I would argue that these things *should* be done. Bitcoin should be attacked and abused to the max, all the time. I don't want to store my wealth in a system where we have to kindly ask people not to break it. We already have that. Break this shit, and please do it quick. I don't want to be surprised in the future. This is the correct answer really, though BurtW is right in that it can be an annoyance. I have found it useful for notarizing or timestamping data, using http://deedbot.org/
|
|
|
it looks even more similar to blazr2's avatar? is this a coincidence or maybe a joke? I LOVE this Right down to the Blazr2 LOGO. I have got to get my hands on some of this. Maybe if we drink enough of this blazr2 Unobtanium beer, we can summon The Great Old back to this thread. The merchants listed here have it: http://boxingrock.ca/blog/unobtainium
|
|
|
Ok, I'll try it again this weekend. Thats also what the magic dice game said to do. cryptapus is correct, because vnc is all kinds of filthy and slow. If you need help setting up your ssh keys or a yubi just pm me.
|
|
|
I requested that C-CEX reduce their UNO witdhrawal fee. 0.1 is too steep, it's 0.01 on Bleutrade, 0.0002 on Bittrex & 0.0001 on Cryptopia. I'd probably even ask Bleutrade to reduce theirs if we went over $5/coin.
Thanks for letting us know. 0.0001 is set. Cryptopia is the only exchange I use for $uno. api just works.
|
|
|
Just thought I'd drop in and LOL because waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more than 2 weeks have passed since this bold declaration and still no 20 MB blocks and Mike Hearn has ragequit.
|
|
|
For cryptapus, just some UNO dust for your efforts - was cleaning out wallets and thought you might could use it. -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
hQIMA6XIyEZyPm/iAQ/+LUUwa4LgAB48Wi1XLgNlnUyy8QSl5BVewfVspagUxnUu 0mbcmt+u26c1wnHH4fmMbNg1KX+FC+S/C0Tcse5IRpad9fXt+rF4x+bQCvAabxRv UBdTu4cRVX5cberQDg/3kZkZaEHqo4bWQIPN1wYKplie/Lu2aHUisyNK3AZTUjvq FNKfHLZ8AjOqvUyorRgySg7Ak+V5bOWkv59vHJjFs0JEZwfMheW8vMNm0Bt7T95l qTq5zyY7L5NdMKCp1RDR4zDt98eb0de5xAskk2+zVFs4zSkKeMTuCZDoMD3jZbOn QkobFJ2fj+u8R6XCeowVXY194Xtc5nkep2Z6mq4FT1oFEMH+6CJoM+EGyat8EAC4 ZAcB/8yYjXa+m8UiKPKL5toAzFE8C+j4UtSyarzUNEeM1tIP1xVRF34zQ3kuzCLL AM39PrTDgK4djP5vjyjHadf9IUu2NZstxNVxagUWdMNTIOnA5NRqfFSYxgz7/tLE OBe6VIigOpV7px3b9IeQ1jGUQ076KgfWWMKwCjMVvqQITrIR1n4WkVEHIXEppHbc 9/OsiPn+SbeFV43pHygNOdex01dUNHo0qq+IS7gYzU/j0iBfbCqLTsisZCG8SY0E d+7z/J6xsurlFp52Dl07QPNWR5VmuPuVyUfKsotdZPw1GGWzcINcAgjKg5qWj/7S sgHKxJAWUS03Li/mQjF6CkeJEqVbc9ZOxEtjPZb6iyW2jEYglA2s+c3t6ciL1/RU UhFaJpsEfoSqwZ20r7GWZbLd6mIBCNcDtqU15BT04ows/Nqcv4HFMfZAAytzvV11 OP4plBpqsvmCAGazt4tMJwNzn2lkGTl1pthTsT62AsKZNDP3/qJyjzS+4R6kbpCA 7AlHMAP42qi8nqRBVZphP8JGn1Hrrl8ySAaNik+NlK67BTE= =iW7l
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
I am staking my key here, thank you. -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
