Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 01:09:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
281  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DDoS attack on Bitcoin.org on: September 17, 2014, 03:29:58 PM
Probably just some anti-Foundation skiddie who saw this:
  https://bitcoinfoundation.org/2014/09/bitcoin-org-walk-down-memory-lane/


So you are saying it is not credible that the site is sponsored by the Foundation but claims it is completely independent ... and now people are mad?
282  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitcoinBountyHunter.com Bitcoin Bounties to catch the crooks! on: September 17, 2014, 03:02:49 PM
interesting project but also a controversial one. what happens, if i post a "crime" which isnt a crime in your country? who decides which "crime" is worth a bounty and which is not? i also could fake informations or make wrongful allegations.

Until a distributed system is developed,  I will be moderating what bounties are allowed and what are not.  
I will only be allowing bounties for crimes in which there is a clear victim.  

Oh really, and who are you to decide who is a "clear victim"?  The world does not need you being some kind of judge and jury.  Why are you trying to link this stuff to Bitcoin?  Other than using that as a payment system it has nothing to do with Bitcoin.  You are doing the same thing as all those news articles that try to link Bitcoin to stuff just because it is being used a payment method.  It is not "Internet Bounty Hunter" because it is being done on the Internet, it is "Bitcoin Bounty Hunter" because Bitcoin is being used as a payment method.

These kind of stunts gets a few upvotes on reddit but they drive the general population away from Bitcoin and make it weaker.  Bitcoin is politically agnostic and it merely gives people more tools to do what they want.
283  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DDoS attack on Bitcoin.org on: September 17, 2014, 02:39:52 PM
The site is unreachable from here
284  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Where does term "Days Destroyed" Come From? on: September 17, 2014, 02:32:25 PM
Keep in mind that exchanges generally do off-blockchain transactions.  They usually give you an account with "play money" and actual transactions only take place when you transfer in and out.  The "days destroyed" will not take into account trades made on exchanges.  This is unlike stocks where a "stock certificate days destroyed" could be measured because they trade actual stocks once they complete your order.  Bitcoin could not be measured the same way because nobody has access to all the data on exchanges and private sales.
285  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Somehow my reciever received .0001 and .215 went to fees on: September 17, 2014, 03:18:50 AM
So i received a message on cex yesterday that this is going to be sent up to management to discuss, so hopefully i can get at least a portion back

There have been cases worse than yours, and they got their money back, so don't worry. Some people put in like 4 BTC as a fee, and they got it back.

Well first they said there is nothing that can be done because the blocks are found then immediately distributed to the miners, but i linked a thread where more than 1 person said that ghash was kind enough to return mistakenly sent fees, one of who had sent like 2.6 btcs and they all got them back. I realize they are certainly not obligated to help me out, however i think it would be the right thing to do.

It is true that they do distribute it so it would be their loss.  The rewards take 100 blocks to be spendable so pools usually distribute it then.
286  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: HELP ! How to restore an encrypted bitcoin wallet (bounty 0.04btc) on: September 17, 2014, 03:16:23 AM
Use a deterministic wallet and backup the key remotely.  If you don't label it as a Bitcoin wallet backup key nobody will know what it is.
287  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Certified Bitcoin Professional on: September 16, 2014, 04:51:19 PM

Of course you're qualified for a certification. Everyone reading this forum for more than a year is probably qualified. I think it would be better for you to link up with a brick n mortar school to offer the certification online. That might add a little credence to it. You're in New Jersey right? Why not contact NJIT or UNNJ about offering an online class? You could even offer them the curriculum and teach them about Bitcoin. Make the pitch that other universities are now offering Bitcoin courses and they could lead the country in being the first to have a certification program using this new technology. Not to mention the fact that they will make a little money on the deal.


Not specifically for certification but I actually have been making Bitcoin caontacts.  I contacted Rutgers and Stockton (near Atlantic City) but no real interest so far. 

Shamoon Siddiqui has been working with NJIT http://njitvector.com/2013/colloquium-bitcoins-with-shamoon-siddiqui/

Princeton has professor Felton doing some research https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/felten/bitcoin-research-in-princeton-cs/
288  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Certified Bitcoin Professional on: September 16, 2014, 12:54:59 PM
BTW - I also obtained the FinCEN ruling concerning Bitcoin mining:

http://www.coindesk.com/fincen-bitcoin-miners-need-not-register-money-transmitters/
http://cointext.com/fincen-issues-bitcoin-friendly-ruling-for-miners/

I would think all these activities, along with passing the test, qualifies me for the lowest level certification.
289  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Is it a bad idea to have a wallet with 10s of thousands of addresses? on: September 16, 2014, 12:09:38 PM
Well rescan is not really a concern here, since we are talking about bitcoind node that's up 24/7 on a dedicated server.
I'm more concerned if it would make using the wallet slower for the front end app or cause other problems.

