Leipzig showed once again that they are never fit to be a consistent contender to the title as they are a very volatile team most of the time,you never know to expect of them.I did bet on them on a parlay tonight and strange enough I won all other games except them as they drew their game against Werder Bremen.This year the true fight will be between Bayer Leverkussen and Bayern Munchen and they both look very consistent this year with very few games where they have made mistakes while Leipzig together with Dortmund have made quite so many mistakes up until now,so I exclude them from the title fight this season.
I also did not see Leipzig, Stuttgart, and Dortmund as a strong title contender this season, I am only considering Bayern Leverkusen and Munich as the top title contenders because they are the only two most consistent teams in Bundesliga so far this season. Dortmund on the other hand has started their inconsistent performance again, they open the score list with a goal by Brandt, and they have now conceded a goal just before half time, this showed that they cannot be trusted with our money as they don't worth betting on; nevertheless, they can still win the match but Mainz is battling in the relegation zone, they will try their best to win this match in order to escape the relegation zone. Dortmund had another important three points during this season and this time they lost these points against Mainz while they could easily beat Mainz. Compared to Mainz, Dortmund had much more control over the game and they had more opportunities in this match but they couldn't use the chances they had. Now Dortmund is in the 5th place of the Bundesliga table with 27 points and they are far from the first place of the table. Its been a rough few matches for Dortmund fans, right? Our team's inability to capitalize on home advantage is disappointing. I thought we would have won against Mainz, but it was a disappointing tie. We dominated possession and had seven shots on goal, but only one converted. Our Dortmund isnt like that. It appears the team is losing confidence. After losing 9 points in five matches, we're in danger in the Bundesliga. Uneven second-half attacking against Mainz proved worrisome. Something must alter, maybe tactics or mindset, to climb back up the table.
|
|
|
Some times gambler make good prediction about gambling but he doesn't have enough money. Gambling wins and losses are very common. I have been gambling for a long time and still do. I often follow different schedules of gambling. Sometimes I find it very easy to predict the winning of certain games. But at that time in many cases there is not enough money. And that time is the most difficult time for a gambler. Because i feels that winning the game is certain and i can get more money from it. I don't bet money that will change my life but sometimes that chance comes to me. But there is nothing to do because the risk is high that is not possible for me. Would you dare to bet especially if you get 50 times more against any betting odds? Of course there is a high chance of losing if you bet.
Interesting, eh? This is how gamblers navigate chance and certainty. Combining the pleasure of prediction with financial restraint is a telling experience. Do you find it intriguing that gambling, a game of luck, requires self-awareness and control? Examine betting 50 times more against the odds. Though tempting, gambling is amusement, not a source of money. Gamble properly and accept losses as part of the game. The issue is balancing the risk of loss with the excitement of winning. Your situation requires equilibrium. Given the risk, you've sensibly avoided life-changing bets. Understanding gambling's unpredictability and that it shouldnt fix financial difficulties informs this strategy. Responsible gambling requires understanding when to quit, no matter how likely a victory.
|
|
|
It seems like Arsenal have a favourable matchup for themselves to reach the quarter finals. I mean I don't think Porto are good enough to eliminate Arsenal in the Champions League. Porto lost both of their games against Barcelona in the group stage for example. I think Barcelona are even playing worse than Arsenal these days. Considering that Arsenal should be able to get past them easily. Maybe Porto can defend them stronger home and they might get a draw as well. But at Emirates I would just expect Arsenal to destroy them by a gap of a few goals. I dont think it will be an easy game. Although Porto may not be as well-known or flashy as some other teams, their toughness and experience should not be forgotten. After a break, Arsenal recently returned to the Champions League, which makes things more uncertain. High-stakes games like this benefit a lot from having experienced players, which Porto could use to their advantage even though they are the favorites. Obviously, Arsenal is better, especially at the Emirates, but Porto could still pull off an upset. Not to mention that they've been good enough in the UCL to compete with teams like Barcelona, even scoring the same number of points. This game requires Arsenal to be very alert; if they get too confident, they could find themselves in a tough spot.
|
|
|
then what about Manchester City, they are becoming more and more worrying day by day and are very far from their usual performance like at the start of the season, they are losing a lot of points, and yesterday's match they only got one point against Crystal Palace because the match ended in a draw, Guardiola's squad couldn't added more goals, and ended with a score of 2-2.
but it is reported that KDB and Erling Haaland are ready to return to the field because they can be said to have recovered from their injuries, and is it possible that with this Manchester City can return to the top of the standings?
