^ The reason I stopped joining their contest is just because of the KYC requirements, every time I tried to log in it will always pop up the KYC form which is I did not want to submit. Probably, there could be an effect but they only know this. Many gamblers are preferred on the none KYC gambling sites and did not require any personal information, especially we are using a decentralized currency. Nevertheless, we can not blame them if this is good for their eyesight and follow the KYC to avoid possible money laundering.

^ Probably it is and it is simple, these places don’t have any authority or valid license to operate gambling activities and offer it to the clients.
The problem with this is that there is a possibility that they are not aware of the regulations within the country and they operated gambling facilities and platforms with ignorance of the law. However, ignorance and not knowing the law will never defend them, they will still become liable for it. I just hope that other gambling facilities and platforms would try their best to comply to avoid these. It is not just a ruined reputation, it is also a shame and a very heartbreaking scene.

^ I think this might have a simple answer, I am not really in the martingale approach every time but sometimes I do. And when I do, I just simply want to play it safe and try to take time to enjoy my gambling game. Especially when I had a loss on the previous day. Martingale can actually give you the sense of chances, cause when you lose, you still have a lot of tries to win back. For me, you can only use the one-time-bet strategy when you have a huge of capital. A one-time bet for a small-time gambler is not really effective as we tend to use 90% of cash when we gamble but still not enough. We do not have backups. That is why some of us prefer to use martingale instead just to enjoy the game.

^ Definitely right and accusing without solid proof still consider slandering.
I always doubt Sicodice.com but it seems like they might not have focused their platforms to live supports as they already trust their platform to work well. I just wanna ask if they have Live support which is just MIA or they don’t really have one at all. Live support is also a costly one in their business, instead of spending funds to pay salary to live support, they can just give better odds, right? Kidding aside, I think if they can just make both advantages co-exist, they would win already. That is my opinion.

^ Yeah, I have seen this before but I do not remember where I encounter this somewhere else, it probably here or in the other forum.
This is very usual and we were practicing the same approach before. However, on our end, we ended up not really good. But it does not mean it would apply to everybody. What I can only give is for you to have good luck with the next ticket, we will never know. As long as you still take the responsibility to place the amount you can afford to lose, you never lose my friend. I will support you with this. Have fun and good luck with your experiment.

^ Out of these 3 options, I never knew someone would find out!
Kidding aside, this actually applies to all sports whether it is a big one or small.
Fans are the gains of the business, if they won’t pay the platform to be entertained, the cash won’t flow properly. Clubs are almost included with the fans as they support the teams of the players, it is just that they are more invested with it compared to the fans who only watch and support their teams. But the ones who really benefit are the founders of the leagues, as they are highly compensated because of founding it and deciding to start the hype.

^ Actually, Curacao has the right to give a license to platforms but the license could not guarantee that security that the licensee will be operating 100% legal. Meaning to say that, it still gonna be up to the licensee if they want to do a scam but still, they will be liable if they are found guilty. Second, Curacao has opportunities with a regulatory, they can legally grant license but they are lack with a regulatory process such as monitoring. Provide a set of paperwork, notarize it and make it legal, pay the fees and registration bills, then you have your license. Can you imagine how risky that business is?
Nevertheless, on the other side, it depends on the reputation of the gambling platform not just on a license they had.

^ Those are definitely good gambling sites to hang on and I personally been there.
Me as a gambler, I only have two gambling platforms that I used for how many years and I would never miss recommending those to you.
1. Fortunejack - this platform’s reputation is too much to take, I don’t even think that I had to recommend it first before you find out how good this one is. I will never regret myself vouching for this one.
2. sportsbet.io - if you’re into sports especially in NFL, NBA, FIFA, or Tennis, this one is for you. This is the only platform I could tell that gives proper/best odds. I also recommend for you to check with the analyst first so you can have a step away from your win.
Nevertheless, new gambling platforms are good to explore as I quoted above and that is probably an interesting site to stay for a while.

^ Just my own opinion, for me this is an epic fail idea. I don’t really know the reason why they have decided to create this league.
I just smelled something fishy about this, seems like the people behind this idea are about to make money for themselves on the wrong way. Challenging other authorities is something that is not really good. I read that their vision was to create a better quality league that would grow financially and become world-class. Nevertheless, I think they missed the point that they might just share the market in a way that they would possibly shrink.

