If something like that were the case and it were proven in future, it would ensure that no other President would ever be allowed to take office until their financial history were properly looked in to (far more than before) and candidate should ever be considered by any party until every single aspect of their financial dealing are laid out for all to see in order to ensure no conflict of interest and no corruption.
Trump did not even publish his tax returns, he should never have been allowed to stand as a candidate for any party.
....
Here's the problem with your assertion. (one problem... there are others) You've been non-stop slamming Trump's financial activities with zero proof, and very, very limited facts, because of your obvious political inclinations. Your own actions are the proof that such data should not be made public. It's pretty irrational to assume that Trump isn't guilty of Bank and Tax Fraud or that there's 'zero proof'. We have the NYTimes reports (including the one that won a Pulitzer for investigative journalism in 2018), we have documents, we know his personal lawyer and campaign chairman both went to prison for Bank and Tax Fraud. |
|
|
|
It is like thief dressed up like police officer saying 'hey lets catch the thief'...
Exactly. |
|
|
|
|
I really think you should leave the basic design (or lack of) as is. I like it.
|
|
|
|
|
nice try gosha.
pretty clever, but not clever enough.
|
|
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
4187
bc1qn3smfapysu8ac9xpqxp6dfxfg43qalxxezmvkt
|
|
|
|
Hi all -
Firstly, please accept our apologies for the delay in response and thank you to all - especially the senior members of the community - for your patience while we collated all of the relevant facts so that we could respond extremely accurately.
A comment on @efxes's case from Cloudbet.
1. Cloudbet does not accept players from USA. If USA players attempt to create an account, they see a clear message that their jurisdiction is prohibited.
2. If a player is found to be circumventing our automated checks and connects from a prohibited jurisdiction (such as USA), their account is immediately frozen pending an investigation. In this case, the player in question knowingly and deliberately circumvented our location checks, and was discovered and confirmed to be located in USA. They provided both ID and address proof from USA and also repeatedly attempted to login from USA IP addresses.
That the player is located in the USA is without doubt, and we prohibit all players from USA. That they knowingly and deliberately circumvented our country checks is also without doubt.
3. In accordance with our T&Cs, in these situations we reserve the right to void all bets and return their account balance, up to the sum of their deposits. Furthermore, we reserve the right to confiscate funds in certain cases (such as repeat offenders). We did not confiscate any funds in this case, but instead voided all bets.
4. In this particular case, the customer has already withdrawn more than the sum of their deposits and accordingly we consider the matter closed. If the player offers their consent, we can gladly share transaction hashes of all relevant transactions.
5. Additionally, the player is sharing information and making claims in public web forums (such as this one) that they know to be untrue. For example, the player claims they have provided us with address proof outside of the USA which is untrue. The player has also made other untrue claims - such as the size of their deposits.
6. We continue to have a duty of privacy to the player, so cannot publish information we have that directly contradicts their claims without the player's explicit consent. We can, however, share this with our regulator, or an arbiter with the player's consent. Additionally, if the player would like to consent to us sharing this information with select senior members of the community, we would be happy to do so.
7. If the player wishes to continue their claim, we strongly encourage the player to take their case to either Curacao eGaming or AskGamblers.com, either of whom will act as an arbiter. We agree to be bound by any ruling they make in this case.
Fellow members - we know the player is creating a lot of noise about this case, and we treat every claim of this nature seriously, but in this situation, the player knowingly tried to circumvent our rules, was caught, has already withdrawn more than their deposit, and is providing false information in public. We ask for the community's support to dismiss these false claims by the player.
Thanks
Team Cloudbet
Because Cloudbet has volunteered to go to arbitration I have removed my neg trust and support of flag. @efxes, You claimed that you sent proof to cloudbet that you were not in the United States when you opened your account and placed any wagers. They claim that you did not, and they are willing to use a third party to arbitrate. I think it's more likely that you are lying than them. Because this involves evidence that can't be made public, if you're actually telling the truth, you should work out arbitration and send them whatever documents you sent cloudbet. |
|
|
|
Hello, is it possible to please pay me back the money that was in the account that I deposited that day? Usually you pay back the account balance minus any winnings since the account was last zero'd out.
Is that not the case now? Cloudbet?
I can't take 48 hours off. You took my entire livelihood from me. This isn't a joke. This isn't going away.
You should take a break for a bit. This is going to be a long process and your chances aren't very good - constant posting will not help - in fact it might hurt. Mentally the money should be written off as a loss. |
|
|
|
Stop bumping the same thing over and over. The rule is once per 24 hours. If you have time to spam the forum you should have time to do a little thinking and realize your games aren't provably fair. Are you trying to bury the issue because you understand my explanation?
Why not just remove the provably fair claims so that players are deceived?
