That's right maybe some kind of a forum or chat where players can discuss their own predictions as well. At least some good sports betting predictions every week from gosu will be really worth it.

Promotions can be done in sports betting section too though. Like gosu gives their own prediction and users can comment below their predictions and the user with the most accurate prediction gets some kind of a bonus.

Don't know about others but for me, sports betting section is a must have. I am not so fond of streamings because I don't have hours to sit and watch the other guy play .

Looking at how it was 50 bucks at some point and looking at how it dropped 10% in recent time as well, so it is really not looking good. If we are going to speculate about the situation Dot is in then I have to say it is in big big trouble, trouble that other coins have faced before. I remember there were some coins in top 10 back in 2017 peak, and in 2018 drop they dropped a ton in price and by 2021 they are nowhere to be found, which happens in crypto, if you are not staying still and growing bigger, then it means you are dropping.

And you do not even have to do anything bad to drop, if you are not improving at all while everything else is growing to be bigger, then that means you are not going to end up being high for long. Dot has a big challenge ahead, if they can stay then they may increase in price when others do, but I doubt that will happen.

It is obvious that we are all scared about it because China has been a big part of the crypto world, but that doesn't change the fact that we may not see anything substantially changing from crypto world when they leave neither. Remember they can only sell once and after they do, we do not need them anymore to keep the price high, just let them go and after that we can share the spoils of the war for years to come and that is why we will profit from it.

I personally believe that we should not be focusing on what to do with China situation but we should probably focus something more about what we can do about the mining operations in other nations. While China dreaming of a world where they can catch USA in power, the reality is that ever since they stopped mining operations, there are now a lot more starting up in USA and specially in Texas, which could bring USA some more power.

I am not sure if financial fair play would matter in a free transfer type of situation, because you are not paying an insane amount of money to team in that case, and you pay it to player. Even if let's say that they paid him more than what they can afford, it happens at the end of the season, so they may still take a risk, get him, pay him a lot, then at the end of the season hope that their income is big enough to cover it, if not then all they have to do is getting transfer block until they go under because it ls just a warning for the first time, and in that case they could get rid of some players to drop under.

Look at Barcelona for example, they are literally selling players left and right because they want to be able to stay under financial fair play if they need to pay Messi a lot of money, same could be done by PSG next season as well.

I would advise you guys to wager with the profit and not the capital, that is the best advice someone gave me and I think it worked out awesome for me. So let's assume you have 1000 BFG, that will earn you some BFG right? Never tap into that 1000 BFG and always keep it there, sometimes you will earn a lot with it and sometimes you will earn very tiny with it but no matter what just keep on betting with that extra you earn and never the capital. That way you could basically end up growing it as well, because you will earn more when gambling too, not just by winning the bets but more like mining it as well.

So long story short I would say keep the capital in and never gamble with it no matter what the outcome may look like, whereas always end up gambling with the extra you make and maybe even keep a small portion aside to grow your capital as well.

Holy cow!! He didn't win that bet? I thought it was more like "whoever wins and goes to next stage" and not the 90 minutes thing. Now this changes sooo much, I can't believe it, some guy wagered on England to win and wagered a whole million dollars on a fucking bet and he ended up losing? Wow man, wow.

I seriously did not understand it, I assumed he won, and I was still not that much shocked because you know how "house always wins" which I thought this guy would hyped and wager more and eventually end up losing it back, but this means he is already out a million dollars and losing. I can't say I am sad for him too much though because he knew the risks and he took it and he ended up losing in the end... but come ooooon! Losing it like this? I mean England were clear favorites and they end up winning anyway and this guy lost only because of 90 minute result, that must sting A LOT.

I am a little confused here. You created and posted their ANN thread which makes me feel like you are either a part of their team or you are the founder. You even posted all the links and I cannot imagine an investor in the project would go that far. Although I see that you haven't mentioned anywhere in the ANN that you are part of their team, but I suggest you to make a small disclaimer or note that you are not part of the team, if you actually aren't.

If you are part of the team then I don't think starting a thread like this one makes any sense because obviously, this is marketing more than your actual analysis.

The last 5-10 posts of yours are all regarding this project, which isn't a problem but you look connected to their team in some ways mate .

Giannis had such a beast game but it wasn't enough, others were just not playing that well. This is the chess game that you have to play, if you give your best player the ball all the time then he will play awesomely and get hot and have a good game and others will look like they are playing a bad game. However remember those games when Giannis couldn't play? Brook Lopez had one of the best games of his career that game, why? Because he got the greenlight, he shot more, he got hot early on.

When you do not give those players the ball at all times, it is going to be harder, so which one will coach Bud will prefer, give the ball to 3 different lesser talent (still awesome though) players so they can all get hot and not utilize Giannis to fullest? Or just give it to Giannis all the time and hope that it is enough for him to get the game all by himself?

I have to say Kasper played one of the best performances from a goalkeeper I have ever seen in my entire life. I mean that was one of the best goalkeeping ever and it was not enough. At the end of the day, all he did was to prevent a bigger goal scoring difference in the game, it would have been a lot more goals and England would have won in the 90 minutes and the game would have been over.

When you are a goalkeeper even when you play the best game many people seen in a decade, that ends up sometimes not enough because you end up with other team being much better. Dude literally saved the penalty, what else do you really expect from him at the end of the day? It was just unlucky and England played a lot better overall. This is the perfect example of "team" game because you can't just have one player being awesome and others not so awesome and end up still winning.

Yeah that part is true, if you are gambling extra just to get more tickets and lose more than you are comfortable with, that is going to end up being horrible for you. I would never do that because that means I am taking extra risk for something that I will most probably not win, that means I am going to be double upset when I end up not winning like how I should not. That is totally a great point and I agree with it.

