I'd like to suggest that you should reconsider #5 and #6 on the OP. trust me on this, change them and you might have a chance at becoming a source. personally I'd advise against making you a merit source period. because I don't find you trustworthy but that's just me maybe the admin has another idea.

And the purpose of negative trust is to identify scammers, when you start tagging everybody who disagrees with you or is against what you are doing the negative trust would lose it's purpose and people would distrust such a system. default trust is in the hands of a few and most of them are either abusing it or are indifferent about the abuse which is going on.

Negative trust doesn't mean somebody is scammer, so I don't see why we should care about letting red trusted member in a campaign? if we could have another system named reputation we could differentiate between real scammers and victims of trust abuse.
For example: am I a scammer if I call you trust abuser and receive a negative trust from you? the answer is no, so if I'm not a scammer but still have red trust score, trust system has lost it's purpose.

Fighting against trust abuse and corruption is a lost cause in this forum, people like OgNasty have been abusing the trust system for years and seems nobody is man enough to stop them.

There are many campaigns accepting negative trust members, that means default trust holds no value in this forum. if we had a system where people could only tag scammers with real risked amount, we could identify who is really a scammer or who is not.
I have already suggested for a new system "reputation" but that's just me.

Why would you post this here? this forum is not the support forum of coinpayments.net therefore I see no merits to post scam accusation against them.

Having a negative trust on an account involved in shady business and creating another account to continue the same shady business is considered evading the red trust and is considered as untrustworthy behavior for me. don't worry because nobody from DT will tag you unless they find this action untrustworthy.

Every signature campaign also asks to post your application, asking for proof of authentication on bounty section is not considered as "low effort" posting . imagine it was a signature campaign and the manager were asking to post your application with one difference, in sig camps you go and post all over the forum but in an airdrop you simply skip the posting part and get paid.
All I ask is for a review and if it was really breaking the rules I have no objection, also I think the ban period is 14 days?

After reviewing the case about "actmyname" I think he was banned by mistake, I don't think that they were asking people to post their addresses and asking for proof of participation should be OK only if the airdrop thread were posted on bounties. since all of those threads were nuked I can't recall whether it was in bounties or not, if it was in bounties then we could consider the thread as a signature campaign where people post their applications.

If that thread was on ANN board then a mod could've just moved it to the bounties board like every other thread being posted on wrong sections.
I would like for a mod to again review the case of "actmyname" please because I think there has been a misunderstanding.

We could say that they were airdropping for anybody supporting their project via social medias. kind of like what most of the ICOs and bounties do.

Look guys, Welsh is the new moderator on altcoin sections helping mprep, I'd suggest that if any of you interested in becoming moderator start reporting more on those sections without a dedicated moderator.
More reports=having more chance to be hired as a mod (paid or volunteer). now that we have a really good and supportive member as our newest moderator it's time to focus on the next moderator position to be filled if there is actually a need for it.
Again congratulation @Welsh, I like your character very much and I respect you, soon you'll get a lot of reports from me.

Congratulation on becoming the new staff @Welsh, you truly deserve it and I say this from my heart.
On topic now, @LoyceV you have included my name on your list of spammers, lol I posted there to tell them that I am reporting all of the "good projects" posts. don't ban me for it @mods.

I have already reported them all, you can read more here. I think the whole thread should be trashed if they are fake, scam ICO as in using bots for all of their threads. of course we know that scam is not moderated but these kind of activity should be stopped.

EDIT: it's already trashed.

I was going to suggest listing this coin on POSwallet.com but then I went there to see that they have changed into something else which I can't figure out what they are doing really, is there any other service like the old POSwallet.com to do the staking and possibly you could list your coin there?

Do you need translation? is there also any airdrop worth any money? I can use some money.

@theymos, please review the reports and activity of LoyceV, they are actively reporting so many newbies and bots. what you could at least do would be to grant them access to independently deal with these bots and newbie spammers. if they are doing it voluntarily then there is no harm in making them a temporary staff until you are satisfied with their performance. IMO these kind of members are an asset for this forum and you should try them out.

Can I ask something? why do you have so many shills posting back and forth with their redundant comments? if you check their post histories you'll see that most of the people posting here are all shills and all of their posts are only on this thread. this is bad and people can see through you.

My problem is not only about positive trust given to his friends, I have a problem with his ratings about other people especially the red ones.
He has tagged virtually anybody who has spoken against him or accused him of something untrustworthy. that is by definition trust abuse when you tag people like that.

---

OgNasty hands out positive trust to those who'd use his escrow service to encourage others to use him instead of other escrows, unethical practice, misuse of the trust system for financial gains, unbelievable and untrustworthy individual.
Here use my escrow service because I am giving people some fake green trust, I'm using the trust system to encourage people to support my projects and use me to escrow for them. I have been doing this for years and nobody has ever questioned my behavior because I'm on DT1.

Bad news for you ogy, I'm on to you and I will let everybody know about this.

---

Once again, another misuse of trust:

This member has received positive trust simply by participating in a signature campaign, OgNasty is giving positive or negative trust to whomever he wants.

I know where you are getting at, shame on you for backing trust abusers and trying to get me banned, and for what? so that you could be noticed by some DT members and they cheer you up either with listing you on their trust list or giving you positive trust? this is really embarrassing to have a groupthink cartel running around this forum to do whatever they want.
Tell me more about how this forum works? is this the right version?

You get on DT and whatever you do should be trusted all the times and if you say something about the wrongdoings of people you should get tagged and then banned?

Or you get on DT and when you start abusing others and build a fake reputation for yourself by the means of positive trust you should get called out and excluded from DT?
I like the second version more.

I'm not surprised to see that SebastianJu is on OgNasty's trust list, escrowing for account sales for years and no wonder nobody got the balls to tag SebastianJu because they are afraid of getting tagged by OgNasty. OgNasty is a trust abuser and he has abused other people with red tags.
I wonder if he is actually going to defend himself here other than giving out negative trust to shut me up?
OgNasty should not be trusted. end of my discussion.

In that case I'd like to suggest LoyceV, they are extremely active and interested in moderation stuff, they are actually doing a lot of job on behalf of the moderators. if you were looking for suggestions.
The rest is up to the admin whether they want to hire more mods or not. IMO we should grab people like LoyceV before they get tired and quit their good job at finding bots and spammers.

Yes you should ban me and start abusing the trust system with your DT masters.