Bitcoin Forum
July 07, 2024, 02:59:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 [1198] 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 ... 1370 »
23941  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Does Core work fine on Xubuntu and Lubuntu? on: February 01, 2018, 06:34:16 PM
The documentation in the bitcoin.org site only talks about Ubuntu but no other distros.
It's all Ubuntu-based, so it shouldn't be a problem.

Quote
I would like to start a new node in some old computer I got, but the problem is, Ubuntu uses GNOME which is too much of a bloatware for my taste and specially for my older computer.
Can I go off-topic and think out of the box? I prefer Linux Mint over Lubunu and Xubuntu. I've tried them all many times.
I use Linux Mint on an old netbook with 1 GB RAM. It's still running Mint 17.3 (supported until April next year), and it works fine. I've used Bitcoin Core (pruned) on it for a long time, but stopped using it because it syncs too slow. If you keep it on continuously as a node, that shouldn't be a problem. I did install a SSD, but RAM and CPU are quite limited. I just tested it: Progress syncing Bitcoin Core: 0.09% per hour.

You say Gnome is too bloated, but have you tried Clearlooks? I once again have a blue bar on top of my active Window (like Windows 95), my Window Manager is Makro + Compositing (instead of the bloated Compiz), I disabled all animations and 3D effects, and it feels less bloated.
23942  Other / Archival / Re: I WANT TO RESET MY ACCOUNT on: February 01, 2018, 02:49:42 PM
I would like to delete all my posts because some of the posts i published arent updated or the services i used to sell are not available .
It's easier to just lock the topics.

Just keep your history, it looks supsicious you want a reset anyway.
OP has created several duplicate topics in the past, spamming it on multiple boards.
To preserve it, I've archived his entire post history all here Cheesy

i want to delete this thread
Click "Move Topic" at the bottom-left of this page, move it to Other > Archival.
This is the wrong board anyway.
23943  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin capital fleeing to Ethereum? on: February 01, 2018, 01:49:33 PM
I have avoided Ethereum like the plage since day one mostly because of technological reasons, and when the DAO fiasco happened I felt like I proved my bias against it.
I felt the same; Ethereum had one USP: "Code is law!". They broke that, which makes them a useless centrally controlled altoin. Created with one goal: make the creator rich!

Quote
Having said that, from a market perspective I have to admit that Ethereum had an amazing performance during the last four months, and it's doing remarkably well during this bloody January.
The market can be irrational. Right after the DAO-failure, I never expected so many people to keep buying this coin that can fork at any time!
Ethereum has also been massively used by ITOs (most of them under the fake name ICO). Hundreds of them have a similar looking website, some random BS "idea", many promises, a BS roadmap, and people have been throwing a few billion dollars at them last year. Since they sell tokens running on Ethereum, it profited from this.

Quote
Right now Bitcoin have a market cap of $172B, and for Ethereum it's $110B. If this trend continues we may get overpassed this quarter, and since it seems like no new money is coming to the crypto market in general I wonder if people are, for whatever reason, swapping Bitcoin for Ethereum.
The Ethereum-boys have been saying that for a long time now. One way or another, it doesn't matter, Ethereum is nothing like Bitcoin.

Quote
Are bad programmed smart contracts running over an insecure platform that hot for this market?
Apparently! If the DOA taught us one thing, it's that nobody understands smart contracts, which renders them useless. I haven't seen a real application yet.
23944  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Question about inputs and transaction size. on: February 01, 2018, 12:46:42 PM
If I have 31 inputs on my wallet and send everything to a new address. My new address will have only 1 input and so on I can have small transaction fees because of less transaction size?
Two days ago, I made a topic that ansers your question: Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!
23945  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: How to properly validate a BIP38 paper wallet? on: February 01, 2018, 12:33:01 PM
Now I have the BIP38 public and private keys. So I print these.
Let's call them Bitcoin address and BIP38 encrypted private key. The address isn't encrypted.

Quote
In order to validate this wallet is functioning correctly, I use bitaddress.org's "wallet info" tab and enter the encrypted (6P...) private key on my paper wallet and passphrase.
All good so far!

Quote
Success. It opens a bunch of different addresses; the important ones I'm guessing are "Bitcoin Address" and "Bitcoin Address Compressed"
I suggest to only use the Compressed address, which is what bitaddress.org uses by default.

