Please post in bigger fonts. I enjoy it the same way as when someone screams out an argument. Louder and more annoying always makes an argument more persuasive and accurate.

Anyway, I did post an answer earlier, but you chose to ignore it. And I expected you would. Nobody here has an exact list for you, and it may be difficult seeing as distribution is not even over yet. There is no need to repeatedly post the same thing, in giant letters, unless you simply wish to confirm your troll status even further.

You asked your questions... if not answered by the time distribution is complete, ask again like a normal human.

They aren't even finished yet --


There are/were lists for distribution either on the old thread, or on ecoiner, or somewhere. But again, it'd probably make more sense to wait until distribution is finalized.

They have stated the amount in the lost wallet and put a fix in.

Not that I expect any answers will matter to you.

I don't call people a troll when they bring up concerns. I call people trolls when they post in giant letters and feel a need to repeat themselves nonstop ... post over and over the same exact things, and expect the dev to somehow magically drop whatever he is doing (I would expect he is at work) and answer questions immediately.

As for the distribution, I may be incorrect, but don't even think they are 100% finished yet, as they have that reconsideration thing on their 1st page.

The higher the price, the more the trolls will come out to play.

You'll have those who didn't receive a stake, or 2nd stake, and angry about it.
And you'll get those who cashed out early on and are feeling bad that the price is now higher.
You'll also get those who simply want to buy in cheap and get the price down a bit.

I believe Brewer did come out later on (semi recently) saying they were reviewing mazacoin, which is more than he ever said previously. At least he publicly admitted he knew what it was.

But no, no public statements from the tribe saying they already accepted it has come out.

Hmm... an eensy, teensy piece of the Earth. Maybe a grain?

Although I am not sure if I see the point based on EAC's current prices. I don't think many people will be buying things with sat equivalents of EAC.

I agree. It's not like either option is so great. It's difficult to come up with another rational explanation though.

I've wondered about that. It could explain the hesitance to fork as well.

I have a hard time coming up for a rational explanation otherwise. Basically everything AP says or does seems designed to drive the price of the coin down. I also don't get the 'long term' outlook statements, as at some point, don't they kinda need to give the Lakotas their mazacoin? And what use is it if it's worth less than a $1 per 1000? They can't say that in 5+ years they plan to give the coin out, as the coin will be long dead by then.

So maybe he is just gobbling up cheap coins, with the idea the CNN story, or some news, will then spike up the price later.

Or he is just grossly incompetent.

I meant they may charge coin makers for the privilege of getting rated. And that is dangerous territory.

I think such groups rating coins are on their way, regardless of what this forum does. I do question if they are needed for coins like rapecoin/scamcoin/fuckcoin and the like, however. I mean, what type of person needs a rating group to tell them that those coins may not be wise investments?

I'd be fine with some forum moderation here, within reason. To be honest, I was surprised when I started here and saw basically no moderation whatsoever. I'd say removing anything promoting illegal activity wouldn't be such a bad idea. It doesn't matter though what we say, as if moderators haven't done anything about it by now, I doubt they will.

You automatically assume I felt the OP was not qualified, I see.

I never said such. I simply asked if the OP had any qualifications that would make him appropriate to start such a group.

If a new member, they may not have the background as to know what type of people post in this forum or enough experience with cryptos. Hence why I asked. And if not a new member, we'd question why they are using a fake account.

Edited: mistakenly thought the OP was replying.

Yeah, that is another valid point. If someone needs a group to tell them that they shouldn't invest their life savings into Herpes Coin or Rape Coin, they have bigger problems than how to invest in a coin. They should see a doctor as perhaps they just had a stroke or fell on their head one too many times.

What people probably could use, but it's out of our hands, is real forum moderation. And I don't mean censorship. I mean outright scams (like nearly 100% certain it's a scam), trolling, and coins that are over the top offensive or clearly pure junk (such as those promoting illegal activity) ... could be cleaned up from the forum. There is no way to stop people from making terrible coins, nor should anyone even try to stop them. But the forum can be  moderated to a somewhat normal extent.

Again, no way to make the moderators do this, however.

And what is your background and why do you feel you are qualified to start this type of group?

As stated by someone else, if you want distinguished members here, you may have slim pickings if you want honest appraisals. Many distinguished people here are 'distinguished' for their bad behavior .. the same people who formed that shitcoin killing group. And the same people who have scammed and cheated people here with their shitcoins, or have taken part in their own shady dealings.

