Just being in love with and dedicated to someone doesn't get rid of their herpes.

Not even close to true:  https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2688536

Probably worth getting a few basic 'facts' straight then maybe you would be able to get non-issues out of your mind a little better.

I CAN get the idea that every driver on the road can maim or kill me and any of my family by a brief move of the steering wheel out of my head.  Probably it is because there is no intense propaganda campaign against driving.  (We'll have to wait for self-driving cars to be perfected before that one is rolled out.)

You are not thinking very expansively (though your sentimentalism is heart-warming.)

There's normally a good supply of ho's in almost any city and it contributes to the service sector of the economy.

Or you could go gay and help save the world by not contributing to the overpopulation problem.  All the kids are doing it!  Especially in S.E. Asia it seems.  The young people seem to have taken to fagotry like a fish to water after a couple of kabalistic MTV vids with the EDM or whatever,  Probably in the U.S. metro areas as well but I'd not been to one of those areas for about 5 years even when I lived in the country so I was pretty out-of-touch.

I think that for 98% of people anywhere civil war comes to them rather than the other way around.  I think it possible, if not likely, that the 2% could and would hit the go button, and it could happen at any time.

How Americans will react (to civil war) is pretty hard for me to judge.  The extreme interest in gun control indicates to me that some people anticipate an 'event'.  It's really the only reasonable explanation for the intense focus on what is basically a non-issue.  5G is another wildcard in 'reaction profiles' as I see it.  It is another program that has been rolled out with a very suspicious degree of frenzy...the wonderful ability to download a DVD in 4 seconds isn't really explaining things to my satisfaction.

Anyway, it's better to watch what happens in/to the U.S. from afar.  Seems to me that Malaysia is well out in front of The Philippines insofar as understanding the root cause of the evils vexing the modern planet.  I'm afraid that The Philippines would fall into the trap without ever seeing it coming.

I didn't follow you're guys tiff much, but all I hear Tech[hole] say is that if there is a danger that subpoenea could be launched by Trump as a function of his defense, a trial would be unlikely.  I'd bet money that he's right on that because every one of his attackers have skeletons buried and Trump probably knows where to start digging.

Since I 'sensed' that Trump would not be interested in a 2nd term from even before he started his first, I've been expecting an 'out' of some sort for 3 years now.  'Impeachment' would be just the ticket.  He currently could claim victory (in running the country) and most of the people who are still his supporters would eat it right up.

I'll look for yet more stagecraft where Trump slides back out of government and his mock-enemies don't have to worry about a backlash in the form of (real) subpoenas (filed in anger.)  I expect that one of the Kushners will end up at the helm.  Probably by way of Mike Pence and/or civil war.

http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter14.htm

  "The name of God is not profaned when it is not known by the Goi that the Jew has lied."

It sure is interesting how similar in some way Islam and Talmudic Judism are.  Makes a guy wonder...

Maybe the Koran has as many directly evil and supremacist things in it as does the Talmud, but I've not looked at it as much since obviously Islam is not much of a threat to me here in the U.S..

If there is a condensation of such disgusting teachings from the Christian Bible in the same vein as the above two referenced works, I'd love to see reference to it and would read it with interest.

I mean just what I said in the text you clipped.

The Dengvaxia fiasco came about because of negligence and malfeasance on the part of Sanofi-Pastuer who influenced negligent and malfeasant elements of the government.

The same Sanofi-Pastuer and the same basic government that did Dengvaxia has been and is responsible for 'ordinary' vaccines as well.  How can you believe that they act differently in the Dengvaxia case than they act with vaccinations generally?

What country?  In lots of countries wild strain paralytic polio is rare or non-existent but vaccine strain paralytic polio is increasingly common.  That means that the vaccination is spreading a mutant form of the disease.

