Ali zato me dobro streslo jutros kad sam vidio poruku od Telegram bot-a da sam dobio ban na forumu. Malo je reći da sam se usrao  Ja sam prvo vidio notifikaciju od altcointalk bota i tu sam fakat pomislio da sam popusio ban iako nisam tamo napisao post najmanje mjesec dana ali ono ne znam pravila tamo pa rekoh ko zna, mozda i je istina. A onda sam vidio i bitcointalk notifikaciju pa se sjetio datuma. Bome mene je fino streslo kad sam vidio notifikaciju. Iako sad kad razmislim, sumnjam da bi bot obavijestio o banu ali kad nešto takvo pročitaš, ne razmišljaš previše;D Jedna od losijih prvoaprilskih fora, imho. Da, slažem se. Ne sjećam se točno što je bilo prošlih godina ali sjećam se da je bilo dobro. Ali OK, teško je uvijek biti kreativan. |
|
|
|
Well, I see a funny status on my profile, my bitcointalk position as loudmouth and my merits -30 . I don't understand how that came about.
Maybe that's one of the reasons I can't open the question.
Haha. I didn't see it until you wrote it Maybe it's just Theymos having his standard April fools joke  I don't see anything changed on my profile so I'm not sure, but that shouldn't be a reason for not being able to open questions. It's a Google forms website, it doesn't have anything to do with the forum. |
|
|
|
The question aren't opening on my browser, been trying it since and it isn't opening. Is anyone having thesame issues or is it just me? I think it's just you. I opened the question an hour or so ago and it worked without a problem. When something from Google doesn't work on someone's computer or mobile, it's 95% chances that the problem is in that person's device. Try on another device or another browser. |
|
|
|
Zar nije Theymos prošlih godina za 1. april uvijek imao neku šalu na forumu? Nisam siguran ali mislim da nisam primijetio ništa takvog ove godine. Ali zato me dobro streslo jutros kad sam vidio poruku od Telegram bot-a da sam dobio ban na forumu. Malo je reći da sam se usrao  Prvo sam pomislio da je neki hack pa me bilo strah kliknuti na link, ali vidio sam da vodi na dobru domenu pa sam ipak otvorio. Ako nekog zanima, link vodi ovdje: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248878.msg63884796#msg63884796 |
|
|
|
Oh man... I just checked the spreadsheet and if I don't count casperBGD, I'm the only one in the whole competition with straight four losses. That's really some achievement Maybe I should just close my eyes and pick answers blindfolded. I just might try that in the next round. It doesn't make sense to spend time on research when I lose anyway... |
|
|
|
/snip
Bome padam na listi iz mjeseca u mjesec....
Pa znamo svi da je u Gambling sekciji puno bolja lova nego u našem lokalnom forumu  Ali dobro, tebi ćemo oprostiti jer ipak vodiš BSFL s cryptofrkom pa na taj dio sigurno ode puno vremena. Samo nemoj zaboraviti otkuda si došao jednom kad postaneš glavni menadžer u Gamblingu |
|
|
|
Ovo sa Apple-Mac čipovima nema nikakve veze sa Trezor hardverskim novčanicima, a i novi Trezor 3 Safe ima secure element. A i ako se sa starih Trezora nekom sci-fi ''malom'' investicijom mogu ukrasti ti privatni ključevi (a sumnjam), onda se sa softverskim novčanicima to može besplatno uraditi  A znači novi Trezor nema tu ranjivost? Onda sam miran Nije da sam se previše zabrinut zbog toga ali ipak mi je draže znati da wallet nema ranjivosti. Barem ne ranjivosti koje su dosad poznate. Ali opet... Ne treba previše razbijati glavu o walletima. Sve dok paziš što radiš i je pričaš okolo kako si se obogatio na kriptu, možeš biti miran. A ako svima razglasiš da imaš bogatstvo u kriptu, onda ti nikakav wallet neće pomoći kad ti netko dođe doma. |
|
|
|
/snip
Maybe we will try to put some questions in the future that take odds into consideration. For instance H2H question, we give few teams and if you go for favorite it gives you 1 point and if you go for underdog it gives you 2 points.
This sounds like a good idea. Maybe it would be best to introduce one question like that in a round to see how it goes. But it sounds like it would bring some extra fun to the competition. /snip
I’m not so much of a tennis addict, but I do pay attention to whatever sports and or players I decide to spend my time watching, Dimitrov defeating Zverev further proves his win against Alcaraz was no fluke.