Quote
Also, "Private Key WIF 51 characters base58, starts with a '5'" and "Private Key WIF Compressed 52 characters base58, starts with a 'K' or 'L'".
You'll only need the Private Key WIF Compressed to use your funds from the compressed address.

Quote
I was under the impression that the "Bitcoin Address" was supposed to match the public key on my physical paper wallet, which goes along with the "Private Key WIF 51 characters base58, starts with a '5'".

However, I notice my physical paper wallets public address does not match the displayed "Bitcoin Address" from the "wallet info" tab. Instead the "Bitcoin Address Compressed" matches.
By default, it uses the compressed address. This reduces fees when you make a transaction.

Quote
So if I were importing and sweeping this wallet onto a hot wallet, would I use the "Encrypted Private Key (6p...)" as seen on my physical paper wallet
If your wallet supports it (my phone wallet Mycelium does), you can import/sweep the BIP38 encrypted key directly and enter the password in your wallet.

Quote
or the "Private Key WIF 51 characters base58, starts with a '5'" or "Private Key WIF Compressed 52 characters base58, starts with a 'K' or 'L displayed in the "wallet info" tab?
This works too. Decrypting the BIP38 private key before importing/sweeping works in almost any wallet.

Quote
Furthermore, is opening the wallet under "wallet details" on bitaddress.org (offline) using the encrypted private key on my paper wallet and passphrase, and seeing the matching "Bitcoin Address Compressed" to the physical paperwallet's public key in my hand, enough to verify the wallet is functioning correct and to begin sending funds to?
This is what I do too.
You could be even safer by using other software to decrypt the private key, so you don't rely on bitaddress only. I've used bitcoinpaperwallet.NOWSCAMMING.com for this, although I think it uses the same engine.

Before funding your paper wallet with high amounts, I suggest to make a small transaction first, and sweep it into a wallet to experience how it works. Fees aren't that high at the moment.
After this transaction your paper wallet can no longer be called "cold storage": create a new one.
23946  Other / Meta / Re: Behavior change request for clicking links on: February 01, 2018, 11:26:44 AM
Please don't implement this! I can now choose to open a link in a new tab (which I often do with a simple middle-mouse-click), but for sites with _blank I can't choose to open the link on the same page.
The Merit+ button opens in a new tab, unlike "Report to moderator". This limits my options as I can't open it in the same tab.

Previously, user-generated links would often open in a new window/tab. However, kcud_dab found out that there are security issues with this, so I removed it. You'll have to middle-click links if you want them to open in a new tab.

i'm asking for this only for external links; for internal redirection the behavior can remain as it is
The same applies for external links: I can open it any way I want now. After your suggestion, I only get a new tab.

Quote
btw for phone you don't have a mouse Smiley, and that's why i am requesting this
Hold link > open in new tab. Is that what you wanted?
23947  Other / Meta / Re: Patrol: "Great Project". Cleanup request/discussion for Mods. on: February 01, 2018, 09:55:00 AM
Unfortunately this isn't exclusive to newbies
As far as I know, there is no way for me to download all new posts. Only Newbie's posts show up in patrol.

Quote
Possibly making the section self moderated threads only and the topic starter is responsible for clearing out these types of replies and if they don't do it their thread gets trashed.
I make my threads self-moderated (turns out I couldn't do that in Meta). But it doesn't work if the topic starter doesn't care, I've seen self-moderated threads with hundreds of pages filled with spam.
In a self-moderated thread you can use your middle-mouse on the delete-button. This opens a new tab, and deletes the post without popup asking for confirmation. This is a very fast way to delete spam.

