I read whitepaper, well!
Why road map ends at NOV 2018?
Do you have roadmap 2019?
I am also interested in this question ... Yes. How about a roadmap? An incomprehensible situation. Is there 2019 or not? I do not see the information yet! According to what the admin responded to some one on the Telegram chat, they are limited in how they can talk about future activities. So, It seems that they won't share the road map with community. I hope so. suddenly they have no plans after October 2019 and they will close the company after that. Personally, I am not optimistic on this. Not sharing the road map due to such a limitation is not reasonable. Every successful project has a public road map and this project should be same as them. I don't know why other ICO's have not this limitation. |
|
|
|
I read whitepaper, well!
Why road map ends at NOV 2018?
Do you have roadmap 2019?
I am also interested in this question ... Yes. How about a roadmap? An incomprehensible situation. Is there 2019 or not? I do not see the information yet! According to what the admin responded to some one on the Telegram chat, they are limited in how they can talk about future activities. So, It seems that they won't share the road map with community. |
|
|
|
They have nothing to share with the community. They haven't expected low price of bitcoin and haven't thought of it. Seems that they have no plan for now. And they might be scammers.
I still think its too quick to conclude this project to be a scam, after all their telegram chat group is still very active, this are hardtmes for ico's and securix is no exception, i think the list the team will do if they ran out of options to keep the project afloat is to make refunds to investors imo. If they are not seeing any possibilities they can do that, though it's really tough market condition that putting every project at risk and most developers are not performing well, but just same with your argument it's better to send those investment to each participants if the team don't have the capability to overcome this situation that's the best that they can do now. That must be done. And that is why soft cap is usually considered in ICOs. When the soft cap is not reached and the progress of the project is impossible, investors must be refunded. |
|
|
|
In order to remove ERC-20 tokens from circulation, we created a voluntary ‘Buy-back’ program for everyone which follows a 1:20 ratio where for every 20 old tokens you will receive 1 new token. Instructions have been released yesterday : https://youtu.be/w4U6Bh-7vVAWhy do you need to remove ERC-20 tokens from circulation? It's not like they are hurting anyone. In fact the rise of the price could just confuse people about their purpose. Ass we mentioned in previous reply, they are not exactly in circulation, but they are still out there and we want them all in one place so they are not confused with the new SPHTX token. Also this is our way to say thank you to all our supporters by giving them additional tokens for free. You are not giving people something valuable. You are only swapping old coins to new tokens with a certain rate. Even if you give 20,000 tokens for each old token, there is no difference. |
|
|
|
They have nothing to share with the community. They haven't expected low price of bitcoin and haven't thought of it. Seems that they have no plan for now. And they might be scammers.
I still think its too quick to conclude this project to be a scam, after all their telegram chat group is still very active, this are hardtmes for ico's and securix is no exception, i think the list the team will do if they ran out of options to keep the project afloat is to make refunds to investors imo. I didn't conclude that they are scammers. All of us know that the project is not going well. There are three possibilities. 1. They have nothing to share but they are trying to solve the issues. 2. The project have failed. 3. They have been scammers. |
|
|
|
Today I went to the website of the project and noticed that there is almost nothing there. This is blank. Almost all information is removed from it
I don't remember information that were available on their website . But according to what I see now, there is nothing available there. As, their identities have been also removed, they have likely left the project. |
|
|
|
Anyway repetitives sentences on Telegram like “announcement soon”, “the real is working hard” and stuff like that are really annoying!
- website don’t work (since last month!)
- dead Twitter, Facebook, automatic answer on Telegram (despite a real CM behind)
- 0 communication...
Not serious
I see these words from project to project. Everyone says there'll be news soon. Wait a little longer. It feels like they're conspiring. That's right.. It's like some kind of communication scam. "The team is at work and big news coming soon" (aka= no time to discuss) It takes 30 seconds to write a message on Telegram/Facebook, seriously! After everyone is anxious and tired of waiting for news then slowly they are quiet, silent, silent and disappear No communication = no trust i think the team are just looking for other ways to support the project financially, if the crowdsale did not perform well and probably didn't achieve softcap to start with development they must think of other source of funding, otherwise how will they secure all the mining equipment and other expenses, these are tough times for most ico's, it is like survival for the fittest. One more time, It’s something I can understand Everyone know the difficult time for the whole cryptos-sector But why the f... they don’t take 1 minute to speaks and inform their community?? They have nothing to share with the community. They haven't expected low price of bitcoin and haven't thought of it. Seems that they have no plan for now. And they might be scammers. |
|
|
|
Rozita
This is due to the fact that now many projects can not be fully appreciated by the community, because they no longer have the same confidence as in 2017.
