That proves absolutely nothing considering that can be changed on the profile page. Keep hoping though guys........ It is you that has no proof. Only speculation. We don't have proof either... just speculating. HIVE is probably a scam... but you've been around here a while so you know how the game goes. Hell...CRAVE was a huge scam. But people made a lot of money by exiting at the right time. Shitcoin or not.... just about all coins are these days. I'm always looking for the next CRAVE. Why are you even arguing, when the "dev" has not even responded to these allegations? Are you part of it? I'm not arguing with some fool in a forum. I openly admitted this was probably a scam. I think it's sketchy too. But I know too little at this point to point fingers. Because you made such a hilarious meme for me, here's one for you:  Calm the fuck down Chicken Little! The problem with posting proof or circumstantial evidence of a scam, is it gives the scammer an idea of what to avoid doing on his next scam so he will not be caught. In the crypto world, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a fucking duck. People should just take it at that. I'm leaving this thread for now. Not cause I do not feel like arguing the point with you (we can continue this in pms if you want). But because this scam does not need all of these free bumps. It makes people think it is more popular than it is. |
|
|
|
CLAM is a great altcoin, there's no reason it can't be used for other applications outside of gambling
What's the advantage of CLAM over other existing altcoins? What are the unique features? That you can use them to play or invest in Just Dice  Everyone got Clamcoins for free. (everyone quote these line and post 1 perk!  ) CLAMS don't have AIDS. And you cannot catch HIV by downloading the wallet. |
|
|
|
That proves absolutely nothing considering that can be changed on the profile page. Keep hoping though guys........ It is you that has no proof. Only speculation. We don't have proof either... just speculating. HIVE is probably a scam... but you've been around here a while so you know how the game goes. Hell...CRAVE was a huge scam. But people made a lot of money by exiting at the right time. Shitcoin or not.... just about all coins are these days. I'm always looking for the next CRAVE. Why are you even arguing, when the "dev" has not even responded to these allegations? Are you part of it? |
|
|
|
You know why. So obv its same dev.............
however :-) it would be easyer to create a new coin and would cost less time He does not want to lose the $10 or however much it costs to get a coin cloned for him. |
|
|
|
Stop this fake TAKEOVER now
and refund all your investor BTC
you live in a fairy tale this poor guy is trying rite a wrong i bought into the ico and i want my bitrush so this guy is doing a good thing even if you get your share your will just become a victim of pump and dump group and they will just make more lies soon you didnt even know what happen XUP because your not around here that time so it better if you make some research first Just out of interest have you bought into BitRush ? why he dont order a new coin ? ... make this Takeover any sense ? You know why. So obv its same dev............. edit: I should not even call him a dev tbh. He has done 0% development on this. Someone else cloned it for him. smh |
|
|
|
That proves absolutely nothing considering that can be changed on the profile page. Keep hoping though guys........ |
|
|
|
a wallet using 100% of your cpu with only 2 peers has no future... seems even worst than axiom
if a cpu miner can only do 100H/s, that means the wallet can also only accept 100 blocks max per second (during sync), and its worst than that
Its what i call a cpu resistant algo :p well... not efficient
I have over 60 peers...and the hashrate is irrelevant because there are PoS and PoW blocks. My wallet syncs pretty quickly....not the fastest but not the slowest by any means. Is this the next big thing? Probably not... but I had a good time finding some blocks with my cpu. Dev said he has some kind of plans...just waiting to see what happens smh Not even going to respond to the fact that the original wallet contained a virus, and the "new dev" has made no effort to deny that he is same person?  |
|
|
|
a wallet using 100% of your cpu with only 2 peers has no future... seems even worst than axiom
if a cpu miner can only do 100H/s, that means the wallet can also only accept 100 blocks max per second (during sync), and its worst than that
Its what i call a cpu resistant algo :p well... not efficient
The funny thing is you still are going to have people mining it, and asking "when exchange?". Hoping against hope that they have stumbled across the next big thing. Even though the original release contained a virus, and even though there is a good chance it is the same dev for both the original and the takeover. |
|
|
|
|
Chrismon, how much did you buy that account for?
|
|
|
|
This is not me I was hacked
If you got hacked, wouldn't the first thing you did was change your password? And if you changed your password does it not show at the top of trust screen in orange letters "This users password was recently changed"? Well:  |
|
|
|
This is not me I was hacked
Anyone that downloaded and installed this needs to check their systems now. Also should turn firewall on maximum protection and look for anything odd. |
|
|
|
|
Posting on first page of epic thread.
|
|
|
|
more nodes?
addnode=109.98.4.75
addnode=159.203.88.80
addnode=24.254.138.75
addnode=46.72.99.51
addnode=82.66.55.40
addnode=106.184.5.237
addnode=221.229.22.235
addnode=176.205.219.55
addnode=106.3.230.177
addnode=104.238.169.82
addnode=113.167.196.164
addnode=178.130.36.81
addnode=24.89.45.196
addnode=14.167.172.167
addnode=183.16.199.193
addnode=183.57.42.177
addnode=54.187.131.248
addnode=85.214.153.21
addnode=121.229.147.13
addnode=84.110.80.85
addnode=59.46.101.40
addnode=37.218.143.254
addnode=46.174.194.107
addnode=108.61.103.113
addnode=77.131.12.65
addnode=91.211.46.3
addnode=5.136.147.195
addnode=2.50.178.64
addnode=45.55.34.105
addnode=188.166.112.161
addnode=104.236.225.3
addnode=54.149.252.47
addnode=79.103.177.230
addnode=93.183.212.222
addnode=5.251.112.221
addnode=91.134.53.161
addnode=85.255.233.89
addnode=212.112.119.140
addnode=222.217.132.61
addnode=104.238.169.148
addnode=80.56.214.86
addnode=31.29.6.131
addnode=193.90.105.180
addnode=74.66.86.127
addnode=195.209.99.5
addnode=109.189.198.251
addnode=217.156.83.102
addnode=83.20.177.248
Just curious, why are some of those the same ones posted in the original HIVE thread at launch? |
|
|
|
So a lot of the gaw bagholders switched to and promoted LTCGear. They got ripped off by that. So now I see in the Altcoin ANNs that there is a LTCGearcoin being released  SMH So when will they launch a coin to "help those that were burned by LTCGearcoin"? |
|
|
|
No plans DEV? You got the BTC and you have investors in the ass?
BUT, but, but he has 20 years coding experience. Thats gotta be worth something right? Just to be able to be a bagholder of a coin his greatness made? |
|
|
|
Guess I was right about this. Don't worry, he will be back with another shit ICO and a bunch of empty promises. Good graphics though..... |
|
|
|
Our launch was postponed 4-5 hours. We found the problem and are now fixing everything we need to properly launch again.
Edit: Saul found us on twitter and showed a lot of interest in our project since the beginning. He's a trader but we'll listen to him if we ever need his advice though (he has more experience in the cryptosphere than us).
You are digging your hole deeper. Please stop lying. The account is yours and you know it. And it would not even matter if you had not offered a fake bounty that was claimed by yourself. |
|
|
|
|
Also it is 100% obvious that you and the account saulcryptoman are the same person. But you mislead everyone by offering a fake BTC "bounty" to quote the post. You messed up by accidently posting "we are looking into this" from the Saul account before quickly erasing it. This is stepping into scam territory already.
edit: It was actually "We are investigating", not "We are looking into it" as proved by the screenshot below. I misquoted it =/.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
