-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- My account <PrintMule> has been hacked/lost. Please reset the email to <########@###.com>. The current date is <14 December 2017>. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- <1F7qwE7nLLcnx5SPY7wYi8rYQHF2rQmGRU> <IGYhU9H9eNnr3fNwZHOk5EyQ/M6rraSViLw2RiZFxi0LH4as3nlBqnmsUwzoY/qo0XOiM7etWCyt/Vst6ReQHEw=> -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This message can't be verified, probably because the email address got removed. Try again using [code-tags].
|
|
|
I noticed textcoin is denominated in GB too btw. I think the high value of a full GB is fitting for what BB is. You can easily edit that. Thanks for the tip, but I can't seem to change it in the mobile wallet. It is set to bytes as a unit, but the message talks about GB. You can (manually) edit it before posting. It's just text.
|
|
|
Here is my signature: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is premium_domainer from bitcointalk.org. Help me to get my account back. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 14KTahF8SyH4ZBrBiNrYL8V9BXb7A6TL2p IE3YCA0/yDhUSf+fpC1og/Z/GyqpSA9Q/8eDlY6od7IdUvLwDeonQGcmxOc+jTQtMNUOMNbRhM9iywUrwH1iGmg= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I can't verify this signature. But, even if it would check out, it's something anybody can use. You should add more details and the date to the signed message, for example: This is BitcoinBazaar.net from Bitcointalk, today is January 13, 2018. My account premium_domainer got hacked. Help me to get my account back.
That being said, I can personally confirm user premium_domainer had links to PremiumBitcoins.com in his profile on October 22, 2016. It may not be enough to get your account back, but if you can post a small comment confirming the hack on PremiumBitcoins.com it could be enough to get it some red trust from DT2. (updated image host)
|
|
|
Honestly... move to somewhere where your government doesn't dictate how much electricity you can use, lol.
They seem to decide "when", and not "how much". It also seems like a very bad policy if they try to limit electricy consumption by creating daily rolling blackouts, while a user can use 200 kW for free! What they should do, is charge a normal price for electricity, and make it available all day. I'm curious: where is this place?
|
|
|
New users should be given links to the rules and maybe a FAQ (which I'm working on right now) which answers most of the commonly asked questions. Can this sent by PM to new users, in several messages, for instance one message after each post he makes, or one message per day? I have (some) hope new users are more likely to read it, if it's delivered in small chunks at a time, instead of the standard "yes I agree to all the terms that I never bothered to read".
|
|
|
It's the first time I hear about rushwallet, https://rushwallet.com/ shows: *** This site will no longer be available as of APRIL 15 2018 *** Please transfer your funds to a different wallet through the Settings (top right gears icon) Export Keys option From your old thread: When i click on export I get a brainwallet and my private key, that was not enough for me to load it into my bitcoin wallet client. If you have a private key, why isn't that enough? One of the most recommended/used wallets is Electrum. Can you import your private key here? Out of curiosity and as a sanity check: do you really have 20 different wallets with 0.0007 BTC each? Update: I've just tested it on site: I can create a wallet, export private keys, and indeed it gives me a Brain Wallet and a Private Key. You don't need the Brain Wallet, just import the private key into Electrum and you're done.
|
|
|
Based on what I read then, it had something to do with the Key not starting with the right digit/letter. Make sure you copy the correct private key, and nothing else. That way it should work. Should I then try the ABC method of copying the folders to another PC or is there another better method?
I've never used it, so I'll leave this question for someone else.
|
|
|
I have BTC in Bitcoin Core, have never claimed BCH. I tried the Coinomi method and it did not work to claim the BCH. What exactly did you try? And why did you try this already if you still need to move your Bitcoin to a new safe address? These are the basic steps: -move all your Bitcoins to a new address -export the private keys to the Bitcoin addresses that held your coins at the moment of the fork -sweep the private keys into Coinomi, do this for Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold and Bitcore
|
|
|
My problem is that my wallet spent coins from this unconfirmed transaction. Which wallet do you use? I sometimes spend unconfirmed change, but only from my own transactions. I would never spend an incoming transaction before it's confirmed. The coins from the first transaction make up only a fraction of what I spent in this one. Are the coins involved in my second transaction held hostage until the first transaction confirms? You could abandon this transaction, and try to broadcast a new transaction without the unconfirmed input. How you can do this, depends on the wallet you use. My advice (in general) is to Enable coin control features and always manually choose which inputs to use for a transaction. If you know what you're doing, this puts you in complete control. Can I spend the confirmed coins in the second transaction's input list even though they are sitting on the second unconfirmed tx? Maybe. Dropping the transaction and double spending the other inputs normally works, but normally you'd do that to a transaction with a low fee. If my wallet didn't use unconfirmed coins, then this whole thing never would have happened. Correct. And a final question, will the first transaction ever be confirmed anytime soon?