Quote
It's also started to leak into the project development section too.
This is the worst part, which I've noticed too. It's one thing if they pollute the Altcoin Bounties and Off-topic boards, but reading their spam on the serious boards is much worse.
23948  Other / Meta / Re: Patrol: "Great Project". Cleanup request/discussion for Mods. on: January 31, 2018, 09:52:40 PM
(post was too big)
ptrsndc
ngocquoc
CryptoWaffle
mbahchenggur
kbj
Alex1990io
cubefan
adeogun
jkv_crypto
Gabby Bjerke
waliyu
bocosan
Ameed88
Yamidee
cryptochristoph
Manecas1979
JD0x0
bloodest
xtivator
Yudha2015
Bonzenboss
iPrometheus04
boboy02vill
Brettle332
ttymode
Harpointner
Dulanjaya
ramesh750
boggart
KALOSO
marey zokan
omar hashim
LevyThePiGuy
Germanmatamoros
Blesslab1
flik8888
xDispeLme
Triokeen
greatshubh9
anything9ce
itranslate
Arjunislary
dagenoshiela
SGlobal
chanqwph000
sukhdev7696
smithelemuo
chuksamobi
Ray2gud
Little_S
cryptoluke69
Apekool
jaynell
alexcrypt
anupaditya
benevis66
Bjornarlang
blackuche
cryptoafficionado
mustafa.k786
sanjany
primakoni
kinochi
joiker
Assam_Techno
UDskam
Crypto_Noob1E
Akashsharma1
jessbezos
Gotz29900
Ammier
lighterkek
Hakeemjuve
hlteodoro
gasfiles
pushpa018
zeoflavius
ahmkamal
christianax
mimo2010707
edisopian
cryptomunt
mizamuneerashine
segare
mastaprof44
kevlobb
alessio211734
tdrsnd
Cool_kamz
mollish
heniken
krrajeevrk
Bishalacharya
larissa_hf
ladozhskiy1995
Apfelabfall
Thoth1046
Silvente81
dotc8x
cryptomadu
pansu18
Valio982
tdot
Joshuajay4
pokerpen12
Broged
BitLord24
NYCrypto1
Sycra
cryptowolfmk
Damuci
AtitBingit
zyrenhufalar11
maryannsoriano1145
mkhmeleva
slavacrypto
Emil_des
mukthar139
Zeeshan687
babo1973
mehdex
btltoken
nayak9178
jarudet
Edem Ndem
cryptocrat1
IrishSilver
IndeecV
cendolamis
franz15
Sakibhsojib
rrose2
hsngndz23
affiliatecoin
maxj57
shimantasaha01
Jain01
malibrane
clemsu
yvesmarquez11
Thermytee
MrGrieves
ajmahrymohamed
bitcoin3523
petterkipp@gmail.com
mlod07
lightmolly
LEXUS_9
ace09
bitak_tagh
Serumsa
PacMan1985
milename
aziz0011
Donadiva
jermanqs_2005
ahmedmousa10
syednash
crpmp
kheloaki
magdysafwat
TOKENBTC
cryptoman1ac
YuriyProkopets
fzalf1
nadry
Anoop1279
Guiderbabanla
Nozomi01
lavanyaprasad
Gall0wsraven
OGM4ME
bilal93
kerin22
ngodekuy
shana95
MahmoudBakhet
encryptedmind26
V.VARGA
vanja74
aratalawrence
angelinedelatorre
Smekdawn
linuxchip
Wilanim
volverine
Amybankz
Maagooul
henrydera
fazilf30
mouradido10
shaurya69
sefaphlvn
daox
first_user111
mithunrazu
@dissanayaka
imperialGDP
rahul19852015
bullsheep
Yasmine3mustafa
niggau
Linhlieu
hisham102
redace2
susyoke
Bacthaygiacmo32
bobbyk015
Hoiqaunhr372
Cryptomail88
C-Bay Project
psycho7xp
Zousouidi
Lyns_owner
BoDerek
greatoceanTR
Olawale67
gropey
the7rt2
JWdar
dashking09
Chemomorphosis
franzgu
fahed19
seanymal
Spomenka
zoro20
Ralblas
uptrend
sezar.nusti
danktron
onkar chand
Monako001
eroiy
obydur4086
Remiasaus
wasay123
primozpirc
cryptokoc
daminipuna
Tolete
jermaine86
Mauricio3028
tjery
Amit01
opeyemiojo
annaleeDM
ilame
charan030429
brylleleandre0012
bunrein1976
Bambuslooter
boubaker essdik
Esra92
Smoothieking
iotta
Max Lee
CryptoMahi2018
MurphysLawActivated
adrianmanuel
loyakk-bounty
carlobr
1artem1
mido24
monacoestate
blendcoins
CryptoValuta
WZG123
Kerolos amin noshy saad k
Mubashar006
thienqn
ahmado
hossam mohamed
beepower
duong203
rabdo123
Abedsamer
@jprakash87
msupardjokocoinz
BMXMAX
tobyma1981
lucmonne
dlhylton
heroicjelly
Caguioa47
doudou888
07cyborg07
Hicham115
shan11
maaz357
Roman101
Shankar11
Jessel723
BobPantz
Ahmed300
Jonesn4fun
rizkamanditya
paulmichael21
Samehabdo
ndelfin
makeownplan
ibl4d3r
Osamaabdel23
Shwqi90
osmahi
bitsong_official
bitcoinsun
meljijli
harshan66
wahengcha
MasterShare
HeinzKaluffe
mtmaster
THGamage01
xxxko
f.harms
saike
danish2745
mage nashat botrs
Mariogamal
eveguy
dkhanalnp
hjelc
kuz13
zabusa94
crobin
muskarta
malou31
reversemartingale
amberlove01
owates
bebetoin
Imguru
trustdee
Akerele1
bykhiesamuel
ohmdvo
Munnaq12
dariopacomio
Richiegreat
krida17
hashgoun
23949  Other / Meta / Patrol: "Great Project". Cleanup request/discussion for Mods. on: January 31, 2018, 09:52:25 PM
I started out with the best intentions: open patrol, and Merit some Newbie's posts. I couldn't find any, and instead, I started reporting posts.

