Ho visto dei thread dove anche se tu hai risposto per primo e un'ora dopo arriva un'altro che ha un trust superiore al tuo l'offerta del trust neutrale viene ignorata mentre solo quella del trust positivo viene presa in considerazione....
E' naturale che sia cosi. |
|
|
|
a questo punto vogliamo parlare anche del fatto che certa gente da priorità a chi ha un trust positivo?.............
In che senso? Il sistema è fatto apposta. Perchè qualcuno che vuole comprare dovrebbe farlo da chi non ha trust o pure ha trust negativo? Lo farà, forse, se viene offerto un prezzo migliore. |
|
|
|
|
Ne l'obbligo di escrow (argomento già trattato in passato) ne vietare i feedback sono una buona idea.
|
|
|
|
There are many option other than BIP 101 such as BIP 100, 102 & 103.
I think BIP 100 & BIP 103 looks better than BIP 101,so why many companies want use BIP 101? Are they have hidden motives or there are flaws in BIP 100 & BIP 103?
BIP103 is to low. Wuille proposes to increase the block size limit with 4.4% by January 2017 and automatically repeat this process every 97 days, more or less. This allows for a yearly block size growth rate of 17.7%. According to Wuille, this is consistent with the average growth rate of bandwidth over the past years. The increases of the block size limit will then continue up until July 2063. At that rate, the maximum block size will reach 2MB by 2021, 8 MB by 2030, and eventually end up at slightly less than 2GB in 2063. BIP100 The maximum block size could double every 2.7 months, leading to growth at rates of 16x + every year.
The only ceiling on this would be the message size limit of 32MB. This is far faster than allowed by BIP101 and has the potential to truly put running a full client out of reach of all but professionals. https://www.bridge21inc.com/blog/seven-reasons-a-vote-for-bip100-may-be-complicated/Moreover, it add impracticability. None will start business on a network that can have a size a day and a different size two months after and another one the next months (up and down) It's pure logic, nothing hidden. |
|
|
|
|
The name of the client was Bitcoin, than Bitcoin-Qt, and now Bitcoin Core.
Even if the client will have name Bitcoin XXX, the name doesn't matter.
|
|
|
|
I have a doubt, how does XT become a threat to Bitcoin, i would like to know?
Are they going to replace Bitcoin with XT and soon there will be no longer Bitcoin but BitcoinXT if that is the case it is ridiculous. We want Bitcoin the original predecessor to stay.
Yes, XT agents will come to your home and will force you to install an XT node  |
|
|
|
Con Cashila ora è possibile farsi pagare lo stipendio in euro e ricevere Bitcoin. Non serve avere un conto corrente. https://blog.cashila.com/2015/11/03/get-paid-straight-into-your-cashila-account/Entro una settimana o poco più stessa cosa dovrebbe essere possibile finalmente anche con https://www.bitwage.comHi,
Yes actually tonight or tomorrow we were going to release on the site the ability to apply for a EU BPI account.
We wouldn't accept the beta EU users until maybe 1 week later.
I can follow up when it is deployed and where to apply for it.
John |
|
|
|
Which part of "consensus-driven ledger" do you not understand?
I understand that this place is full of people in bad faith that love censorship, appeal to authority and can't talk without being in full of logic fallacies. |
|
|
|
Se hai qualche idea a riguardo spara  |
|
|
|
|
Yes you are allowed, but people with a different opinion were not until few hours ago on r/bitcoin. (it seems that something is changed ...)
It was even lightest forbidden here.
|
|
|
|
I'm new here. Is bitcoin broken or about to be broken? From what I gather here....bitcoin seems to be becoming antiquated but nobody can figure out how to keep the blockchain healthy. It seems that one side doesn't want it to change and the other side wants it to change too fast and too much. I cannot figure out which side the shills are on. If bitcoin is in danger of becoming antiquated, we might need to figure out the most efficient solution to avoid that from happening, or another technology WILL take over....plain and simple.
Someone here thinks that people out of here will wait forever for solution to their problems. They think that Bitcoin will live forever as the only one. How many of you are still using Napster/Winmx/Kazaa/DirectConnect/Shareaza/eDonkey/eMule... instead of BitTorrent to download files? Are you all waiting to know what will be the BitTorrent (killer) of the Bitcoin? Without innovation, Bitcoin is already waiting for its death. |
|
|
|
BIP102
Abstract
Simple, one-time increase in total amount of transaction data permitted in a block from 1MB to 2MB. LOL, you clearly live in a fantasy world. I give up. |
|
|
|
|
Giving power to the miners is a worst case scenario, so the is only the BIP101 as a valid solution now (with big blocks).
It's a logical choice for business as Coinbase, there is no "force" involved.
Everyone is still free to run whatever wants in his computer/server, but a good solution must arrive. (and be developed)
Actually, BIP101 is the only one available in code.
Coinbase (or whatever business) will chose the best one.
If you don't like it, ask and/or pay a developer for something different, but do it early. The market / users demand for a solution now.
|
|
|
|
You should talk to all the owner of nodes, they own the network. https://bitnodes.21.coThe owner of nodes will listen to the demand of the network, the common users. What will the common users demand? Slow confirmations? High fees? I think not |
|
|
|
|
Every businesses that uses Bitcoin will want to have bigger blocks and not giving any voting power to the miners, deal with it.
Coinbase is just the first that has clearly given a state to this issue, just wait for all the others.
Welcome to Bitcoin: permissionless innovation.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
