All those hundreds of millions of years of evolution wasted to make an individual both gambles, and gets depressed by losing when he does so.  Now _that_ is a depressing thought!

Might as well just jerk off like 15 timers per day to deal with derpression.  Especially if you've got fast internet and Universal Basic Income as a 'human right'.

Just so we all know what is going on here, Transverse Myelitis is a horrifying malady whereby in the case of vaccine injury your own dysfunctional immune system  attacks the myelin sheath of nerves.  This is very much like stripping insulation off of the wire in a wiring harness and have the individual wires all start to short out against one another.

The pain of the process is said to be excruciating.  Like having a giant muscle cramp all over your body which won't go away.  When the pain subsides one is left with severe and irreversible neurological damage.

https://www.facebook.com/HighWireTalk/videos/1067872136914587/

At about 5 minutes in is the acute phase of the disease.  This is a rare case where they admitted that it was a vaccine reaction.  Jewtube has scrubbed the video but for some reason it is still on facefuck.  Perhaps so they can note who has seen the clip and is thus aware of what we are talking about with this particular form of vaccine reaction.

The Christian bible talks about creatures with 'stingers' in the 'final days'.  Also about those who get 'the mark' wishing above all else to just be able to die due to the pain.  Watching the vid and understanding physiologically what is happening to the victim's nervous system reminds me of these passages.

So Darwin's claim will lean toward the Trumptards this time around.  One wonders if it was a fair coin-toss or if there were some 'intelligent design' behind the timings. 

Anyway, it won't be hard to stampede the Left-wing-tard contingent over the vaccine cliff at any time of 'their' choosing so this will likely end up an equal-opportunity depopulation after all.

I have to fight back the urge to stand back and let Darwin do his thing.  Back when I was a younger man and felt some alignment with my intelligentsia 'trainers' I would have quasi-welcomed what these folks are up to...under the mistaken assumption that I personally would be included in their group of survivors.

A careful read of the Georgia Guide-stones is really not that bad.  They are saying to remain at a fairly low percentage of the earth's 'carrying capacity' but they are not saying that they will be the ones to get us down into those ranges in the first place.  They (Rosicrutians?), or some contingent of them, might be taking an active role, or they may be just observing those who are.  In any event, there is a lot to like about most of their commandments assuming a steady-state mode (which I doubt is actually very tenable in the real world.)

Franklin is reported to have responded to the question of what have the people been given:  "A republic sir...if you can keep it."  If true, it indicates a incredulity on his part that the work product would be durable.  A well founded doubt to be sure.  Whatever Franklin was, he weren't no fool.

I suspect that most of cor of 'the founders' (with the notable exception of Hamilton) would have considered their work dead by the events of 1871.  The 'bitter clingers' might have held on until the Federal Reserve act of 1913...then followed their friends to The Philippines or some such place.

A historical analysis of things seems to indicate that 'the founders' were shooting for a situation where the common people had relative parity with police powers wielded by the state.  I would say that it is clear why that would be a design goal.  Namely, it puts a limit on the flexibility that the political leadership feels at liberty to wield, and history has show time and time again that that is of benefit for a social fabric.

So, it seems likely that were 'the founders' around today, they would be OK with the common folk having MRAP vehicles and grenade launchers and so forth if they want them.  More likely, they would not be OK with the police having them, or the military operating within the borders utilizing such equipment.

It must be said that 'the founders' of the U.S. were fairly eccentric compared to their counterparts who formed other nations.  I think in a good way, and I think that they were unusually wise, but that's a values judgement on my part...and I'm a gen-x'er.  The educational system was adjusted during the formative years of my cohort to make it not so common to have the peeps thinking as I do.  Now it is much more common for the peeps to instinctively support the centralized power of the state (and soon the entire globe.)  No real mystery about how or why that is.

It's been here since the bottom of the last ice age.

It should be increasingly obvious that those deciding what should be injected into your tissues don't give a flying fuck what you want or don't want, and they soon won't have to care about that in the slightest.

The program won't start until they have achieved the goal of 100% control of the population when it comes to medical procedures, and the stage is just about set to have that be a reality in many countries.  That is mere months by my estimates.  I am anticipating the forced needles waiting for 'the next one'* however.