Man City's condition without Haaland and De Bruyne is quite worrying. Especially after Haaland was absent for several weeks after suffering a minor injury. But I am sure that when Haaland and De Bruyne return to playing and recover from injuries, Man City will gradually improve and return to better performance. But I'm not too sure whether Man City will return to the top of the standings. Because if Liverpool and Arsenal continue to get good results for the rest of this season then both teams will definitely be able to maintain their position between 2nd and 1st place. Unless Arsenal and Liverpool start to lose their consistency this season then maybe Man City can return to the top standings. Manchester City has a shot this season, in my opinion. Haaland and De Bruyne's absence has been detrimental, but they're allegedly back on the field, which is encouraging. I dont underestimate De Bruyne's injury. Yes, hamstring injuries are hard to heal, and it may take time for him to go back to full strength. However, I believe in top players' tenacity and City's adaptation under Guardiola. Haaland should be back on track soon, running on all cylinders. Liverpool and Arsenal are hot, but City is still in the title race. They have a tendency for comebacks, and with important players returning, the standings could change during the season.
|
|
|
The problems that occurred between Mbappe and PSG at the start of the season have been resolved after the player agreed to extend his contract as proposed by PSG. Mbappe is a big player, he has to do something to boost his career. Staying with PSG is not a good decision for him, because he can still get trophies with other clubs that he has never been able to get while playing for PSG. Every time the transfer market opens, rumors of Mbappe leaving PSG always become the main topic. He must take a stand for a better future, stay with PSG or move to another club.
I don't know what Mbappe wants by extending his contract at PSG. Is that a strategy from Mbappe so that if another club wants to sign him then they have to spend large amounts of money and make a tempting offer? Because I think what does Mbappe need from PSG? He's got everything there. Has PSG offered Mbappe a large salary so that he chooses to stay at PSG? Personally, I dont think Mbappe's decision to extend his PSG contract is the easiest. Given his star status, PSG may not want to lose him for nothing. PSG would struggle without Mbappe, especially without Messi and Neymar. Due of his importance, they'll do anything to keep him, even a high wage. However, Mbappe's move may be purposeful. He's protecting his position and ensuring he can depart on his terms. PSG values him highly and charges a premium transfer fee to show their importance to the team. Power play - not just a contract.
|
|
|
Although the bitcoin market is unpredictable, halving events have historically caused bullish movements. Will this pattern persist? The future is unclear and hard to predict. Bitcoin's durability is evident, but be cautious. This journey is full of volatility, so be ready for climbs and descents.
Your perseverance and long-term vision paid off by holding through the bear market. However, risk management requires diversity. With the halving approaching, holding may be enticing, but optimism must be balanced with caution. Profits only come from closing positions.
Personal financial goals and risk tolerance determine whether to hold or sell. Cryptography tests one's fortitude. Despite these challenges, Bitcoin remains a digital financial pioneer. Take this trip with knowledge and anticipation, but keep your expectations grounded in reality.
|
|
|
Your concern regarding Bitcoin's popular adoption is its everyday utility. History: conventional currencies evolved over ages. Bitcoin, meanwhile, is young. Not simply buying water bottles, but establishing an infrastructure that integrates digital currencies into daily life. This is gradual and complicated.
Your political point is important. Current financial systems and governments may oppose decentralized currencies. Remember that innovation generally confronts resistance before adoption. The internet, once innovative, is now essential. Blockchain technology might disrupt finance and other industries, disrupting power systems.
