💸 DigiCube 🔷 NOW ON RAWX (NEW MCXNOW) 💸 EARN 50K CUBE/WEEK WITH TWITTER!

[Bitcoinmeister]

option 1

[iGotSpots]

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I set up a poll on Twitter, please use this to vote:

https://twitter.com/PurePoS/status/692093814857678848

[mrsalve]

Don't have twitter but I vote for option 2

[iGotSpots]

If options 1 and 2 remain fairly close in the poll, I will compromise and do like 50 or something

[optnickr]

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! 


imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

>>
with 100k cubes you will stuck your wallet

[willowfoot]

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! 


imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward.

[iGotSpots]

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!!  


imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward.

I don't think you guys are thinking this through. It auto-splits down. If you send to yourself and let it split for you until you are under the cap, the wallet will do that automatically for you as you stake the max until you are low enough. There is no reason to do it manually if you don't want to..

More inputs over the max = more stakes at the max until you get below it

[johnnysof]

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs.

[iGotSpots]

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs.

So what? That makes more competition for staking and will not stake at exactly 24 hours

You guys are assuming people are going to stake with 100% efficiency. Splitting blocks down that low will definitely curb compounding by a very significant amount..

[yoman1289]

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! 


imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward.

I don't think you guys are thinking this through. It auto-splits down. If you send to yourself and let it split for you until you are under the cap, the wallet will do that automatically for you as you stake the max until you are low enough. There is no reason to do it manually if you don't want to..

More inputs over the max = more stakes at the max until you get below it

So what you are saying is instead of coin controlling like we do now, we skip that and let the split stakes cap out? And the cap only applies to each split chain

Honestly 10 is way too low, and even 100 is pretty low. I might be okay with a 500 cap

[optnickr]

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs.

split their coins into several inputs will breaking the wallet. the wallet not support many inputs!!!! don't know the max of splits you can do, but the max exists.

[iGotSpots]

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! 


imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward.

I don't think you guys are thinking this through. It auto-splits down. If you send to yourself and let it split for you until you are under the cap, the wallet will do that automatically for you as you stake the max until you are low enough. There is no reason to do it manually if you don't want to..

More inputs over the max = more stakes at the max until you get below it

So what you are saying is instead of coin controlling like we do now, we skip that and let the split stakes cap out? And the cap only applies to each split chain

Honestly 10 is way too low, and even 100 is pretty low. I might be okay with a 500 cap

I agree 10 is too low (and even 100 is a bit on the low side, too) but I wanted to put a low option in there. The problem is finding a good balance between incentive to stake and inflation. If I set it too high, coin count gets out of control. If I set it too low, nobody gives a shit because it doesn't stake for enough

[iGotSpots]

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs.

split their coins into several inputs will breaking the wallet. the wallet not support many inputs!!!! don't know the max of splits you can do, but the max exists.

You can have hundreds of millions of inputs staking at once. It's only limited by your hardware, not the software

It would be very stupid to even approach a level that high without recombining, though

[iGotSpots]

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

[yoman1289]

1000

[optnickr]

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

minimum 10 maximum 1000

You need to have about 180Cubes to earn 10cubes, 1800 to earn 100cubes and 18kcubes to earn 1k.

[ltcrstrbrt]

100

[johnnysof]

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

I also think at least 1000 (probably 2k-3k). Think also in the long term. There is a limitation of blocks per day or month and if 100 or 1000 is fine today, difficulty will go up followed by weeks to get a stake and this would probably kill the coin.

[iGotSpots]

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

I also think at least 1000 (probably 2k-3k). Think also in the long term. There is a limitation of blocks per day or month and if 100 or 1000 is fine today, difficulty will go up followed by weeks to get a stake and this would probably kill the coin.

If every block staked for 100 (long-term talk), then it would be creating 288,000 new coins per day

[optnickr]

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

I also think at least 1000 (probably 2k-3k). Think also in the long term. There is a limitation of blocks per day or month and if 100 or 1000 is fine today, difficulty will go up followed by weeks to get a stake and this would probably kill the coin.

If every block staked for 100 (long-term talk), then it would be creating 288,000 new coins per day

after modifying the coin,  we will have chance of losing everything we already have?