Fees for a fast transaction have been relatively low today. If miners find a few blocks with not much time in between, it can drop low enough to confirm. In general fees are lowest on Sunday, so it could confirm in 2 days.
|
|
|
Is there anything I can do if I'm not the sender of the transaction? Not really, it's a very big transaction with 0.1BTC in fee already. It would cost a lot more to accelerate it.
|
|
|
I don't think people use bots to do whole bounty process, but this is what I see a lot:
1: newbie with 1 post joins a certain bounty 2: next post: another newbie with 1 post joins 3: next post: another newbie with 1 post joins
Can't help thinking that must be one person .... I'm surprised they even allow Newbies to join, if there's anything I've learned during my time managing (Bitcoin) giveaway campaigns, it's that many people love joining with many accounts. I can only conclude they simply don't care about fake entries: they're giving away a small fraction of the tokens they've created out of thin air, and make a huge profit off it once it's hyped enough. The more they spam, the more profit they make. I'm increasingly noticing more and more campaigns that are paying newbies because why the hell not. If you've premined a crapcoin for free then it doesn't matter who you pay as long as they're spamming your advert all over which is all they want at the end of the day.
My thoughts exactly! I would love to stop reporting my work on the forum, but I have to report. I was under the impression this isn't even allowed: Specifically, you are not allowed to give people any incentive to post insubstantial posts in your threads. You can't offer to pay people who post their addresses, usernames, etc. Most bounty-threads have hundreds of posts showing nothing more than endless lists of links to twitter and facebook. The bounty board has more than 300 different topics bumped up within 24 hours. Most bounties are only used to hype some ICO, and after the creator gets his money, he moves on to the next similar project to do the same again. According to theymos' definition, most "Initial Coin Offerings" actually sells Tokens, not Coins. Wouldn't it be time to enforce using the right terms, in other words, take away the advantage of using the overly hyped word ICO and force them to call it an ITO if they sell tokens? Agreed to some point, people would be hesitant to pay 100$ for one account, that too in a forum. I just realized one more thing, since a lot of shit posters are from India, not all of them but most. Paying a 100$ would be a little too much, here's the math:- 1$=63 rupees or so. 100$=~6300 rupees. I have heard a lot of people get food for around 30-40 rupees per meal, a lot of Asians would be grieve-struck, if they have to pay a 100$ for such. Also will legitimate users would also have to pay for this? I think it's a ridiculous amount to pay $100 to be able to use a signature on an account on a forum! But, my signature pays me an even bigger amount, so if required, I'd pay it instantly. When I had my first signature payment, it was worth $16.64. Back then, I wouldn't pay $100 for a signature. It may even backfire: the industrial scale farmers could just add the cost to their business model, while normal users back out. I can even imagine the Lending-section will get a new business model: get a $100 loan based on the quality of your past posts, so you can afford to buy a signature and pay back the loan. Paying for a signature won't stop the bounty-spam though.
|
|
|
Yes, my wallet is in the list, but as I said above the exchange I was sending to now shows new address. Was this HitBTC by any chance? I've read about problems like this before.
|
|
|
Newbie Mark R. Slater posted this totally off-topic collection of outdated data: 5 or 10 years is not a road, it probably goes 5 or 10 years Bitcoin prices are likely to exceed $ 100,000 over the next 10 years, up nearly 36 times from the recent peak of $ 2,780. That's from analyst Kay Van-Petersen, who predicted exactly the momentum of this virtual currency this year.
In December of the same year, Saxo Bank (Denmark) published its annual report called "Outrageous Predictions." One of the predictions is that the bitcoin price will reach $ 2,000 in 2017. By the time the report was released, bitcoin traded at $ 754. Five months later, bitcoin reached $ 2,000 on May 20, 1977, an increase of 165%.
