Or at least Sandrine is pretending she has already left. From http://forum.neucoin.org/users/sandrine/activityLast (private, er, "team") post 13 hours Last seen Nov 25th Last (public) post Nov 8th ("Hi everyone I'm leaving") Now, why would Sandrine want us to think she has left, when she still has keys to the office? I believe she doesn't want to be associated with Neucoin, doesn't want to be bind on it, but that she follows how it turns out - and maybe she is also waiting for unrestricted coins to dump. ;-) In a legit project she would be most likely a good CM. I'm glad for her that she left, but at the same time I don't understand how smart people could ever believe that it wouldn't turn out as a disaster. Funny is: The team should be glad that Neucoin never took traction, never got much attention. When they'll leave there won't be much feedback because of it - that's at least what I believe. What I would like to know is if they have to fear the legal side.
|
|
|
Nice work Alex, Bittrex 0.00002000 First buy wall gone.
First Magicking tried to make you look like an "a$$hole". That was bad enough. But then James mod has to rub in the salt. "You keep answering your own questions." oops. James mod knows Jack shite.
James mod, (some say "the thickest person on the internet" mind you, that was before Superman turned up) teaching Alex about "trust" If the ,er, "team" want to orphan Alexs' blocks over 6 minutes late, that's fine with James mod. That's trust. Thanks James
Keep on dumping!
What I really would like to know: How many Coins are in public-Investors hand? Or with other words: How many Coins are not under control of the Neu-team? And what's also interesting: How many Coins from team-members are unrestricted and could reach the market if they want to leave. Because I'm sure that the team is not united. Sandrine is already out and that's an obvious sign. At one point there will be a race who is first to dump.
|
|
|
Keep hope alive, this will be the most used coin in the world @ 2021
cant tell if sarcastic I was also not sure, but... : so this is the coin that will bring mass adoption to crypto ..Haha
... ;-)
|
|
|
Keep hope alive, this will be the most used coin in the world @ 2021
Yes... Mark Zuckerberg will leave Facebook, join the Neu-team and sell billions to China where it will be the official currency. And in 2022 it will replace dollar as petrodollar. MOOOOON! ;-)
|
|
|
Quick note, Alexhiggins tries to get answers to why nokoin keep robbing him of his nokoin mining rewards, After hours of work investigating and posting pages of evidence, after quietly threatening to sell his millions of nokoin if they don't sort this s*%/ out, Magicking reply's, "Both of theses statements (and past posts) make me think that you don't fully understand how things work and hence you make assumptions of how things might work and then get aggressive and mix multiple subject in your post (like this one) even if some answer has been given before." http://forum.neucoin.org/t/public-pos-stakes-being-orphaned-by-foundation-account-stakes/2289/15No attempt at enlightenment. No attempt to discuss. That's always been the nokoin way. So who does fully understand how things work with nokoin? Not Magicking lmo. Nobody does. All part of the plan to dupe the masses. Time to sell up Alex? Possibilities: 1. They don't care any more, the decision to leave is already made so it's just a matter of time they'll let it die. 2. They absolutely don't know how to answer, what to say, how to fix the issues. 3. They are so naive and arrogant, ignorant and blind that they don't believe to be accountable for anything. I believe it's a mix of 1, 2 and 3. And I don't see any possibility that this could turn out in something positive for anyone. Sometime somebody will sell and break the buywalls and the price will totally crash. It's just a matter of time. Really, I thought a lot about this project... just out of the interest if it's theoretical possible that this project has any chance. But still I don't see just one single possible scenario. It has nothing positive but multiple issues and even if it would be a good project, the monster-inflation would be deadly in any case. Out of miner-perspective with wallets full of NEU there is the question if there are chances for a rising price... but even if they should be able to lead it into a little hype, what would they have to do? They need to distribute, so the price can't rise much. And over the time, more and more coins will become unrestricted, the risk that other large holder will bring pressure on the price or even break it is increasing. So, the question is maybe more if it's smarter to sell all at once or over time.