Although in places like the U.S., the military will be 'helping' get the population injected in with their "full power and strength", the real heavy lifting needed for forced injections will come from your own friends, family, and neighbors.  That's what I call 'competent' social engineering at the very least.  Credit where credit is due.

(*) It's interesting that this clip is practically promoted by Jewtube while even a photo of a box of masks stipulating that the product does not protect against viruses is enough to get people banned from social media these days.  Something interesting is going on here.

There was a man with the surname 'Gates' who was a founding member of one of the American Eugenics societies back before the Nazi movement tarnished the reputation of Eugenics.  It is unknown if that person was related to Bill Gates.

Gate's father was a high powered lawyer and I believe the head of Planned Parenthood if not just board member.  Planned Parenthood is basically what became of one of the Eugenics societies after it's fall from grace following the atrocities of the Nazi regime in Germany.

Bill Gates has on many occasions spoken about issues which are near and dear to Eugenicists.  Specifically population density and population control issues.

It is not a stretch at all to suppose that Bill Gates is 'from a family of Eugenicists' and it's one of the motive forces behind his 'philanthropy' (which is also very healthy for his net worth which has ballooned in the time he's been practicing it.)

I think it quite fair to say that many of those who have had a deep interest in the pseudo-science of Eugenics over the past few hundred yeas have been willing and capable of taking actions which result in the goals they seek.  It is quite foolish and dangerous, in my opinion, to ignore the possibility that Bill Gates might take some fairly radical steps to get what he wishes.

Meaningless factoid.

-
A tiny percent of the CO2 released into the atmosphere (and absorbed out of the atmosphere) annually is from human activity.


Various scientists have challenged the results of other scientists over this finding and the magnitude of it.


CO2 is CO2.  It is not possible to distinguish one 'variety' as fossil fuel derived and another as the result of a biological process.  Nor does CO2 from one source act any differently than that from another in terms of being re-absorbed.


Every atom or molecule 'absorbs heat'.  Every atom or molecule also 'releases heat'.  Meaningless statement.


It's an observation which could be explained by a great many hypotheses.  Some mutually exclusive and some not.


The sun (which is responsible for something like 99.999% of the energy in the atmosphere (aka, heat)) has not been ruled out as a factor in so-called 'climate change.'


Computer models have nowhere near the power to simulate such tiny factors as human contribution.  They inevitably err on the alarmist side as has been proven by observations made.  Not surprising since money is allocated to people and programs which achieve this result and withdrawn or withheld from programs which tend to try to achieve accuracy.


Again, consensus about what exactly?  This is the trick I described.

No scientist wants to stand behind your list of ridiculous 'points' because they are not sustainable.  That's why, yet again, we see a vague assertion that 'scientists say something' but what the names of the scientists are and what, exactly, they say is left to the imagination of the (usually highly indoctrinated and propagandized) viewer.

The 'trick' of the '97%' scam (Cook et-al) is to say the 'ninety seven percent' part, but leave the 97% believe XXX blank and allow the reader to assume one thing or another.  'humans cause' is deliberately vague,  And sometimes they even leave that out and say scientists 'believe in ' climate change.  Well, everyone 'believes in' climate change including 'deniers'.

I read somewhere that if the question is:

  "Do you [competent scientist with domain experience] believe that the human contribution of carbon dioxide
     to the atmosphere accounts for more than 50% of the warming which the earth has experienced over the last 100 years."

it is far fewer than 3% of the scientist who report to believe that this hypothesis is true.  In my study of the science and mathematics behind the subject that is what I would expect.  I cannot imagine (and have not seen) a competent scientist arguing that human contribution to atmospheric CO2 since the industrial revolution is a major factor in global warming.  The science simply isn't there.  A much more sustainable argument is that pollution and land use changes which humans are responsible for have induced a strong enough signal to be seen.  It just doesn't work for CO2 as a greenhouse gas is all.

I guess the phone scammers compete with the Trump family e-mail spamhaus operation:

  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5260582.msg55105485#msg55105485

Plenty of people who work on the new nucleic acid 'vaccines' themselves liken their product to software engineering.

They are designing (writing) genetic sequences (code) which code for specific proteins (results) and injecting (staging) them into tissue and inserting (uploading) these RNA through cell membranes to be integrated (executed) by the cellular machinery (factory.)

