The following Rollin users received Free Lottery Tickets (Ticket number(s) shown behind the name). Your name can be in the list more than one time:SergiuS 41 sinkorswim 42 star2343 43 Nintron711 44 ashitha 45 Blackmamba 46 lontong 47 almosa_bit 48 angayan17 49 Humbertin19_ 50 AtlantaSix 51 2x CASIO 52,53 Ton 54 2x singpays 55,56 2x Barcode 57,58 aRp 59 3x shanem 60,61,62 2x interbtc 63,64 2x hitava 65,66 Wilhelm 67 3x katerniko1 68,69,70 Alby 71 Landak 72 rhoiry 73 lordleahcim 75 If you posted your name but didn't get tickets, one of these options is most likely the cause:- You used the wrong format in your post. Use this format: Username: Loyce
- The username you posted doesn’t exist on Rollin.io
- You never talked in Rollin Chatter Box
- You have Red Trust on Bitcointalk
- You are Blacklisted for abusing this giveaway
- You have already claimed Free Tickets today
- You posted shortly before I posted this, and your post wasn't there yet when my Scraping Bot checked for new posts. If this happened, your post will be included in the next run.
You can always send me a message. 6 remaining ticket(s) (74-80) donated in Rollin Chatter Box:FLT rains 5 tickets: mikail-1,lordleahcim-1,Rhoiry-1,IIO-1,Loyce-1 PvP 80 Next Draw is Wednesday 23:00h (Dutch time). Lottery pot: 8 mBTC. Good luck!
|
|
|
I think you need Bitcoin Core to double spend your coins, but someone more knowledgeable can elucidate on this matter.
I just did this Not from Ledger HW, but from Electrum. If you can extract the private key, you can do this. Simply import the private key into Bitcoin Core, select "Enable coin control features" under Options>Wallet, and manually choose the Input you used for the unconfirmed transaction. After this you can make the same transaction again, with a higher fee. This is of course only useful if you already have Bitcoin Core with a full chain installed on your computer. Otherwise you'll have to download 90 GB first, and in that case just waiting for a confirmation is probably faster. Is it something wrong with the blockchain (not blockchain.info) ?
Your fee is once again too low for a fast transaction. Whether or not something is wrong with blockchain is debated: blocks are full, blocks don't get larger any time soon, so you'll have to compete with other transactions. That's awesome, didn't now Electrum also had coin control.
It doesn't.
|
|
|
I had to enter my phone number and get a confirmation code, and after that just insert cash.
Why do they need your phone number? Is that a legal requirement? I was expecting you'd enter your bank pas like a normal ATM, and get Bitcoins instead of cash. But it makes sense to use cash, so it can go both ways directly. It even printed out a receipt. How did you get the Bitcoins? Printed on the same receipt? The screen says "Withdraw Cash", if that means you have to wait for 1 (or 6?) confirmations, how does that work? Do you have to wait at the machine and guard it for minutes to hours until your money comes out? What if more people want to use it?
|
|
|
Congratulations Barcode for winning 54 mBTC with a Free Lottery Ticket. Full Lottery Results are of course public.The winning Lottery Ticket was #308. The next Draw is Wednesday (tomorrow) 23:00h Amsterdam time. As always, you can claim Free Lottery Tickets every day.Next server seed: aWLf4N56UTHS4713930G6US2eb9T8981
|
|
|
The following Rollin users received Free Lottery Tickets (Ticket number(s) shown behind the name). Your name can be in the list more than one time:2x Barcode 308,309 Humbertin19_ 310 2x CASIO 361,362 3x Katerniko1 363,364,365 aRp 366 Blackmamba 367 james1 368 2x hitava 369,370 3x shanem 371,372,373 Provablylucky_ 374 Ton 375 2x Slick 376,377 angayan17 378 Wilhelm 379 Alby 380 ashitha 381 2x interbtc 382,383 BitLab 384 lontong 385 2x Barcode 386,387 2x singpays 388,389 3x psonowa 390,391,392 2x maat 393,394 rhoiry 395 If you posted your name but didn't get tickets, one of these options is most likely the cause:- You used the wrong format in your post. Use this format: Username: Loyce
- The username you posted doesn’t exist on Rollin.io
- You never talked in Rollin Chatter Box
- You have Red Trust on Bitcointalk
- You are Blacklisted for abusing this giveaway
- You have already claimed Free Tickets today
- You posted shortly before I posted this, and your post wasn't there yet when my Scraping Bot checked for new posts. If this happened, your post will be included in the next run.