Yeah, he seems to be in a pretty good form. But the problem is that in Indian Wells he lost straight 2-0 to Medvedev. That's practically the same tournament as Miami (ATP1000, hardcourt) and he couldn't pass the second round. At least that's how it looks to me. |
|
|
|
/snip I za sam kraj, lista svih koji su na nasem boardu napisali makar 1 post, pa cak i ako je kasnije bio obrisan. Ono sto je odmah primjetno da unatoc tome sto imamo manji broj psotova, l;ista nije nimalo karac u odnosu na mjesec ranije te je cak i ovaj put duza za 3 imena sto je svakako dobra stvar. Na vrhu same liste je naravno slackovic na visokom 2. mjestu je casperBGD (koji ce svakakao faliti) a nas porezni ekspert Domchi je na visokom 3. mjestu. 1. slackovic [35]2. casperBGD [24]/snip Kao i uvijek, hvala na detaljnoj analizi. Ovo gore naročito pokazuje koliko će nam casperBGD nedostajati. Uvijek je bio pri vrhu po broju napisanih postova i s njegovim odsustvom aktivnost će nam još dodatno pasti. Baš šteta... On i Daniel91 su nam stvarno veliki gubitak. Ne znam samo što se dogodilo s Trofom. Ako se ne varam, bilo je mjeseci kad je bio odmah na drugom mjestu iza mene, a sad je tek na 10. mjestu. |
|
|
|
Ne koristim Apple pa nisam baš dobro pratio vijest o ovome, ali mislim da sam pročitao da ranjivost nije moguće ispraviti softverskom nadogradnjom. Je li se nešto u međuvremenu promijenilo? Ne, sotverska nadogradnja ne može otkloniti ovu ranjivost. Stvar je u samom fizičkom dizajnu čipa. Softverksim update-om bi se mogao umanjiti problem ali bi to značajno smanjilo performanse čipova. Slična ranjivost koja se također ne može otkloniti iz kripto industrije je problem kojeg imaju npr. Trezor hardverski novčanici. S njih osoba koja zna šta da radi može uz malu investiciju ukrasti privatne ključeve uz fizički pristup novčaniku. E je*iga sad... Gdje si bio kad sam kupovao novi hardware wallet i odlučio kupiti novi Trezor? Ali dobro, ako netko ima fizički pristup Trezoru, onda ima i fizički pristup mojoj glavi pa uvijek može napraviti $5 wrench attack. Što se tiče Apple problema, tako sam i ja pročitao. Zato me malo zbunilo kad je Lunoreal napisao da je bitno instalirati sve dostupne nadogradnje kako bi računalo bilo sigurno. |
|
|
|
There is much more to Tennis than just what the ATP ranking suggest, there are some players that are a headache for certain players simply because of their strength.
Dimitrov definitely is no slouch when it comes to playing tennis at a top level, and he's a very good player with a very similar style to Roger Federer, he's even nicknamed Baby Fed for that reason. Alcaraz strength comes from being a very physical player, and very mobile, but still have a huge weakness especially with his service, he's never at an advantage even when serving, he barely gets any free point from serving against top opponents.
Dimitrov had all the answers to Alcaraz play in that game, he didn't need to be completely mobile to beat Alcaraz because, even when Alcaraz kept going for the baseline and far corner top spin shots, Dimitrov had the advantage due to his flawless one hand backhand spin, drop or winning shots ability.
This post is a great answer to my question on why would anyone go with a surprise result instead of a safe bet. I guess you really like tennis and follow it closely. I watch tennis only when there is a Davis Cup tournament and Croatia is playing. Otherwise, it's a boring sport to me. This is more related to the type of person you are, and maybe you are confident in your selections, this is like in football some coaches make teir plans and plays without see how the other team plays, and others dont makes anything by himself they only try to stop the way the other team play, that coaches normally are fully defensive, and the other ones are more towards attacking.
For me like other said beofre, i put my selections by the way i think but in some cases i cover what the other guy is gonna put if im not 100% sure.
With this explanation I guess I know how I managed to win all rounds in the season one and now in season four I can't get a single win. I guess other teams really got to know my style of play, so they already know how I will answer even before I submit my answers. That's actually good to know because now I can make adjustments to my game |
|
|
|
It is not just that, it is the odds. Let's go back to Alcaraz example, he was 1.10 to win against Dimitrov. Even though I believed Dimitrov is winning that I will never play that high odds in competition like this. You are playing against the bookie and whole field and even if you win you don't get the payout that should go with odds like that.
Simply not worth it. I rather picked Alcaraz here and played it safe in BSFL then backed Dimitrov to cover 4.5 handicap on ticket.
That may sound like a great way to combine BSFL and betting, but it sounds like mumbo jumbo to me Since I don't follow sport that closely like many of you, I have no idea when a favorit player could easily lose. But that's something I know it's my weakeness in this competition and I'm OK with ti. To be honest, I'm pretty surprised that I made it three seasons in a row in division 1 |
|
|
|
|
I am reading the discussion and I have to say that I have never thought about how my opponent will answer a question. I always go with how I feel the outcome of a game will be. Maybe it's because I'm not following sport that closely so I'm always going with a safe option. But I don't understand why would I risk a point by answering differently than what I think my opponent will answer. Surprises are always possible in sport but I never expect a surprise simply because they are rarer than expected outcome.