By the way, did it ever occur to you to look into the Dengvaxia issue and analyze how and why it came about.  It seems to have been drug corporations producing bogus science and paying off corrupt government officials.  Did it occur to you to wonder if the same thing might be happening with the other coerced vaccinations?  I mean Sanofi-Pastuer was the company who was responsible the Dengvaxia malfeasance and they practically own the vaccine distribution in The Philippines.  Would you write of Dengvaxia to an isolated case of a few bad apples, or would you expend just a little bit of effort to see if the problems are more wide-spread?

When Atheist and/or Zionists of various religious stripes commit a bomb blast, the media talk about it falsely as a Muslim thing a lot.

9/11 is a classic example, but there are many many more.  In fact I don't know of a single bomb blast that is know to be an entirely organically grown Muslim thing.  Under sober analysis there are questionable aspects to almost every incident in almost every country in which it happens.  At least the incidents which get a lot of Western air-play.

Crime families often suffer high mortality rates.  It warms the cockles of my heart when a whole genetic line of these scum are wiped out.

Yes, there is prima facie evidence of Biden in mob boss mode getting the Ukranian prosecutor fired in the form of Joe himself braging about it at the CFR.  And to add insult to injury, he was using my tax dollars as a tool in this operation.

The only thing worse than a mob boss is a kiddie groping mob boss.  There is prima facie evidence of creepy 'uncle Chester' Joe having that perversion in his resume as well.

A blind man could see that the Dems have put up Joe Biden to make sure that they lose.  Probably because there is a three-card-monte trick being played on the Trump side which will get a Kushner in and they don't want the mock-Dems to mess it up.  Funny enough, either Jared or Yael Kushner could probably run as a Dem and win anyway.

Anyone, Trump included who suggested/requested that Ukraine evaluate the Biden crime family's activities in Ukraine was doing UKRAINE a favor.

Were they also helping themselves?  Sure they were; that's how humans roll, and it's certainly not limited to politicians.  This is a minor kerfuffle between two quasi-American crime families (Trumps and Bidens) who are in a bit of a turf war.  If Ukraine get's an opportunity to limit the damage they are doing in their nation, that's great.  If the American peeps get a peek the nature of the crimes that these families are involved in, that's also great.  With me at least.



Your apologetics for the Biden clan make perfect sense.  More importantly they are amusing to watch.

I liked the way the Khmer Rouge did it:  make a 'year zero' by burning all the books and shooting anyone who wore glasses under the suspicion that they know how to read.  Communists seem to have a thing about children so they had the kids do the machete killings in order to help with their training.

Marx is suggested to have been a Satanist, and there seems to be perhaps some credible evidence in this regard.  One way or another, the expression of Communism in most instance of it's practice suggest that there were some real sickos at the helm.  Likewise, it seems to have a disproportionate appeal to sickos in the modern world as well for whatever reason.  In part because it has marketing value I would guess.  But in fairness I would say that that appeal is more the fault of negligence on the part of the Capitalists for not realizing the long term value of mildly fair transfers of wealth than it is the fault of the 'Communists' who can make hay of the disparities for their own nefarious goal.

Yeah, on Zionist owned and controlled media and information platforms.

I see nothing wrong with asking anyone to open an investigation if there is suspicion of a crime.  I'm all about criminals being investigated, and even more importantly...and much more rarely...actually prosecuted.  Being a politician should not insulate one from investigation into wrongdoing or give someone a free pass for criminal behavior.  That's a big problem that the U.S. and many other countries have and part of the reason why we have such corrupt governments.

If politician A asks country B to investigate a non-existent crime against politician B for political reasons then politician A is committing a crime for which he/she can be punished.  That's the deterance.  If politician B is guilty of a crime then it's doing the world a favor to pound his balls flat.

Here's an idea:  How about if the political parties put forward candidates who are not criminals?  Someone should try that someday.

No problem; one's wife can be 'lightly beaten' until she comes around and agrees to share, right?

I hate that they are sometimes suckers enough to follow a crypto-jew poser as a leader.  No different than the Catholics and most of the Evangelical Christians these days.