Now, the prediction is that Kay Van-Petersen is looking at the long term and thinks bitcoin will continue to appreciate. I can't find an exact copy, it looks like it was rewritten from for example https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-could-hit-100-000-051325607.html . Either way, he's a shitposter with irrelevant posts, please stop him before he pollutes the forum more.
|
|
|
So, I looked up the wallet it was being sent to and it showed up in another transaction with with 23 confirmations, but I have not received the btc. Do you mean you looked up the address on a block explorer, or did you see 23 confirmations in your wallet? Is your receiving address in this list? If it is, and your wallet doesn't show it, it might be out of sync.
|
|
|
I assume you've downloaded https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin, just search for the hash eternalgloom mentioned. Quick and dirty, but it works: bitcoin-master $ for i in `find`; do grep 000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f $i 2> /dev/null; done settings['genesis'] = '000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f' genesis=000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f assert(consensus.hashGenesisBlock == uint256S("0x000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f")); src/bitcoin-cli -named getblock blockhash=000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f Or, if you want to see which files contain these lines: bitcoin-master $ for i in `find`; do if [ -n "`grep 000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f $i 2> /dev/null`" ]; then echo $i; fi; done ./contrib/linearize/linearize-data.py ./contrib/linearize/example-linearize.cfg ./src/chainparams.cpp ./doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.14.0.md
|
|
|
It is my understanding that if I no longer sync that wallet I will not broadcast the transactions and in 20 days ( Bitcoin Core ) will be drop from all memory pools so my BTC will 'return' to source . That's not enough, Bitcoin Core will just re-broadcast it again when you start it. What can I do ? The best solution for me is to drop the transactions and 'return' the bitcoins to the source wallet . You can manually remove the transactions from Bitcoin Core: -Exit Bitcoin Core -Backup your wallet.dat, even though you should have a backup already, make another backup -Start Bitcoin Core from a command prompt with options -zapwallettxes -rescan (if you're using a pruned wallet, you can't use this) Depending on your hardware, it will take a few hours to rescan. After this, your transactions should be gone, but Bitcoin Core might pick them up from mempool again. In that case just wait for it to drop again. Full description of the commands: -zapwallettxes=<mode> Delete all wallet transactions and only recover those parts of the blockchain through -rescan on startup (1 = keep tx meta data e.g. account owner and payment request information, 2 = drop tx meta data) -rescan Rescan the block chain for missing wallet transactions on startup Another tip: don't use inputs like this one: 17h6vyHcZee6VAxeTvgbhALFvbzZpv9KC9 (0.00000001 BTC - Output) It's Bitcoin dust, and costs you a lot more in fees than it's worth. If you Enable coin control features (click Settings > Options > Wallet), you can manually select which Inputs to use when you make a transaction. Don't use these very small inputs. One last thing: You also own Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold and Bitcore! If you didn't know this yet: it's worth about $700 in total. After moving your Bitcoins, I can explain how to claim it if needed.
|
|
|
I agree spam like +1 should be deleted or plagiarism but if a guy is posting in a 2nd or 3rd language have a little understanding. I don't think anybody complains about a Newbie posting a serious question/problem in Bitcoin Technical Support in very broken English. I don't report them, I answer them (if I can). They don't get banned for that. I think it's pretty clear when a "kid from a third world country" tries to post "English" just to earn from a signature campaign. That's what it's about. I've posted (in English) on an Italian board too, but I did it only once, on a subject that interested me. or come away smelling of curry at best. That's Indians, not Filipinos
For what it's worth: English isn't my first language either, I know my limitations, and I see native speakers who just write better sentences than I do.
|
|
|
At that time I just registered an account, just a novice, do not understand the rules of the forum Copyright violations are illegal in all modern countries. Not understanding the rules is no excuse. I just made such a, if you want to ban, then you should tell me, but have passed more than two months, then I never paste copy If you ban me because of a reply I received more than two months ago, I think it is not fair What's not fair about it? Copy/pasting is hard to catch, once caught, you get banned. Looking at your post history, it's either stuff I can't read, or "tweet and retweet". You won't be missed. Note that the ban is for you, as a person. You're not allowed to create another account and continue posting outside of Meta.
|
|
|
|