I especially dislike posts saying "great project", they don't add anything, they're probably shill-accounts, they're creating insubstantial posts to rank up, and there are hundreds of accounts doing the same!

I've been downloading patrol since the AlexPromotion-spam, but only kept data from the past 6 days. I ran a case insensitive search on "great project", and in the past 6 days alone 735 different Newbie-accounts posted that phrase.

My AlexPromotion-report was 100% accurate, this one is not! But when I look at the post history of these users, most of them are worthless. There are more phrases that are being reused over and over again.
Example:


I found some false positives: My search included all quoted "great project" too.
Some, like KeeperOfCoins clearly don't deserve to be on my list, while others, like Olaide06 are probably bots.

Is this something Mods want to pursue? The entire list needs manual checking, but I expect a large part can be nuked. I am willing to manually reduce the list in some bored hours if a Mod takes action after that.

My complete list (I choose clickable over code-tags):
wentdream
sniffintrades
samwilliamsayo
elsherbeny
Niko2017
Kunleofficial
RrelXRrel
bitshahzada123
Walid128
Viliam
bethlopez020808
jhoanne
Silver166
BitcoinStream
ashkie22
tigerMJyang
tonybogs
girish123
Flex345
manish2447
Sophyy
Kennetheno
lomakin.ivan
odisomajor
ivorychris
Ahmed4119
btcdeds
AlainBKK
Anyone01
vinodr
samster
Barry001
hadroncloud
Feeliks
Praveen Bhardwaj
MiddleFingerToTheMan
Crytomaster
GmanUtrecht
BLTC
Vyacheslav7000
doctorhyip
kampret4545
a.zivert
Paule-2345
adelynkng
isi93mlssirebel
Jahanam
Sceat
k3jaguar66
vandumen
rajpacl
Invested4future
mizzya
Eben_olus
snaptrck
Montero2018
sabrinamaria1
Raphael93
Jn_
Ec9397
berburu doku
xskubix
Tu Thanh
ggokidok
jayhal
Leckter13
koplok
jayarellano
chixijane
aykutaksoyy
debsin
techloys
Beforemember
ultimatecrypto
Subzy
Puff Pastry Hangman
sammyonehouse
brownie_something
saldriass
financialfreedom
criscypto
Joekondo
macayub
denpirates
parekouh
Cherry_The_Countess
ololade120
JaneClacio
solid8
babelyn
anizpk
GabrielPontello
jepjep00
Cryptovine
Rainmaker45
mayela01
klimenok1991
viper1909
CrackDonald
Noadconsult3
Kikomon
cryptouser63
Sagacious18
BlackCrypto29
NadhilJanitra
bennani
Lavie1124
Valz009
vivekagarwalbkn
Baront
RoManus145
nicholasogb
Hotbaba1
nistopop
kerv12
arbl0422
segfadin
Kinkadeinspired
flashmoniltd
freshtyt
vicsylicious
Skyyat
ravb26
Ainez
Bitcoinerx
qusimyusuffx
Hodl_till_homeless
syang2
candyman22
0dz4
mitmitos44
IntroNumeric
saintwudi
backup.contact999
applepie_tidbitz
jayjose
Demen
Joejiwang
ukid007
tzantza_bogdan
Bayuanggara
Daffaraj
dmanuge
4u2win
Dlex24
Rahulk
emiegracey
Yoko333
myousaf002
zafiramaghfur
rokayab
tobwesley
ridhohandriyanto
mahdifaster
voiloo
marcostocco93
Anthony Anh
Halitime
cryptadikt
anhlp1
neeploki
DonePrince
maduka15
jamalbak
khaiem
Currency_Boy
procom
kizzone69
Rakovzvizg