You can always send me a message. 5 remaining ticket(s) (396-400) donated in Rollin Chatter Box:FLT rains 4 tickets: carmen-1,Loyce-1,Riven-1,se7en8891-1 PvP 400 Next Draw is Sunday 23:00h (Dutch time). Lottery pot: 42 mBTC. Good luck!
|
|
|
Lottery Bot is back online!After the DDOS (2 weeks ago), Rollin was quickly back online. But the changes in servers and the fact that Mod madcoin was not physically on the right location took Lottery offline for 2 weeks. The Draw is tomorrow. I've just donated the 297 Tickets that I owed you guys.The following Rollin users received Free Lottery Tickets (Ticket number(s) shown behind the name). Your name can be in the list more than one time:hardtime 1 james1 2 sangmrsimple 3 2x maat 4,5 almosa_bit 6 lolgatocell 7 natsag3 8 BitLab 9 3x shanem 10,11,12 AtlantaSix 13 blackmamba 14 2x hitava 15,16 angayan17 17 Visions 18 Provablylucky_ 19 arunkmr865 20 star2343 21 3x psonowa 22,23,24 ashitha 25 aRp 26 james1 27 2x Akai 28,29 ba4114 30 Barcode 31 Alby 32 famiextrem 33 2x CASIO 34,35 Wilhelm 36 8x katerniko1 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44 Humbertin19_ 45 vavilon 46 maksosip 47 2x maat 48,49 2x SimpleRed7 50,51 Humbertin19_ 52 ashitha 53 fitraok09 54 2x hitava 55,56 blackmamba 57 2x Akai 58,59 BitLab 60 james1 61 3x katerniko1 62,63,64 vavilon 65 2x Slick 66,67 wibuindon 68 2x hardtime 69 ba4114 70 2x maat 71,72 2x interbtc 73,74 AtlantaSix 77 2x hitava 78,79 3x shanem 80,81,82 blackmamba 83 arunkmr865 84 Humbertin19_ 85 BitLab 86 aRp 87 2x Barcode 88,89 2x SimpleRed7 90,91 james1 92 famiextrem 93 ba4114 94 2x maat 95,96 Provablylucky_ 97 3x katerniko1 98,99,100 Rhoiry 101 2x Slick 102,103 AtlantaSix 104 ba4114 105 BitLab 106 2x SimpleRed7 107,108 2x hitava 109,110 Alby 111 2x interbtc 112,113 ashitha 114 2x maat 115,116 BitYoLo 117 2x hitava 118,119 Fitraok09 120 3x shanem 121,122,123 3x Erikalui 124,125,126 arunkmr865 127 2x interbtc 128,129 Humbertin19_ 130 james1 131 BitLab 132 3x psonowa 133,134,135 2x maat 136,137 famiextrem 138 2x Slick 139,140 2x somuchee 141,142 wibuindon 143 3x shanem 144,145,146 arunkmr865 147 james1 148 3x katerniko1 149,150,151 ashitha 152 2x bankk 153,154 ba4114 155 2x maat 156,157 3x shanem 158,159,160 arunkmr865 161 2x hitava 162,163 sangmrsimple 164 L3gionario 165 3x katerniko1 166,167,168 2x interbtc 169,170 2x SimpleRed7 171,172 james1 173 latina 174 2x Slick 175,176 2x maat 177,178 AtlantaSix 179 Angayan17 180 2x hitava 181,182 blackmamba 183 L3gionario 184 arunkmr865 185 3x shanem 186,187,188 fitraok09 189 2x interbtc 190,191 james1 192 2x maat 193,194 2x hitava 195,196 3x shanem 197,198,199 L3gionario 200 arunkmr865 201 2x interbtc 202,203 almosa_bit 204 BitLab 205 2x SimpleRed7 206,207 Alby 208 Alby 209 3x shanem 210,211,212 ashitha 213 2x hitava 214,215 2x interbtc 216,217 arunkmr865 218 2x maat 219,220 BitLab 221 2x hitava 222 visions 223 3x shanem 224,225,226 Blackmamba 227 Alby 228 3x katerniko1 229,230,231 2x interbtc 232,233 arunkmr865 234 2x bankk 235,236 almosa_bit 237 2x Slick 238,239 2x SimpleRed7 240,241 2x maat 242,243 BitLab 244 natsag3 245 2x hitava 246,247 Blackmamba 248 3x shanem 249,250,251 2x SimpleRed7 252,253 Alby 254 james1 255 Alby 256 L3gionario 257 2x hitava 258,259 3x shanem 260,261,262 2x Slick 263,264 famiextrem 268 2x interbtc 269,270 2x maat 75,76 BitLab 265 2x hitava 266,267 3x shanem 281,282,283 Alby 284 james1 285 2x SimpleRed7 286,287 2x interbtc 288,289 2x Slick 290,291 2x maat 292,293 hulkpanther 294 2x hitava 295,296 AtlantaSix 297 3x shanem 298,299,300 Alby 301 almosa_bit 302 Wilhelm 303 BitLab 304 3x psonowa 305,306,307 If you posted your name but didn't get tickets, one of these options is most likely the cause:- You used the wrong format in your post. Use this format: Username: Loyce