I cannot find the study now.  Lots of stuff is being memory-holed off the internet.  Earlier in this thread I have at least once put a link to it, but the search functions on this site are dismal.

The policy is to reduce the amount of gun crimes by criminals against non-criminals by making the penelty very high for comiting a crime using a firearm.  Much higher than doing the same crime without using a firearm.

The policy is pretty common sense, and it worked will since it was implemented.  As a consequence gun related crimes have dropped for 20 or 30 years.

Again, the main findings of the study were that guns are a MUST HAVE for criminals to protect themselves against other criminals.  As a consequence of this, outlawing guns is utterly futile for removing guns from the hands of criminals.

Of course if your goal is to remove guns from the hands of NON-criminals, which I strongly believe is the driving force behind the political push for gun control, then the above study should be minimized and the policies which fell out of it should be deprecated.

As I see it the main reason to get guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens is NOT for fear of revolution or whatever.  What it would do is make it less possible for communities to police themselves from within.  That would make people dependant on the state for security.


When the study was done it was clearly done by serious professionals at the FBI who wanted to understand the problem and come up with workable policy input.

Now, 30 or 40 years later the FBI is a very different organization.  Highly corrupt and beholden to their political sponsors.


My point is that laws generally did change.  And thus so did policy.  And thus so did behavior.

We now live in a time when most laws, policies, and behaviors are specifically engineered to make more problems.  The driving force behind it are people who have some ideas which they might be able to sell as 'solutions'.  Classic Hegelian dialectic.

An alternate but related hypothesis is that the controllers simply wish to destroy the society and don't really care so much about the minor details.  More and more I am leaning toward that one.

I'm not 'contro' on efficient use of energy.  In fact I am right now in some heavy research about cooling buildings in a high temp high humidity environment.  Not an easy problem thermodynamically.

I am against efficient use of energy to 'save the earth'.  Anthropogenic climate change is 99.999% scam to make rich people have more control and to have their lackies make some bucks while the serve as pawns in a game which they don't even understand.  They'll be flushed when their job is done.

I'm interested in alternative energy methods only because I have money to burn and I enjoy a challenge.  Coal would give the most people the best quality of life as long as it is burnt in facilities which have scrubbers (such as those in the U.S..)  Most of the 'greenie' crowd are conditioned to hate human beings and want a population reduction because that's how their sponsors have conditioned them.

'Green energy' will come along naturally when it makes economic sense.  Right now it's mostly a scam funded by the dynastic wealth families for nefarious reasons, but some of the wasted money ends up in millions of people's pockets which keeps the game going.  True, technological progress is moving faster by dumping trillions into the boondoggle, but since global climate change is a sham it really doesn't matter.  There are better and more humane ways to spend the money.  Artificial scarcity in energy will kill millions and billions...maybe that's part of the idea...

I was pro-vaccine from the initial indoctrination that we all get.  I was pretty much pro-everything which was marketed as 'science'.  When I started looking into the science behind vaccines I expected that it would re-enforce my pro-vaccine beliefs.  What I found eventually shifted me 180 degrees.

Actually the above is more true of 'global warming'.  I think with vaccines the shift started when I was writings from old-time social engineers about how injections could be used in the future to shape and mold human populations coupled with lots and lots of reports of injury from victims that piqued my interest enough that I started reading and observing the scientific and medical papers.

It is hard not to notice that those arguing pro-global-warming and pro-vaccine lean heavily on appeal to authority and actively discourage any deeper understanding of the fundamental principles of science.  OTOH, people who don't tow the mainstream line on these topics often bend over backwards to teach basic things like what the n=0.05 in a statistical calculation.  The apperent reason is that when real science and real understanding wins, they win.

So you don't think that Jeff Epstein knew what a dead-man's switch is?  Or didn't arrange one?  Or dint know nuffin bout nobody which could provide material?

I'd be very surprised if Jeff Epstein is dead and have seen nothing which is even vaguely convincing to support the contention.  Most likely he is alive, but he could be living in pampered comport or under threat of significant discomfort.