Software is as much as hardware under that warranty, simply because it's only them who can deliver it.
Or you expect they'll change the Nano S for Nano S plus when people will complain that the LL no longer supports their Nano because the software is too old!?
So the important updates will be there.


They've done many questionable moves lately and they've lost a great deal of popularity.
It would make no sense to deliver different software for Nano S and Nano S plus, that costs them more and the effect on people's perception will be very bad.
It could indeed force people buy other models, but the negative advertising will make most turn to other makers.


SeedSigner is also sold completely assembled. It's not for dummies, but people like the one with the not-that-cold storage from my previous post can probably already use it.


You've confused me with the last part. Doesn't SeedSigner need to contain seed or zprv in order to sign tx?!

Dupa o zi in care parca toate mi-au mers prost, ma bucur de bucuria ta. Ma bucur ca am fost de ajutor.
Bafta sa avem!

I don't have to do anything. Maybe tell the manager to look at the recording.
The dealer should have been not letting anyone touch the chips, so it's all on him.

1. This is not losing 350k, it's.. not winning 350k.
2. This cannot happen because afaik nobody is allowed to touch your chips, even if that one is with you/your friend. An I wrong?

Let's not confuse movies with reality.

With Seb leaving? With the Alonso drama? With Ricci leaving? With the uncertainty over Mick?
With all the issues about the car's floor? With Ferraris having such a good start and such a bad continuation?
With Russell being overall more constant and arguably better than Lewis?
With Checo telling at some point that he is aiming for the championship?

I think that there will be enough ammo for a bit of drama and a good enough season, really.

---

More on-topic: I see that the Brazilian GP will bring again a sprint race. I was missing those, actually. It will be a fun week-end.

Dupa doua "editii" rapide, avem partea a 3-a, mai "normala":

[FREE RAFFLE] Betnomi Cold Wallet - 3 round 🦊
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5419733

Organizator: betnomi

Se poate castiga: hardware wallet.


Poate participa oricine are cont creat dupa 1 Sep 2022.
Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar (care nu a fost deja rezervat) de la 00 la 99
Transportul este gratuit.

Concurs incheiat.

46 - NeuroticFish

Thank you!

An (old) airgapped computer is always a good option, but it lacks 2 things: convenience (you probably won't get it out with you) and foolproof (I will never forget the guy that came to bitcointalk complaining that his money got stolen from his "airgapped computer which he used to connect to network only for short periods to get his transactions out", heh).

That's why I consider SeedSigner a strong option. It's just a Raspberry Pi Zero (not too far from a general purpose computer after all, just cheaper) with a fancy enclosure and the necessary hardware and software added to it. It's cheaper too than the 200$ mark. Ah, and no WiFi, so less chances for errors.

You cannot be more wrong.
A forum that doesn't allow administration and censorship is the recipe for disaster. Although the forum, as it is now, allows freedom of speech, it still prohibits spam, plagiarism and spreading malware. Probably more too. And hundreds of posts (at least) are removed daily because of this.
On the other hand, a forum like you propose will be the ultimate garbage collector.

So my proposal is, like I tell those who want to create a better Bitcoin too: be my guest, make your own and see how many will embrace your idea. Then you will see if the idea was good or not.

This is correct. On the other hand, I hope that you realize that the chances are slim that it's only Binance faking their volumes (and FSX is not). So I'd take absolutely every exchanges' volumes with quite a pinch of salt.
And just the fact Binance's shitcoin does much better than FTX's shitcoin tells that CZ must be doing something better than SBF, even if that's only the playing the smokes and mirrors game.


Edit: fixed typo

While FTX is still rather small, they had aggressive advertising and many have foreseen FTX as the one that will soon replace Binance as pretty much the top CEX around.
Of course that now, with FTT in trouble, CZ has found the best moment to liquidate his stash and cause even more problems to the competitor.
Will this destroy FTX? I don't know. But it will most probably show that its place is not on top.

This is the "benefit" of doing this kind of things privately, on telegram, instead of publicly, on the forum.
If done publicly, others could have been seeing the links and the story and tell you from start that it all stinks.

PS. Scammers were around in 2014 too. Even more, since then the account could have easily change hands too (hack, selling, ...); tagging it now.

I agree it should be moved, but not to altcoins, but to service discussions.
Imho those (shit)tokens only show that a service may have issues. The emphasis is imho on "Are your funds safe at FTX", not "FTT is falling".

The problem is that comments may turn the topic in altcoins shitshow.

While looking up for something unrelated, I've read about Trezor's official reasons behind not using Secure Elements.


I don't know whether it's the same chip as Nano S is using, but maybe you get to use some of Trezor's knowledge on the matter.
Unlike Ledger, who are bound to not divulge anything about the secure chip they use, Trezor may be able to help.
I don't know, maybe I'm wrong, still, it can be an idea...

OK, I've looked myself for their help pages. Bitcoin (> 0.01BTC) and most altcoins' withdrawals are officially for free. ETH, tokens are not free.
Even more, of qualifying for free withdrawals, one has to actually trade, it seems:


So I don't know where the 100$ fee comes from and if it's for real (there are plenty of users complaining on the internet about this or that without understanding what they're doing and how this or that service is charging money from them, so without proof I tend to ignore most of those).

However, I see FTX policy somehow related to Binance's no trading fees for this or that pair (and also an attempt to increase FTX user base) and I think that it is only a temporary policy.

This is the usual mindset that makes people lose al their belongings at gambling. Obviously, a wrong mindset.
Gambling should go by the "lost some, won some" mindset. If you lost some today, you'll also play tomorrow (or whenever) only money you can afford to lose. If you win, great, if you lose, no biggie.
BTW: the "lucky people like me" idea may be a result of simply not playing too many rounds. Keep gambling at the fun level, else you may become very unlucky, and you don't want that.

While FTT is expected to have... difficulties, especially after CZ announcement that they'll (slowly) sell some huge amounts, I don't know of actual withdrawal issues from FTX.
However, it's always well known that keeping funds at centralized exchanges is risky, so at least those keeping their money there for no good reason should really consider withdrawing to their own wallets, especially as I've read that FTX has not withdrawal fees (I don't know though whether this is for Bitcoin only or other crypto too).

I agree, there's no rush at all. Nano S will not be phased out neither too soon, neither too abruptly, and during that time many better and cheaper models can be launched.
And not only by known or new HW makers, but also independent projects like SeedSigner.

So while looking for fallback cannot hurt, it's early for that ; new HW will most probably be launched meanwhile and then one will have to take a close look again.

Nici maximalistii nu le stiu pe toate, desi unii s-ar putea sa fi devenit maximalisti fie fiindca s-au ars ei, fie fiindca au vazut cat de multi s-au ars cu monedele alternative.
Si da, tehnologia a avansat, cu toate poticnelile si erorile inerente, dar da, tot evolutie este.


Banii sunt tot timpul o problema spinoasa si fiecare decide pentru el ce face cu banii lui, ca parerile vor fi intotdeauna impartite.
Intelesem punctul tau de vedere, incercasem doar sa iti spun (cum) sa privesti si din alt unghi problema.. refuzurilor.. si sa nu o pui prea tare la suflet.


  sa ai noroc si sa creasca cel putin cum iti doresti!

I beg to differ, for this only case. With banks being picky in many countries about where the money comes from, this can easily become a problem if one sells Bitcoin.
I find crypto cards useful for those who can't use Skrill and similar.

But maybe I am missing something, my experience is limited.