In terms of an upset, this one has a higher chance in my opinion, Valdez have an undefeated record for a reason and I think it is worth banking on that possibility. Yeah, I know their stats so I know which one should I bet on.

The money that will pour in this celebrity fight will definitely be something to watch out for. If I were a fan of this kinds of disasters of show or a fanatic of a certain celebrity, I would go there no matter what happens. We all know that Mayweather will crush any celebrity but it wouldn't hurt to watch it, remember that we could be the people that want to watch a disaster, and this thing could humanize our favorite celebrities. To make this fight interesting, I suggest that they would not bet on who wins but a certain events should be bet on in real time like who will be the first highlight after the end of the round or who will go down first or how long will the rounds last.

They are both orthodox but Berchelt has the reach and height advantage, in terms of experience they both are not that far away from each other with Berchelt having 36 wins under his belt and Valdez having a good undefeated record, in power advantage Berchelt definitely has the power advantage on this one and the age is also a factor too, with Berchelt younger than Valdez by 1 year, and experience wise, Berchelt does have one too. The odds are lower on Berchelt which means that the chances that he win will be higher but an upset can be expected.

I could see where your getting at but if you know how to roll a certain way in dice, you can actually have higher chance to land your numbers than others who just do a Hail Mary dice throw, I don't know if that is a real tip but I have done it a long time ago and in my experience, a certain dice throw can help you get your numbers much higher. Lottery can also be based on skill, the statistics is just too big and the players that play it are just too dumb to do it.

AFAIK that is the case for this one, they are giving the employee a choice on how they are going to be payed. That worries me too, the volatility will definitely play a big role in this because as bitcoin as it is back then, it is still as volatile as ever. I am rooting for this to be successful although the volatility obstacle is definitely a hard one to get past.

Hopefully the market will push out of the 40k by coming days, I think that we will be looking at a another resistance at around 60k if the pattern where 20k to 30k transition was smooth were to happen again. I have to say, if another ATH looms, I will be following my planned exit price, no matter how the market will still go up.

The cake shop is bigot but the bank is not, that is the difference. Just because they both denied their services doesn't necessarily mean that they are similar, for me that is just a pathetic excuse of bigotry. The reason that business doesn't want to do anything with Trump is because they know that it will tarnish their reputation, the reputation of the bank whereas the case with the gay hating bake shop, it is the reputation of the owner whose mind is still living in the 1940s. If it is a free market then how come we are discriminating a customer/client?

As a citizen that has lived long enough and has reach the age of reason, we should know by now that any words or promises made by politicians are nothing but BS that needs to be said so they can win the people's confidence into voting them into power. I saw a post in Twitter about the similarity of the people believing in politician's promise to the people who believes that the prostitutes are in love with them.

To answer the question as to whether Biden's administration will be good for business, definitely women and minorities will be a highlight in their presidency but the recent ghosting of their administration on the BLM movement after the election will definitely be a factor in this part; most programs and regulations will be targeting the recovery of the economy and considering small business are hit the hardest although they are making the big part in economy, which could mean that there is a possibility that most programs and regulations will be good for small businesses. And maybe they will give power to some big fintech companies. In conclusion, this administration will be a mixed bag.

It is more of an underrated in my opinion, we do not think twice when we are using gas for cars, or electricity for that matter, because they are always there but what will happen when those things get lost, would we still be thinking the same thing, I don't think so but there is nothing wrong with that, these things are far better underrated because as most things do and what most employees agree is they work better when not bothered. I also do think that OP is overrating those things that OP mentioned.

Maybe what the 2% refers to is the active wallets and it does not always equate that one person is using that one wallet or that a person only has one wallet. 10% is a lot of people considering that a lot of institutional whales and traditional whales are accumulating a lot of bitcoin resulting to the decrease of wallets that are owning 1 or more bitcoin, not to mention that for an average person, 1 bitcoin is a pipe dream.

OP really likes to boost the reputation of his/her alt accounts. Now that I think about it, you two have the same non sense topics and the way you structure your posts that are filled with errors.

If there is no supply but there is still a demand then it could be lynchpin to a increase in prices, I don't think that it should be infinite but if scarcity is in play, bitcoin market will not be a good indicator for the prices because people will put their own price tag having the knowledge that bitcoin supply is zero.

The protest is what I am suspecting in the first place. I am surprised because AFAIK there is around 10% or higher cryptocurrency user in the country, putting regulation as the quote above says is the best way to go for anything involving crypto, I believe that this is a political play because you can easily make profit out of the crypto population in your country by putting regulations and taxes, either bankers are involved in this, or a government official that fears that crypto is giving people power or a government official being lobbied by bankers.

He does technically own the bitcoin but considering the he doesn't have access to it then I don't think that it is right to put him on this list, I would agree with the part of him become a self made billionaire but he has to be able to access the money before doing that. What do you mean by the 0.22 billion?

I don't know what happens in Nigeria currently but I assume that this is a bad one. And what do you mean by OccupyCBN? My hunch tells me that this is not a good idea but the orders of the Central Bank of Nigeria is a far more sinister than what I think. Did they even took some research as to how many people are using cryptocurrency in their country? With around 10% of their population using cryptocurrency I think the best case for anything relating to banning cryptocurrency is not banning it but instead regulating it.

Don't blame your self, you said it to be a necessity then it is better than starving to death, the only way that I can think of so this kind of things wouldn't happen again is to have another mode of cashflow. I do agree with patience and trust but we also have to be smart about it, remember that being too greedy could the cause of us getting left behind.

Exactly what I was going to say but performance wise, I think that bots are going to be defeating the humans not to mention that there are advancements in robotics that it came to the point where a bot can be better than human although technically humans made those bots smarter than us but we are at a point where we can create a robot or AI to teach itself. Maybe if you can record your trading patterns for awhile, you can probably use almost any bots remember that most bots are tweaked base on the human patterns.

I don't get it, is there something wrong that I am giving my sMerits away? If other users see this as something bad then I will delete the topic, will you be happy after that? I created this topic so users can have a hub so users can earn some merits and for other users to check out the thread so they can narrow their search for merit worthy post, also I am not trying to impress any users if that is what you are thinking. Do you want one too? If so, then just follow the format.

The reason that they are threatened by it is that they have a big population that if they let bitcoin proliferate in the populace then they will have a harder time to control it. We really can't do anything about it because they have the might to enforce this regulations. Stocks is far safer to be honest, it is backed by governments and the people behind it wouldn't want a blue chip to crash so you investment is safe although it is not a lot.

Not to mention that when your bitcoin gets lost in the void forever, you are contributing to the increase in prices of bitcoin in the market. It sort of a noble purpose but I don't think that it is a worth thing to pursue especially if you plan to have a family, then do what the quote above says, make it part of your inheritance.