Given that London controls most of the world's banking, GMT is probably the most useful time zone for international Bitcoin transactions.
Given that the Middle East controls the world's oil supply, Dubai time is probably the most useful when pumping gas.
|
|
|
I see a lot of anti-inflation sentiment around. I am frankly in disagreement with it all. The 'hodl' mentality is deflationary spiral nonsense which does nothing to help the economy of Bitcoin.
Ask anyone from Venezuela how they feel about inflation. Ask anyone who was an adult in the U.S. in the 1970's what they think about inflation. I'm guessing that you don't think inflation is bad because you have never really experienced it. I believe there should be inflation to get the economy of Bitcoin going so the market cap rises on actual economic activity than pointless speculation. This should be fixed at about 1.5% annually. This will encourage investment and commerce, which is the point of a currency.
There are a lot of ways you can do inflation. You could give the new coins to miners, or you could do a "stock split" where the amount of Bitcoin an individual has increases 1.5% annually.
You may be happy to know that your suggestion of giving new coins to miners is how it works right now. The current Bitcoin inflation rate is about 4%. It will drop to about 2% in 2020.
|
|
|
I think we should focus more on educating people instead of warning them because malware programs will always be here and anti-viruses are not going to help.
Mac users, in general, believe that they are immune to viruses. I agree that people should be more careful, but they won't until they realize that there is a real danger.
|
|
|
... you can't even come up with bullshit to explain the acceleration from the change in speed every 12 hours due to the 66.6k MPH claimed orbit around the Sun.
At a certain time at the equator, you are traveling in a direction at about 65.6k mph, and then about 67.6k mph in that direction 12 hours later. The change in speed is about 2000 mph over 43200 seconds, which is an overall acceleration of about 0.0463 mph/s. That's nothing compared to falling, at 21.8 mph/s, which is why we don't fly off the earth. If we accelerated at that rate when we started walking, it would take over a minute just to get to a normal pace of 3 mph.
|
|
|
The price has risen 10% above the low 6 weeks ago. Are you sure we aren't already in a recovery?
|
|
|
can someone please help me I got a call from vegas and these guys talked me into transferring all my coins from binance. I notices I cannot make trades or send it back to my biance what do I do? I think I got scammed...please help
You can try contacting the FBI: https://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx
|
|
|
I want to sign a message with a Bitcoin address using PHP. I am using openssl_sign() for this. But, this appears to accept RSA private key, instead of WIF or HEX format. Now, how do I convert WIF/HEX to the required format for signing? Sorry, I know very little about PHP, but this might help: https://www.example-code.com/phpext/ecdsa_sign_data.asp
|
|
|
I've just found out about the MACD, and of course, I will have to learn how to use it. Hopefully it will help me to get a whopper ( wait, that isn't McDonalds is it ) before I lose my chips. Lets hope I can make some buffalo wraps rather than chicken wraps, and I can pick up some golden nuggets.
Ignoring that frivolity, a MACD is The Moving Average Convergence Divergence, and it relates to the divergence between a long period EMA and a short period EMA, and it can provide a buy or sell indication. More info when I've watched the video, and I tried to use it.
While the concept may have some merit, the standard implementation of a MACD is a comparison of two weighted moving averages that are misaligned, and the result is mostly noise.
|
|
|
England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the Channel Islands all have their own forms of cash. Most of the time they'll be refused if you try to pay for them outside their locale. I've never been able to spend a Scottish note in England and the article points out they're not even legal tender in Scotland. Similarly I've never been able to spend a £50 note anywhere. They've all been turned down. If you try to pay a largish sum in coins most places will refuse you. As long as two individuals agree that they're exchanging value it don't matter what the legal definition is.
Many people assume that legal tender must be accepted for payment, but that is not correct. Legal tender has a very narrow and technical meaning, which relates to settling debts. It means that if you are in debt to someone then you can’t be sued for non-payment if you offer full payment of your debts in legal tender.
Spending money in a shop is not the same as paying a debt.
|
|
|
If you pump the price by buying, driving the price up, and then unload all the coins you wanted to get rid of, don't you just drive the market priced down past where it was and end up with more coins than you initially had to sell? I just don't get the logic.
Yes. You are correct. Many people (such as Autumn_Rain) don't understand how it works. Here is how pump and dump really works: - 1. The scammer buys the coins. Usually the buying is done slowly in order to prevent lack of liquidity from driving the price up, but sometimes the scammer is willing to let the price rise and pay more. See (A).
- 2. The scammer promotes the coin in various ways on social media. This is the "pump". See (B), (C), and (D).
- 3. If the scammer's promotion is successful, the price begins to rise as more and more people are suckered into buying. Contrary to popular belief, this is not the "pump", #2 is the pump.
- 4. As the price rises, the scammer sells to the victims, getting a better and better price until they have unloaded their coins. This is the "dump".
- 5. Eventually, the demand for the coin dries up and the price plummets because there are no buyers and everyone is selling. Note that the scammer has already sold all of their coins before this point. People that don't sell or are "buying the dip" are left with coins that are as worthless as the were before the scam started.
