Confermo, puoi comunque andarlo a promuovere nelle sezioni inglesi.
|
|
|
Ho visto ora che è stato aggiunto un sistema ad invito. Chi ha un account free può generarne uno al giorno, chi ha un account premium 3 al giorno invece.
|
|
|
Ma in Italia è legale questa cosa? Perchè io, senza volere offendere nessuno, ci vedo solo scopi poco legali , perchè chi è che non ha un iban nel 2016, basta prendere una superflash o una postepay evolution. Perchè ricevendo pagamenti su iban non mio e poi convertendo il tutto in bitcoin, non è un modo per non farsi tracciare?
Questa tecnologia è stata inventata per fare il più possibile a meno delle banche, avere la minima indipendenza, fin quanto possibile. Purtroppo come indicato bisogna comunque dare i proprio dati se si vuole andare oltre i soli 1000 euro l'anno.
|
|
|
Maybe both things can be good, mods will be able to disable signature on their local sections, global-mods instead should be able to disable the signature everywhere.
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this was already suggested.
I would like as a mod to have a button to disable the signature of the X user in my Y section.
So, I'll be able to disable the signature of the users that I think that they are writing useless text just for their paid-sig.
Their signature will still be visible on the other sections, where the other mods will make their decisions.
|
|
|
@picchio Non ho modo/poteri io di farlo, e comunque non ci saranno modifiche/aggiunte a questa versione del forum, è da più di un anno che stanno lavorando a creare una versione nuova.
|
|
|
Non so se conti il fatto di attivare javascript, comunque mi sa che si fa senza (sito)
|
|
|
Consider.it isn't a democracy system on Bitcoin, it can't be. To be a democracy, users must be forced to install Classic or a next version of Classic, by a law, by force.
Users aren't forced to do it, as they aren't forced to install Bitcoin Core.
Users are free to choose to install Classic, hard fork the network, and then even going back to Bitcoin Core and fork the network again!
Consider.it is a market research that devs will be able to use to understand "the demand", and then making choices on how serve it.
They will not follow blindly any request, and when ever they will do something bad, against the will of the users, the simpler solution is just not installing it and using another client (even again forking the network if needed)
The consensus happen on Bitcoin every 10 minutes, so every users/exchange/miner/payment processor/wallet is voting on the network every 10 minutes, and not on Consider.it.
At the worst case scenario of full of idiocy, you can just sell all your coins and move to another better/safer coin.
|
|
|
@gmaxwell Move Core just to 2MB and you will have killed Classic. But your team will not do it, even if it was in the proposal of someone directly from Blockstream at the beginning of the debate. The reason is unknown, but it falls in the conflict of interest hole, that produces many dirty answers.
Anyway, if there will be an hardfork to 2MB, you will still be able to get back the network, by releasing many features loved by "Network". Competing teams is the best situation.
I'll be ready to switch back to Core every 10 minutes.
|
|
|
Show me the code that Satoshi has wrote before making Bitcoin Anyway, they are touching (mainly Gavin) very few parts of the code, and this doesn't stop other better devs to come and making other better changes.
|
|
|
|