hdbuck
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
 |
January 19, 2016, 08:42:34 PM |
|
ideally we'd see a dev team backed by VC money step up, promising all kinds of good things for Bitcoin, starting with an easy to agree to block limit increases.
when it comes to bitcoins dev team i am completely indifferent, i don't really care who writes the code as long as they are competent.
the way i see it they don't really have any power, the world gets what the world wants.
best of luck to classic, and shame on core for being so fucking slow in the head.
Wtf giving away bitcoin to some VC...  Kids really need to stop reading the social media bullshit. VC Devs or Core Devs, they really have no choice but to write wtv the fuck we want them to write. the current situation shows how it's impossible for devs to go against our will  "Against our will"..  Maybe it is not too late to give it to R3 bankster consortium?! It is not that core is slow, it is just that core cannot. As it will go with any other unaligned client/dev/fork. Anywa, what's the hurry? You really have to ph0rk bitcoin before the halving do you? there is a deadline. it not set in stone or anything, but at one point, the system will become slower and/or more expensive and getting everyone to agree to continue to use this increasingly broken system when alternative exists is going to be impossible. but as i keep saying, there is still time and it won't come to that... Oh fork you adam. Such bullshit you are buying, it is amazing you've been around here for more than 3 years and have not learn anything besides clueless cheerful thinking. Trusted bitcoiner my ass. |
|
|
|
|
|
hmmkay
|
|
January 19, 2016, 08:42:45 PM |
|
There probably won't be a hard fork to classic.
By April, core will have implemented 2MB+ blocks, by then the incentive to switch to classic will be low.
this is a rumor worth buying. If they don't hold to this roadmap, they'll lose all credibility I'm afraid. |
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
January 19, 2016, 08:43:32 PM |
|
ideally we'd see a dev team backed by VC money step up, promising all kinds of good things for Bitcoin, starting with an easy to agree to block limit increases.
when it comes to bitcoins dev team i am completely indifferent, i don't really care who writes the code as long as they are competent.
the way i see it they don't really have any power, the world gets what the world wants.
best of luck to classic, and shame on core for being so fucking slow in the head.
Wtf giving away bitcoin to some VC... Kids really need to stop reading the social media bullshit. VC Devs or Core Devs, they really have no choice but to write wtv the fuck we want them to write. the current situation shows how it's impossible for devs to go against our will "Against our will".. Maybe it is not too late to give it to R3 bankster consortium?! It is not that core is slow, it is just that core cannot. As it will go with any other unaligned client/dev/fork. Anywa, what's the hurry? You really have to ph0rk bitcoin before the halving do you? there is a deadline. it not set in stone or anything, but at one point, the system will become slower and/or more expensive and getting everyone to agree to continue to use this increasingly broken system when alternative exists is going to be impossible. but as i keep saying, there is still time and it won't come to that... Oh fork you adam. Such bullshit you are buying, it is amazing you've been around here for more than 3 years and have not learn anything besides clueless cheerful thinking. Trusted bitcoiner my ass. HAHAHAHAHA oh you. |
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
January 19, 2016, 08:44:54 PM |
|
they'll be fine, it would be surprising to see them fuck up so bad that people choose to adopt a new dev team. |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 19, 2016, 08:55:03 PM |
|
they'll be fine, it would be surprising to see them fuck up so bad that people choose to adopt a new dev team. ever thought of joining some dev dating website/app? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
January 19, 2016, 08:59:34 PM |
|
they'll be fine, it would be surprising to see them fuck up so bad that people choose to adopt a new dev team. ever thought of joining some dev dating website/app? yes, I have a bittrex account. |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:01:54 PM |
|
FORK IT bitchez! ACK it all the way! me GPU ready to rumble! |
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:02:49 PM |
|
Yeah, try getting miners to run that shit. |
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:03:46 PM |
|
FORK IT bitchez! they should support both for a while, and then discontinue SHA2 once most miners are running SHA3 machines |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:03:50 PM |
|
Yeah, try getting miners to run that shit. nah the nodes will. after coulpe week of diff adjustement, it will be fine.  |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 19, 2016, 09:04:01 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:06:08 PM |
|
they'll be fine, it would be surprising to see them fuck up so bad that people choose to adopt a new dev team.  |
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:06:20 PM |
|
Yeah, try getting miners to run that shit. nah the nodes will. after coulpe week of diff adjustement, it will be fine. its obv a hardfork, so there wont be weeks needed to any diff-adjustment. you start right away with a very low diff. |
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2614
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:06:39 PM |
|
but as i keep saying, there is still time and it won't come to that...
Bags of time  |
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2614
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:10:20 PM |
|
So, did Bitcoin need to fork when they added the 1Mb limit? Just curious.
Technically, it could have. In truth, the block size limit was 700-1000 times the size of blocks that were being mined at the time so it was not an issue. |
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2614
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:12:39 PM |
|
they should support both for a while, and then discontinue SHA2 once most miners are running SHA3 machines
The point is to threaten/injure the miners. |
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:13:38 PM |
|
Yeah, try getting miners to run that shit. nah the nodes will. after coulpe week of diff adjustement, it will be fine. its obv a hardfork, so there wont be weeks needed to any diff-adjustment. you start right away with a very low diff. That would be a car crash of a hard fork. "2016 Apr 14" isn't far away. Do we even listen to Luke nowadays? |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:25:53 PM |
|
they should support both for a while, and then discontinue SHA2 once most miners are running SHA3 machines
The point is to threaten/injure the miners corporations. You forkers can move on with coinbase/blockchain/KNCminer/MIT/bitpay. bubye  |
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
January 19, 2016, 09:26:26 PM |
|
they should support both for a while, and then discontinue SHA2 once most miners are running SHA3 machines
The point is to threaten/injure the miners corporations. You forkers can move on with coinbase/blockchain/KNCminer/MIT/bitpay. bubye you forgot like 5000 other names but ok! buBye! |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