^ Well probably, this person really have the skills to win honestly. It is just that his goal and agenda is way too different than just winning games. He is now a businessman and not a coach (a corrupted one). I heard that this guy plays dirty in a way that he manipulates the game and influences his players to do so. They used his previous reputation to earn underground. He used it to be considered as one of the candidates and took the chance to earn from losing. He was actually good before this time. He has his golden times before, but I guess as usual everybody’s time fades time by time. So you really have to enjoy it while it lasts.

^ Enough with the trash talks, let’s see who will win on this match. My bet will be placed in Linares the Golden Boy. Let us say that he is older than Haney, but it does not mean that Haney really is at his advantage. Definitely experienced-wise, The Golden Boy Linares is way too far from The Dream. The odds will surely favor Linares on this match, but I hope he won’t miss a shot cause in the case, Hanes will do his best to take him down. What is scary about Haney is that I find him hungry and that hunger would make him win the match, possibly at least 20%.

^ Probably but in heavyweight, it is really hard to reach the top. Strongest will always have a match and that is why I really admire Tyson Fury. He had a very tough way to the top. Imagine having 31 fights and only have 1 loss? Like what the hell was that?
So it is really possible that he can defeat Joshua, basing it on his previous match and also their style of fighting, you can tell that Tyson has the advantage to win. Besides, Fury is the mainstream and his bigmouth only implies being an entertaining boxer. Cause conflicts make the people urge to watch the fight and that is business.

^ My opinion is during the days when ATMs were myths, Mastercard was there to make the impossible and helped the world become having more convenient than before. Before them, people have to fall in line and approach an intimidating teller. Now, I guess they are making their best position with the innovation of fintech once again. They have done it once and they can still do it twice or even more.

^ Thx.
Just want to confirm that I received the BTC.

^ Regardless if you have a stable job or a jobless or unemployed person, you have to know how to control your finance, you have to make sure you know how much you can spend on each in every aspect of your life. If you want to do gambling, they allocate funds for that but never give you all. You will end up becoming impulsive and greedy especially when you are already there. I have been there and done that, advice was not very much helpful that I had to learn from my experience. And I am telling you, it is a pain in the ass. Recovering from massive debt is very much torturing. But still don’t give up and have hope.

^ The only reason why newbies or beginners are being trapped becoming traders who FOMO, impulsive trading, and selling loss is because of the people who consider trading as gambling, and they are very much influential most of the time and they can influence the news that trading works that way. If you are gonna browse, you see successful traders wanna be with the pictures of their trading platform on their old laptop, looking fancy and professional. But in reality, they don’t learn from others. They are very much egoistic and just wanted to look cool and smart and the cycle keeps on rolling.

^ I never doubt that BTC will receive negative stories/feedbacks, hearsay, and gossips. Not just because Bitcoin is becoming mains stream, negative stories have been there since was created and just like the as usual for the mainstream. And I guess it would not be bad if we consider or we find it as something to appreciate. It only means that we are kind of halfway there.
Nevertheless, the downs were always there and from a percentage perspective, the lows today are actually not that affecting compared to what we have experienced back then. Let us just enjoy and stick to what we are doing to take advantage and let us keep the naysayers stay there and keep on doing what they are doing as it helps.

^ You are not paying BTC probably this will move to altcoin service.
BTW, I am subscribed. My LTC address: MCp4PBiGrSXwaFhAFpyiz368mFrAp9ry6y
My BTC address: bc1qlsu5nqnyjem6wm3zgsual9jsufdhwd5jcg85jm
Good luck!

^ The only reason why the Ex-CIA has to prove that BTCs legality and low rate or percentage of use in Illicit or illegal transaction is because of the greediest person Janet Yellen. Probably people already knew about her personal agenda and where she really is after and also the people behind her campaign that supports her because they find BTC as a threat to their business. If you will check carefully, the percentage of BTC being used for illicit purposes is way smaller than fiat now. The community has successfully controlled illegal stuff to be connected to cryptocurrency’s pioneer.

^ In my own gamblers do not even care if the fees are high. But having low fees would definitely be appreciated.
I can tell that after the update, there is a lot of good problems that will incur. One of them is having big traffics, time efficiency might be something we are going to have an issue as well. Probably, no matter what happens gamblers will always choose to placebos regardless. Those fees are like their orbits to the server.  Nevertheless, as long as we have platforms where we can enjoy playing that is enough for us.