This is ridiculous, it has been over 24 hours, I still have 0 confirmations. If only I knew, ugh. I would pay for my VPN again with the fee provided, but I already have the transaction in progress. I'm frustrated because of how helpless I am, it's ironic that one of Bitcoin's many selling points was "NO TAXES" This shit's got to stop  Time is a commodity or, moreover, a [not-so] hidden tax when it comes to awaiting confirmations. |
|
|
|
You are seriously the worst person on Bitcointalk. You just float from thread to thread talking about how every coin is a shitty pump/dump coin and how much every dev sucks. You have got to be the most annoying person I have ever had the displeasure of seeing almost every fucking day on here. It's ridiculous. What's wrong with you. To paraphrase a wise ass man ... it is hard being a retard 100% of the time? |
|
|
|
After going to brenda's address for the second time and her not answering the door I left a note. Here a week later I get a voicemail from her, here it is: https://clyp.it/2ina4pj3So I guess right after the scam is outed and people sent her thousands of dollars (I have a guy who told me he lost 25k) she "no longer has time for this" She also won't return my phone calls. Looks like Channel 4 was met with the same response: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFEoMO0pc7k |
|
|
|
Im just saying! Calm your jets!
<snip>
We saw Miner speeds go from 60GH/s to 7TH/s in 5 years. We will see a jump in speed somewhere along the line and probably very soon. Hate to pop your shiny glowing bubble vision of What Will Soon Be... No, we won't and I for one will be damned before I support mention that something along those lines is possible today or even within 2 years. All it does is lend credence to scammer claims. They rely on that bright wide-eyed wonder to pitch their frauds. Even back in 2013 when 65nm miners were finally moving out the door and 28nm tech miners were being hawked/pre-sold, the current 14/16nm tech had been in development for around 5 years and they had only recently succeeded in making viable test circuits of any sort. It took another 3 years before TSMC, Samsung, and GloFo finally started commercial production of 16/14nm chips. The next generation of chips targeting the 10nm and 7nm nodes are in the same boat. Just because Bitmain et al say they have a road map to those nodes does not mean they will be soon seen. The very simple reason is that those nodes cannot yet be produced by even Intel or IBM much less TSMC and the others. Earlier this year both Intel and IBM announced making test circuits at the 10nm node and test structures at 7nm. If past history is any guide that puts test-production of functional main-stream use (eg CPU/GPU) 10nm chips at least 2 years out and 7nm as huge??? I thought Samsung foundry just started to ship mass produced 10nm FF processors in the new S8's. I remember reading about there advanced 3D transistor structure and big efficiency gains (like 30% better at 40% less power or so). I hate going OT like this, especially since I think you're still 100% right, it doesn't really make any kind of sense to think miners are getting 10nm chips or magnitudes of better efficiency very soon. I know of a 62-year-old woman residing in California that would disagree with you to your face if by happenstance she ever answers her door again. |
|
|
|
"Storjcoin (STORJ) will soon be migrating from Bitcoin’s Counterparty protocol to Ethereum’s ERC20 standard. Concurrently with the migration process, we will be running a Token Sale for STORJ: opening May 19th and running until June 19th at the latest. We want to make sure that you, the community, receive all the details as soon as they become available. That’s why we’re launching a new Telegram channel dedicated specifically to the STORJ Token Sale. The Storj team, as well as our advisors from Argon Group will be available on the channel throughout the process." (Quated from Storjcoin forum) What to say about this? Is Storjcoin team stupid?  No, only because I like and respect Shawn Wilkinson: https://twitter.com/super3/ He's a cool dude! Please tell him that Bruno said hi, bud. "Storjcoin (STORJ) will soon be migrating from Bitcoin’s Counterparty protocol to Ethereum’s ERC20 standard. Concurrently with the migration process, we will be running a Token Sale for STORJ: opening May 19th and running until June 19th at the latest. We want to make sure that you, the community, receive all the details as soon as they become available. That’s why we’re launching a new Telegram channel dedicated specifically to the STORJ Token Sale. The Storj team, as well as our advisors from Argon Group will be available on the channel throughout the process." (Quated from Storjcoin forum) What to say about this? Is Storjcoin team stupid? Apparently there are still many naive guys falling for this "scam". I haven't seen this interview with Argon Group posted here, maybe it just doesn't add controversy so it's pointless for