mQINBFav2jMBEADPCRsFp9Vtw0vlkeho2v8lIPblVNNeW43HLNXeEGvgn+gaK5sW9H5mbp6Z LEjbdEr7zc3eu7iLFudw9IdJCLKYcqkXWBpAQF7JF6l4J18oOQK1TfzcQyU5jWuAcc+Ds8RE W91X/N9Ae/QF+dtRyuv1ILFKZ88G2za/TdV06PuNdyi3qTlD5HPVhd5YrZyY7GVG1gTi7Wtj 6tONGjjQARR6T1LDuN75QmoDvw3m68U5QnoECGg4BFAdPrnFxYpTCl6SyV9AsCfzTwP2mIkL KZi7X/wSubt4b+nhPMuFeZ/6XFCfHCD4mEcQudyXByi7FgAXmX+UPS1iFtaXG8UJHM4Fq2k5 FcjdLXW2s0kKk915XVEE9Q4YwWQpTonr9FwgT+aSbV7UX8ihNhNCSQAv1RnIIt8t9hncztfZ D7g/FMj4FfZ8GkI0gmn3DliSlswBZbr1rN0HTitAzYKNUsiinIxwICfj9yRTcQ92F0ML+zwQ B5UOXjEJra+D3tGjyVCNKO940rbjvj/QAvakoNBdCnbaZDKf26Hc0qpcn3DvGei0QLFJ2gmz EnK1dW4kftcJE8piibvq35EEptqkDiCMlI0Eq819vtJBumF3ZSBjMeEB1IPfSvDG1OoUXXS0 TGwCGstjMTRQ1S2D8fDb0ENBrbdhyWXZVQFzxi/YMwkNGswDoQARAQABtBpzaGlub2hhaSA8 YnRjaW5mb0BzZGYub3JnPokCNwQTAQgAIQIbAwIeAQIXgAUCVq/czQULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUW AgMBAAAKCRBKdYg8wbHTTPjiD/oCwpoSbdQRzS6B0tsSfEhAI3pHVY50a+m+7GE6RlPtnl5s f7SWscdAilBuPpMEhNcCju1sReEwxPAs3GFi8xsTOrVgvEXcJke8SaZzm0sYLDbpNkv3WLcP BqF3fyeAkyrazdfekcinJQDyBpX0lG4n85ur/JCRYbmBWVB8OISO3i5HgYNVlLo0RfJVdjh0 o4a45q9tUUFthRVsnL9tuoA5nnW1QZX3zxzxzJt3blwGHP56wDMzZuCPqkQM+WdWI+RvJEPX Lb5/n2hwLVhrEDMIsYduzAB+pm02qLgapa9MhcaJbPEao8CqrQ4ZiP8Gr0+/HJjbsadZMwj+ czHD7HiayZ3YcpGOJSFzCdExp3WT186cMdkRk7o15D+dAZkfPXlEmswiYZJhfpPDlJxYk6iA TIu2Z7j5L2IeU6U0X6hoaciFhsyjrQQy7stqZqnU66d+UBl2TBl0spidQYrJryHOZi9K1y9t szZEjf4FXUuILfyoTo2fdGCAC/IpbaMsESBAAUqFXcf3IuOGS3QC5IKOxsDpACSEM8amWCs3 A7baZG6mvblNZ93nsF0/fOG3ScdbPhkjESU75vUp1X/S3BN2buhqElfdgwKdmvF3EQ2qAdJ8 /egz58fisSoyqYaGt0G4XYE6j/s0E0Dexo2J27jyGH0vppAvBSnadsgBeXwKsLkCDQRWr9oz ARAAscDkms+WKznSdqady//OOeAAhoURl2MyrTYI/YDzU+hsiQx1vsetUzdQHkddzKjOVGiL zK44RNe24eti4ZKQRL4NnEa2ARnu6/Cf/BNENYvxXhZ40uz3gBjpk99pKw7c9BoXEWKE4erl gSG92omGMlOXbn4reTm0o0t6lh0QXSK9j4nuv6aSzlV3Xg7G7bHFOtx5Lo0TJY2HeLj0eqCc BYHUG8kivbSlPx1Et6oV/EieoRDeq37sxDjVspzd+qHw0u+FtrK2cVxea8+18WDFHtu/vbGX dM5YE5ly/t8HFH8gk3692cWXcdBS/BmOdzq2Q0JkgsmOuu9d9zvxM1XQSx+b2NSPbndR9j8a Az0GnI5d+v5kQqSjRrNjoedgdzWyeVO2HhBuDjHANcwtm5YofRMUYYt4AyhXKU15JbyTz0uH 3yLq3WBU5HFmvCqPgpPkRxDpd6lwCDa0JPQeTNvnit0gbebwvC//intGod76ZLi1Fdj4oprY MN/HqA8Px/97/r0OjuZmC0wqmOfXPOB2cNjVhmiXV4B2aa9g5cLhDAkJMD1lLed6/vP0q7uC 2g47Cb9lejDU03mAfXuC31sGYRwNVLN0lOAOOweTKTZk15gcVS319KlSX67NHOe9uhdenLgK qS/KTkOfjv1D0Pfhdpf9Yd5cSsNCNGQauLTqoc0AEQEAAYkCHwQYAQgACQUCVq/aMwIbDAAK CRBKdYg8wbHTTBroD/9ORoWo2IOBEueH5/JXG755BptcOTVT+zkvcMxmP+pw0x1/K5jL1RQW EF3qwgWRKCIoVzwU7r0N72H1538IJckcOkL3qSzN6Hs9IiyyT40FNuUoF7rZdhCI1W82LXJp FwxoVBouyB0qpoyELpq00Fmx88lAAOfKLVIeGj2JeGgCsQjjEiZas1JzppGURSMpwus8R2b4 evBtm7+dN8O0dEvOu34zu6p3JETECO/jGEX1r03YsKrcPtHSlJEw4ZByM+LBx2ZliElF4QtZ CAPQaMcVV3XS+RqAHXtC/+tnEly+xw7dbZANIYTte4rNcLt7JpS1Hk77C+y31yN2ziEI2NQn ZTcn+ubrRZ7xbDTVWr9mRFxmHGR9rryoGP6riGtfsgm3/MP2mLfmoaIueDQJXb6FxOhD7Pm2 bg74hix1wi30C7jLuzXyciRJD28SzH/ufJP25GfK+7wvsdxKUUiO6B2mGLaEA7ETdjSK0WML gl5S7dunSBppnW8y0+W64m8O0AmWJIY3fY51e/naQHFU1axPgOwF2+OiVbxWiq4ZeqzyJXAf Nfl6EoOIbwCTlj73GQn1q7R1Rrz8ziaTcQULXqGFHNUq1Yv9Y+VkfhZ1QwOvKWOUHSt3zUg1 yIXLTcTMQmL+f3MUk1UQrE27RYPLUR5CR4auBVSJNDvKPk0la38c7A== =ZzAJ -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Fingerprint: 0x260FA57BCE677A5C04BF60BA4A75883CC1B1D34C wot: http://wot.deedbot.org/260fa57bce677a5c04bf60ba4a75883cc1b1d34c.html
|
|
|
BIG POST SNIP ~
I think you make too much sense for this forum Great post and balanced. Hopefully both sides of the debate may be a bit more open minded and learn something. I like the point that XT is off the table (clearly), yet you still see "XTards" comments and such. Its actually pretty funny. Does classictard suit you better?
|
|
|
i like to think outside of the box. and it seems that many people argue, if your not a XT supporter you must be a blockstream supporter.
which brings people to start a 'race war' about which community people belong to.