The potential alien civilization parallel is crazy. It emphasizes that social and legislative constraints limit us, not technology. Blockchain technology can be universally adopted with a perception and regulatory shift. Bitcoin's general acceptance is a marathon that requires patience, ingenuity, and social change.
|
|
|
Bitcoin is appealing for its privacy and decentralization. It symbolizes financial autonomy and protects against government overreach. Lets not ignore the changing. The government cannot directly control Bitcoin, but it may influence its boundaries by regulating exchanges, taxing, and proposing central bank digital currencies. The goal is to adapt to a new financial paradigm, not only ban Bitcoin.
Consider the consequences of this tug-of-war. Bitcoin's decentralization is admirable, but governments wont stay silent. They're investigating blockchain integration into existing systems. This doesnt mean Bitcoin's demise; it just means we must stay vigilant and imaginative.
Future Bitcoin must balance goals with realities of a changing world. We must defend its principles while monitoring government change. Bitcoin's technology and our shared dedication to its values make it resilient.
|
|
|
Though understandable, privacy must be considered. Though, caution is crucial. However, your Bitcoin passion is admirable. Your support of Bitcoin and knowledge helped your friend's financial education. Your Bitcoin introduction was thoughtful. Explaining the DCA approach and helping him buy displays a strong awareness of the crypto market's volatility. Newcomers should use this method to reduce market volatility and investment risk.
While openness is good, practice caution. Future conversations, especially about digital currencies, must emphasize Bitcoin's potential, security, and privacy. This new digital financial world requires your cooperation and responsible advice.
|
|
|
its a tool, not a cure-all. Digital currencies can skip banking constraints and reach underprivileged populations, promoting financial inclusion. Is the poor ready for such a technical leap? Bitcoin training is helpful, but without financial understanding and technology, its ineffective.
While decentralized money empowers people, Bitcoin is volatile. The poorest are at risk from this volatility. Digital currency enthusiasm must be balanced with realistic appraisals of its potential and threats.
Recognise that poverty is complex. Bad government, weak infrastructure, and economic instability are deeper issues than digital literacy and financial education. Bitcoin can help, but not too much. Poverty reduction is a bigger picture.
|
|
|
I like been in control of myself when gambling, I am now very used to walking away whenever I feel like, I don't gamble always but when I do I am doing it to kill time, we all want to make money but I don't want to make mine with gambling, because I don't want to get destroyed.
There are too many people that turn into something they are not because of gambling exposure, it's a hazardous thing for those who have no idea what awaits them, you need to be in total control of your mind to gamble without building up a bad habit inside of you.
Many gamblers walk into casinos with the mind of coming out with big money, this is a wrong think to use the mind for, where you don't plant money to grow you should not expect to money from such places, gambling is the game on your mindset, be careful not to get enchanted.
We must acknowledge that not everyone is self-disciplined. Gambling can lead to addiction for many. The appeal of "huge money" sometimes blinds people to the fact that casinos are for-profit businesses. They need more losses than wins. Gambling to kill time, not to make money, is healthier, but be careful. Remember, casinos are engineered to keep you playing longer, from illumination to the lack of timers. They target psychological vulnerabilities, making it hard to keep control. Controlling your activities requires understanding the environment and its effects on your mind. Gambling should be occasional enjoyment, not a habit. Be cautious and analyze your intentions and behaviors.
|
|
|
They know how to behave when gambling. They also do not try to recover their losses due to errors in their strategy so they will just end their gambling game that day. They may not try gambling for a few days to think about other things that might be successful in the next gambling game.
