renting this many hash is likely more than the 12.5 BTC reward...
It ALWAYS costs more to rent hash than the expected reward from it. |
|
|
|
Someone's dumping the most hashrate I've ever seen onto the pool at the moment. {"hashrate1m": "24.6P", "hashrate5m": "23.6P", "hashrate15m": "22P", "hashrate1hr": "14.8P", "hashrate6hr": "5.1P", "hashrate1d": "2.54P", "hashrate7d": "3.55P"}
Good luck to them. |
|
|
|
True, halving has had its effect, BTC got 50% price increase so no problem there. Whether the price ll continue to rise, well, yes, I think so. 1000 is the next obvious milestone.
Most of us would not attribute the rise in BTC value to the halving itself, and even if it were the halving, it would need to have been a 100% rise to have offset the halving. |
|
|
|
|
Another alleged cloud hashing loss making service, most likely a scam making service appears out of nowhere from a newbie account with zero credibility. This is not pooled mining, off you go to services where you can try and make people lose money there.
I recommend people ignore this alleged service which has zero credibility.
|
|
|
|
Sorry for posting this in an old thread but nothing very new came up in a casual look at the search results.
I am seeing two different figures, one:
Approximately 0.04146199 BTC remaining to enter payout queue
and the other:
Estimated Total: 0.00048105 BTC
Why is one reading twice as much?
Totally unnecessary necropost. There's a support thread here, use it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=441465.0/locked |
|
|
|
Yes I see you reconnect but submit no shares. Are you using the latest git ckproxy?
I believe so: root@bitcoin:/usr/src/ckpool# git pull
Already up-to-date.
Looks like a bug then. Try using stratum.ckpool.org instead of solo.ckpool.org |
|
|
|
The issue I am having is that it does not appear to switch back. If you note the timestamp in the second snippet which is from the ckproxy.log, it's still using proxy 1 20 minutes later, and http://solo.ckpool.org/users/1JfWNu78kncYPP7CajXVGk45nGnim3MKuL shows a hashrate of 200MH when it should be closer to 3.5TH. It logs a "Stratifier setting active proxy to 1" but never back to proxy 0. Yes I see you reconnect but submit no shares. Are you using the latest git ckproxy? |
|
|
|
Hi -ck, I'm mining with through ckproxy, when I point the first preference to the solo pool it looks like it's not liking me and kicking me over to the secondary. Any ideas why this would be? ==> /var/log/upstart/ckproxy-solo.log <==
[2016-11-10 14:00:02.152] Proxy 1:stratum.kano.is:3333 connection established
[2016-11-10 14:00:02.606] Proxy 0:solo.ckpool.org:3333 connection established
[2016-11-10 14:00:03.091] Successfully connected to pool 0 solo.ckpool.org:3333 as proxy
[2016-11-10 14:00:03.092] ckproxy generator ready
[2016-11-10 14:00:04.028] Proxy 0:solo.ckpool.org:3333 reconnect issue to stratum.ckpool.org:443, dropping existing connection
[2016-11-10 14:00:04.029] Proxy 0:stratum.ckpool.org:443 failed, attempting reconnect
[2016-11-10 14:00:04.029] Successfully connected to pool 1 stratum.kano.is:3333 as proxy
[2016-11-10 14:00:09.030] Proxy 0:stratum.ckpool.org:443 recovered
[2016-11-10 14:00:09.030] Successfully connected to pool 0 stratum.ckpool.org:443 as proxy That's it negotiating the redirect order from solo.ckpool.org and is perfectly fine. You'll see it switches back to pool 0 once it has negotiated the new connection which is only 5 seconds later. |
|
|
|
Hey -ck You should make a solo pool to block S9's and leave the existing one for S9's only. They are bad luck machines. i know it wont happen but
just upset that i had to go to a diff solo pool that was using your code, which in turn screwed me out a block anyways
All the data I've seen shows S9s find blocks at the same rate as everything else. Since everyone mines for themselves on this pool it makes no difference what other hardware is mining for other people so your suggestion makes no real sense on any level to me. It also doesn't explain why you "had to go to a diff solo pool".. and FUpool isn't even a solo pool. |
|
|
|
Does anyone know how i would locate to see what block # it is?
How would i go about locating this block? well to see if it did solve and go through
ckproxy says possible block solved and my miner says block solved. but didnt get btc.