- The username you posted doesn’t exist on Rollin.io
- You never talked in Rollin Chatter Box
- You have Red Trust on Bitcointalk
- You are Blacklisted for abusing this giveaway
- You have already claimed Free Tickets today
- You posted shortly before I posted this, and your post wasn't there yet when my Scraping Bot checked for new posts. If this happened, your post will be included in the next run.
You can always send me a message. Happy Hour (from the 9th of October):0 remaining ticket(s) (-) donated in Rollin Chatter Box:- Next Draw is Tuesday 23:00h (Dutch time). Lottery pot: 31 mBTC. Next server seed: 4p59p6T1M7a272W63jV4z76e9837232Z Good luck!
|
|
|
Congratulations! That was fast! I already expected this one may have been too easy
|
|
|
There are one thousand, one hundred and seventy-three pages of members with the "website" in their profile... ((1,172 X 30) + 22 = 35,182 ) Those were (or are) spam and were usually nuked on sight (after they posted). After realizing that, some probably kept registering without posting. If you can compile a list of links, we could nuke them relatively easy[1] (even though they aren't/won't cause harm).
Update: [1] Re-read the post and realized it's 35 thousand. I can do this, if you can nuke that many accounts at once. Do you have cluster-nukes to nuke'm all, or would you have to do them one by one? but 30k accounts is overkill for a single patroller.
So no cluster nukes
|
|
|
.bitcoin directory size 64M
I know blockchain size 80GB How can I speed up blockchain download?
"At the beginning" blocks are small, so you should quickly go through the first few "years behind", even though the directory size doesn't go up much. So this seems normal. Later on, I've noticed (and tested) the speed is mainly limited by my harddrive. If you can, use a SSD (if you're not already doing it). When I tested this from a ram-drive, my CPU become the limitation, while running from my laptop's hdd the CPU was mainly idle waiting for the disk.
|
|
|
4 inches away from the charger is better than being plugged into it I wouldn't call this "in Mid-Air". It's just hovering above a charging station, and if you're there hovering anyway, it will be a lot more efficient to land, turn of the rotors, and charge. I see a different application: with 4 inches distance this could be used to charger electric cars on a highway! The article doesn't mention the overall efficiency, so I assume quite low. And that has always been the (fundamental) problem with "wireless charging": the transfer efficiency goes down exponentially with increasing distance.
|
|
|
There is really almost no valid reason for one to sell their account here. Even if they were desperate for money, then the best thing to do would be to put it in as collateral for a loan. The account only has value as collateral if it can be sold. And if that's the "almost no valid reason" you mean, it could also be abused to sell an account: take a fake loan, default the loan, sell the account. I'm not sure about that, nor what other moderators/administrators think. Currently, banned users get stripped of their signature and other profile information (implemented sometime in 2016 IIRC).
I would suggest a Rank: "Banned". One word, right under the username. It can even be a warning for other people.
|
|
|
As I have joined some twitter campaigns so i thought of a new address :
Prefix : 1TweeT
Apparently prefixes starting with a T are the tough ones. After 34 minutes I got you this: Address: 1 TweeT78tN2qb2b2EH7FJiFfhoDW4pDgV (Balance: ) PrivkeyPart: 5JiwwTUhjUmWUuqA5R8Ls1KNY7ziXHaCodvq9m11EPmPjrapRXE
|
|
|
Looks like Lauda has been going strong with cleaning up the Bitmixer campaign. If that means that I get banned as well, then it is what it is. But it's a good effort to keep the forum clean.