mycrypto93
Kumar Augustine
Larzen
Natty10
Q1906
Garthanjes
Xmarritomelind
Mustaqeem147
bobbyzz
fredaine
nafez1
Aigunawan95
elemdylamidi
ducaalfa
Travels999
Ahaameedasif1
Enri
ICOPass
secretgod
jkwasiu
Sumartini
Yettybaby
Eric Cointona
Aqhi69
clickmasta
Frankkie2
DENARO.IO
vrushc
Umarye
Jimmy_Coin
Prosper01
pooh111
Gokay4141
Zion30
daosylam1990
coinsolence
masterdisaster
Privat2017
Bigrayz
ivrytwr3
shirlyo17
singlecrytpo
chuckz143
roni rahman
Andrea29
ishwar377
FOUAD1994
YangStevens
Warptrooper
Kawsar_DA
Piet246
dubr0vsky
Andruha1993
telexnetwork
Puffyreall
akira1972
akira2005
skhanmashwani
Prasadyel
mna110
itssawai
Gilas
SMS5
riqui
125koolkheart
Hennypenny59
Christopher Eves
Adam Palvin
herro2017
yoshisland
fifycurency
hekimogluburaketem
hshakir15
coinboy2017
MercyG
kemijibbz001
lupee0323
Asseta
stil3tto
Dhara1
capitalbtc
IvolveR
Olaide06
alaaddin
haipham195
Borngreat23
FelipeSanon
KeeperOfCoins
Aniolatt
tuantrau
singha10
angelaurum
prashantcrypto2
krypticcoin
cryptoparty
muhammeday61
arinze8888
D2guns_21
Yuraf
Torn80beta
TipuSultan24
luckynegara20
Feybyen
elturrco
biboy01
cryto_phoenix
ikramhaider
sooybin
lordwindp
hakud8990
tharindu.some
sahadatthed
ajinkya1396
lalit01
pratikawasare
anilkumarakb
Sapnuji@
Vimal1992
Zanthar
maah75
gresh23
Dilipishara
Emee
bisiz
nikiknowsnothing
Master_noder
marchendaye
sagin
Heroofcoin
adamcoin83
laramcoin
Lucas amos
Timcheerful11
scholes83
friendsfingers
BCRDev
bttmember
cabaymauu
makeng
gungagunga
chinny286
dgcrypto2
Kamal.strong365
omaraha111
Beurlz
karburator
Romanovic
GiseleGarnet
oliver1975
Devil995
bolaris
bernard12345
Irenjosh
Cajn1
fahim786
CryptoMiner88
moneyneed1
Komorhan
Olumide1000
belibis26
Altamash K
kidsnow
spartasparta007
mvplol
samiran19
tatyanaaaa
naim559
ivan_lzr
eldzinan05
phantrongthiem
coldflame821
cebongcilik
saidur3419
OMLETovich
SanuStrico
Raj81
chadhaashish
rahul338725
kekeson
naderba666
Nwanyieze1
Carseas
seb12000
Marksmanio
drillsm
Yuniarrm
spivorcointaun
spanolesbaluko
Oliviatee
bethereum
Victorheywhy
boussaid
shaman11
jikook
Monicgray
angeluhihu
Walang-kekek
Flaver
flankb
JeanCoin
Tchalla
poi35
bismillaamin
vmazhard
Billygent
rrmzbaig@gmail.com
oskar007
CryptoPlushkin
ikki92
Pchow
geoffrom
blessed101
nascrypto
GalacX
Rahim2984
Hurkacoin
barat2000
chizaram_vikita
angelbeatzprod
4ripin
Callahan93
JazzyJeff
kenhdautu
Jack tom
23950  Other / Meta / Re: Plagiarism and copy/paste on: January 31, 2018, 07:10:21 PM
I've found something, it seems that anti-spam giveaway is useful in some way  Smiley
So several of them started copy/pasting in the last few days hoping to earn Merit? At least they can't easily level up a new account now. It feels like the leaking faucet has been fixed, and now we can start mopping.

I was looking for a thread like this one Cheesy
May I suggest to keep it centralized in Mod, please check new additions: Reporting copy/pasting, please permban? I still add new posts there once in a while.