I wish it's that easy. We stop now and try to evaluate our mistakes then come up with a new strategy and see if it work, that's what we do gamblers, most of us especially if we are playing on games that are skilled based, but do we really succeed? Answer is very obvious, no, most of us failed because choosing a winning bet is not the only key to succeed, there are also other factors that needs to be considered, and that includes a bankroll, yes, setting up a realistic bankroll is very important. About bankroll, if we were able to set up a decent bankroll, the most challenging part is on how to manage it. If we are weak in controlling our emotion, that would lead to early wiping out of your money, you know, when you double and try to chase your losses, it usually end up losing everything. Indeed, picking a winning bet isnt everything. Why? Because gaming is complex. We need financial management, emotional control, and strategic planning. Each is crucial to success or failure. Bankroll is about management, not just amount. A large bankroll can swiftly disappear without discipline and foresight. This leads to emotional control. Without this talent, one may make hasty decisions like chasing losses. These behaviors quickly deplete finances. Therefore, a holistic approach is vital, not just the strategy. We require competence, emotional intelligence, and financial prudence. Only then can we succeed in unpredictable gambling.
|
|
|
I had already commented on this in some places, but I think that talking about it here is also something useful, this issue of responsible gambling, addiction to gambling, is something that really worries society in general, and something that worries many families. but the saddest thing about all this is that we see governments being very tough on gambling because according to these governments that ban gambling, they claim that people will spend all their money on gambling, they claim that people people will become addicted and that's why the government is banning people from using credit cards in casinos and banning people from using casinos.
Therefore, casinos are left with no choice and place countries that prohibit gambling on the list of restricted countries, but it is ironic that the same countries that ban gambling allow people to consume a lot of drinks such as wine and beer and not They run campaigns like: "don't drink excessively" or they don't ban wine and beer factories and they don't talk every day about how people will become addicted to alcohol. The saddest part of all this is that the number of car accidents involving driving under the influence of alcohol has risen alarmingly,
Hundreds of people are dying every day because they drink alcohol and drive their cars and the result is car accidents, hundreds of people are dying because their livers and lungs are failing due to alcohol, and what is the government doing? ? they don't do anything. That's because they own the car factories, they own the beer factories, they own the wine factories, they own the hospitals. When more people consume alcohol, destroy cars, end up in hospitals, the more profits the owners of beer, wine, car and hospital factories will make. while these government guys don't care about gambling
We see strict gaming laws to preserve public welfare yet weak alcohol laws despite their risks. Paradoxical, right? In theory, the government should protect citizens, but their approach to gambling and drinking looks biased. Are these policies truly for public health, or are there business motives? The government's participation in automotive and alcohol poses conflict of interest concerns. Its crucial to consider whether business comes before public health. This scenario emphasizes the necessity for responsible governance that treats all addictions equally. Promoting responsible conduct and addiction support is the goal, not prohibiting industries. Shouldnt governments treat gambling and alcohol addictions equally?
|
|
|
I confess that I am surprised by the result of Lille's game against PSG, despite Lille being a very difficult opponent because in the last few games they have not lost in any game and had many draws, I still expected that PSG would be able to come away with a victory In that game, PSG had difficulty scoring a goal, thanks to the penalty they benefited from which allowed them to score a goal, if there hadn't been that penalty, then PSG would have lost in that game, but I have to congratulate them because PSG were very well in defense, they only conceded 1 goal in this game and that is something positive, it shows that their defense was good
with this draw PSG remains at the top of the table and with a comfortable advantage, I sincerely doubt very much that they will lose this number one position until the end of the league, in my opinion PSG have no opponents in league1 so they will win league1 again in this one season also mainly because the other teams have lost, Nice and Monaco, which could be teams that would cause some threat to PSG, had defeats, which only benefited PSG even more. I still can't understand why the other Ligue 1 teams can't have strong squads in their teams to the point where they can compete at the same level as PSG
I was among those who assumed PSG would easily beat Lille. Given their history, watching them battle for goals was surprising. The penalty saved them from losing. However, their defense deserves praise for allowing only one goal. PSG's inability to win such a key match shows that Ligue 1 is getting more unpredictable. Although comfortable, their top gap is not guaranteed. Nice and Monaco's struggles give them an edge. Despite PSG's supremacy, other teams must not be complacent if they want to challenge them.
|
|
|
Just trying to get the communities opinion based on their experience about the topic.