I like this plot twist! Although it struck me as dubious at first, offering a job to a Staff-member after messages regarding spam, it actually is a good solution. This way Staff gets paid to clean up instead of doing it for free, and the polluter pays. I'd like to hear what people think about making account sales banned?
If Paypal can't stop it, I have no illusions thinking Bitcointalk can stop it. Email addresses and IPs can change, which makes it very hard to detect a sale. Even if 2 accounts were originally created from the same IP, and one of them moves to a different IP, it could have been 2 different people, for example in a student house. In my opinion, the only thing Bitcointalk can really do, is ban the account-for-sale-threads on this site, after which sales continue on other forums. Well, some argue that you can't halt account sales completely (which is a straw-man) and I'm sure that the staff is well aware of this.
While reading on, you say exactly what I just typed Banning sales will most likely limit it, but botany has a point too pointing at the "false sense of security" it can give. Just like obvious scam threads aren't deleted.
|
|
|
is it possible for me to get knox2o3 or knox23 here the pub key : 0490D4C920198496BD7E547812AC8E2783BF1BE3F941C9F88F336C46FAA6B407D56D5631A8A78563D9480D9FBB128F78CFDCEBED36FC48499CCECFCA58CAC97C01 1Knox2o3 is too long for this giveaway, I got you 1Knox23, with a capital K: Address: 1 Knox23VL9nwfRUcidL4GmXpFeS4M2KCb4 (Balance: ) PrivkeyPart: 5JRFdorLENCU9T5w6QoSTZoZWiDLSsiis2g9Dqxcp87V2GmMBkA If you want 1Knox2o3, I can do it for a price though As discussed would like to have 1psonowa or 1MatriX Here is the public key 04823A250ED18560C75D83F2996C8B2B200F37FAD4BCC50A81CF6E8B423FFE2DCE1B9B9D324644F267E6C3B9E377CDC18D677263E241059FFFC654AE9235E0E82A
1psonowa is too long for this giveaway. I can get you 1Psonowa at a price if you want, 1psonowa would take too long for my hardware. I got you 1Matrix or 1MatriX. Choose one: Address: 1 MatriXsZ5YT5m6xeNU8yEvGGadAxUeHNG (Balance: ) PrivkeyPart: 5JYpa3ce1UrgHhKcZay3HFpoYD6vw2oHTWgmKwprrkya2Kejz36 Address: 1 MatrixtaaVPm8u8TgYomCwtVtWmo9pHLv (Balance: ) PrivkeyPart: 5KHp32mPCUqzQGYFZnz3DbtXnBGwKnfyDADT6CaWAPskQoKZJD
|
|
|
I understand that it is about Bitcointalk account. It's not: a deal i am doing for a localbitcoin acc
I'm not sure about the details of localbitcoin, as I've never used it. But I can only think of bad reasons to buy an account there.
|
|
|
It is not that simple. There were, and most likely still are, huge signature campaigns that recruit hundreds of users while there may be not so many good posters, thus the campaign managers which are chosen to run these campaigns might not have any other option left but to accept almost anyone who knows how to sign up for a campaign and not make a dozen mistakes therewith... If there are not enough quality posters, the campaign should not hire that many people. Simple as that. If they want more posters, campaigns could compete with other campaigns on the price they offer. On the other hand, the services may be more interested in the sheer exposure their ads get than in the quality of posts the enrollees make Obviously. So I'm in favour of banning campaigns if warning them doesn't help. I think he's talking about me.