That doesn't matter because Armory takes the blockchain data and reprocesses it into the Armory database and that is what takes long.  Rescan means Armory is scanning that data for transactions associated with the addresses in the wallet. 
who the f*** is talking about armory at all dude?
Check OP twice, please.

Either way, "dude," scanning and keeping the node updated are 2 different things.
290  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Is it a bad idea to have a wallet with 10s of thousands of addresses? on: September 16, 2014, 11:50:19 AM
Well rescan is not really a concern here, since we are talking about bitcoind node that's up 24/7 on a dedicated server.
I'm more concerned if it would make using the wallet slower for the front end app or cause other problems.

That doesn't matter because Armory takes the blockchain data and reprocesses it into the Armory database and that is what takes long.  Rescan means Armory is scanning that data for transactions associated with the addresses in the wallet. 
291  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Certified Bitcoin Professional on: September 16, 2014, 11:24:57 AM

Since you've gotten your cpb, how many businesses have you consulted with?  How many have you successfully convinced to adopt and implement bitcoin?  


I already explained I am retired and I already have a Master's in physics and Com Sci degrees from Rutgers, and a CISSP.  I am putting together web sites such as http://bitcoin.me so you can see for yourself.  I just launched the Bitcoin.me video and I am getting a pretty good reaction from those that see it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4UYpbRO8nw

292  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Offline wallet on: September 15, 2014, 08:01:55 PM
I would use Armory wallet.  If you make any transactions you will need to deal with change addresses and backing those keys up as well.  With Armory there is just one code you need to back up.
293  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: ECDSA Signatures allow recovery of the public key on: September 14, 2014, 04:51:27 PM
The original reference was taken down awhile back.  I got a copy off the Wayback machine and put it at http://bitcoin.me/sec1-v2.pdf

This is how you get the public keys from the signature:


Code:
4.1.6 Public Key Recovery Operation
Given an ECDSA signature (r, s) and EC domain parameters, it is generally possible to determine
the public key Q, at least to within a small number of choices.
This is useful for generating self-signed signatures.
This is also useful in bandwidth constrained environments, when transmission of public keys cannot
be afforded. Entity U could send a signature to entity V , who recovers QU. Entity V can look
up the public key in some certificate or directory, and if it matches then the signature can be
accepted. Alternatively, entity U may transmit the signature together with the certificate except
that the public key is omitted from the certificate. For example, in long certificate chains signed
with ECDSA, bandwidth can be saved by omission of the public keys.
Potentially, several candidate public keys can be recovered from a signature. At a small cost, the
signer can generate the ECDSA signature in such a way that only one of the candidate public keys
is viable, and such that the verifier has a very small additional cost of determining which is the
correct public key.
Input: The public key recovery operations takes as input:
1. Elliptic curve domain parameters T = (p, a, b, G, n, h) or T = (m, f(x), a, b,G, n, h) at the
desired security level.
2. A message M.
3. An ECDSA signature value (r, s) that is valid on message M for some public key to be
determined.
Output: An elliptic curve public key Q for which (r, s) is a valid signature on message M.
Actions: Find public key Q as follows.
1. For j from 0 to h do the following.
1.1. Let x = r + jn.
1.2. Convert the integer x to an octet string X of length mlen using the conversion routine
specified in Section 2.3.7, where mlen = d(log2 p)/8e or mlen = dm/8e.
1.3. Convert the octet string 0216kX to an elliptic curve point R using the conversion routine
specified in Section 2.3.4. If this conversion routine outputs “invalid”, then do another
iteration of Step 1.
1.4. If nR 6= O, then do another iteration of Step 1.
1.5. Compute e from M using Steps 2 and 3 of ECDSA signature verification.
1.6. For k from 1 to 2 do the following.
1.6.1. Compute a candidate public key as:
Q = r−1(sR − eG).
1.6.2. Verify that Q is the authentic public key. (For example, verify the signature of a
certification authority in a certificate which has been truncated by the omission of
Q from the certificate.) If Q is authenticated, stop and output Q.
1.6.3. Change R to −R.
2. Output “invalid”.
294  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: HELP ! How to restore an encrypted bitcoin wallet on: September 14, 2014, 02:56:28 PM
I am sure some experts will chime in as I have never run it myself.  I have always used a deterministic wallet where one key generates all the keys and you don't have this problem.

pywallet.py is a program used to get data from Bitcoin wallets that may have been damaged and can't be opened by the program.

Python is the programming language and you will need to install an interpreter so that python programs can run on your computer.