Although this thread got them banned faster, my last few additions are still at large.
23951  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs! on: January 31, 2018, 03:24:57 PM
@cellard
I've read the term Schnorr signatures before, but never fully understood it. It seems to be under development since a few years. I'm not waiting for it, fees can also just keep rising.

@NeuroticFish
I've added a small note on SegWit. I didn't cover it yet for two reasons:
1. The effect on the fee is much smaller than what you can safe by consolidating at the right moment.
2. I still haven't setup a SegWit wallet by myself (it on my TODO list though), so I can't speak from experience.
Wind_FURY's link explains it much better than I ever can.
23952  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: January 31, 2018, 01:06:53 PM
Address:
Quote
15EVVkYmAZhXwnG6BHmQnW735Cz64i9M3x
Message:
Quote
BTT account - LucoVegas
Signature:
Quote
IJfHJLfULt3zN2ZdVV1YZR1eneE9IVAKkF6qxX971oRrRHeJRHZe4J3FwfcMZ5FYlBX6CwMolkdawbT I8BJF0t0=
Quoted and verified!

Code:
----BITCOIN ADRESS ----
1Q6KoaoC6cRvNhjZV2jhgxeqKmXGcmB5Gx

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE---—
This is vinipoars from bitcointalk.org and today is 31.01.2018.

—---BEGIN SIGNATURE---—
HxLjV1hW55Xv07boJlzbEvhO7Fw+UM0eGVQP0fa9jHpkDVbr+Hl3R26DMpi9Nrd7Lg/UqN5PocwnkoFZTeDnH3M=
Quoted and verified!
23953  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Double spend BTC transaction, negativ credit on: January 31, 2018, 12:54:23 PM
My Friends transaction is a follow up with 0.08BTC in the following stairs.
Can you share the txid or address?
23954  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Double spend BTC transaction, negativ credit on: January 31, 2018, 12:30:49 PM
Friendly advice: For someone who owns this much money in Bitcoin, you know very little about how it works. May I suggest you learn more about Bitcoin before you make a very expensive mistake?

Bitcoin addresses can't have a negative balance. It's impossible.
Blockchain.info has bugs, the website shows a negative balance after a double spend. There's no need to "refill" that wallet, and even if you would do it, that wouldn't change anything for existing transactions.

This is what I understand:
1. On December 15, you tried to send 11.23 BTC to 1MeLoYPNZbc4XfMi2PuhxWnATDnYD9VuMH, with a low fee.
The transaction above will never confirm, because the inputs are used in the transaction below. It will at some point drop from mempool, and be completely forgotten.
2. On December 21, you sent 1.24 BTC to the same address, and 10 BTC to a change address.
This transaction got confirmed and the funds were used again in other transactions.

The unconfirmed double spend transaction that will never confirm was used as an input for other transactions. These too will never confirm, the original input has been used somewhere else already.

Your wallet should drop those transactions, and stop broadcasting them. Which wallet do you use?
Basically, your wallet is a bit of a mess now, by building upon unconfirmed double spend transactions. It depends on your wallet how you can best deal with this.
23955  Other / Meta / Re: [LIST] USERS THAT ARE ABUSING MERIT SYSTEM on: January 31, 2018, 11:47:41 AM
My first contribution to this thread: alexberezov (=account seller) conveniently went from 100 to 250 Merit on one day for these three posts:

As far as I know, bounty hunters have already received their rewards I think they really want to sell rewards, but we really want to buy, we need an exchange!
Sir, unfortunately I have no more access to my eidoo wallet, and I have no seed..
If there is no way to change eidoo address for bounty reward then please do not send me my reward.
Let my reward be distributed among other participants of the bounty. It's strange rules that you can not change a address.. so, I lose 15k$ in eidoo tokens Sad
This is not a loyality towards those who worked for you..
Dividends should be tomorrow, it will be slightly less than 100 dollars for 5000 coins
One of the posts is 20 days older than the rest, I don't think this was a coincidence.

The 3x50 Merits came from chixka000, NetFreak199 and blo8i (=Scammer).
My guess is that he used his 3 Hero-accounts to be able to rank up his Full Member to Sr. Member.

Credit where credit is due:
1. Mahirap left alexberezov red trust 6 days ago: "Using his/her alt accounts to send some merits to this account."