There are NO ANY ISSUE. I have answered your questions. I Will answer more, when I take time. The issue is your games aren't provably fair. If you have time to spam the forum you have time to take a second to understand what I'm saying. Answer
The important thing to note is that the card deck is shuffled before the game starts and before the player seed is passed and known by the server. This is guaranteed by revealing the server hash. Let's suppose the deck was shuffled or deliberately constructed in favor of the house. After the player starts a new game their seed is passed to the server. The server uses the seed to calculate the shift number (it's described how it's calculated on the provably fair verification page). Then the card deck is cut based on the shift number. The number of cards that will be cut is not known in advance (and can not be predicted without knowing the client seed), thus it's impossible to construct a deck that with any possible shift number would still provide advantage to the house. This makes it useless for the house to try to cheat and initially shuffle the deck in its favor.
No, it's not. If the deck is constructed so that no A, K, Q, J, or T of the same suit had less than 11 cards between them, with the last card being considered next to the first card - a royal flush would be impossible to hit regardless of the seed the player chooses.\ In order for the game to be provably fair, the player seed needs to effect the initial shuffle - not simply where the pre shuffled deck starts dealing from. Answer
The layout of the reels is provided in the each Slots game page.
Yeah I already mentioned I found them. Thanks. I was able to find the reel layouts, it's good you provide them.
But like in video poker, the player seed is limited in what it can influence since the initial result is generated non transparently. Maybe an actual example will help you understand. Here's the result of an initial shuffle, before the players seed is used to determine where to 'cut' the deck: D3,C7,S5,S7,HK,DA,C8,S2,DJ,DQ,CA,D7,H3,HT,S6,C2,ST,HA,H9,SA,CT,C3,H7,S3,S4,DT,D8,C4,H6,H5,H2,D2,D5,CJ,S8,D4,D9,SJ,CK,SK,DK,S9,CQ,HQ,H4,C9,C6,H8,C5,D6,HJ,SQ I color coded the royal flush cards. You'll notice that no matter where the deck is cut, the player has no chance at being dealt a royal flush. Can you prove that the the shuffle was not manipulated to make royal flush possibilities happen less often than they should?
There is no need to prove anything, because each user can see the full deck after the game is played and ensure that the deck wasn't manipulated to eliminate royal flush possibility. Ok, here's the full deck: D3,C7,S5,S7,HK,DA,C8,S2,DJ,DQ,CA,D7,H3,HT,S6,C2,ST,HA,H9,SA,CT,C3,H7,S3,S4,DT,D8,C4,H6,H5,H2,D2,D5,CJ,S8,D4,D9,SJ,CK,SK,DK,S9,CQ,HQ,H4,C9,C6,H8,C5,D6,HJ,SQ There's no royal flush possible. How do we know that it wasn't manipulated. The answer is "we don't". |
|
|
|
I believe that the rates of Covid being the SOLE cause of death to be infinitesimally small..
Yeah that's how viruses (or any deadly disease) work. Nobody died SOLEY from covid. |
|
|
|
I'll give you this, cause it is totally right.
I suppose everyone who is entering the debate facility could also submit to a test, but even doing that isn't going to rule out everything -- as people could be too early in the process to test positive for a test.
Another day in paradise, lol.
Part of the problem with the White House outbreak is that they put a lot of trust into notoriously unreliable rapid tests while ignoring most of the distancing and mask guidelines. Trump's team refused to wear masks in the first debate. Trump's now sick along with 30+ people linked to the White House. The administration has not been transparent in this whole fiasco. Given all that a virtual debate is absolutely the right decision. Not everyone has a chopper on stand by and a team of doctors with experimental drugs  Why? Because they choose to only listen to advice from those most qualified when it's not too inconvenient. The rapid testing wasn't too inconvenient. The rest was. I'm skeptical. Makes sense considering you think global cooling is the greatest threat to the planet. |
|
|
|
I'll give you this, cause it is totally right.
I suppose everyone who is entering the debate facility could also submit to a test, but even doing that isn't going to rule out everything -- as people could be too early in the process to test positive for a test.
Another day in paradise, lol.
Part of the problem with the White House outbreak is that they put a lot of trust into notoriously unreliable rapid tests while ignoring most of the distancing and mask guidelines. Trump's team refused to wear masks in the first debate. Trump's now sick along with 30+ people linked to the White House. The administration has not been transparent in this whole fiasco. Given all that a virtual debate is absolutely the right decision. Not everyone has a chopper on stand by and a team of doctors with experimental drugs Why? Because they choose to only listen to advice from those most qualified when it's not too inconvenient. The rapid testing wasn't too inconvenient. The rest was. |
|
|
|
|
After chickening out of the debate Trump called on Barr to be the greatest AG in history and indict Biden lol.