[2016-11-08 02:00:17.733] Possible block solve diff 543270040839.320251 !
Thanx
You would check your address that you are mining to, check if there is a 12 BTC transaction from a block, and get the block from there. You probably didn't get BTC because you either relayed it too late, it was stale or orphaned. Solo CK hasn't found a block of over 4 days now. Check your address on the pools website and see that your best share is i wasnt soloing on cksolo, i was on a diff solo pool and cant seem to get ahold of the pool operator. they use ckpool software, so im sure the block solve went to their btc address and it is supposed to get sent to me after that, like cksolo does when i hit a block. thats why im trying to see how i would look for it by time and date, with block solve diff No, the block goes directly to you when you are mining here at ck.solo . I *never* see any of the rest of the block that goes to the person who's mining so there is zero danger to the miner of me running off with your block. Now if you'll kindly go to whoever you were mining with and ask them for support, I'd be grateful since it has nothing to do with this pool. |
|
|
|
|
So why are you posting this here? Looking for investors or people to host their hardware or what?
|
|
|
|
So next, with so many miners what is the easiest way to control them all at once?
Use ckproxy. Link is in my signature. |
|
|
|
So is there a limit to how many workers you can have on Kano per 1 account? I only ask because am at 83 and now anything past that I am getting a connection refused.
I am working with S9's and have tried several other trouble shooting techniques before coming to this forum, but the next 5 units all have been refused by your pool but I can connect to others. Very frustrating as I have a lot more that I am planning to move to this pool. Can you offer any help.
There isn't an upper limit to the number of workers you can have provided you're a hashing miner (which you are since you said S9s, as opposed to a CPU botnet); you're probably unintentionally being blocked by the DoS strategies regarding the pool front end. I'll ping Kano to look into it for you. |
|
|
|
what are the specs requirements? please need help.
Computers do not mine bitcoin in any meaningful fashion regardless of the software. It does not matter what the specs of your PC are, you need an ASIC to do any bitcoin mining that earns anything besides 'dust' - which means a denomination so small that no one would even allow you to transfer it. |
|
|
|
[2016-11-05 01:21:25.592] Possible block solve diff 285801930514.475220 !
[2016-11-05 01:21:25.770] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-11-05 01:21:25.770] Solved and confirmed block 437423 by 1HRJufks87yZDGJCqipYTNmakHXgZUfTLK.AntMiner4
[2016-11-05 01:21:25.770] User 1HRJufks87yZDGJCqipYTNmakHXgZUfTLK:{"hashrate1m": "11.2T", "hashrate5m": "10.1T", "hashrate1hr": "9.26T", "hashrate1d": "9.07T", "hashrate7d": "13.3T"}
[2016-11-05 01:21:25.770] Worker 1HRJufks87yZDGJCqipYTNmakHXgZUfTLK.AntMiner4:{"hashrate1m": "5.48T", "hashrate5m": "4.81T", "hashrate1hr": "4.57T", "hashrate1d": "4.57T", "hashrate7d": "2.73T"}
[2016-11-05 01:21:25.770] Block solved after 212418826191 shares at 83.8% diff
|
|
|
|
[2016-11-03 06:52:30.547] Possible block solve diff 725530420819.596680 !
[2016-11-03 06:52:30.797] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-11-03 06:52:30.797] Solved and confirmed block 437179 by 1DrEYt9nX48dgbYXx4rq3ug3GrZJJX33g3
[2016-11-03 06:52:30.797] User 1DrEYt9nX48dgbYXx4rq3ug3GrZJJX33g3:{"hashrate1m": "46T", "hashrate5m": "44.7T", "hashrate1hr": "43.5T", "hashrate1d": "42.9T", "hashrate7d": "36.9T"}
[2016-11-03 06:52:30.797] Worker 1DrEYt9nX48dgbYXx4rq3ug3GrZJJX33g3:{"hashrate1m": "46T", "hashrate5m": "44.7T", "hashrate1hr": "43.5T", "hashrate1d": "42.9T", "hashrate7d": "36.9T"}
[2016-11-03 06:52:30.797] Block solved after 86616242910 shares at 34.2% diff
|
|
|
|
|
If you are talking about bitcoin mining, then no. You cannot meaningfully mine bitcoin with a GPU today. If you are talking about altcoin mining then you are posting in the wrong section so I will help you by moving your post.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