but think outside of the box and ask yourself, in 2011 when mining was done on GPU, why wasnt there "security risks" and people crying when the average block went from 100kb to 200kb, when the average persons hard drive was 250gb
why in 2013 when mining was done by 60ghash miners and the blocks were 500kb average and peoples hard drives were 500gb average, that there was no big arguments?
why in 2016 where a 2TB hard drive is cheap enough for regular people to buy, suddenly there is a problem for even an increase of the blocklimit to 2mb.
afterall if a GPU that is 1,000,000 slower than just one current asic, but was able to handle 10% of a 2mb block potential(200kb average bloat).. then just going by the numbers. an asic can handle alot more let alone a farm of asics. and the amount of ram the pool can put on their motherboards is higher than previous years too, meaning it debunks the the block hashing problem.(crying about orphans)
as for non mining user distribution of the solved blocks(full node users).. a 2tb hard drive can fix that argument too.. as a 2mb block would allow for 104gb yearly bloat, for ~20 years even gavins proposed 8mb allows users to have 412gb yearly bloat for 5 years..
i personally think 8mb is a bit much straight off the cuff. id prefer 2mb and then increase if bottlenecks happen in the future. by which time internet speed and storage capacity would be far more then average now. and affordable by average people.
if the debate is about bandwidth.. well i run a fullnode, i watch streaming videos (netflix, etc) play online gaming.. and i dont have any internet hiccups, and i dont expect to have any if the blocks went upto 2mb either. and im on a internet speed of under 20mb/s (nothing special)
once you realise that netflix streams at 1gb/hour SD and 3gb/hour HD.. which equates to 166mb every 10 minutes SD or 500mb every 10 minutes HD. you will then see that moaning about 1mb, 2mb, 8mb for something that gives you financial security.. is smallfry compared to bandwidth bloat of video which gives you just boredom relief temporarily.
in short if your computer and internet can handle netflix.. then blocksizes are not a problem
in short: i just dont see a rational and logical reason why upping the block limit is going to be so disastrous
i would also like to know. out of all the people arguing which camp people belong to, and also what is the best way forward for bitcoin as a whole...who of them actually runs a bitcoin full node. as i think it should only be a discussion for those people who will actually be running a full node. or actually want to run a full node
I am neither an XT supporter, nor a Blockstream supporter. I support Bitcoin.
|
|
|
We can't both be quite happy with how things are changing, because one of us keeps frantically trying to protect the status quo
We'd just all be happy if you could leave Bitcoin alone and take care of your altcoins. Quite. To put it succinctly: http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2015-December/000184.htmlany implementation that does not validate the entire blockchain during initial sync, including transaction signatures, may not be considered a Bitcoin client How hard is that to understand?
|
|
|
Only the charlatans are not brave/honest enough to come up with a proper name and instead leech on bitcoin's name notoriety.