Contrary to popular misconception, the scammer (or manipulator) doesn't drive the price up by buying because that is too risky and it generally doesn't work. Notes: - A. If the scammer is reasonably skilled, they may intentionally allow the price to rise when they are buying even though it increases their risk of loss. They make the rise part of the story that they use to convince the victims to buy.
- B. In the classic "pump-and-dump", scammers promote the coin by simply posting lies about how the coin is going to explode or "moon" on forums, twitter, reddit, facebook, etc.
- C. One popular pump-and-dump scam is a newsletter or a "signals" group. The members are the intended victims. In this case, the scammer simply buys a coin and then tells the members to buy it because it will go up any day now. This is basically the same as a classic pump-and-dump, but it is more sophisticated as it attempts to scam the members over and over.
- D. Another popular pump-and-dump scam is a "pump" group. Again, the members are the intended victims, though members may be led to believe that non-members are the victims. In this case, the scammer convinces the group that if everyone buys at the same time, the price will go up and they can sell at the higher price. Of course, that doesn't work. What really happens is that the members buy from the scammer at inflated prices and then the price collapses.
[/list]
|
|
|
What is your honest opinion about the way the phrase "pump and dump" is used in this community?
I think that it is misused. The newbies here have never learned what the term "pump and dump" actually means. They see the term "pump" describing the price going up and the term "dump" describing the price falling, but they just don't know that "pump and dump" means something very different -- it's a kind of scam. It is unfortunate that scammers take advantage of the ignorance and confusion. They convince these newbies to join their "pump and dump" groups, telling them that they can make money off of "pumps" and "dumps". But these groups are real "pump and dump" schemes that actually prey on the members instead.
|
|
|
I don't seem to be able to recognise the channel boundaries, and I always seem to be outside them. This means that I execute a trade at the wrong end of a new channel, or a trade doesn't execute.
Perhaps you are doing everything correctly, but instead the real problem is that channels don't actually exist. Perhaps your situation is similar to a ghost-hunter saying "I have all the right equipment and this house is known to be haunted, but I just can't detect any ghosts."
|
|
|
Bitcoin BTC can be a currency only if its price is stable.
I agree, because until there is a stable price for cryptocurrency, it will not be used in the daily routine such as: shopping in the market, paying for utilities, etc. Your thinking is too polarized. You are thinking all-or-nothing. There is no reason that Bitcoin can't be used as a currency while it is volatile. The reality is that it might be less used when it is volatile, but that is not the same as not used.
|
|
|
It's a scam. Don't send them any money. The site is less than 2 weeks old and it is a copy of the cex.io site. The website looks like a legit crypto exchange but they are not. They trap with a 0.01btc deposit for verification, then tell you that a premium account is needed and an additional deposit 0.05BTC is needed to withdraw.
|
|
|
Looking at the past history and chart of the crypto market, there have only been two halving in history (2012 and 2016) and both resulted in a powerful bullish trend which took coins to a new all time high. The next Bitcoin halving is scheduled for mid 2020, and it will have a powerful bullish trend on the crypto market.
People like to believe that there is a correlation between halvings and bull trends, and they make up faulty explanations to support their misconceptions. The most common explanation is the "reduced supply" explanation, which is simply not true. If you actually look at the history, you will see that the trends do not actually coincide with the halvings. There is actually is a low correlation when you don't cherry-pick just the trends around the times of the halvings. In other words, there have been many ATHs over the last 10 years. The fact that two of them happened near the occurrences of the halvings means nothing.
|
|
|
I had never put much thought into it before, but Blockchain is a very male dominated industry. I don't see that as a problem per se, but I wouldn't be surprised if women found entering the space intimidating/have a lot of barriers to entry.
The blockchain industry is tiny. I don't think there is a good reason for any women to feel intimidated, nor do I think there are any real "barriers to entry". It wouldn't take many women at all to dominate the industry and if there are any barriers, there is no reason why they can't just go around them.
|
|
|
The ECDSA and the SHA-256 hash are unrelated cryptographic operations. It is convenient that they are both 256 bits, and it is not completely a coincidence.
Signing a transaction is complicated, but the Bitcoin wiki goes into detail about how it is done. The signature proves that the spender controls the address associated with an output. The output of a transaction contains the address (in binary), and in order to spend the output, the public key is provided to show that the proper address is being spent and the private key is used to sign it.
|
|
|
hey everyone! quite an old story about crypto coin guaranteed by something real for ex. gold. good old physical gold. just wondering your thoughts about what kind of blockchain or existed coin is able to suit this? coins suppose to be pre-mined i think
There are literally dozens of coins that are backed by gold. Here is a list: https://www.cointelligence.com/content/gold-backed-cryptocurrency/I can think of two issues with gold-backed coins: 1. Who pays for the storage of the gold? 2. Who guarantees the company behind the coin?
|
|
|
... I think most of whales want to have low price so they can still buy more tokens.
That makes absolutely no sense. Think about it. If a whale has a ton of coins, they want the price to go higher, not lower. For example, let's say you are a whale with 100,000 BTC, currently worth about $350 million. Would you drive the value of your coins down by 20%, or $70 million, just so you can save $7 million when you buy another 10000 coins? Lose $70 million, but save $7 million -- sounds like a great plan.
|
|
|
|