many. https://youtu.be/sS1Ryi9jOtEGleb Gamow, again, I really appreciate your input but you don't have to be so vulgar and repetitive, you are grasping at straws man. I'm in no way affiliated with the team and I myself had doubts about how they managed certain things but you are just going too far. I suggest you to please redirect your research skills (which are awesome by the way) to other projects, we really need you patrolling other threads for actual scams. Even 50-100 BTC ICOs scams are important and I don't see you there. This may be a bad investment but I'm sure they won't run with our money anytime soon. Noted, bud. It's just that it doesn't smell right. Please also note that my stance doesn't have anything to do with Brock Pierce personally in regards to any past issues pertaining to him. I quit riding that [unsaid] horse upon meeting him in person. Overall, he may be great for the overall space, but I do have transparency issues with how this ICO was handled. Argon Group was not needed in any capacity in accomplishing the exact same feat. That said, I took a double dose of my Tourette syndrome medication.  |
|
|
|
Hey Bruno [...] [...] Tell the misses I said hey, bud. [...] she told me ask if you're still wearing that cute little pink outfit. She says you'd fit in just fine around here. We see guys wearing those all the time in the Castro. lol [...] I see the headlines now: Bald-headed Dude AGAIN Meets Tutu-donning Toothless Fuck - Film at 11 Just for the people wondering WTF they're talking about (and maybe a nostalgic chuckle here and there):  That only made it worse... WTF?!?!? Don't start passing judgement. Bruno was supporting a very worthy cause and I applaud him for it. It takes a very secure man to wear a tutu in public to support a disease afflicting only women. The ultimate sacrifice is to give of yourself to support a cause that doesn't effect you at all just because it's the right thing to do. Very few people are willing to do that. http://thetutuproject.comFair enough. I missed who this actually was. I thought it was one of the BFL guys or something. I have no qualms with anybody making fun of me. It's all good. Thanks, QA, for coming up to bat for me nonetheless. |
|
|
|
If you missed out on the ICO, what would be the best price to buy this puppy?
I'm also curious, how much do you see QTUM growing price wise?
Ethereum seems to be tearing up the crypto space...
The best price will be whatever Steven Dai starts dumping his Qtum tokens at. Dumped as in every other post sans one espousing the name Steven Dai. Don't believe me? Search this thread for Steven Dai (sans quotes). |
|
|
|
I think the dev is afraid to show any TX ID`s because of the hackers, but what really puzzling is, if you raise 15 million dollars worth of bitcoin the devs have the bragging right to show off, but people need proof such as TX ID`s, even if the devs invested on their own token and they have the right to do so. still you need to show transparency with other investors.
its really easy to publish to the world that they got 15M dollars but what is tricky is to show people the proof.  That's not our concern anymore, the fact that they raised that big amount, I can tell they are getting big investors. I was part of their signature campaign in the past and they pay an awesome amount so by simply looking at the scenario, I conclude they are big. Maybe if everything is real, but being a smart investor we must focus in a more transparent and trustworthy Team behind it. Besides, this is not the only coin introduced this time and not in our standard criteria. So, good luck quantum fans!..  Qtum is a hard and innovative project. it's a new kind of project, before Qtum, no one want to combine Bitcoin and ethereum Qtum is the first one want to do this. So Qtum combine the advantages of Bitcoin and ethereum. Also Qtum team showed some proof of 6 partners signature from exchanges to prove they raised that amount of money. and i believe qtum will delivery their promise. the ico price is 1BTC= 3800 Qtum after the project release, i think it's easy the price will go to 1 BTC= 380 Qtum. All ico investors will make some great profit for sure. Are you part of the Qtum team? no i am a big miner in china. but i know a lot of information from Qtum wechat community. the Qtum wechat community is more active than bitcointalk Qtum wechat have about 15 groups, each group have about 400-500 people. so it's about 6000 people in Qtum wechat community. Ethereum in china only have 1 big wechat group (500 people) i think Qtum have a bigger community than ethereum in china. This is why I invested in Qtum. The Asian market has not seemed to embrace ETH yet. Qtum can fill that place. from what i know, Ethereum only have 2 wechat group in china, which have about 1000 people in wechat group. but Qtum have about 15 groups, each group have about 400-500 people. so 6000-7500 people in Qtum wechat group. plus different Qtum QQ group which have about 2000 people. i think only in different groups Qtum have 10000 people in china. do not forget, we have 1.4 billion people in china.  So, you're in China? |
