I was very disappointed when she sent a letter calling Jon to bend the knee
That was very shitty, I was expecting her to side by Jon and allow them to hold the North
It sounds bad and should not be mentioned in his letter, that Jon should kneel in front of Daenerys. I really wondered if Jon would do that kneel in front of Daenerys and become an ally. Can not wait to see Jon and Daenerys meetings He read only Tyrions letter in episode 2, I'm unsure if Deny sent a seperate letter or that was the one o.o If it was, the knee bending was avoided  I believe Jon has too much honor to bend the knee However, he puts the battle against the dead above all else and might put aside his honor He does have people beliving in him though everybody will agree that this series is full of sureprise,at the begining i guest that Eddard Stark will keep alive until end the season,but at the season 1,he murdered. and now i just think Jon snow Bran Stark will grow with new strength and conquer the westernos.
Bran is definitely not going to conquer westeros I was very disappointed when she sent a letter calling Jon to bend the knee
That was very shitty, I was expecting her to side by Jon and allow them to hold the North
It sounds bad and should not be mentioned in his letter, that Jon should kneel in front of Daenerys. I really wondered if Jon would do that kneel in front of Daenerys and become an ally. Can not wait to see Jon and Daenerys meetings You know the one who really doesn't want the throne will end up becoming the King of westerns. Jon Snow has no ambition of being king and he is actually the rightful king of Westeros. As he is the son of Rhaegaer himself, he has more right than even the Dragon King but if you seek allies , you don't tell them to bend the knee. He is, but how can you prove his legitimacy? Joffrey and Tommen were born out of incest in no relation to Robert but their reign wasn't disputed Him being the legitimate heir doesn't hold much influence Most likely neither Jon Snow or Daenerys since I don't see the point in that, I would venture to say that one of them will die and if you press me I would say it will be Daenerys. Jon Snow is not fit to be a king or a ruler, more of a leader and will most likely remain that, so maybe he will hand of the king to whoever gets that title.
However I still think a Stark will rule coming full circle to Ed Stark, so I would say that Sansa is the one that makes most sense now plus it will be a nice story arc for her. We are getting some glimpses here and there from her evolution, if that continues to happen then look out...
He is a leader, not a hand of the king I don't believe he'll assume such a function A woman? I don't think so. |
|
|
|
I like how sansa's character has evolved from season 1 up to now. Today it seems she's the scheming type much like that of baelish. I think she's even more dangerous than him now but it's possible she may end up dead this or next season. I think Jon also will sacrifice perhaps his king in the north status to get dany's help in the coming war.
Indeed, the dead are defeated by fire Deny has 3 dragons They are the biggest hope there are to defeating the Night King I was very disappointed when she sent a letter calling Jon to bend the knee That was very shitty, I was expecting her to side by Jon and allow them to hold the North Theon and his sister are even now! I think that's hilarious even though I probably shouldn't laugh about it. Well, you have understand him. It's not his fault. After going through what he went through every single person on this planet would be psychologically damaged beyond repair, there's no way in hell he could influence his own actions all the time beyond his instincts and fear projected from previous torture. --- About Baelish They're very ungrateful towards him He saved their fcking asses in front of Winterfell, didn't he help Sansa escape too? They should be grateful to him for eternity, not dissing him like this |
|
|
|
I read through this thread and in general everyone seems to be quite impressed by this mix (no pun intended) of mixing coins and gambling.
But have anyone actually tested this gambling while mixing thing and can share the first-hand opinion about this service? Worth or not?
3% House Edge seems kinda high considered that standard minimum mixing fee is 0.5% plus 0.0005 for every forward address.
You are talking about the wrong mixer. ChipMixer doesn't require you to pay any fees, and you can get multiple chips of Bitcoin without paying an additional fee. Gambling isn't there for hardcore gamblers to play a lot with, but rather for people that might be mixing coins and want to try to throw people trying to track their Bitcoin off by ending with more BTC than they deposited. He's talking about the house edge not the fee There is no fee for mixing on ChipMixer but it's expected of you to donate a small amount or gamble a small amount After all, you are using a free service, you should give them some reward for providing the service did anybody try this service so much scammers out there and need a food mixer since bitmixer.io close the doors
They had a giveaway thread for testing purposes where they gave out 0.01-0.02 BTC to 10 people to test the website out (in vouchers) Withdrawals were sucessful |
|
|
|
LoLz... declaration like this wont help. U need to show where your bitcoins are and sign a message from that address. Moreover, 500$ is less than 0.2 BTC right. Come up with at least 10+ BTC.