I've seen your posts And would like to give you a "thumbs up" on your posts if I could. Instead of just Activity, based on just the number of post spread over the years, it would be really nice to have a +1 or -1 option to like/dislike posts as a quality-indicator for the user. But I think the army of Alts will quickly mess that up too. A good poster can't make more than, say, 15 posts daily on a regular basis, and daily might really be a hefty overstretch. Sometimes you don't feel like posting at all. Shit posters simply don't have such issues altogether
It's a day job to them. I've done the math, it can produce a very nice income in a lot of countries. In my experience it's mainly Asians (Indonesia/Philippines), which explains the bad English. And the more people discover this, the worse it gets. Until the market/forum is saturated with spam and the price per post goes down. Or until the moment the ban hammer hits them hard. Spamming should not be condoned - it should be as simple as that. If any person could kindly tell me why spammers help the bitcointalk ecosystem (apart from pointless traffic for ad revenue) in any way at all, then I will certainly change my ways and turn into a hardcore one-line spammer myself. After all, I can easily pump out hundreds of useless posts to grind out those cents!
It seems it has become more or less accepted to post this way. And because people post like this, others see it's accepted and do the same. Guess who just randomly decided to respond to my pm? Bitmixer. What a coincidence! I'm sure someone with about ten accounts on their campaign mailed them in a panic or something.
So just the idea of bans is already paying off! Any idea what the timeline on the stricter rules for spammers is?
|
|
|
Mitigation 1: Campaigns run by bots. Mitigation 2: Sign up for campaigns outside of forum. While they keep figuring out ways to mitigate this, we've lost a lot of time and effectively accomplished only minor results.
Countermeasure 1: reroute links in their signatures somewhere else? That will for sure stop playing whack-a-manager with alts. Most campaigns don't want users with red trust. A red trust label "spammer" from a Moderator could make the account worthless to farmers. It may also be possible to disable the signature for any account that has red trust on a certain DT level. Ever hear of the saying "A few bad apples ruin the bunch"? That is exactly what is happening here. If those users who are not shit posters actually post with decent quality, they should have absolutely no problem finding another signature campaign willing to both pay them more and accept them into the campaign.
Yesterday I saw a good post from someone with a Yobit-signature. I checked his post history, and it really felt like such a waste to see him in that campaign. The image of the signature really makes his posts look bad, while they're not. It is entirely bitmixer.io's fault for paying the shit posters and not enforcing their own anti-spam rule. It is entirely their fault for enabling those shit posters/account farmers to continue to post and be paid for it. They are encouraging shit posting by continuing to pay for it; and that is entirely their fault. Clearly, they earn from it. And as long as there are no repercussions for them, they keep earning. Devil's advocate: why do more work to earn less? Many are, but many still continue to shit post after their bans or they come back with alts to complain about their bans. However there is enough evidence to suggest that many of those spammers spam because they are being paid by poorly managed campaigns. Thus instead of treating the symptoms of the problem (i.e. the spammers), we need to treat the source (i.e. the campaigns themselves and the people who run them). Go for it Usually I read topics filled with complaints about spam, I might have missed some topics, but this is the first time I read about plans to take action against it.
|
|
|
whenever I post my experience with Bitgold which happens to be positive, I am slammed and downtrodden and said to be everything from being a Bitgold conspirator to a bought poster to an employee. People don't sign up to post positive reviews, people sign up to complain about things! For that reason, reviews online are in general less positive than reality. Example: Paypal on Trustpilot: rating 1.3 out of 10 after 2521 reviews. That doesn't mean they don't have millions of happy users, they just don't have a reason to post about it. Just like you don't sign up to a forum to say you're happy with your new toaster, or bank account, or anything else. If you're unhappy on the other hand, it is more likely you want to spread the word. So if you just sign up to say how happy you are, you shouldn't be surprised people are going to take that with a grain of salt.
|
|
|
This comment under it sums it up nicely: thesonandheir Oct 19, 2016 7:57 AM
A deflationary currency really scares them eh? Central Banks need inflation, governments need inflation, and the rich and powerful need inflation. As a civilian, I am much better off if 1 euro/dollar will still be worth the same in 20 years. I don't need inflation, especially not if it's combined with barely 0.5% savings interest and taxes. I think inflation is used as a mechanism to hide the fact that "the middle class" now earns much less than the middle class did 40 years ago. Your salary goes up, so it's hard to compare wages now to wages in another time. To get back on topic: I don't think ECB/EU will be able to regulate Bitcoin, and even if they do, I don't expect it to lose value over it. If anything, it's value will only go up! the minute it shows any signs of mainstream adoption they powers above will stomp on it
I don't think banning Bitcoin will stop mainstream adoption. Compare this with downloading music: although illegal, most people have done it.
|
|
|
|