|
|
|
|
Krada Privatnih Kljuceva - Apple Mac M1, M2, M3 [21.03.2024.]Ne znamo da li je FUD, ali treba se paziti. Azuriraj ako koristis. Nisan htia stavljat u neku vec temu jer je ozbiljna vijest pa radim novu. Ispod radara je prošla vijest da kripto ključevi mogu da se hakuju sa Apple kompjutera M-serije. Ova ranjivost nije problematična samo za kripto već je generalno problem haka na svim Mekovima koji koriste M1, M2, i M3 čipove. Problematičan je i Intelov 13 Gen Raptor Lake, ali ne toliko. Naučnici nekoliko univerziteta su objavili mogućnost i opis GoFetch napada, ( https://gofetch.fail/) koji su prijavili Apple kompaniji pre 107 dana. Nije poznato da li je Apple reagovao, ali ažurirajte svoje mekove redovno jer valjda nisu toliko ludi da ne odreaguju i uklone ranjivost kad tad. Više informacija o krađi privatnih ključeva: https://www.zetter-zeroday.com/apple-chips/preuzeto s @bitbalkan tg stranice /snip Pročitao sam ovu vijest mislim prošli tjedan. Ne koristim Apple pa nisam baš dobro pratio vijest o ovome, ali mislim da sam pročitao da ranjivost nije moguće ispraviti softverskom nadogradnjom. Je li se nešto u međuvremenu promijenilo? |
|
|
|
Primjetio sam u posljednjih par dana jedan pokušaj prevare na Twitteru koji uključuje verifikovane naloge. Da li su nalozi hakirani ili ne, nisam provjeravao i ne zanima me. U biti tvitovi shiluju neku fake Ethereum gas stranicu koja provjerava koliko je vaša adresa platila naknada kroz historiju. Zatim napravi obračun i isplati vam sve što ste platili za naknade. Na straincu klikao nisam pa ne znam šta tačno traže. Da li da upišete seed, preuzmete neki zaraženi softver ili da povežete wallet sa aplikacijom koja će dobiti dozvolu da vam isprazni tokene sa adrese. Dovoljni su mi ti tvitovi da znam da je prevara. Pa pripazite, pogotovo zbog shilanja od strane verifikovanih naloga sa plavom kvakicom. Ma ta plava kvačica meni ne znači apsolutno ništa. To bi kao trebali biti verificirani računi, ali mislim da je to samo način kako izmusti još love od ljudi. Inače sam neki dan pročitao tweet od Muska da će svi Twitter računi koji imaju preko 2500 verificiranih pratitelja dobiti Twitter Premium besplatno. Nisam siguran radi li se tu samo o Premium usluzi koja se plaća ili to znači da će dobiti plavu kvačicu. |
|
|
|
Podmitiš prave ljude i pojeo vuk magare..
Za Ameriku je ovo smiješno mala kazna, vani je za 15 godina s milijardama dolara.
Nekako sam očekivao da od njega naprave primjer pa me, bez obzira na njegovo zaleđe, ovo dosta začudilo.
Da, mene isto malo iznenadilo da je dobio "samo" 20 godina. Očekivao sam da će dobiti više, a opet nije ni 20 godina baš ništa. Ipak je to četvrtina života i nisam siguran bi li baš puno ljudi svjesno to išlo napraviti očekujući sa će toliko vremena provesti u zatvoru. |
|
|
|
/snip Same way with Alcaraz, I am actually thinking he will loose to Dinitrov but it just isn't worth it to risk and go for that answer when I know everyone will have Alcaraz to pass.
Yep, same here. Sometimes I just go with the flow, the odds just aren't there to risk with such things. I did go with Poland expecting most would go with Wales, these risks make more sense. Actually, I wanted to go with Poland in that question. But then I remembered that Wales beat us (Croatia) in last qualifications so I decided to go with them instead. I just checked both teams and honestly, even if I did the research, I'm not sure how would I answer it. They are both pretty equal teams and the result of the game shows that. Wales even had four shots on target, while Poland had zero. |
|
|
|
This was easier than expected, lost my bet but at least 3 points are here. It does get a bit stupid when we have almost all the answers same.
I even answered wales-poland question wrongly just because I was afraid to loose point. I knew you will go for Wales due to the odds but I had a feeling Poland is gonna get that. It was a true 50/50 game so I decided to go safe way. Same way with Alcaraz, I am actually thinking he will loose to Dinitrov but it just isn't worth it to risk and go for that answer when I know everyone will have Alcaraz to pass.
What to say? Congrats on your winning. I guess my path is the fight not to get relegated. But hey, relegation is not that bad. Look at Southampton. They got relegated last season and they already practically secured a promotion playoff. With two games less than Leeds and Ipswitch, they can even fight for a direct promotion. |
|
|
|
|
So... Machač never stood a chance against Sinner. He lost straight 2-0 and with that result I guess I have to admit another defeat by one point. That freaking fourth round in a row that I lost by one point. I can't believe... And it's only after two days.
|
|
|
|
Sinner wasn't always reliable, but I think he stepped up his game especially in terms of stability. It's probably going to happen less often that he loses a game out of a sudden when he was supposed to be the big favorite. He is on a good way to dominate along with Alcaraz.
/snip
No, no. I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say that he played bad in the past. He just played opposite to my expectations each and every time we had him in the questions. That's why I stopped trying to research his form before answering questions about him. He is my kryptonite when it comes to BSFL |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