And forum moderators barely show up here at all, as from what I can see. Normal moderated forums would have removed coins like rapecoin as soon as they were posted -- both for moral reasons, and legal reasons.

Sad as it is to say, this place is not the place to look for honest members who can fairly review coins. You'll basically end up with scammers reviewing other coins from scammers.

Anyway, I believe the exchanges may be arranging something like this anyway? Or some group is. I recall the NobleCoin dev commenting on some groups forming as a way to rate coins. If they charge for it, it's bad news. If free, and if the members are professionally organized (meaning not based on some forum post), I guess it could be better than nothing.

Submitted an application too.

If you have a ton of NAS to give out and not enough takers, offer the same deal to Cryptorush/Coinex people... although I expect that may require an awful lot of free coin to make up for the pain.

I think maza is the first coin where the devs actively seem to hate its supporters. And yeah, he basically called everyone a troll. Such a bizarre mindset. Forget the fork, the coin has other problems besides the fact there are too many coins.

Maybe he will call people who hate his website a troll too? And by changing his website, which was designed with the Master Coin Website formula, it would disrupt the longterm price of the coin?

It's almost like Maza is the Anti-Community coin.

I am not so sure I would say someone is trolling if they aren't completely objective, but everyone will have a different definition for a troll. I haven't seen much trolling at all in this thread. As an example, look at the past history for Spoetnik's posts, and you can see troll-like behavior. Although I will give him credit in this thread and say he has been rather reserved. I wish he posted like this more often.

As for the coin, the thing is, we really invest in the developer when we purchase a coin. Yes, of course the coin specs matter, but we need to both trust the dev and believe he will actively support the coin in a way that makes sense. So when we spend money on a coin, it's really a bet on the developer. Would you trust this dev with your money? If you say yes, it's about the same as saying you'd happily give up your money to that late night host on an infommercial. Do you believe this dev has good judgment? I don't think any sane person would say yes.

And scam is overused as a term here, although one could say the dev does appear to be somewhat shady with how he set things up. He is relying on a false market cap based on the premine and making outlandish claims. And although I believe in assuming a person is innocent, when there is a 97% premine, or whatever insane number there is, and the dev holds it in its entirely ... let's just say even I am not that trusting.

A centralized cryptocurrency is sort of the opposite of what most here believe in. There is also an outright flaw in the coin's objectives, as you can say if the premine is used properly, cities and boats and whatever is possible. But a fake market cap does not equate to actual money. There is nobody to sell the coins to, no way to turn a fake cap of millions into real money. There is  2K daily volume. Maybe the dev can buy a tent and a sailboat for his Utopia? So the flaws with such a vision is you need to have blind trust in the dev, and there needs to be an actual demand and use for the coin. In this case, there really is neither.

Well, it's your money. If you feel safe investing in delusions, be my guest. And yes, many coins and new inventions may have great dreams. But there is a difference between an achievable dream and downright nuttiness.

It probably will bounce around marketcap, but so what? Again, I stated to look at volume, not its fake cap number.

People actually aren't even trolling in this thread, much to my surprise. Almost everyone thinks the coin looks way too fishy, relies on a gigantic premine, and the dev is using infommercial-speak on his website. The title of your thread is truth, scandal or scam. We offered our thoughts... just because we think negatively of the coin it doesn't make people a troll.

There is natural suspicion when new people seem pro anything in this forum. And in many cases, it's justified. I do admit it's suspcious that anyone would be pro-marine coin, and it does look bad since the dev has been known to spam and use sock puppets before.

But even dismissing that ... and even dismissing the giant premine, and the fact people are supposed to trust the dev. Simply look at the website --

'Designed to be the crypto standard for the next thousand years.'
'Marinecoin City Project, The Ultimate City for the Ultimate People.'
'The Maritime Tower, datacenter & central trading floor. NewYork City'

It reads like a bad infommercial. Either the developer is a scammer or clearly delusional .. or both. And the way the premine is set up, it basically games the market cap to make it look bigger than it really is. The key number to look at is volume. 24 hr volume of $2100. You can pick coins that nobody has heard of, with tiny market caps, that easily double that.

Odd how people with less than 500 posts and with 'member' next to their name, not 'full member' are trying to apply or re-apply at higher levels. Just be happy with whatever you got.