Read the tag, it says that I have claimed OgNasty is giving positive trust to people using his escrow, spoiler alert: he does.
Where do you find this claim to be false?

I have already posted my evidence, you needed evidence right? read the post above and prove me wrong instead of tagging me to have it your way. if the OP is considered "lies" then prove me wrong. but no you want to bully me like you have bullied people for years.

You can't just tag people after they called you out, that's abuse of power. if you believe that I am lying then defend yourself with words not with negative trust, you should know it better that negative trust generally means that somebody is a scammer no matter how much you try to put it otherwise.

I'm not a scammer, find something really untrustworthy and then tag me based on it, until then it's not fair.

Here is the evidences of massive trust abuse of this forum bully, note that he has tagged me after I called him out to be a trust abuser. literally when you speak against somebody they should tag you with red right?

I have evidence to back up my claims, why did you tag me?



So you have handed out positive trust for somebody who is supporting your project?


Again, another supporter of his project, you can get a positive trust from this bully by supporting his project aka paying money to him in exchange receive green trust.


I think you are in bed with this member, that's why you have tagged so many people for extorting them allegedly. can we know the reason for this green trust? they have earned your trust maybe by paying you? who knows right? because there is no evidence and ref link we could say that you are in bed with this member.


So you got paid with money as your escrow fee and just handed out a positive trust? cool, nothing wrong with that right? you are trusted by default so whatever you say is legit? not.


Again, supporter of his project, I'm accusing you of selling green trust to this member because there is no reference link to prove otherwise, do you have any evidence to back this up? because I'm accusing you for selling green trust.


I think you were paid with money to hand out this positive trust, can you prove otherwise?


I strongly believe that you got paid with money to hand out this positive trust, can you prove otherwise?


I am accusing you of trust abuse by giving positive trust to these members with no reference, I think you were paid with money to tag them with green, can you prove otherwise?


You do use default trust in exchange of money you lying two face trust abuser.


Do you need more evidence from me? be my guest and check his trust page OgNasty is a blatant trust abuser and he has been on this business for years. shame on you, you can't get away with such money you have earned.

---

EDIT: OgNasty is literally scamming other escrows by giving positive trust to people who'd use his escrow service to attract more clients for himself, to give an incentive to people so that they go and use his escrow services just to get a green trust score, in another words OgNasty is stealing the opportunity from other escrows by doing this. untrustworthy and unethical DT1 member and he should not be trusted and hold any power here.

Yes I agree with you not. giving somebody 20 merits is not an excuse, it's simply being lazy ass merit source, or giving 5 merits to every single post you come across and like is also being lazy.
That's on you, if you want to keep meriting people like that. but sending merits to ANN threads or garbage posts is not OK. again this might be another of many double standards of our dear DT members. if some of the DT members have tagged people for similar merit transactions they should tag them all especially after they get to know about such cases.

Need I remind you that I'm not a garbage poster hunting for bounties to need a second chance. you look up to DT members as sort of an authority while they are humans, totally random human beings only in a position of default trust list and they are abusing other people. I will speak out against any fucking tyranny whenever I see it. they are deceiving, manipulating and earning trust and money, not to mention that they are corrupt.


I'm not harassing anybody here, I'm being harassed by them. what I am doing is questioning the legitimacy of their positive and negative trust feedbacks, if people claim that trust system is decentralized and unmoderated, I'm calling it bullshit because it's not.
We all know that marlboroza got on DT2 after he tagged me for the first time and after he removed the tag he got worried that he might lose his status and tagged me again after I PMed him to ask for help after suchmoon tagged me. so yes I don't believe he is trying to help people rather saying who is scammer and untrustworthy and who is not.

He is not in any position to tag people and tell them what to do in order to get rid of the red trust, this could be the start of a long con being played by him. first he would start tagging ICO scammers and bounty hunters with a promise of removing the tags after they have deleted all the evidence to send a message to other scammers, next time when they see him near their scam ICOs they might even submit to whatever he asks from them.


I don't have Telegram, you will never find a Telegram account associated with me. need I to remind you again what kind of a hypocrite you are?
 

The only nonsense I can see here is from you and not me, nobody cares about the reputation of 2 random newbies. maybe you could go and lie more that you are selling 200K Bitcoins.