|
|
|
So, wtf IS going on with these block explorers? Huey said "the blockchain never lies" Well, at least one of them is lying. nokoin.io states 3.95bn nokoin exist. http://www.neucoin.io/richlistnokoin.org state 3.39bn nokoin exist. http://explorer.neucoin.org/overviewI had expected to see at least ~3.7bn in existence at this point, using nokoin own formula. http://forum.neucoin.org/t/how-will-neucoins-be-mined-after-release/163/28However,with the super compounding effect for the controllers of nokoin, nokoin.io's figure of 3.95bn is plausible. On the other hand, nokoin.org's 3.39bn figure is several hundred million nokoin below their own projections. So, are they holding back on staking, or have they just messed up the process of staking, or did they mess up the original figures, or is their blockchain just plain wrong? (I think the figures are good as the first months nokoin growth was in line with expectations, as reported on this thread. the nokoin growth therefore must have slowed after month one. I dont know how to go back in time, now, to "easily verify" how many nokoin existed after month one on "todays version of events" at nokoin.org explorer?) Is the difference between the two because nokoin.org rewrite (their) history every month (on "distribution day") and nokoin.io doesn't obey? After all, when nokoin team rewrite history, that then makes it "true". Even when nokoin team are not rewriting, every tx is is based on the 51% attack. The controllers say it did or did not happen. NOBODY else gets a say. If you disagree, (when finding a block) you will be orphaned? Also Veegolds' transaction history on the two explorers deviates on distribution day, Oct 23rd, coincidence? http://www.neucoin.io/address/NSx81GyspxWA5H8z7MHam9dezptCKBqzkCI don't think Acorn would have deliberately robbed Veegold, but could a bug in the reorg/rewrite be to blame? What is going on? Can anything about nokoin be trusted? Probably not.... unless you FULLY trust the team. (mostly gone or hiding behind "Acorn" for anonymity) As Sandrine said,(Apr 25) "Pre-mined cryptocurrencies like NeuCoin reintroduce a trust factor during a part of the distribution phase, while the Foundations still hold the majority of the coin. It is a paradigm Bitcointalk members do not like." That's really weird. My calculation, with compound interest, would be for 70 days: 100% per year = 0.27% per day 3,000,000,000 * (1 + 0.27/100) ^70 = 3,633,262,031 NEU So, it would be near what you say: "I had expected to see at least ~3.7bn in existence at this point"Maybe it's a decreasing interest rate to avoid compound interest. But the question would be still what's wrong with one or both BE's. Kind of funny is: It seems, nobody cares anymore about those questions. The team knows that Neucoin is done (is there still a team btw?). Some Investors maybe still hope but how many Investors do they have? The forum shows also a decreasing activity. There are so many points, and every single point would be a huge scandal in every legit project, but it's totally normal for Neucoin that things are wrong and nobody cares. FYI... the actual interest rate hardcoded into the count is approx 0.2424 pct a day Thanks for the info! But under the line it doesn't really matter. The market would be at 1 sat if just 1/2 day of staking would be sold. Buy-Side on Bittrex: 4 Mio. And it's mainly 1.25 Mio because of the "Neu-team-buywall" at 2000 sat. And 1,8 Mio at 1 sat. 2 Mio would be enough to crash it totally and the staking of just one day is about 8 Mio. There is no way that this Coin will survive. And: Without the buy-walls of the Neu-team the price would be already much lower and they won't ever be able to distribute just one day of staking. And that says a lot about the current price. It's totally overvalued and at the same time clearly lower than the ICO-price, wich says a lot about the ICO-price. My question is really mostly: Is this project a result of Incompetence or Fraud or is it an incompetent Fraud?
|
|
|
Kurzes Update: Das CFC-Minimum wurde nicht erreicht und gilt daher als gescheitert. Aber: Das R3D-Team hat sich nach alternativen Finanzierungsmöglichkeiten umgesehen und es scheint Grund zu Optimismus zu geben. Sicher ist m.A.n. dass das Projekt nicht in die Schublade wandern wird.