The analogous nature of biology and computer science rarely fails to impress.  At least not to people who have a grasp of both sciences.  I've seen some pretty shoddy work in the field of software engineering, and I've seen indications that those working on biological systems are vastly more ambivalent design and about quality control.  It doesn't seem to bother them in the slightest that they have no idea what the impacts will be other than that they achieve the objective of getting certain antibody counts up to a billable level.

The real 'Trump Accomplishments' thread needs a bump because someone hit the fake moderated one.

Anyone who wants to make real comments and not risk having their work censored by a partisan (and probably tribal member) should really use this thread instead.

Why is it that the 'stupid' ones like GW Bush somehow seem to get a lot of (usually very bad) stuff done while the 'smart' ones like Obama somehow don't seem to be able to get that they (claim they) want done?  Could it be that all the geniuses who can clairvoyantly administer the Stanford-Binnet are not really appreciating the subtle advantages of being 'stupid' and are thus unprepared to deal effectively with the various kinds of 'spells being cast'?  If so, where does that put them on the intelligence chart actually?

Well let's see here...  Oh, I have an idea!

Why don't we install a person who is perceived by one wing of the idiot public to be of an appropriate racial background and instruct him that one of the two top missions of NASA is to find ways to make Muslims feel good about their accomplishments?

Surely someone here is on some other candidate's spam list.  They should feel free to post their daily catch on this thread so that we can compare.

For the purposes of analyzing the spam-storm generated, I thought about buying one of the 'temple coins' which are being pumped in Christian Zionist circles ostensibly to build the 'Third Temple' so the antichrist can return or whatever those idiots want.  I suspect that a good portion of the money ends up in the fuel tank of Rabbi Hagee's Gulfstream jet for his frequent trips back home to Israel, but that's neither here nor there and it's better than Pompeo who uses my tax dollars for the same purpose.

I suspect that humans (or hominids) may really have had a noteworthy impact on the global climate at some point a million or so years ago.  Basically when 'we' were of homo-habilis or australopithecus grade, knew how to use fire, and experienced a transient population boom.  The changes wouldn't have been via CO2 particularly, but more associated with deforestation which sifted the terrestrial flora somewhat.  It's just kind of an estimate on my part, but is something which seems to be a practical method by which climate could be shifted (over a 'short' several thousand year period of time) by human type creatures using primitive technology.

The current Club-of-Rome induced climate change fraud suggests that we humans are impacting the climate by having a tiny contribution to a trace atmospheric gas which itself has a tiny residence time (being highly in-demand plant-food) and is only a minor greenhouse gas in the atmosphere anyway.  It's quite ludicrous actually.  That's quite different than setting an entire geographic region on fire every year to help bag a few more rabbits.

NASA and NOAA or two of the most politicized (and useless) administrations in the whole US-branded corp/gov system.  Either of these two issuing a statement about something like this makes me confident that it IS bunk.  I'm not even being facetious!

Anyone who has sat through some of the CSPAN footage of the heads of these types of organizations talking (including specifically the CDC and FDA) really cannot come away without wondering if the people really are borderline retarded.  Sometimes they have assistants/handlers who seem to have it together somewhat.  Sometimes not.  I'm not being facetious about that either.

On occasion there is a chairperson who is actually mentally sharp but who is, politically and policy-wise, genuinely scary.  Obama's EPA Gina McCarthy was one such person fairly recently.

That's what happened to me.  I deferred looking into the issue for a long time expecting it to require a fair bit of research.  I anticipated finding that the 'global warming' thing was real and was a matter of concern since it was what I heard all of my life.

What actually happened was that I rather quickly ran into very strong indications of fraud of the above nature.  And on a scientific front when one gets into the numbers, the idea of 'climate change' vis-a-vis anthropogenic CO2 is laughable.  My research fairly quickly evolved into more of a political study of why 'they' were hyping this particular fraud.

The above said, methods of modifying the weather and manipulating climate on a regional level using methods such as 'solar radiation management' are not outlandish at all.  I strongly suspect that they can be effective, and probably already are.  They may have the potential to be catastrophically effective as they are further weaponized.