pivx and komodo are the ones i'd go for

Deep onions distributional method is the best and fairest

Reward those that promote your project

Free airdrops to people that contribute nothing are not as good.

Not ONE valid and correct criticism in that entire barrage of nonsense. Possibly the most embarrassing post Ive seen in quite some time.
The only valid thing not essentially a criticism is that bay is built on pos3 not built from the ground up. I am expecting in the future once david has fully analysed dag, hashgraph like systems, dpos, exotic sharding for us to go with what is best or side chains etc. For now POS3 works well.

What you do not understand is that with a project you are investing in the developer that is the driving/creating force and if you can find me 10 better devs on this board in terms of creativity or ingenuity then I will agree bay does not warrant being a top 10 coin. Come back with 10 better devs from 10 different projects and we can work on deciding where bay should place in coin market cap.

The xmas surprise was okay for me and quite useful if you want a SAFE place to play such a game. Obviously i would have liked it more if david has said he coded in some savings bonds like i had mentioned before.

If you bought at 1900 and are annoyed it has sunk to 1300 dont worry about that just keep buying more as it sinks and await the return journey up. Thats how you play the crypto game. Don't worry after another few years you'll get the hang of it.

both a waste of btc

bitbay
blocknet
byteball
komodo

serious projects

without a large funding pot no devs are coming here.

I would say 5% of total minting with an aim to further code in a funding mechanism for future development efforts.

If there are WDC whales which i expect there are perhaps a few we will need them to donate

I'm shocked real developers are not accumulating these old fairly mined POW giants of old at these pathetic prices and planning a big come back for them all. Seems easy money to me.

Let's find the latest codebase that has all the things we need , funding mechanism, voting, anon, incentives to accumulate and hold etc and fork and coin swap over.

I see the smallest of small projects able to manage coins swaps and yet the giants of old are languishing on these old redundant ancient codebases that are no longer practical no interesting to new investors.

I would suggest employing with the 5% someone who can get things done.


wdc, quark, digi, mec  all those giants look ripe for revival.  I though wouldn't buy more of most of these unless I saw some half interesting roadmap ahead. Qrk are trying something but SLOW is not the word, Mec is trying something again slow burner. WDC is doing nothing as far as i can tell at all.

Although i see some activity on the thread here with people willing to help so all is not lost.

Time though is running out it will only get harder and harder to stage a good comeback unless you manage to entice a really good dev team. I guess a huge dev pot could be a good incentive to bring on a nice team.

I do think world coin is one of the best names around.

the question does not make sense really since total market cap is the main thing to look at

however under 1 buck

bitbay

curecoin is going quantum proof

I wonder what can be done to get this ready for listing on kucoin with the new codebase...

seems that exchange is going to do well next year and listings currently are kind of possible.

Where is tony ch??

where is his direct response to the fact the entire thread is discussing the moving of gbyte to mbyte

same as where was his direct response to the fact giving most of the bb away to competing ico managers was a shit idea.

I am not getting this lack of involvement on key issues?

bittrex will change the unit tag if tony ch tells them too 100% I have seen it done before with other projects.

how to force that shit hole exchange poloniex to re open the xdn wallet for withdrawals?

nxt remains the daddy

any future babies need to pay daddy to be born so I understand it.

Thanks for the support

Graham will know if there is something you can help with i'm sure.

They turned full scam but don't worry we are nulling their wallets.

this is not relevant to the fact they are retaining peoples coins against their will.

they are a disgrace of an exchange

Did speca ever come through with helping on the dev side of things or is that not going to happen here now?

Masternodes are pretty much up on every new shit coin hard to believe quark is experiencing such a delay in rolling out what is now such a standard feature.

pivx komodo

There are no good reasons NOT to use escrow

he would get a lot more donations if he did he knows this.


So what good reason not to use it??

BENBTC from ZETH pulled the same idea?


Combine eth and zcash - take the latest fad and add anon

That dev has some reasonable knowledge but will never produce any work and will walk with the BTC.


I would like a reasonable answer from this dev why he will not use escrow?

Well what about the fact iota is not even able to operate in a decentralised manner right now. It has its coordinator training wheels on and they are afraid to remove them. I would find that far more worrying right now.

Their latest white paper looks very interesting if they are serious

Well you are simply agreeing with me in that case.