Also, what's the max. bet 25$  |
|
|
|
You site just came and you really think people will invest in new site without any credibility.
First build trust with community then start taking any investment.
This is true. @OP If you want to, I can escrow some cold storage funds for you, so you have some credibility for payouts. |
|
|
|
You should make a detailed description of the website as in writing: - house edge - provable fairness - bankroll - why you should play here etc. Just writing what do you think about pandadice.com is a bad idea |
|
|
|
Bitcasino.io - 4.5
Fortunajack - 2
Betcoinag - the lowest possible
I don't want to be rude against fortune jack but I lost a lot of money over there
That's not a good measure for a grade. That's what gambling is. You can (will) lose money in the best casino possible because that's what gambling is - gambling. |
|
|
|
The thing is. If you going to cheat at live sport and match fix you going to have to know about it and have players agree. Many people will know and have to be apart of it and that is much harder to do then having one person control a casino and cheating. Also match fixing you under time restrain.
Its still possible. But I really doubt it happens much.
You know, one player sports exist too Also, if you're a goalkeeper in football, it's fairly easy for you frame the match The problem with this is that most sportsbookies that accept bitcoin accept only the major games and leagues, and have max. bet or max. wins.
Players playing these matches in major leagues often earn a lot more than they'll be able to win by forfeiting the game when they place a bet.
Would it be worth it for them?
It wouldn't be. It's possible for them to earn a lot on a fix just that one time, but it's very risky. The only situation that would make it worth trying is if the fixers were to retire after that match anyway due to health condition or they knew the club is not going to renew their contract. Well, I don't think bitcoin bookies offer things like the Turkish league or 2nd German league Which are actually good leagues However, the French,English etc. leagues offer a better reward than betting for example 10 BTC and framing the match I'm completely unsure what the max.bets are so I'm in no position to argue for this |
|
|
|
|
The problem with this is that most sportsbookies that accept bitcoin accept only the major games and leagues, and have max. bet or max. wins.
Players playing these matches in major leagues often earn a lot more than they'll be able to win by forfeiting the game when they place a bet.
Would it be worth it for them?
|
|
|
|
XMR hot wallet has been empty for a week.
looks like either they are out of funds or they don't care paying attention to the user experience on the site. XMR is doing fine, people made deposit and withdrawal normally now and last week. Please note that PID is mandatory and you can't withdraw to your deposit address. If you still have any trouble please drop me an email and I'll check for the reason why your withdrawal was failed. hey SafeDice, what about any possible disruption on the Bitcoin network that might happen in case of a split.
What are your plans? Will you stop deposits, investiments, withdrawals, bets etc.?
After your site was affected by several DDOS I have left but I would like to join and play again so I would like to know more about the above.
Thanks
Deposit and investment will work normally and it shouldn't affect us in any way. I'm considering to stop automated withdrawal for some short period of time, until the fork is becoming more stable. This is similliar to the same statement I made when we had discussion on bitcoin unlimited. I don't see what could be the possible problems not removing automated withdrawals? I have also expereienced an empty hot wallet, however, the next time I logged in I was able to withdraw without a problem So, I see you're working on it, just try to have a bit more funds in your hot wallets as a lot of users have complained they weren't able to withdraw at a certain time. Do you mean it's completely ok to remove automated withdrawal for the critical period? I think so, but I'll try to minimize the downtime for user convenient. Thank you for confirming the withdrawal. I have refilled the hot wallet again, and will keep on monitoring the balance. It's okay to remove it, but minimize the downtime, set it up again and require more confirmations but let it work. I might be missing something, you know how your automatization works Awesome  Yeah, it's no problem, I have always been able to withdraw my BTC |
|
|
|
Does it include only casinos or dice sites are elgible too? If it's casino only FortuneJack - 5 CloudBet- 5 Betcoin.ag - 1.49 Otherwise I'd give a 5 to PrimeDice too |
|
|
|
I'm still looking forward to the continuation of this coin and project, when ICO 1 btc = 100 Time and I join at ICO, expect the price to go up to the minimum price at ICO.
that look like half price from ico , that is very bad! why, is look nice project to me, no dev team support? The dev is pretty active actually, I myself also don't quite understand the fall in value. Probably a whale in need of money making a dump? |
|
|
|
They don't want to take a risk and want to collect the most deposits so they are playing safe. If more number of days means many people get a chance to invest. Slowly all other big casinos will also follow similar ways to collect the money.