2.
23956  Economy / Services / Re: LoyceV's Bitcoin Fork claiming guide (and service) on: January 31, 2018, 11:14:26 AM
Looks like a pretty cool service, and thank you very much for all of the valuable info. Can I just send you a dump of all my used BTC addresses, can you scan for forked tokens, tell me which addresses have said tokens, and I send over the priv keys? I'd happily give you 5-10% of the value for your service.
(we've discussed this in PM)

General answer: Depending on how many different addresses you have, this can be quite a lot of work. Doing this manually means having to look up the balance for each address at the moment of each fork. For addresses with many transactions it's even more work to find back historic balances on a block explorer.
I don't mind looking into the occasional Bitcoin address, but if it's a long list of addresses with low balance, you'll have to do this on your own.

We are already having similar list here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2591813.0
That list hasn't been updated in a month. I checked some of the websites, and they do offer wallets, but I haven't tested them yet.



I think I have many addresses that have claimable fork coins, but it does seem like a lot of work and I am terrible at tracking down change addresses. I use Core, which seems to generate many many change addresses and so I'm wondering if you would be willing to help me dig through my wallets to discover what stash is lying in wait.
I can help you get started Smiley

Quote
I am positive I have a few addresses that were around for the BCH fork, which also seems to be the most profitable fork from what I can tell. Is there any easy way to keep track of Core's Change addresses or to easily take a snapshot of a particular date in time for your wallets for quick checking?
As far as I know, there is no easy way to take such a snapshot in Bitcoin Core. It can export all addresses you ever used: type listaddressgroupings in Console for the list.

Quote
While I'm interested in the service, I do not want to waste either of our time and would like to do what I can to figure out where I'm at without completely doing everything for myself, since it sounds dreadful.
An easy way to get an estimate is if you can remember your approximate balance on August 1, 2017 (the fork date for Bitcoin Cash) and other major fork dates that happened after this. Each Bitcoin you had is worth around $1500 in Bitcoin Cash, plus more in other forks. This should quickly tell you whether or not it's worth the effort.



Their main chain isn't launched yet.
23957  Other / Meta / Re: Merit - one week later on: January 31, 2018, 10:29:03 AM
The altcoin section, from what I've seen, has some of the most degenerate shitposters known to man--very close to the gambling section, and I'm not sure who'd take home the trophy if they wrestled.
There are good posts in the Altcoin section, but they're very hard to find amongst millions of useless posts.
I've merited at least three.
23958  Economy / Services / Re: [WTB] Someone to check my BTC addresses for forks on: January 31, 2018, 07:34:11 AM
You posted already on LoyceV's Bitcoin Fork claiming guide (and service).  Atleast wait for his reply today.
I'll respond to all comments tomorrow, sorry for the delay.
Thanks Smiley


I wanted to give a more in-depth reply, but for now: if it's only 10 addresses, can you PM them to me? You'll be my first customer!
23959  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: How to sell Bitcoin on your Cell Phone from a Paper Wallet on: January 31, 2018, 07:21:21 AM
1) You need to check and see if you have any forked coins (shitcoins) here- http://Forkexplorer.com
This looks like https://bitcore.cc/checker.php (which doesn't work anymore), and has the same bug: "Balance in $" is calculated from the wrong fields.
Example:


Thanks - I was starting to gather that. Do you know of one that works right these days? This is ridiculous and why they’re shitcoins -just throwing that out there
Just ignore the "Balance in $"-row, the Balance in Forkcoins is correct.
23960  Economy / Lending / Re: Need super quick 0.01 loan. Guaranteed legit! on: January 30, 2018, 09:30:11 PM
I hope you're certain. It's suspicious at best that this person would come back after 1 year+ and demand a loan without allowing us to ask for old wallet signatures, just because whoever was behind that account in the past was trustworthy. It makes me uneasy.
If you haven't done it yet: Read BePolarBob's post history, it's good stuff!
Last time he popped up after months of inactivity was in November 2016, he instantly asked for a 1BTC loan, got it, and repaid.

This guy has trust board hanging around his neck and he's asking for a 0.01 loan Grin
I was expecting him to give the 0.01 away instantly, he calls it buying earning trust.

BiPolarBob: although we haven't met, I just want to say: you're quite a character! I'm a big fan Cheesy

Quote
(I am not saying that he's trying to scam but caution would be great as we have seen so many hacked accounts asking for loans in this section.)
If anyone would manage to hack his account, he could get a much higher loan in a heartbeat! Of course, he'd have to post an addy to get it.
Pages: « 1 ... 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 [1198] 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 ... 1370 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!