I don't normally comment on price, but this bid is absolutely insane (especially coming from a brand new account):

B   2.41   Notawhaleyet   -   2016 Titanium One Bitcoin

F - 3.0

 F - 2.9

F - 2.8 BTC

F - 2.75

.22

0.19BTC

Frank, while the feedback here may seem harsh, I hope you keep coming back with more releases.  The community here can be very vocal and critical, but that's because there are so many copycats and scammers in the crypto world and we've all been burned.  There is a hyper awareness to anything that might be "off" because these coins may one day be holding millions of dollars in value.  There is such a ridiculous degree of trust involved in crypto that every aspect of these products will be scrutinized (and it doesn't matter whether you made the keys, whether they intended to be funded ,etc). 

It seems you have taken the criticism well and so I hope to see you back here with more interesting releases

Details!  Your sales post reads like a text message 

What # is that signature set?  Also, could you add in some asking prices? Many of these products have been auctioned/sold recently so they have predictable price ranges. 

I like the idea of having different face value chips, like a 0.05 instead of 0.5. 

1) Please no Bcash. I think most collectors here would rather see an LTC collectible than a Bcash one (Plus we love Charlie). 

2) Newly mined is the entire value proposition, in addition to the fact these are stamped with BTCC's name along with your reputation

3) Lower denomination titanium is a good idea (0.1) as someone suggested.  For the Chips I'm not sure you could go lower than 1k bits and have it easily spendable if/when the blocks become full again.  One thing that would help is moving to a P2SH Segwit or Bech32 Segwit address format.   

0.125

Is it possible to see the hologram design you are going with? 

Lot 3 - 0.01
Lot 4 - 0.01

Great to see you back, Bobby.  I'll be following this auction closely.

Lot D - 1 BTC

My wallet is synced, but the balance shows as HIDDEN.  I can see older transactions but it shows the XMV in the denomination as it was in XMR, not the 1:10 split. So, in other words if I had 1 XMR before the fork, it shows a transaction found containing 1 XMV. Is this how it should display?

Interesting.  Is there a date printed on it anywhere? 

Bye, Felicia

0 please thank you

.122