|
If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen
|
|
|
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs. split their coins into several inputs will breaking the wallet. the wallet not support many inputs!!!! don't know the max of splits you can do, but the max exists. You can have hundreds of millions of inputs staking at once. It's only limited by your hardware, not the software It would be very stupid to even approach a level that high without recombining, though |
|
|
|
I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!!  imagine if you had 1 million cubes! yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward. I don't think you guys are thinking this through. It auto-splits down. If you send to yourself and let it split for you until you are under the cap, the wallet will do that automatically for you as you stake the max until you are low enough. There is no reason to do it manually if you don't want to.. More inputs over the max = more stakes at the max until you get below it So what you are saying is instead of coin controlling like we do now, we skip that and let the split stakes cap out? And the cap only applies to each split chain Honestly 10 is way too low, and even 100 is pretty low. I might be okay with a 500 capI agree 10 is too low (and even 100 is a bit on the low side, too) but I wanted to put a low option in there. The problem is finding a good balance between incentive to stake and inflation. If I set it too high, coin count gets out of control. If I set it too low, nobody gives a shit because it doesn't stake for enough |
|
|
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs. So what? That makes more competition for staking and will not stake at exactly 24 hours You guys are assuming people are going to stake with 100% efficiency. Splitting blocks down that low will definitely curb compounding by a very significant amount.. |
|
|
|
I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! imagine if you had 1 million cubes! yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward. I don't think you guys are thinking this through. It auto-splits down. If you send to yourself and let it split for you until you are under the cap, the wallet will do that automatically for you as you stake the max until you are low enough. There is no reason to do it manually if you don't want to.. More inputs over the max = more stakes at the max until you get below it |
|
|
|
|
If options 1 and 2 remain fairly close in the poll, I will compromise and do like 50 or something
|
|
|
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
I set up a poll on Twitter, please use this to vote: https://twitter.com/PurePoS/status/692093814857678848 |
|
|
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
option 4 revert to a HIpos scheme of 1 coin per block period lol nowthat the coin has been given a platform i think that this will curb inflation. there is allready a good initial supply and slowing inflation to 1 coin per block limits dumping just my 2 cents tho I like this thinking, large wallets will still find a way to stake full 2000% encouraging dumping. Curb inflation by bringing the stake rate down ...Not going to happen Large wallets will either stake for the max or have to wait just as long as small wallets do for their inputs to stake if they choose to split down (This change benefits small wallets, not large ones..) |
|
|
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.Yes Ok, but... If I set inputs less than 10 CUBE, this change will change anything? If your stake reward is less than 10 you would still earn the full amount. If it's over 10, it will be set to 10 in this example |
|
|
|
|
Look at his post history, he's done like 20 coins with company names and nobody cares, including a very VERY weird story about Mickey and Minnie Mouse.. Pretty sure he's just trying to bait a lawsuit. Just move along, nothing to see here
|
|
|
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.Yes |
|
|
|
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
|
|
|
|
Has just one person received the stakestick so far?
No |
|
|
|
soonnn..
you only can STAKE CUBE on STAKESTICKS.
and then we're going to the MOONN
No, you'll always be able to use whatever operating system you choose |
|
|
|
Why not updated OP?
? Road map? Working on getting the two items up on http://www.freestaking.com, StakeSticks are coming back and the new unit I haven't said much about, yet - Batch 1 and 2 StakeSticks are arriving to customers as we speak |
|
|
|
I do not regret the way CUBE was handled. The coin is still the same as it was last week. If you have a problem with CUBE, it's because you don't like me personally. Simple as that
I have nothing against you personally. By the way, you seem forget to send me the signature payment last Sunday. Could you please check and backpay asap? Just run CUBE normally and I think people will trust you more  I forgot to do them all on Sunday, I'm going to do them in a few minutes |
|
|
|
http://www.freestaking.com will be returning soon with a new item  F5 if you have been on the page before, tickers are now working in the top right
|
|
|
|
|
This is the exact reason I usually self-mod my posts, by the way; not because I'm afraid of discussion but because it gets like a middle school locker room arguing who has the biggest 4 inch dick
Honestly, people like Fallout are not worth the time it takes to respond. I don't even read what they write anymore. They spew filth, hate, and nonsense for no reason even knowing I have them on ignore. They just want attention, ignore them and it gets much better
|
|
|
|
|
I do not regret the way CUBE was handled. The coin is still the same as it was last week. If you have a problem with CUBE, it's because you don't like me personally. Simple as that
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