|
|
|
^devs scammed us out of our "airdrop" ~ go crawl into a dark place.. D: I, for one, wasn't scammed. At the beginning of this venture, I raised alarms about how folks could easily game the system in participating by earning several airdrops, the example I used depicted ten airdrops. My concerns were met by devs stating that there were defense mechanisms in place so to curtail such practices. That wasn't good enough for me, so I created 20 users accounts and successfully game the system with all 20 of them, received my airdrops, then quickly sold them off, making about five grand - five grand from something that was impossible to accomplish, and sold to some users on this thread who had the red-ass for me at the time. Pretty fuckin amazin', eh? Since then, I've stayed cleared of this thread, mostly because it doesn't seem like a major nefarious entity, albeit I profited from it the same ways others and perhaps Decred, itself, made bank. That said, if you like airdrops it just so happens that I'm conducting one myself to the tune of dropping U$1M of my CPL token. Take a look -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1900371.0 I'll even pay users acting as an oversight committee of sorts in making sure that everything surrounding the airdrop et al. is above board. |
|
|
|
Still no coin has been transferred out. Why? Because Paul Vernon still has enough loot in his coffer to live off in China alongside the sweetest Chinese pussy known to mankind, hence Paul leaving his wife and their two kids to fend for themselves. The man that hath no music in himself, Nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds, is fit for treasons, stratagems and spoils. |
|
|
|
I am encouraged that some investors believe the Parity investment is a good move because of Polkadot and Gavin Woods involvement. In order for me to put a value on my investment does anyone actually know why its a good deal from a commercial point of view?
I guess the same reason, why it was a good idea to buy Ethereum 2 years ago. It still haunts me that i sold almost 10000 for below 50 cents, because i listened to the FUD http://www.coindesk.com/ethereum-bitcoin-decline-9-million-funding-shortfall/Since then i am kind of allergic against those FUD trolls. Yes ETH was a good gamble however the deal between BACP and Parity has specific details and Blockchain Capital will not tell me what they are. Allow me to repeat a truism that some folks consider FUD. BCAP raised U$50M: U$40M from VC and U$10M from this ICO. The U$10M raised via the ICO went to Parity, an entity own by millionaires fully capable of funding their greatest invention since sliced bread. The other U$40M raised by BCAP remains untouched IF IT EXISTED AT ALL! The Russian team overseeing the ICO touted 5 other ICO's supposedly under their control, visible on their website. At the end of BCAP's ICO, the other 5 ICOs were expunged from their website along with myriad posts by me on this non-self-moderated thread. To date, Team Russians have yet to embrace another ICO, supposedly running its course as an entity in this space. |
|
|
|
Let me guess, still no tx ids or addresses to prove ICO funds? Yall need to learn about the blockchain, it's this new tech that let's you do things like prove transactions/funds in a trustless manner. Pretty neat stuff. Check out bitcointalk.org it's a good place to introduce yourself to the concept.
I participated in their ICO. I don't have tx ids for BTC, but here's the Qtum ETH transaction page: https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0xa37f1c452e16188d59c8956b1b624b4ac8ccf3ab&p=140,001 ETH sent to address 0x556B5712C2a7CC5506fbfA785B52536fb8243765. I don't know who this belongs to or what to make of it. i think Qtum did not public any eth address. since all their eth from different exchanges. where you participate the ico? You're completely right. I participated via bizhongchou.com. I wonder if 0x556B5712C2a7CC5506fbfA785B52536fb8243765 is an address owned by Qtum... that's not a qtum address. The devs could clear this up for us in an instant but for some reason refuse to. sooner or later they will. just be patient. plus all these dramas, Qtum is still the first POS Smart contact platform and compatible with BIPs.... that's some real innovations. it's rare in crypto world. It's the first? I wasn't aware qtum was released and functional yet. stormia, onetwo12 ain't right in the head. Two months ago he asked me to investigate something for him, then a little of three hours later he stated that I should be banned. Now the retard is jacking off all over himself about Qtum's great contribution to the crypto space that hasn't been released yet.  Weixing ChenBillionaire founder of KuaiDi how many Qtum this billionaire hold ? why he invest? Gleb, can you do some research on this guy? thank you man Fuck you Gleb and BTCspace, can you guys stop post?