It turns out that you doubt the project? What exactly embarrassed you in the program? If you explain to us in more detail it would be very good. I am still neutral about this project. I was speaking generally about the ICOs. Unfortunately being successful is very difficult for the ICOs even if there is a great product. These days people are not interested in ICOs. |
|
|
|
Strange, because most teams first write this amount of fundraising. And here no one mentioned how much money can be discussed and how much they expect.
Show me at least a couple of projects that write the amount of funds raised. As far as I know, this information basically remains incognito. I agree with you. I watched the projects and most often this information is provided only after the end of all rounds of ICO sales. I have seen many ICOs that the money raised is shown in their website. But these days, as they don't raise big money, almost none of the ICOs provides such information. They just say that they have reached the soft cap and don't provide any information before end of the ICO. |
|
|
|
People are not interested in ICOs like before. It is very difficult to raise big money. Securix is facing even more problems than other projects. Even if they had raised enough money, they wouldn't be able to be successful. Because mining is no longer profitable.
I agree, now is not the best time for mining, but this is temporary. As soon as the market starts to grow, the mining boom will start again, but the entry threshold will be much larger than now. Though mining must be done for the development of the applications offered, Securix is quite difficult to deal with this situation, I cannot imagine this. The market went down and many miners stopped with mining activities, did Securix also do this? They haven't even purchased mining equipment. What is going on is completely unclear. They don't announce any thing about progress of the project. We don't know if they are going to start the mining. |
|
|
|
Hi!
Anybody knows the smart contract address?
Is this token traded on any exchange?
Thanks!
I don't think they want the tokens to be listed on any external exchanges. The tokens should be traded on their own exchange which has not fully launched yet. Absolutely right, they must try their tokens to be traded before entering the market which will be determined later. This is a thing to try. Yes IRX will only be traded in IronX for now untill maybe in the near future if they will make provisions for external exchange as well, now the IronX exchange still in the process of beta testing, i hope the main lunch will happen a bit sooner and all features are in place and working perfectly so users can enjoy the feel of highest quality exchange.  And even if they become interested in listing on other exchange in future, as long as the exchange has not launched, it shouldn't happen. I am sure listing on other exchanges before launch of the exchange will lead to price fall. |
|
|
|
so far what is the latest update about securix？ any news regarding the development of the mining factory, if the mining equipment has already been secured, i could remember they mentioned about listing on exchange, i wonder when it will happen.
hope there will be update and news regarding development and listing as well as bounty distribution.
It doesn't seem that the project is going to be launched soon. Because the public sale did not go well. Another big problem is the high mining cost. What are the next option for team now that the public sale didn't perform well as expected? Will they be thinking of refunds to investors or go ahead with the limited funds generated during the sale? I think they should have extended the sale period to enable achieve their goal, other project are doing same. They are not responding to people question and they are not talking about the Bounty payments. In the beginning, i thought securix will give us very good returns to a holder who are holding their coins but from my experience, it is not a good idea to invest in Mining based coins and it seems they are very equal cloud mining websites. Yeah i see your point, this project at the initial stage was looking very promising with potential to succeed, suddenly things are not going according to expectations couple with the unending bearish market we are experiencing a long period, it is hard for securix to implement its objectives, i think all related project will face this hardship. People are not interested in ICOs like before. It is very difficult to raise big money. Securix is facing even more problems than other projects. Even if they had raised enough money, they wouldn't be able to be successful. Because mining is no longer profitable. |
|
|
|
Since they are big investors do they get shares of the company,or FABA tokens only? Well it is not that big investment if you ask me, it is just decent, so guess no shares. Every Faba investor has both shares and Faba tokens. This is what enables us to deliver dividends to our investors. People are still in same mindset as if we were talking about utility tokens.They forget that this is security token and that it works like stocks do so everyone actually gets the shares and dividends according to their investment. Exactly, STO is something much needed in crypto space and security tokens are going to surely take over simply because they offer much safer conditions for investors. Faba is one of the examples of what is going to become standard pretty soon. What is difference between STO and ICO?Is STO only for security tokens,or can utility token be sold in STO? STO is security tokens offering. In a security tokens offering, investors buy the tokens that are backed by tangible assets, profits or company revenue. |
|
|
|
so far what is the latest update about securix？ any news regarding the development of the mining factory, if the mining equipment has already been secured, i could remember they mentioned about listing on exchange, i wonder when it will happen.
