After testing it here are my thoughts:
- zip code is the only manual imput data that "tracks" user location and seems to only accept usa zip code
- could not take part in 75% of surveys because I did not fit in the wanted category based on the few calibration questions (work in multi national company, have some odd disease etc)
- there is nowhere to manually mention the country I am from and all surveys done so far were for USA (I don't have Target store, Walmart etc in my country) and perhaps not knowing what to pick I always got the smaller end of the stick. Survey paid 150 - 3500 sat and received 150 everytime.

I guess all fine if you are frim US but not so much for the other 52

Good Luck!

Plase move to Service Discussion altcoins first of all. You are not developing anything.
A twitter clone made by CSW to promote BSV and "earn for your posts" does not even come close to any sort of killer app. Crypto kitties had more potential (that's why it clogged much of the network in the goos old days).
Sorry to say but I don't see it! Can you please explain why you think that?

After clicking on "get started" I can't pass question 3... zip code.
My country is on the list (not USA) but when I enter the zip code gives this error "We cannot locate that postal code. We have surveys available in United States so please enter a postal code near your location.". It only knows US zip codes ?
I use Opera browser with built-in VPN and currently on a European IP.
Any suggestions ?

My country is on the list so I guess I could participate. Will open an account to test it later. Could you also mention some topics for the surveys, so I can know what to expect. Personal info, services used.. a few randon examples is you don't mind. GL with this

Did not realise the full extent of this "trick" initially
Got reading a bit more and found this: https://medium.com/@yenthanh/token-honey-pot-scam-on-ethereum-network-when-hacker-scam-hacker-1b3118a46495
Goes to show that anything can be used for the wrong purpose...

Initially I assumed it was a proof of concept, ingenious and also fairly expensive way to secure funds. Did not see any evil side. Can you please explain how this would be used to trick someone? besides a thief that tries to empty the wallet...

What kind of scam is this ?
You posted same ann 2 times (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215293.0) only coin name changed and eth contract is for another token, STRATIUM https://etherscan.io/token/0x61e24dd8d1f04a020f1160181a1bc7a5e07f417f

What kind of scam is this ?
You posted same ann 2 times (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215289.0) only coin name changed and eth contract is for another token, STRATIUM https://etherscan.io/token/0x61e24dd8d1f04a020f1160181a1bc7a5e07f417f

Since ETH blocks are at 12 seconds intervals I assume that's why it works on Ethereum network. Maybe you tried with another coin. Just guessing ...

What's the difference between Dash and Kash ?



Yeah... Ctrl + R

Seems a guy, Robert Forster, a some kind of hacker published his private key for a wallet of his with 1ETH balance.  Someone else tried to withdraw but still was not able to ...

Forster used something called RBF ( Replace by Fee).
He signed a transaction but keep it offline, not informing the network about that. Then with the use of a listening node "watched" his wallet for any activity and when someone would try to move the funds he would sent the previous signed transaction to the network and since it would have higher fees it would replace the initial one and get propagated faster within the network.

Source link: https://www.trustnodes.com/2020/01/04/hacker-publishes-private-key-but-no-one-can-steal-his-eth

The process sounds pretty simple and straightforward and definitely used as proof of concept.
The thing that grinds my gears is that for the signed transaction he seems to have added a fee equal to the wallet balance (at least from what I understood, to make it not profitable at all for any thief). And for any attempt to withdraw his funds he would "lose" the amount as fees for miners.
 

   

It seems it is the other way around. If you answer correct the acc gets locked and you need to email and prove it is your acc. Not sure what the logic is but... it is what it is  

If you also have some examples please do!

Did you try to reset via secret question? What that does is blocks your account and you need to send an email to unblock

Bidding part really sounds interesting. It would work if you integrate some sort of signed message from the wallet, so you can confirm the user who has access to the wallet has some balance. Or in order to place bid you would need to charge them a simbolic fee (1000 sat) to be able to bid and the users that do not win would get 999 sats back. It is a business after all :p
Good luck with the project if you're really serious on starting.

Just to be clear so I understand what you want to do... do you want to add crypto as form of payment? Or want to use fiat? Because OmegaStarScream had a few valid ideas but did not see any reaction from you

Bitcoin's goal is mainstream adoption not reaching $1M. Not just a trading pair...WTF

Bitcoin is decentralized ! Even tho chinese miners have most of the hasing power it is not all under one single pool. Not a 51% attack. And even if all fails and bitcoin does fall to this... no problem. Bitcoin 2.0 will step in, more powerful then ever (not BSV... another one )

Bitcoin is not manipulated (to my knowledge). Yes, btc price can/was pumped by third parties (see USTD, and many other examples) but no one controls it. ISP will not ban IP associated with crypto nodes ... let's be realistic here. Big companies may try to centralize as much as possible, to censor, to manipulate popular opinions ... The Overton Window is a great example and an interesting read imo.
There was a time when some ISP (it may still happen....donno) blocked traffic when they realized you were using torrent systems. But mostly torrents were piracy. Crypto is freedom!

It's not the "INTERNET" you have to fear. If you have a router and few meters of FTP cable you can make a local network and presto.... you have INTERNET. Not World Wide Web... mostly 3 house wide web ... but still the same concept.
I believe Satoshi's legacy is the blockchain and bitcoin was a practical example of how revolutionary it actually is.
A decentralized internet would be great. Many similar options to pick from, no monopol, net neutrality etc. would be awesome. But don't see how without theese crypto will perish !

Can you please explain how a wallet can be "multicultural" 

All evidence so far point to that... I am honestly a bit relieved but on the other hand makes me cringe to see how such a behemoth as YT can still be manipulated by a few telegram attack groups...

If this happens to major authority as Antonopoulos then we might be facing a huge problem. Hope I'm just paranoid here