Personally, a a bettor, I find it very stressful when watching the game you are betting especially if it will end up a losing bet.
If we have the same experience, how do you cope up with that problem, after all, gambling should be fun but why we have this kind of feeling that we feel disappointed when our bet loses?
It's humane if you are disappointed by losing a bet. You just need to play more relaxed, nothing can be predicted precisely in gambling. Limit your losses so you don't get depressed. The more often you play, the more often you will lose if you don't play with a clear mind. Gambling is fun, don't make it a pressure. Play moderately, take your money when you win. That will make you calmer. Many people lose money because they don't enjoy the game, they are quite stressed when it comes to playing. Nice advice, but there is no way anyone would be able to clear their mind if they are watching the match they bet on and the team is losing or the condition is working against his prediction. It's blood that flows in our veins, so it's not easy and I am certain that the pressure on the person can be proportional to the amount of money used to bet the game. Also, think about it, someone that permutated his games where about 9 out of 10 games have already been won, but the last one is about to ruin the whole ticket. Would you expect the person to play nice, especially when the money to be won is high, having betted with a small amount of money to make such a huge amount? This is why in this category, I like to keep my mute because it depends on the individual. This is the situation where you will talk anyhow to the person and the person could break your head simply due to needless aggression. I can only urge anyone who is betting to be wise, it's not a must that you watch the match you bet on, and if you know you can handle it, go for it. Yet, a mature person will always know that betting is not a do-or-die thing, you can win or lose, so you don't have to be entirely sentimental simply because you have some preference. As it's difficult to practice, we can still try and it will help us over the change in attitude at that time. Sports betting certainly stirs emotions. Bets involve money, hopes, and expectations. Our wager is on the line, so watching the game is an emotional roller coaster. Pressure might be high, especially with a large sum. Humans feel the heat when our predictions are precarious. This is when wisdom comes in. Remember that betting is a chance, not a certainty. Expectations and emotions must be managed. Detachment isnt just advised and survival technique in wagering. Those who master this can experience the excitement without emotional distress. Betting should be fun, not stressful. If watching the game is nerve-wracking, we should rethink our strategy. Betting is a game of chance, so we must stay calm and steady.
|
|
|
Match fixing is disturbing, but its incidence varies. I've found that sport governing organizations' integrity matters more than country size. Due to fewer earnings and less oversight, smaller leagues are vulnerable, but so are larger ones. The bigger stakes in big leagues can attract more sophisticated match-fixing.
I've learnt to focus on controllables as a bettor. Dont fight match fixing alone, but be aware and gamble properly. Observing unusually changing odds or last-minute team roster changes can indicate fixing. This is a complicated subject. Match fixing ruins the skill-luck balance of betting. I dont let match fixing worry me when betting, but I support tighter sports regulations.
|
|
|
I always want to laugh when an addict tells me that he had a big win. But after I asked, is the money still there? And he answered that he had run out of money, because the money earned from previous winnings was spent on betting larger amounts. And suddenly I burst out laughing.
I always pay attention to gambling addicts, and they will only tell me that they won big after their money is gone. maybe because they are afraid, if for example I knew he had a big win, then I would ask for his share. even though I had no intention of doing that. And what I just want is that he can be better at gambling. And if possible, he stops these activities, for his own good. Gambling addicts always talk about their big wins, they do this as a form of "defense" against their bad behavior in gambling. Because they know very well that other people know the magnitude of the losses they have experienced. So people will lecture him until the gambling addict's ears feel hot.
Gambling addicts' "great gains" are often a front for their losses. They're insulating themselves from external judgment and possibly from realizing the problem. Its a defense mechanism, but more complicated. A coping mechanism, it rationalizes gambling despite losses. Despite brief wins and defeats, addiction remains. Financial, emotional, and psychic turmoil are all part of this cycle. Your concern for their health and gambling cessation is not intrusive. Society must treat gambling addiction as a health issue as much as a financial one. The key is identifying psychological triggers, providing assistance, and creating circumstances where healthy gambling or abstinence is the norm. Breaking the addiction cycle requires this person-centered approach.
|
|
|
I always want to laugh when an addict tells me that he had a big win. But after I asked, is the money still there? And he answered that he had run out of money, because the money earned from previous winnings was spent on betting larger amounts. And suddenly I burst out laughing.
