Yeah, enforcement is off and our good old "friend" showed up again. Search "XxDotRpSDzgyAkx3jHkLZD8YYZRwbcjmmA" on forum  |
|
|
|
I think the network is slower to update this time around because V12 was released so close to a weekend. Hopefully it will pick up some today. ..... sync-ing the BlockChain now - but - have to work today..... Will hopefully have it up and running by 04:00 UTC, from now [3rd try - ugh] Can't get DASH MN to run with ubuntu MATE on Pi - gonna stick to Raspiban on 32GB - crashes during compile with errors, every time, with ubuntu MATE on Pi Mine compiled flawlessly on Raspbian. I think i had to add "sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev" to get dash-cli to build. Running at the moment. Not too happy with the 50% cpu of the Pi2. Used to be 15 to 20 ish.  It should calm down once we drop the old network. |
|
|
|
Build from source choking @ :- /usr/bin/ld: ./leveldb/libleveldb.a(db_impl.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `_ZTVN7leveldb2DBE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
./leveldb/libleveldb.a: error adding symbols: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [dashd] Error 1
Anyone got a work around? Make sure you have all dependencies in place https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/master/doc/look for build-YOUR_OS.md file also issue ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make clean before actually running make |
|
|
|
I updated to V12 yesterday and I'm having issues with my masternode staying online. I start it from my wallet and I can see that it is enabled from my vps right away but after a couple hours or something, I don't know the exact amount of time, I'll check it again and it's not online. I tried doing "grep HotCold .dash/debug.log" again, there was no message after I did this, and restarting my vps but neither of those have worked. Anyone have any ideas what I could be missing?
Having similar issues as you have described. My only success so far has been to leave my cold wallet open for one of the MN's and it seems to have been my longest running active mn so far. I think we might have to hold tight and wait for release 45 which the dev folks are working hard on ATM. Guys, please make sure both your local wallet and remote node are running on the same protocol |
|
|
|
Imagine the miners were as committed to the dash project? Coinmine still has over 60% of the hashrate. This could kill all credibility for a coin to consistently have over 60% of it's hashrate generating from one pool.
I recall when BTC had this same issue, the community pulled together and miners started leaving the pool responsible.
All this community seems hell bent on protecting are their own feelings and rationale when called out on instamine etc.
If I were smooth or any of the other dash haters I would simply keep calling the community out on their laggard response to a network hashrate distribution issue.
Buckle up, do something as a community, spread the word to your miner friends on dash and tell them to leave coinmine for the time being and join another pool or go p2p mining(it's so dam easy)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dash/#!extractionand it's been around 40% for about 12h already https://dashtalk.org/threads/51-hashrate-coinmine-pl.5860/#post-63095 |
|
|
|
Pushed few more strings to https://www.transifex.com/dash/dash/dash_ents/I think now that's pretty much it for v12 translations. Please, translate as much as you can, I'll grab and submit languages with enough translation progress to github tomorrow. I'm thinking about 80% threshold, like we had it before. Thank you!  |
|
|
|
I have a identical masternode setup on both servers, but the right one uses much more traffic. I'm a little bit scared if the 100GB will last for this one until end of the month. Solutions please? maybe 0.12 update will fix it anyway. Maybe it were only this 2 large peaks who caused massive traffic and its ok now.
Did you try adjusting max connections? maxconnections=20 does not work for me - hummmmm... ever I still get 30-40 connections thoughts? will be fixed in v12 EDIT: hopefully  |
|
|
|
For the record, Dash is a direct fork of bitcoin core and not litecoin as stated by a 'Dev'
Dash is a fork of litecoin according to github. Bitcoin code may have been merged/replaced later but let's not rewrite history, despite some history being inconvenient.  You can't change it by yourself, you can only delete old repo, fork it from scratch and upload code back to fix that link. This however will drop all stars, watchers, issues, pull requests and wiki afaik. Or you can ask github staff to relink your base fork point and hope they have time for it. Since it's never been a real issue but just a cosmetic one we didn't really bother doing this. What is inconvenient about github regarding Dash as a fork of Litecoin is that you can't search the repo's code: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/search?q=printf&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93Of course for developers, this is not an issue, since you just search locally in your IDE, but for occasionally interested parties, it makes it more inconvenient to contribute Hmm... Well, that's a good point... EDIT: that however will be "broken" even if we were recognized as a fork of Bitcoin https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/search?q=printf&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93 |
|
|
|
For the record, Dash is a direct fork of bitcoin core and not litecoin as stated by a 'Dev'
Dash is a fork of litecoin according to github. Bitcoin code may have been merged/replaced later but let's not rewrite history, despite some history being inconvenient. You can't change it by yourself, you can only delete old repo, fork it from scratch and upload code back to fix that link. This however will drop all stars, watchers, issues, pull requests and wiki afaik. Or you can ask github staff to relink your base fork point and hope they have time for it. Since it's never been a real issue but just a cosmetic one we didn't really bother doing this. |
|
|
|
UdjinM6, I join the french team. Accept me please. I'm as Lebubar there too. Done! Thank you for joining! |
|
|
|
Is there a way of sending lots of change like 0.1 Dash to 10,000 addresses in one command? I'm stuck doing the instantX flood test because all the balances keep going to unconfirmed change stopping it, and don't want to create 1000's of addresses manually, only way I see is using darksend to create small balances but there is not enough created to try it, must be a workaround somehow  > dash-cli bloatblockchain 10000 |
|
|
|
Whatever coin config it is besides Dash's Guys, can you please move this talk to a proper thread / pm / whatever? Thank you. |
|
|
|
Wow, I had no idea there is smth at that scale in Europe! Bookmarked But I would not forget that that "hybrid" 3rd-party solution where both crypto and old physical form preloaded card involved is good as an easy but still risky way to get in crypto imo. All you have after you payed cash is not [bit]coins but a plastic card with numbers until you actually redeem it to your wallet. And now that 3rd-party is basically your new bank. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
You can delete my name if you like, LOL.