Was macht man kein Shidcoin geworden ?? Was willst du hören? Was macht man jetzt? Was ich Dir versichern kann: Falls das Project startet, wird es ganz sicher kein Shitcoin sein. ist ja aber super ruhig geworden und selbst Forum Troll yak ist Ruhig zu dem Thema, daher wahrscheinlich eher Tot das Thema. Ich weiß es ehrlich gesagt nicht. Ich weiß, das schon sehr viel Arbeit drin steckt, also schon einiges geleistet wurde und glaube eigentlich nicht dass das total in der Schublade verschwinden wird. Aber ob es wirklich noch kommt und wenn ja, wann und wie... keine Ahnung. Falls nicht, kann man aber eigentlich nur sagen das es schade ist und das zumindest niemand Geld verloren hat außer dem Team selbst, die ja Kosten für Development und ICO hatten.
|
|
|
So, wtf IS going on with these block explorers? Huey said "the blockchain never lies" Well, at least one of them is lying. nokoin.io states 3.95bn nokoin exist. http://www.neucoin.io/richlistnokoin.org state 3.39bn nokoin exist. http://explorer.neucoin.org/overviewI had expected to see at least ~3.7bn in existence at this point, using nokoin own formula. http://forum.neucoin.org/t/how-will-neucoins-be-mined-after-release/163/28However,with the super compounding effect for the controllers of nokoin, nokoin.io's figure of 3.95bn is plausible. On the other hand, nokoin.org's 3.39bn figure is several hundred million nokoin below their own projections. So, are they holding back on staking, or have they just messed up the process of staking, or did they mess up the original figures, or is their blockchain just plain wrong? (I think the figures are good as the first months nokoin growth was in line with expectations, as reported on this thread. the nokoin growth therefore must have slowed after month one. I dont know how to go back in time, now, to "easily verify" how many nokoin existed after month one on "todays version of events" at nokoin.org explorer?) Is the difference between the two because nokoin.org rewrite (their) history every month (on "distribution day") and nokoin.io doesn't obey? After all, when nokoin team rewrite history, that then makes it "true". Even when nokoin team are not rewriting, every tx is is based on the 51% attack. The controllers say it did or did not happen. NOBODY else gets a say. If you disagree, (when finding a block) you will be orphaned? Also Veegolds' transaction history on the two explorers deviates on distribution day, Oct 23rd, coincidence? http://www.neucoin.io/address/NSx81GyspxWA5H8z7MHam9dezptCKBqzkCI don't think Acorn would have deliberately robbed Veegold, but could a bug in the reorg/rewrite be to blame? What is going on? Can anything about nokoin be trusted? Probably not.... unless you FULLY trust the team. (mostly gone or hiding behind "Acorn" for anonymity) As Sandrine said,(Apr 25) "Pre-mined cryptocurrencies like NeuCoin reintroduce a trust factor during a part of the distribution phase, while the Foundations still hold the majority of the coin. It is a paradigm Bitcointalk members do not like." That's really weird. My calculation, with compound interest, would be for 70 days: 100% per year = 0.27% per day 3,000,000,000 * (1 + 0.27/100) ^70 = 3,633,262,031 NEU So, it would be near what you say: "I had expected to see at least ~3.7bn in existence at this point"Maybe it's a decreasing interest rate to avoid compound interest. But the question would be still what's wrong with one or both BE's. Kind of funny is: It seems, nobody cares anymore about those questions. The team knows that Neucoin is done (is there still a team btw?). Some Investors maybe still hope but how many Investors do they have? The forum shows also a decreasing activity. There are so many points, and every single point would be a huge scandal in every legit project, but it's totally normal for Neucoin that things are wrong and nobody cares.
|
|
|
At least for me this is new: Cryptid is the next generation of identification. Cryptid eliminates the possibility of counterfeits by adding factors of authentication and encryption that is backed a distributed global network. It benefits a group or organization of any scale by allowing them implement a secure method of managing the verification of official members. Utilizing existing standards, such as ISO 19794-2 for our fingerprint templates and AAMVA and ANSI personal information format standards, our system can be integrated with existing software and hardware (fingerprint scanners) and easily understood. Our current version of Cryptid uses Factom as its blockchain backend. For encryption we use AES-512-CBC for data encryption and RSA-4096 for signing and verification.(...) http://devpost.com/software/cryptid
|
|
|
Kurzes Update: Das CFC-Minimum wurde nicht erreicht und gilt daher als gescheitert. Aber: Das R3D-Team hat sich nach alternativen Finanzierungsmöglichkeiten umgesehen und es scheint Grund zu Optimismus zu geben. Sicher ist m.A.n. dass das Projekt nicht in die Schublade wandern wird.