He wants to be a dictator so bad.
|
|
|
|
Trump throws a tantrum because he can't spread his " blessing"... no more debates I guess. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/08/politics/second-presidential-debate-virtual/index.htmlPresident Donald Trump said Thursday that he will not participate in the second presidential debate with Joe Biden after the Commission on Presidential Debates said the event will be held virtually in the wake of the President's positive coronavirus diagnosis.
"I am not going to do a virtual debate," Trump said on Fox Business. "I am not going to waste my time on a virtual debate." Biden should just ambush him by calling in while Trump is on Fox and Friends. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone else notice that fly on Pences head? It's been there for like 5 minutes now.
|
|
|
|
|
Polls are widening in favor of Biden, almost time for Russia to drop the Biden version of 'her emails'. I'm guessing Hunter will be involved - although, the topic backfired on him in the debate and got him impeached, so they might take a different route.
|
|
|
|
|
Wait so the entire league is taking a full week off? Just saw the next round doesn't start till the 17th. (obv a soccer n00b here)
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the VP Debate is tomorrow night, the Biden campaign already petitioned to have the podiums moved further apart but at this point in the campaign it still seems like such an unnecessary risk for Kamala to be in the same room as any member of team "don't worry about it!" |
|
|
|
Are you trying to bury the issue because you understand my explanation?
Why not just remove the provably fair claims so that players are deceived?
There are NO ANY ISSUE. I have answered your questions. I Will answer more, when I take time. The issue is your games aren't provably fair. If you have time to spam the forum you have time to take a second to understand what I'm saying. Answer
The important thing to note is that the card deck is shuffled before the game starts and before the player seed is passed and known by the server. This is guaranteed by revealing the server hash. Let's suppose the deck was shuffled or deliberately constructed in favor of the house. After the player starts a new game their seed is passed to the server. The server uses the seed to calculate the shift number (it's described how it's calculated on the provably fair verification page). Then the card deck is cut based on the shift number. The number of cards that will be cut is not known in advance (and can not be predicted without knowing the client seed), thus it's impossible to construct a deck that with any possible shift number would still provide advantage to the house. This makes it useless for the house to try to cheat and initially shuffle the deck in its favor.
No, it's not. If the deck is constructed so that no A, K, Q, J, or T of the same suit had less than 11 cards between them, with the last card being considered next to the first card - a royal flush would be impossible to hit regardless of the seed the player chooses.\ In order for the game to be provably fair, the player seed needs to effect the initial shuffle - not simply where the pre shuffled deck starts dealing from. Answer
The layout of the reels is provided in the each Slots game page.
Yeah I already mentioned I found them. Thanks. I was able to find the reel layouts, it's good you provide them.
But like in video poker, the player seed is limited in what it can influence since the initial result is generated non transparently. Maybe an actual example will help you understand. Here's the result of an initial shuffle, before the players seed is used to determine where to 'cut' the deck: D3,C7,S5,S7,HK,DA,C8,S2,DJ,DQ,CA,D7,H3,HT,S6,C2,ST,HA,H9,SA,CT,C3,H7,S3,S4,DT,D8,C4,H6,H5,H2,D2,D5,CJ,S8,D4,D9,SJ,CK,SK,DK,S9,CQ,HQ,H4,C9,C6,H8,C5,D6,HJ,SQ I color coded the royal flush cards. You'll notice that no matter where the deck is cut, the player has no chance at being dealt a royal flush. Can you prove that the the shuffle was not manipulated to make royal flush possibilities happen less often than they should?
There is no need to prove anything, because each user can see the full deck after the game is played and ensure that the deck wasn't manipulated to eliminate royal flush possibility. Ok, here's the full deck: D3,C7,S5,S7,HK,DA,C8,S2,DJ,DQ,CA,D7,H3,HT,S6,C2,ST,HA,H9,SA,CT,C3,H7,S3,S4,DT,D8,C4,H6,H5,H2,D2,D5,CJ,S8,D4,D9,SJ,CK,SK,DK,S9,CQ,HQ,H4,C9,C6,H8,C5,D6,HJ,SQ There's no royal flush possible, where's the proof it wasn't manipulated. |
|
|
|
When it becomes known who Trump is in personal debt to the tune of $400 million, a connection will be made between him and his creditors to some action he took which might have benefited his benefactors. The whole thing looks like it will be published before the election..... Creditors are not "benefactors." Not in the least. What you do with creditors is pay the payments and adhere to the terms of the loan. Or you negotiate a deal that doesn't involve paying the debt directly but benefits the creditors in other ways. Like, for example, allowing Turkey to steamroll the Kurds even though they were our close allies in taking out ISIS in exchange for writing off a few hundred million in personal debt. Really? A case of TDS creates interesting conspiracy theories. The only problem is, what you assert hasn't actually happened.I think you could gas light people much more effectively if you mixed it up a little. The TDS + vague comment is so 2018. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