Only the authoritarians are not brave/honest enough to live by the free market they claim they espouse to. People calling themselves libertarians, but demanding protectionism in what's supposed to be an open and permissionless system, free from restrictions. I'm pretty left wing myself, you'd probably even call me "statist", but apparently even I have more stomach for an open market than you do, coward. Yes. They represent the Front National. They are fulltime statists/fascists/National collectivists. (hdbuck, iCE, brg444) Is this genuinely true? I've seen iCEBREAKER wear the Front National logo as an avatar, but are all three of them? "The National Front is a socially conservative, nationalist political party in France. Its major policies include economic protectionism, a zero tolerance approach to law and order issues, and opposition to immigration." Oh! Lovely. ie rascist fascists swella win for bitcoinTo be fair we hate fat people too.
|
|
|
I think i'll stick with Satoshi's vision. hint: Bitcoin started with 32MB blocks. 1MB was intended to be a temporary spam measure. qntra eh? God damn, you can't even meme correctly.
|
|
|
I'm afraid you noobs and authority cravers handle bitcoin to USG and corporations for the Big Brother Finale. (FASCIST! ) Bitcoin is about freedom, but freedom is not about democracy. It is about the individual (as in the individual must be able to mine, run a full node, access the blockchain and cryptographic signatures by himself).Not the illusion of the greater number of stupid 'marketed' sheeple precipitating the rest into the abyss. Bitcoin consensus mechanism fights exactly this by preventing social/populist coup over its protocol. You are stupid if you think any fork attempt will be successful as the previous ones lamely failed and with not even as much people involved as of now. Bitcoin's protocol is not some incorporated IOS that has to be upgraded every two weeks tm. This is the core of why I don't agree with a lot of the proposals out there. They seek to weaken Bitcoin's cryptography in some way or pass off complete signatures as not necessary. Without a fully verified node you may as well be using pebbles recorded in the rockchain, You do realize that Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) was a major section in Satoshi's original white paper right? It was part of the Bitcoin vision from day 1. So where you do get this shit from? SPV doesn't weaken the cryptography at all. You're spouting nonsense. I have no issues with SPV wallets in general. It is possible to use one that verifies off your own personal server. It's not nonsense at all. I sense a redditard. http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2015-December/000184.htmlJust because it is appropriate for the bitcoin foundation (an institution) to run a full node doesn't mean every individual user has to...which was the whole point of Satoshi's SPV...So yeah, it IS nonsense. I'm not going to argue further with yet another brain-damaged BIP101 supporter, as you most certainly are. Relevant quote from #bitcoin-assets today http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=12-01-2016#1368164See also: http://qntra.net/2015/01/the-hard-fork-missile-crisis/Good luck with your scamcoin.
|
|
|
All is ok for me. All my payouts have been carried out correctly. Thanks everybody for the support!
This thread can be closed.
Good to know. Thank you for your patience.
|
|
|
I'm afraid you noobs and authority cravers handle bitcoin to USG and corporations for the Big Brother Finale. (FASCIST! ) Bitcoin is about freedom, but freedom is not about democracy. It is about the individual (as in the individual must be able to mine, run a full node, access the blockchain and cryptographic signatures by himself).Not the illusion of the greater number of stupid 'marketed' sheeple precipitating the rest into the abyss. Bitcoin consensus mechanism fights exactly this by preventing social/populist coup over its protocol. You are stupid if you think any fork attempt will be successful as the previous ones lamely failed and with not even as much people involved as of now. Bitcoin's protocol is not some incorporated IOS that has to be upgraded every two weeks tm. This is the core of why I don't agree with a lot of the proposals out there. They seek to weaken Bitcoin's cryptography in some way or pass off complete signatures as not necessary. Without a fully verified node you may as well be using pebbles recorded in the rockchain, You do realize that Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) was a major section in Satoshi's original white paper right? It was part of the Bitcoin vision from day 1. So where you do get this shit from? SPV doesn't weaken the cryptography at all. You're spouting nonsense. I have no issues with SPV wallets in general. It is possible to use one that verifies off your own personal server. It's not nonsense at all. I sense a redditard. http://therealbitcoin.org/ml/btc-dev/2015-December/000184.html
|
|
|
No problem. I'll post any developments if I see them discussed in chat.
|
|
|
Long live La Serenissima. @siameze join us sometimes on #bitcoin-assets
|
|
|
I heard Tiff is getting married?
Ahahhahahahah yup on 31 February!! Now , where in the world did u hear that? That's it I'm having calendars made with Feb 31st on them Good luck with that lol We ain't getting married, woman? You're crushing my hopes. I'll start using the sock again. Use a soft one , so u wont hurt yourself mhuahahhaha #rekt
|
|
|
|