Was macht man kein Shidcoin geworden ?? Was willst du hören? Was macht man jetzt? Was ich Dir versichern kann: Falls das Project startet, wird es ganz sicher kein Shitcoin sein.
|
|
|
Dead crap. Exactly what I said. U ended up killing this project and a few supporters with ur indifference. Plus u fucked up ur own roadmap.
Where is the fully functioning network of federated servers? Where is the balance sheet? U received 700 btc from koinify. Where do u spend money people gave u?
"All funds will be stored in a multi-signature wallet, to ensure security and to provide a system of checks and audits inherent to the release of funds. We will be working with the Crypto Currency Certification Consortium to ensure our key storage meets all levels of security, qualification, and certification. Two of three signatures will be needed to release any funds until the milestones are met and funds are delivered to the Factom controlled accounts." https://koinify.com/blog/introducing-the-factom-software-sale/And maybe you should take a look into github: https://github.com/FactomProject/What do you see? Daily updates. The last one: Updated 6 hours ago It's a little bit premature to speak from a "dead project".
|
|
|
Whales interested in coin with 2 BtC daily volume. OK....
Plus: "Professionals", but brandnew Account and the first post in this thread... ;-)
|
|
|
Interesting project, we'll be keeping an eye on it.
"We"? You're more than just one person? Yes. We are a crew of professionals, creators, whales, traders, etc. PM me if you want to know more about the group. That subject is a bit off topic here though, we'll be checking the thread for NeuCoin progress. Sure! That's what I wanted to see! Professionals... sure! But, please explain everybody what's interesting about Neucoin out of the perspective of professionals? Or whale-traders?
|
|
|
Interesting project, we'll be keeping an eye on it.
"We"? You're more than just one person?
|
|
|
They don't mention Factom, but what they say sounds like it. Would it be possible for Factom to handle that much data? HSBC says the blockchain could be used for 'helicopter money'
(...) HSBC outlines the trust problem with helicopter money — in short, people are rightly sceptical of a central bank's ability to work out how much help the economy actually needs. If it's too much, helicopter money could be wildly inflationary. Here's how they think the blockchain could help with that: If we move towards an economy where all transactions become recorded in real-time on a Blockchain type of technology, it will not be too dissimilar to the current eco-systems that many ecommerce giants have around the globe. Online e-commerce stores are able to give out loans to merchants without collateral, because they know all the flows already from the merchants’ point of view: from how much people are spending to the conversion rate of pages viewed to purchases. In the same way, a modernised monetary transmission system, based on real-time big data analysis through Blockchain, could allow the government to balance the economy more efficiently and systematically. In short, the blockchain would allow the government to know a huge amount more about what's actually happening in the economy. (...) http://www.businessinsider.com/hsbc-says-the-blockchain-could-be-used-for-radical-central-bank-helicopter-money-policies-2015-11?r=UK&IR=TEdit: Another Article about it from Coindesk HSBC: Blockchain Tech Could Complement Central Bank Policies http://www.coindesk.com/hsbc-central-banks-blockchain-economic-activity/
|
|
|
I believe a BTC-hype would be good PR for Factom and even if the FCT-price should drop first because of a hyping BTC I expect a "FCT-hype" with a little delay. That was the case with many Altcoins in Nov 2013.
That's what I was hoping for but it doesn't seem to be playing out that way. When BTC ran way up in 2013, LTC ran up even harder. Yes. But there was a big delay. BTC started to rise in early October while the LTC-price in BTC decreased. LTC spiked in mid-November. Bestcase: BTC hypes, good news for Factom at the same time or even before - a GUI, hopefully more exchanges etc. ;-)
|
|
|
I ask again about the Entry credits which are already used (10-20 per block) are they used only because of test purposes or some people / company actually use it for real purpose already?
Most of it is testing I think. There is already a photo-app which can be used, but there were some tests, like this one: https://www.facebook.com/FactomProject/posts/278806202243728
|
|
|
|