Does anyone know what a hashrate on gtx 970 for this algo?
With tpruvot's ccminer it's 1.5-1.7 Mh/s |
|
|
|
Who is the moron renting 25.6PH at high prices?
Someone wanting to do a 51% attack on a coin? Someone wanting to make the supply of a coin short? I can think of many reasons. |
|
|
|
Error -63 while attempting to enqueue branch 5 kernel
Error -63 while attempting to enqueue branch 5 kernel
Error -63 while attempting to enqueue branch 5 kernel
Where did I read this before? Hmmmm... |
|
|
|
|
A coin may survive much more than a longer than expected period with no updates. People may give up as fast as they come back. Who holds longer wins. If you do what all the others do, you will not succeed.
|
|
|
|
Guys I'll be closing suprnovas esp pool soon, please move over to the Remaining pools, thanks!
Noooo  The esp suprnova pool is the best And i don't know any other pool The OP has one ;-) Thanks, but i'm trying to mine solo, do i need to add the nodes to my wallet or the default nodes will work ? If the wallet syncs fine, don't bother adding nodes. |
|
|
|
Guys I'll be closing suprnovas esp pool soon, please move over to the Remaining pools, thanks!
Noooo The esp suprnova pool is the best And i don't know any other pool The OP has one ;-) |
|
|
|
Guys I'll be closing suprnovas esp pool soon, please move over to the Remaining pools, thanks!
May I ask why? It's been working pretty fine for months. I donated a lot to the pool. The coin is worthless and a resource hog, I have to pay for the servers and all the fees and donations I made since I started the pool are about 5 $ .. Not to mention the work I had getting the algo integrated etc. It's like with investments.. At some point a decision has to be made I see. What about increasing the fee to 2% before giving up? Maybe some more people will donate now that they know the situation. |
|
|
|
Guys I'll be closing suprnovas esp pool soon, please move over to the Remaining pools, thanks!
May I ask why? It's been working pretty fine for months. I donated a lot to the pool. |
|
|
|
Look, the devs are complaining they don't have enough time to work on the project. They want donations. They want to hardfork the coin in order to force 5% donation fee.
The pools have quit.
Miners have quit.
The coin is dead.
Have you ever heard of a coin with a 5% donation fee built into the coin? Maybe I haven't been around long enough. I haven't played with enough alts. But I certainly haven't heard of a successful coin with a 5% donation fee built into it!
Try diamond |
|
|
|
The probability of finding a block doesn't change with time, it's always the same given a certain difficulty, so "staying on a coin long enough" doesn't make sense.
See "gambler's fallacy" for further explanation.
true if you play with fiat, a dollar is a dollar after a week, in altcoins your winnings usually drop in hours to the point where your bet becomes higher than winning in a 50:50 game. And an LBC is an LBC after a week. If the graph was shown in the native coin it would only drop at payout time or when a block orphans. Since the graph is displayed in a different currency the exchange fluctuations are added to the graph. Exchange price can go up and down. Profit switching and auto exchange can exacerbate the exchange fluctuations. When a coin becomes profitable it attracts a lot more hash. That more hash will produce more coins. When the coins mature and are sent to the exchnage it will put downward pressure on the price. It can be concluded that will put a downward bias on time risk. it works that way if most of the other miners ot that coin are not dumping, and it doesn't apply to lbry anyways because zpool has a very low percentage of hashrate. and, again, probability is not affected by time, so the frequency of block finding doesn't affect the price the coins will be sold at. |
|
|
|
|
but more importantly it's got updated information.
|
|
|
|
The problem with lbry(if it is a problem), is currently we need a lot of Mhash to get it profitable. In a rolling scrypt batch file, you won't stay on the coin long enough to solve it when current blocks are found in 30 minute or longer intervals. To get it profitable we need to get down to about 5 min intervals so a scrypt will actually stay on it long enough to find it. Otherwise its manually selecting the coin to force it to pay. It's the same with sib at the moment. Both coins are incredibly profitable but we currently don't have the hash to hit it.
The probability of finding a block doesn't change with time, it's always the same given a certain difficulty, so "staying on a coin long enough" doesn't make sense. See "gambler's fallacy" for further explanation. true if you play with fiat, a dollar is a dollar after a week, in altcoins your winnings usually drop in hours to the point where your bet becomes higher than winning in a 50:50 game. sometimes it goes down sometimes up. and even if it goes down, you should bring block maturity time into account: for example decred needs a full day. EDIT: furthermore, the average payout per unit of time doesn't change so your point is void.
I don't even bring luck probability where you need at least 2% of total blocks within a difficulty change to have at least average winnings(like in 50:50 game), but this is more for bitcoin mining where difficulty changes in 2 weeks.
again difficulty goes up and down. in the case of lbry, we mined only 3 blocks in two days and profit was much higher than expected, and much higher than any other "fast block" coins there is. |
|
|
|
Anyone working on improvements on Epsylons Library code? I assume it's pretty fresh because it's just released and can be improved on.
I had a quick look and could only add 1%, I don't think there is much room for improvement but if the coin keeps being more profitable than others (which I don't think will happen) it might be worth investigating further. |
|
|
|
The problem with lbry(if it is a problem), is currently we need a lot of Mhash to get it profitable. In a rolling scrypt batch file, you won't stay on the coin long enough to solve it when current blocks are found in 30 minute or longer intervals. To get it profitable we need to get down to about 5 min intervals so a scrypt will actually stay on it long enough to find it. Otherwise its manually selecting the coin to force it to pay. It's the same with sib at the moment. Both coins are incredibly profitable but we currently don't have the hash to hit it.
The probability of finding a block doesn't change with time, it's always the same given a certain difficulty, so "staying on a coin long enough" doesn't make sense. See "gambler's fallacy" for further explanation. |
|
|
|
|
please make the initial diff for lbry higher: an average rig makes so many shares it gets banned repeatedly.
|
|
|
|
another lbry block found! let them rain! :-)
it's so profitable I wonder why there are only 28 miners on it.
really ugly orphans(or rejected) rate on this coin I have 99.5% accepted shares and I don't see any orphan block. Well, there are just two new blocks since I started mining it. |
|
|
|
|
another lbry block found! let them rain! :-)
it's so profitable I wonder why there are only 28 miners on it.
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, how can I solve the problem of rejected share? I use sgminer 5.3.1, bat line: sgminer.exe -k quark -o stratum+tcp://esp.maxminers.net:5872 -u user -p password -I 16 -w 128 -g 1 with a R9 290 Vapor-X OC. Same problem on maminers or suprnova pool you should select the hmq1725 algo, not quark. it's called quark on cpuminer but it actually is a pretty much different algo. Same error What miner are you using? Please post the full log in textual form. |
|
|
|
Hello, sorry for OFF, but which card is better for mining - gtx1060 or gtx1070? Thank you!
1070 has higher density, so better for mining rigs. efficiency should be about the same, but I still don't have the 1060 numbers. |
|
|
|
Hi guys, how can I solve the problem of rejected share? I use sgminer 5.3.1, bat line: sgminer.exe -k quark -o stratum+tcp://esp.maxminers.net:5872 -u user -p password -I 16 -w 128 -g 1 with a R9 290 Vapor-X OC. Same problem on maminers or suprnova pool you should select the hmq1725 algo, not quark. it's called quark on cpuminer but it actually is a pretty much different algo. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