Bump, marlboroza is helping scammers to get away with promoting scam ICOs and he has tagged me when I tried to help people. this DT2 member is directly moderating the trust system by tagging or removing the red tags on people.
I still have a red trust from marlboroza by offering a service which has nothing to do with anybody other than me and a possible client.
I have offered a service with clear and transparent terms, I didn't ask for money for doing nothing, I asked for money in exchange for my time spent on reputation cases, tell me where is the thing that could be considered untrustworthy?
Ignore me and someday you'll be ignored when you face the same situation.

Prove what? I'm more interested in you proving that you are actually in business with rich people holding thousands of Bitcoins, can you prove that? IMO you don't have any reputation in this forum and I think you are a liar.

For somebody who is involved with Billionaires I wonder why do you keep bitching about some random newbie? you are indeed fake news.

These are blatant misuse of merits and they should be punished, maybe they're alt accounts of DT members and that's why they are not receiving any negative trust? nobody knows. meriting garbage posts with 50 or 31 or 27 is a blatant merit abuse.

I can confirm that OgNasty is a blatant bully and trust abuser, just look at his ratings. I specifically have a problem with one of his tags on owlcatz where he calls OgNasty scammer and OgNasty tags him with red for calling him scammer. this is bullying but unfortunately OgNasty has paid Bitcoins to this forum and therefore he will stay on DT. does it actually matter for anybody if he is a bully? I don't think so. I'm starting to realize why suchmoon countered his tag on owlcatz, we need a DT member to counter all of the unjust negative feedbacks of this bully.

EDIT: OgNasty is also handing out positive trust in exchange of money, note that he is giving positive trust to anybody who uses his escrow service aka when he gets paid for acting as escrow, he tags people with green.

Yes, go ahead and tag a newbie with 0 post, 0 activity and 0 merit. they have collected the money and now are jumping on pussies somewhere safe. I'm sorry for those who got scammed, never invest in any ICO. how many times do we need to tell you that all of the ICOs are scam with 1-3 exceptions.


There is no project, no Cibus, it was all a scam scheme and now they're gone. btw they will use all of the KYC documents to impersonate their victims, this is why I say that you should never provide your KYC to anybody unless you know for sure they are regulated.

First of all thank you for merit dashboard, it's a very useful tool and secondly I still have 9 sMerits left to distribute. some of my recent sent merits are not good compared to before when I was still a source but that's how I am, irresponsible little troll.
I think merit sources should merit legendaries less and focus on those who need to rank up, after all that's the reason for merit system.

I'd suggest you to report his posts and include: "this member is only posting very short posts and insubstantial posts". I'm sure they will ban him for extremely low quality posts.

How could you not know if you have received this garbage token? stop dreaming about getting paid for receiving merits, theymos said something to encourage people on earning merits by constructive posts. this topic now turned out to be advertising for this token.

Be grateful you were not tagged left and right, inventor of game theory lol. you would like others to filter the content for you so that you could easily skip the trolling? good luck with that.
I must admit this thread is one of the best topics I have ever seen since a year now, @theymos please don't ban people because of their opinions, if this dude is in opposition of Bitcoin core, let them discuss, we need to hear everybody and their sides of arguments, his posts is better than usual sig campaign garbage posters. just promise that you are not going to break the rules man, we are also human beings and participate here and we are also following the same rules, asking you to respect these rules is the most civil request IMO.

Quoting for future reference, I wonder if this advice is tag worthy? I remember a few days ago KWH tagged somebody for something similar while that was a misunderstanding, I don't think this one is though. nobody should ever suggest to banned members to go and get a new account. I wouldn't expect anything less from somebody who has the habit of giving access of his account(s)? to other people.

Welsh. he is active and a good reporter, he is also not biased. I don't see why Welsh shouldn't be a moderator. and about the biggest bully in this forum aka OgNasty, he could keep at bullying people with red tags and distribute merits, nothing else.

I'm here to reserve for any translation for any dead and or alive languages, let us promote this shitcoin together.

Hey I would like to offer my translation services, Farsi to English and English to Farsi. I'm here in case you need to scam Farsi speaking people.