If those are old transactions, they were probably dropped from mempool (not confirmed; double spent and dropped or dropped after a while for low fee).
This means they were never mined, hence they don't exist.

With the recession knocking at our door (is the situation in India so much different from the rest of the world? I doubt it), I think that those numbers are greatly exaggerated.


The important point is "if they are forced to come back to office".
I think that the companies will adapt. They will have to. Of course, the employees will adapt to. A middle ground will have to be set.

Some will go back to the office, maybe for bigger salaries.
Some will find a middle ground, like 2-3 days in the office and the rest from home.
Some may stay at home, but unless they're exceptionally qualified, they will have to find different employer.

So the situation is far from "black and white" and I expect that in many (most?) cases a middle ground will be found.

These can be a proper indicator.


These can be faked, so I would not take this alone into account; it needs more.


No, just no. There are so many fake reviews - in both directions! - you better not rely on those.


Many very good wallets are open source and don't have support page as you'd expect.
Support is usually an indicator of a private product, usually meaning custodial service, which brings another list of risks (KYC, "not your keys, not your coins").

---

I think that best is to check/ask on bitcointalk for good wallets. You will get the names and official websites. And the official websites will have the correct link to the correct wallet (and also ways to check it's the correct one).
I would not google search for the official website, since nowadays those also get cloned and get high ranks in search engines.

Indeed, I can confirm that Watch button/feature is working well for me too (for another topic, but that doesn't matter).

I think that we may need both.
We need to play smarter so no new people come under his attention, or worse, gets silenced.
And we need to debunk him - in court! - in a way he will never ever get taken serious by any court in the world. And maybe even punished for his forgeries and for wasting people's time and money (plus health, since I agree with Greg, war is hell).

I've changed my personal text pretty soon after you did.
I've changed my avatar even a little before you did (we were both in the same campaign).
So I'm not sure why I'm in the list.

But if you asked for my thoughts, I'll tell the same as I said (in PM) to that campaign's manager: my current plan (unless a paid campaign comes up for avatar and unless CM changes rules for avatar) is to advertise Bitcoincleanup for a while (how long will that be, I really can't tell).

Nu te stresa, se intampla cand faci treducere / te bazezi prea tare pe altceva. Chiar mai des decat ai crede. Si nu, chiar nu ma refer la tine, ci la traduceri in general.
Si, dupa cum am zis: probabil ca nu a fost cea mai buna zi pentru comunicarea de informatii.


Ca tot am urmarit, cel putin partial, procesul: bine ca (noi) nu am avut de tradus vreo porcarie de-a lui CSW ca o faceam corecta!

Da, foarte bine gandit!

Iar legat de acel feedback, eu chiar nu inteleg actiunile unora, care par sa tina neaparat sa faca rau doar ca sa aiba o anumita reputatie (vorbesc aici de teribilism, nu de reputatia in sensul bitcointalk). Din fericire forumul se auto-regleaza si ii scoate - mai devreme sau mai tarziu (cel putin din DT1) pe cei care actioneaza fara sa se gandeasca pe bune.

LOL! Suntem niste meseriasi amandoi.
Sau doar nu-i cea mai buna zi (sau doar ora) pentru transmitarea de informatii 

Ma refeream la.. aparitia din partea de mai sus a listei...

Pai il vazusem in postare, il vazusem in lista de la pagina 1... le-am amestecat si a iesit o varza  . Scuze.
Atunci trebuie doar sa il muti (si pe acesta) si la pagina 1 in lista celor eliminate.

Buun, doar ca ... am gasit o problema, cel putin momentan. Da, ca de obicei, vad "problema" la postarea ta, nu la cea a lui 1miau 

In primul rand, cand deschid bitcoinchain.com, imi da in partea de sus a paginii o eroare:


In plus, daca dau cautare dupa un tx id (am luat unul, aleator, de pe mempool.space), imi da "Nothing was found".

---
As recomanda ca cele care nu mai sunt bune sa dispara complet sau macar sa fie taiate. Ca m-a cam fraierit Blockexplorer.com de la tine de pe lista.

OK, I (somewhat) stand corrected, still if only displayed on the phone, that's a bad joke, not security.


This would be funny, but it's actually sad; it means that the one(s) who implemented the wallet most probably doesn't have the knowledge on blockchain/bitcoin/transactions he should have (and the wallet is built on wrong assumptions).

I recommend hardware wallet, clearly. Most probably with Electrum.
Even more, if OP values his privacy, he will also get Bitcoin Core, will download the blockchain and will use local Electrum Server and local Blockchain Explorer.


I have a Ledger Nano S and I use it with Electrum. My Electrum connects to a local Electrs that runs on top of a Bitcoin Core.
There are nowadays better options than Ledger, you can search for all the problems they had with their customers' data, plus they are not open source.
I am kinda eyeing SeedSigner, but as long as my Nano S still works, I stick to it.

And yet again all crypto twitter, news and forum(s) talk again again Dimon and JP Morgan. I will call this a successful advertising campaign.

Didn't Dimon say not long after the "i was wrong about Bitcoin" that he still doesn't like nor trust Bitcoin? And then what you guys expect? For him it's just a tool to make more fiat; it has always been. Then why would you expect he would spend a second understand Bitcoin? Do you think that he cares that what he tells is utter stupid? No; his audience doesn't know (nor cares) that either.
Only the Bitcoiners will care and those will.. just help him with further advertising.

I do understand your point. But I do understand "their" point too.
While it's indeed a proper transaction and it should be displayed properly especially on a HW (I complained here and there that the change address and its funds are not visible when I sign a tx and I see that as a possible security issue), from wallet point of view only the fee has "left the wallet".

So, as I said, it's not wrong. And yes, I completely agree, it should be done much better, probably in Electrum and HWs too.

If you look into Electrum at transactions history, that's what Electrum will also show in the list (as amount): only the amount spent/lost as fee.
It's not actually wrong, but I agree it can be seen as misleading.

From what I know you don't offer backup of the seed, hence if your company dies, the user funds go with it. That's not how security should work.
From what I know your wallet doesn't let user see what he's doing, leaving the door open for mistakes. Again, that's not how security should work.
The fact we have to trust your word instead of looking into sources, is a topic already discussed.


Yet one cannot use this from outside of US, hence you most probably do connect a wallet to user IP(s).
Sorry, but these claims coming in a technical area are... weak...

Since afaik you have an old wallet, yes, that is correct. That's why is important to put the correct wallet.dat in place earliest possible.
Of course, Bitcoin Core must not be running at that point, you better restart computer or check the list of processes before copying wallet.dat.

Maybe this helps too:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Data_directory
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/52612/how-do-i-retrieve-my-backed-up-wallet-to-bitcoin-core

Avand in vedere ca unul dintre pasi este completarea datelor de identificare (KYC), eu nu ma bag, 10$ nu merita riscul.
In plus, voi pune aici o recomandare de lectura: De ce procesul KYC este unul deosebit de periculos – și inutil

Exactly. And while, as you said, even Stroll was able to deliver, Latifi (or Mazepin) didn't. Even Zhou had some reasonably OK races. Of course, most probably a big percentage of the blame goes to the cars too, but when the other driver with same car does on a constant manner significantly better... it's time to try somebody new.


I fear that if he cannot go back to Alpine, there's not much other chance for him in F1. I don't think that he will go into much worse cars when he already did bad in better ones.
I guess that we will have to get used to miss his big smile like the one from that McLaren 1-2 win.