Here is Python for Windows:  https://www.python.org/download/windows/

one you install that you can run Python programs such as pywallet.py
295  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Is it a bad idea to have a wallet with 10s of thousands of addresses? on: September 14, 2014, 02:48:21 PM
Awhile back I imported the private key for "correct horse battery staple" and it had so many transactions it kept crashing Armory when I tried to scan the blockchain.  Armory has since updated their wallet but I had already removed the address due to the time it took to open the wallet.  That is number of transactions rather than addresses but I expect the same thing would happen.
296  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: HELP ! How to restore an encrypted bitcoin wallet on: September 14, 2014, 02:44:33 PM
I believe the first step is to try pywallet.py.  py is for Python
297  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Introduction to Bitcoin [VIDEO COMPILATION] on: September 13, 2014, 12:20:17 PM
Situations where Bitcoin is useful

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4UYpbRO8nw - Bitcoin.me video (3 mins)

298  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wallet list at Bitcoin.org on: September 13, 2014, 03:27:36 AM
You are over analyzing the phrase "community controlled". Anyone is free to modify the code, but like with any open source project, you have to get acknowledgment from existing developers in order to get your changes merged in. Gavin likely meant that any member of the community can make a pull request and have a say regarding the site's content. What is your version of "community controlled"?

The Foundation sponsors the site and thereby helps keep it online, but that's it. They wouldn't have any luck trying to use that to influence the site's content. A lot of people are suspicious of them, so any proposed change that was seen to favor the Foundation would struggle to get merged in. Even Saivann couldn't get away with merging it in outright.

I agree. People in the bitcoin community obsess about transparency and/or "community control" without having a clue about what they're talking about. There has to be a decision making process somewhere, even if the decision is made by a few members. The "Community control" part comes in from github pull requests.

Other than that, there's no effective way for something to be "community controlled" as then every single member of the bitcoin community must have a say(bitcoin land is 70% Trolls/Scammers), and absolutely nothing would get down.

Transparency and control are two different things.  Considering input and control are also two different things.  Nobody said "every single member of the bitcoin community must have a say" and that statement is hyperbole.  It is the Foundation that is claiming the site is "community controlled."  Everybody involved gets defensive and calls people trolls when questions are asked.  

The site should say the content is controlled by a small group of people sponsored by the Foundation but anyone can supply input to be considered.  Isn't that what is really happening?

So then how do you think a community controlled website would work? Obviously it would have to be the most adept community members for the job to do the decision making process of what gets added to the site...

You're saying things, but give forth no other solutions.

I am saying they should say what it is instead of claiming something it is not.  I have seen where they dismiss perfectly good suggestions with no explanation and do some unusual things, again with no explanation.  Under those circumstances I would not get involved in its development.  I just object to them claiming it is "community controlled." 

I don't like even like the term "community" because it sounds exclusionary.  I have never heard of the US Dollar community or the Paypal community, anyone can use those financial instruments.  In any case I use Bitcoin and I have no control over that web site and I don't even know who owns it (I know, some anonymous screen name claims to own it but the records are hidden, yada, yada, yada ....)
299  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Coinbase asking bizarre questions on: September 13, 2014, 03:17:57 AM
If you really scolded them, I think they will never again reply to you.
I was like this last time(about a month ago)  Sad

This stuff is so far out it drives many people away from Bitcoin so it is best they don't reply.  The early Internet had people saying advertising would never be permitted, same type of thing.  Articles like that want to project political beliefs onto a technology.
300  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wallet list at Bitcoin.org on: September 13, 2014, 02:56:26 AM
You are over analyzing the phrase "community controlled". Anyone is free to modify the code, but like with any open source project, you have to get acknowledgment from existing developers in order to get your changes merged in. Gavin likely meant that any member of the community can make a pull request and have a say regarding the site's content. What is your version of "community controlled"?

The Foundation sponsors the site and thereby helps keep it online, but that's it. They wouldn't have any luck trying to use that to influence the site's content. A lot of people are suspicious of them, so any proposed change that was seen to favor the Foundation would struggle to get merged in. Even Saivann couldn't get away with merging it in outright.

I agree. People in the bitcoin community obsess about transparency and/or "community control" without having a clue about what they're talking about. There has to be a decision making process somewhere, even if the decision is made by a few members. The "Community control" part comes in from github pull requests.

Other than that, there's no effective way for something to be "community controlled" as then every single member of the bitcoin community must have a say(bitcoin land is 70% Trolls/Scammers), and absolutely nothing would get down.

Transparency and control are two different things.  Considering input and control are also two different things.  Nobody said "every single member of the bitcoin community must have a say" and that statement is hyperbole.  It is the Foundation that is claiming the site is "community controlled."  Everybody involved gets defensive and calls people trolls when questions are asked. 

The site should say the content is controlled by a small group of people sponsored by the Foundation but anyone can supply input to be considered.  Isn't that what is really happening?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!