I have lost: 3.14482421 BTC 31.22782779 BTC Because of bug in MultiBit wallet  Do you lose the private keys to the addresses? |
|
|
|
|
Should make these as configurable options, so people can filter any unwanted addresses or dust outputs easily.
|
|
|
|
My DVC and IXC deposits are not confirmed at all. Is there a 51% attack?
This was due to bitparking temporarily disabling merge mining to track down an issue with a bitcoind upgrade. It has been re-enabled. The difficulty of ixcoin and devcoin are so high they hardly moved from the approximately 36 hour outage so a 51% attack occurring during that time would have required a significant hash rate. It was interesting to see that Devcoin still chugged along, although slowly, but ixcoin ground to a complete halt. It looks like almost no one other than bitparking is mining ixcoin. I am really amazed that people are still buying devcoin and ixcoin |
|
|
|
|
It is strange. I'm mining on bitparking and everything seems normal
|
|
|
|
|
My DVC and IXC deposits are not confirmed at all. Is there a 51% attack?
|
|
|
|
|
I think the word "mining" does not really reflect the nature of the work. As we have moved to ASIC era, mining will become a more specialized activity and no longer a way to attract new users. To make it sounds more professional, I think we should rename it to "transaction validation"/"transaction processing", and miners to "transaction validators"/"transaction processors".
Any thought?
|
|
|
|
1. Log into your https://ripple.com/ account. 2. Advanced -> Trade -> BTC/XRP change issuer key to rvYAfWj5gh67oV6fW32ZzP3Aw4Eubs59B (you should see "BTC bitstamp.net") 3. Click on Order Book (note the UI is messed up a bit at the moment and Ask Table is pushed below the Bid Table) 4. Don't bother looking for BTC/USD or any other order books by any other BTC or USD issuer ... this is as good as it gets for now. Cheers ... I see nothing on the orderbook. Is it down? |
|
|
|
I recently came across some Wenzhou businessman invested in bitcoin, hmmm..........   Are you serious? That's really huge! |
|
|
|
Today, BTC China shot up to 296CNY, or 47.57USD. Somebody spent >100k USD to archive this ATH Don't underestimate Chinese speculators. Some of them could be really irrational  |
|
|
|
In gox, you don't need to remove a wall before you dump
ah, wow, thanks for the info! how absurd, though ... No kidding. So -- let me get this right: if I'm holding a 1000BTC long position in my MtGox account, I can put up a sell order for 1000 at, say, 36.5; and then, without cancelling the 36.5 sell order, I can enter another order to dump 1000 at market? I sure hope their software automatically cancels the initial "36.5 sell 1000" order as soon as the dump orders are filled, otherwise the exchange is taking a serious gamble in a time of high volatility. In any case, this confirms to me the wisdom of my policy of never carrying a sizable balance (of either fiat or BTC) in my MtGox account -- whenever I use it, I get in and get out as quickly as possible: fiat in, buy BTC shortly after the transfer clears, and send my BTC to an address under my control ASAP. If I wanted to convert my cash-in-hand into potentially-worthless derivative claim on an underlying amount of cash-in-someone-else's-hand, I'd wire my fiat to Bernie Madoff or John Corzine at MF Global instead of to MtGox: it's just much more efficient that way... Yes, but the initial one won't be executed unless you still have BTC |
|
|
|
~ $100k wall at 38.5 removed. will a dump follow soon? exciting!
In gox, you don't need to remove a wall before you dump |
|
|
|
CNY,GBP,EUR, all broken $35, will USD follow suit after America wakes up?
It's catching up |
|
|
|
Question: I know Mt. Red has stratum support, but is there also variable (or dynamic) difficulty?
Yes, some of are bigger users are testing it, but it still has some kinks. I have around 0.08BTC missing. Please check PM. Thank you! My account got zero-ed again.......>0.1BTC missing now....... |
|
|
|
|
rnKhmoH1BFrh7CfDnJ21XW6arPySDXUPFZ
|
|
|
|
Part of it might be that the early investors you speak of are all but cashed out.
Source to back up your generalizing statement? I have no source. Which is why I used the word "might". I was speculating, like everyone else in this thread. I think it's 99% true, the early guys got in at $0.001/BTC, and when BTC hit $10, any sensible guy will cash out for a 1000X profit, even if BTC reach $100 that's just 10X more profit, why would they risk it all for 10X more profit, when they already got 1000X. 0.001 to 10 is 10000x not 1000x |
|
|
|
Let's see if my large sells prediction holds true.
And it did. Another correct prediction. Yeah, amazing  |
|
|
|
It'd be a hard-forking change for little/no benefit when Bitcoin is used correctly. It'd also require changing all existing software that speaks the protocol. Agree with Pieter, this isn't worthwhile.
When transaction fee goes up, people without privacy concern would prefer a solution like this, while you can still use bitcoin in the "correct" way. This could be done with other important hardforks. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