I always pay attention to gambling addicts, and they will only tell me that they won big after their money is gone. maybe because they are afraid, if for example I knew he had a big win, then I would ask for his share. even though I had no intention of doing that. And what I just want is that he can be better at gambling. And if possible, he stops these activities, for his own good. Gambling addicts always talk about their big wins, they do this as a form of "defense" against their bad behavior in gambling. Because they know very well that other people know the magnitude of the losses they have experienced. So people will lecture him until the gambling addict's ears feel hot.
Gambling addicts' "great gains" are often a front for their losses. They're insulating themselves from external judgment and possibly from realizing the problem. Its a defense mechanism, but more complicated. A coping mechanism, it rationalizes gambling despite losses. Despite brief wins and defeats, addiction remains. Financial, emotional, and psychic turmoil are all part of this cycle. Your concern for their health and gambling cessation is not intrusive. Society must treat gambling addiction as a health issue as much as a financial one. The key is identifying psychological triggers, providing assistance, and creating circumstances where healthy gambling or abstinence is the norm. Breaking the addiction cycle requires this person-centered approach.
|
|
|
Gambling retirement? Hmmm.. that's quite new to me because I thought a gambler would never retire. I mean, it's not a job after all, if a gambler think it's just for fun, that means it's shouldn't be considered as passion, we can do it anytime we want.
You should rethink if you think gamblers don't retire, there is nothing you can't retire from whether positive or negative, it's about you and what you want for your life. At the age of 60, I don't expect myself to still be gambling at all, and that is for whatever reason. At that game, I want to be following the rhythms of life naturally and undiluted, void of anything that can affect my mental health. If it's for money, I believe I would have fixed it much better before then, and I have never thought that gambling would make me rich ever in my life, so why would I even think of that in my old age? If it's for entertainment, I will play games among friends and family and will not do anything monetarily when it comes to gaming. You see, when we are getting older, there are reasons for us to shift ground, its better to be of more social service inclined and be more useful to yourself, the community and even God in old age and be entirely selfless and refined rather than still believing in things like gambling. That is the way I see it though, everybody is free with their own opinion. As people age, their goals change. Gambling is typically less appealing than mental health and stability. You know gaming doesnt provide money or happiness, especially as you become older, which is smart. In a future culture that values aging well, this fits. Your family activities instead of gambling reflect a positive social shift. You're mature and looking forward to aging. Age changes our wants and needs. Accepting this adjustment is sensible and vital for happiness. Gambling boundaries and mental health effects should be understood. More people agreeing with this concept could make society healthier and more socially connected, especially among older people.
|
|
|
`
If a gambler is no lucky sometimes to win. Then he is not considered to be called a gambler. Yes, there are losses and wins. But for a gambler to not be able to win in casinos at all, there is something that is not right there. He/she should gambling immediately because it is doesn't suit them. Let me understand vividly what your saying here. Are also trying to say that there are some gamblers that do not accept defeat. Defeat/losses cannot be eliminated entirely when it comes in gambling. No one has the best predictions or can foresee the future. This is why there are wins and losses. It is just a game of luck. And defeat may cam when you least expected it. Gamble fundamentally involves chance; winnings and losses are random. This randomness makes gambling appealing and dangerous. Now, if a gambler frequently loses, it may not be their talent or luck, but their approach or knowledge of the games. Responsibility is key to good gambling. Gambling's future, especially with digitalization, requires risk awareness. This is the key: gaming should never be considered a guaranteed income source or financial solution. Its risky entertainment. Gamblers must accept defeat eventually. Gambling involves wins and losses. Gambling should be approached with an accepting mindset, moderating expectations, and responsible play. Don't just win or lose; make informed decisions and grasp the chances.
|
|
|
|