I mean there's almost no doubt the funds are safe and we believe Dean will turn us a profit. What most bankroll investors probably wouldn't like to do is their bitcoins laying around doing nothing for a month, so that's the thing I'm saying. I would understand if the money was being gathered for programmers or something, but bankroll investments for a month, damn |
|
|
|
....
@OP Can you explain how did you calculate the house edge? I'm not an expert in this but would expect to receive 1.99*my bet if the HE is 1% ( you offer only 1.98*my bet ).
1.98x is 1% house edge. 1.99x is 0.5% house edge. Google for more... OP, you 1st need to add bitcoin and then may be a wagering contest will be the best way to promote your game. But with escrow of the prize. Otherwise nobody will participate. But it makes no sense. According this logic the 1.5x payout would be 25% HE and 1x payout would be 50% HE ? How come Theoretical max HE should be 100%. Thats why I asked how it is calculated as I have no experience and just tried to apply common sense. I did some quick googling and found this formula: House edge = 1 - (return / loss) (source) which gives me -98% ( assuming this number reflects the 2% HE). Feel free to educate me. The replies you got are unecessarily complicated Just look at it like this What's 1% of 2? It's 0.02 Which means 99% of x2 would be x1.98 Simple as that. |
|
|
|
There is something big comming for all poker players. PreReg here to save your share: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2028077.0For this thread, tell me and others what is important for you as a poker player - Is poker gambling or sport in your eyes? What you expect from a pokerroom of your dreams? If you don't play, do you want to lern this game and how to play it with profit? What did you like more, CashGame or SnGs/MTTs? I'm happy to read your answers! What's "something big" for all poker players? What is that, that you're going to innovate in the poker industry? Well, I guess everyone would like to play with profit, but that's impossible since there's the same number of people at the table and most profits go to 1 or 2 people SNGs are fun if they're free or low entry, Cash games are the usual thing people play I think? It's just a simple cash bet, nothing complicated Probably a new poker site, or some poker tournament. I also think that this will be a tips and hin on how to play poker but it seems it is more of a project going to launch. Is there an ICO for this? Well, you see, that's why I asked what's something big for all poker players. A new poker website isn't something big for all poker players, it sounds like some innovations are announced. This was a question for OP, have I gotten it right or it's a general poker site? |
|
|
|
where's the signature for full member?
There isn't one unforunately  We'll have to contact kingcarsen in order to have one made |
|
|
|
announcing game 60th
bet is done with 0.05 for 2.550 on the home team to win
announcing game 61st
bet is done with 0.05 for 1.699 on the home team to win
wish me good luck
game 60th was a loss game 61st was a winner stats are updated Confirmed Damn it, so much confirming with no reward |
|
|
|
announcing game 62nd
bet is done with 0.05 for 2.130 on the home team to win
wish me good luck
Confirming bets 60 to 62. |
|
|
|
Payout is automatic after 1 confirmation. Run away with 0.01LTC? ($0.45) Nope, I was talking about the credibility for other deposits Anyways, good job starting the giveaway Wishing you all the best |
|
|
|
I believe in new future gambling sites are going to support to gamble even with lesser than one satoshi. There are lot of speculations about bitcoin prices reaching to some unimaginable levels in millions hence to support gamblers with possible minimum I guess gambling sites may go for diving one satoshi into centi and then milli so that they can keep the same level of USD equivalent minimum betting for gambling.
The biggest advantage of crypto based gambling must be enabling us to gamble even with the value lesser than one USD cent. But the recent price up surge of bitcoin is making this capability of crypto gambling practically impossible but I believe we can switch over to other altcoins so that we can still enjoy gambling with least possible amount of money. Exchanges are having the practice of switching over to litecoin denominated trading when bitcoin denominated trading reaches no buyer even for 1 satoshi. Same thing could be followed for gambling. That's all. Wait for August 1 and we won't have to use altcoins in order to make low value deposits How sure are you that it would happen? You seems so sure about your statement. There is no guarantee about your implication of a fork that would happen on august 1. Also, why would we be able to make low value deposits by that time, in case there would be a fork? With new implementations fees will go down significantly. Remember when we could send bitcoin transactions without fees at all and they would go through in a day? I do, and I believe we'll come close to it, not free, but certainly not as big as today! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