hope there will be update and news regarding development and listing as well as bounty distribution.
It doesn't seem that the project is going to be launched soon. Because the public sale did not go well. Another big problem is the high mining cost. What are the next option for team now that the public sale didn't perform well as expected? Will they be thinking of refunds to investors or go ahead with the limited funds generated during the sale? I think they should have extended the sale period to enable achieve their goal, other project are doing same. They are not responding to people question and they are not talking about the Bounty payments. In the beginning, i thought securix will give us very good returns to a holder who are holding their coins but from my experience, it is not a good idea to invest in Mining based coins and it seems they are very equal cloud mining websites. The fall in bitcoin price, the lack of people interested in ICOs and also being mining nonprofitable changed every thing. What is going now is unclear. |
|
|
|
I don't like buyback programs, I think that they are an artificial mean to drive up the price, only in the short term (also, only if you burn said coins/tokens)
I also like the price rises naturally with developments of the project. But buy back which is going to be done is not bad. Decreasing the supply will be likely effective. It's good even if it rises the price only in short term. Any healthy activity for rising the price should be appreciated. |
|
|
|
so far what is the latest update about securix？ any news regarding the development of the mining factory, if the mining equipment has already been secured, i could remember they mentioned about listing on exchange, i wonder when it will happen.
hope there will be update and news regarding development and listing as well as bounty distribution.
It doesn't seem that the project is going to be launched soon. Because the public sale did not go well. Another big problem is the high mining cost. |
|
|
|
Thing is, to get listed on big exchange like Biinance it bittrex you need working product. Will Faba have that by Q3?
Well they don't have to get listed on one of those and that does not have to happen in Q3, Q4 is also very good time to be listed, like end of November is a good timing. Everyone wants to be listed in the big exchanges. With the market the way it is, I believe that it doesn't have the right month to be listed, for example, the end of last November wasn't very good for many projects, it is impossible to predict. It is clear that with a product in operation, the conditions are more favorable but don't guarantee anything. I hope that FABA will get some decent exchange.I dont think need top exchange right from the beginning as those can cost few million dollar.Its better to get some medium volume one and then work from that. Let the ICO ends first. The ICO will be live until June. As long as the ICO has not ended, cannot find any information about listing on exchanges. What is now important is the money raise and also developments of the project. |
|
|
|
I read the news on BRAVO telegram if the ICO will start at the end of March? It seems the distribution is still long because after the ICO ends then the participants soon will receive their prize. OK, I will continue to monitor the progress of this project and other new information.
ICO dates haven't been announced yet. Seems that the team is watching the market and wants to start the token sale when the market has a better condition. |
|
|
|
"45% Monthly gross revenue share by the SRXIO token"
Please do not need to specify such slogans. When you specify% of income without instructions from where this profit is taken - you turn into the most classical pyramid !!!
They are going to share 45% of all mined cryptocurrencies to the token holders. There is no problem. Less cryptocurrencies are mined, less profit will be distributed among the holders. |
|
|
|
...
It's strange situation, because admin is active in their telegram chat. Anyway they shouldn't forget about communication with their community.
Telegram chat is active enough. But there is no info about bounty token distribution. There are some talks about monthly payouts, exchange listing but no specifics. Why devteam doesn't respond at the forum? Unfortunately situation when project team has bad communication with community is very common. There ara such problems in many other projects. It spoils the impression about projects. In most of the ICOs, the team becomes less responsive after end of the ICO. But Securix team was behaving like this even when we were in ICO phase. nothing has changed. They respond to the community only on Telegram. It is same as the ICO time. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
