify, thus destroying Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is immune from government and corporate influence today, and very technical people are working around the clock to keep it that way. Conspiracy theories about nefarious profit and control motives of the Core Technicians have been promulgated by non-technical people [Big Banks], don't listen to them.
Core Technicians have come up with a time frame and a plan. It's unfortunate that someone [Big Banks], has kept that from you. All your concerns and questions are answered here: in roadmap.
Kind Regards.
Your patience is appreciated while coders write code.TL;DR: I propose we work immediately towards the segwit 4MB block
soft-fork which increases capacity and scalability, and recent speedups
and incoming relay improvements make segwit a reasonable risk. BIP9
and segwit will also make further improvements easier and faster to
deploy. We’ll continue to set the stage for non-bandwidth-increase-based
scaling, while building additional tools that would make bandwidth
increases safer long term. Further work will prepare Bitcoin for further
increases, which will become possible when justified, while also providing
the groundwork to make them justifiable. this is what i thought, core dev really is making headway on scalability. pretty sure we won't have to go with bitcoinclassic. |
|
|
|
ideally we'd see a dev team backed by VC money step up, promising all kinds of good things for Bitcoin, starting with an easy to agree to block limit increases.
when it comes to bitcoins dev team i am completely indifferent, i don't really care who writes the code as long as they are competent.
the way i see it they don't really have any power, the world gets what the world wants.
best of luck to classic, and shame on core for being so fucking slow in the head.
Wtf giving away bitcoin to some VC... Kids really need to stop reading the social media bullshit. VC Devs or Core Devs, they really have no choice but to write wtv the fuck we want them to write. the current situation shows how it's impossible for devs to go against our will |
|
|
|
|
ideally we'd see a dev team backed by VC money step up, promising all kinds of good things for Bitcoin, starting with an easy to agree to block limit increases.
when it comes to bitcoins dev team i am completely indifferent, i don't really care who writes the code as long as they are competent.
the way i see it they don't really have any power, the world gets what the world wants.
best of luck to classic, and shame on core for being so fucking slow in the head.
|
|
|
|
Core devs will act when they absolutely have to. Surely they won't risk losing out purely through ignorance & refusal to change.
its starting to feel like if they don't do somthing fast, their opinion will be irrelevant. they really need to commit to some kind of plan with a time frame at this point. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