your post is too long for newbie account to read.
stop post this shit, i will give you 2 guys my money.
you 2 guys are bump this thread, moderator should ban you 2 guys.
|
|
|
|
 "The other day I walked into a pizza joint and the manager immediately pegged me as the creator of Bitcoin. I asked him if it was the cap that gave my secret identity away and he said no. Some dude named Vlad informed him that I'd be stopping by soon. I asked him where's the bathroom so that I could wash my hands. He said that he will tell me once and that he'll never, even tell me again. I then asked him if I could use that." |
|
|
|
After reading the paste bin it seams there were 2 conversations. Dr Wright left and returned....
Vlad, who created the Pastebin? |
|
|
|
"Blockchain Capital also announced today the fund’s first investment will be into Parity Technologies Ltd (formerly known as Ethcore). Parity is the company that created the Parity Ethereum software. Dr. Gavin Wood, the creator of the Ethereum specification, has recently also proposed a revolutionary heterogenous multichain framework called Polkadot. Polkadot is a third generation public, permissionless blockchain technology designed to be at once scalable and extensible, solving two of the greatest problems preventing widespread adoption of blockchain technology today."
Those are great news and Parity/Polkadot is in the best hands possible with Gavin Woods, seems like a very promising project. I'm not sure how they plan to monetize this eventually, my theory is that there will be an ICO eventually and the fund will act as VC/early founder and get a share of the network. do you have a link for that announcment? FOUND IT, GREAT NEWS. http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/04/21/blockchain-capital-announces-successful-conclusion-fundraise-funds-first-investment-parity-technologies/U$10M raised via the ICO to augment the U$40M put in via VC funding, then the U$10M is put into a pet project owned by millionaires while the U$40M remains untouched. Whose dick do I have to suck to get in on some of this action? Marina's? Oh, and more archaic posts of mine have been deleted from this thread. WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU ASSHOLES TRYIN' TO HIDE? |
|
|
|
Any more news on this scam? I am curious if police have been sent to her address yet.
Given that no police were sent to BFL's facility during the height of their money grab, I kinda doubt that they're gonna to take the time to knock on the door of a 62-year-old woman who has her name on some charter of a business that's 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999% a scam. On the other hand, if she was a homeowner with the last name Wagner who sold some bitcoins as a hobby, there'll be a SWAT team at home within hours making her young children lie on the floor and be quiet else their brains would be blown out. Tell the police she's sellin Bitcoins to kids!!!!!! Tell the police that kids are masturbating on her petunias while eating Morning Glory seeds. |
|
|
|
You announced at 04:26:55 AM (PST - my time; -7 GMT) Wright's time is probably GMT, given that he's in the UK. You're in Romania: +2 GMT You posted the Pastebin link at 09:08:34 AM (PST, again my time) How do you explain this? 7 hours later was the last message: According to the Pastebin timeline, the convo lasted 7 hours according to some unknown timezone, but you have a start-to-finish timeline equaling to ~4 1/2 hours. What am I missing in the equation? A Quantum Derivative in Mod5/Base 17? Computer glitches? The Pastebin was created on 4 May 2017 13:05:12 UTC which equates to 6:05:12 PST (my time). |
|
|
|
Vlad stop all the riddles and share your wisdom.We are too lazy and easily distracted to think for ourselves.I am too afraid to use slack in case one of the doods above ^^^ see my password  ... Haha. If you missed it here's the pastebin. We'll try to do it again, it was really a great experience. https://pastebin.com/5A7AwrmdYou announced at 04:26:55 AM (PST - my time; -7 GMT) Wright's time is probably GMT, given that he's in the UK. You're in Romania: +2 GMT You posted the Pastebin link at 09:08:34 AM (PST, again my time) How do you explain this? 7 hours later was the last message: According to the Pastebin timeline, the convo lasted 7 hours according to some unknown timezone, but you have a start-to-finish timeline equaling to ~4 1/2 hours. What am I missing in the equation? A Quantum Derivative in Mod5/Base 17? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