All I wanted to say was keep gambling the way you always do, and change the way without changing the amount if you have to get some tickets (emphasis on not the amount) and then you can get some tickets, even if it is very few tickets if you can get it then it is fine. At the end of the day the whole point comes down to everyone has a very tiny chance to win, even the people with a lot of tickets do not have a sure thing to win it neither.

^^I didn't even know that you could bet one million dollars in a game. I mean normally in other places there is a limit and because of that limit you can't wager a million dollars even if you wanted to, so I never even imagined I would see this. Dude at least won a huge amount from it, I have seen the 450k or something guy who I think lost and that was a thing in this cup as well, but a million dollars is probably the biggest ever bet I have seen in all my life.

Not just in crypto or not just in sportsbooks, that is the biggest amount of money put into just one wager I have seen so far, it really looks like something that is extra ordinary. At the end of the day dude walked away with 700k+ and that is serious cash, like it is already all by itself enough for me to retire at an early age just with the winning amount and finally be able to live a decent life. Let's see if anyone makes any crazy move on the finals.

Unfortunately there are both truth to yours and mine as well. I understand that if you want to find your freedom in crypto you can find it, if you want financial freedom you can find it, if you want political freedom (to keep your finances away from politicians and governments) you can find it, those are all the great parts about crypto and you can do all of those things without a problem and that is what I like about crypto.

However what I am right about and what this topic is probably about that there are people who create tokens that basically just ignores all the investors and only care about having a lot of a token that they created and others should increase the price of, they create it for free to themselves and then promote it so that the price goes 100x and they could become super wealthy and all thanks to other people who are trying to get that freedom from crypto.

So, in return we can call them "slave masters" in a way that they are trying to find their freedom over others crushed dream of freedom.

He is defending them because he is either being paid by the 1xbit signature if that campaign actually pays or he is just another sockpuppet of the many they have on the forum. I haven't played at 1xbit so I cannot accuse them but with so many complaints against them and -ve trust from DT obviously points that a lot of things are wrong with 1xbit.

Even if I believe you for a moment, how is it possible that there are so many problems associated with 1xbit without single positive feedback from any DT member? So everyone together is playing game with you?

I still think that people would be willing to put in "some" money into it, even if not a ton. I understand that new startups will not be able to get as much invested as bustabit, but just drop your rate to like 1% instead of 15% and you get yourself a big advantage.

Aside from that there are now places that try to make money on their own token instead of just the casino and that is the real money these days. You create a website, you give people token for gambling, that token gives people dividends from gamblers, then you own 30+ percent of that token total and you make dividends while simply selling your tokens to highest bidder in the end. Long story short there are more ways to make money for new startups these days, even if not getting the bankroll funded, it is still something else that could be done and that is how they end up surviving.

Well true and some people are offering such services for quite cheap so you have a point but there was no need to get personal with zanezane because he/she just wanted to get more ideas from users and I wish there could be a system such that abusers can't take advantage while real players can claim bonuses/coins without any complications.

It's quite easy too with so many KYC sellers in the market. It would mean the abusers are enjoying those perks while the real user is getting complicated captchas.

I don't think they will remove 1xbit from their page because according to their "expert review" they are one of the "longest scamming standing" online casino.

Another funny thing I noticed on the review page was the overall review rating as compared to the individual review rating. Usually, the overall rating is the average of all individual ratings.

Although I don't trust or believe these ratings knowing 1xbit is a scam, let's take a look.

GAMES: 4.5
REGISTRATION: 3.5
BANKING: 4
CASINO PLATFORM: 4
MOBILE APP: 3.5
BONUSES: 4
CUSTOMER SERVICE: 3.5
SECURITY: 3.5

OVERALL RATING: 4.5

If my math is correct then 30.5 the total ratings divided by 8 should be 3.8 and I would understand if the overall rating was 4.0 but not sure what kid is doing the calculations on their site who put it 4.5

Anyways the website looks really nice and if you can eliminate promoting scammers, you will have good traffic.

One ticket is all you need to have a chance to win. I understand that many people are worried about the fact that whales will have thousands versus your one and they will have a bigger chance to win and mathematically you are right. However even if there is a guy with a billion tickets and you have one ticket you could still win, it is all based on luck and if you are lucky you will win no matter how many tickets you have.

This is why I try to participate at least once, even if it is just one ticket, or one entry or whatever it is for that promotion I join and get one for myself. I remember in another place, a guy with 1 ticket won and a guy with 5+ million tickets won a lot less reward on the same thing, which was enough proof for me that all you need is one ticket and you have a chance. Ever since then I do not feel the same dread about whales as I used to.

It's indeed quite nice, I am glad some users have already shared their views. I love the layout and just as he said, the navigation is quite easy and user-friendly. Good job!

I have seen HopNPop or a similar name at another casino, I guess but you are right there are some games unique at bitcasino and with the app, it's even better now because I always prefer playing slots on the mobile and for some reason I am more lucky when playing on mobile than on my computer.

I must say, I got to know a few things after visiting your website and I don't know if the sites are legit but may try them in near future. I never heard of Scatter wallet so will even check that out if it looks trustworthy.

One thing I must say, you have written in front of bc.game that deposit bonus and the next line says, no wager requirement which is actually not true. I am a regular player at bc.game and I love the site but facts are facts and the deposit bonus has wager requirements before the BCD, their local coin is released into balance.

This is such a rough time not just for cloudbet but the player as well. This is the reason it's always better to play at sites once you verify yourself because later it would be all confusion and tension between the player and site once they ask for it.

If you don't trust the website to reveal the documents, I can fully understand and respect your privacy racheshki but then why you trusted them with your money? Cloudbet is here for years I am not against them but if you don't trust a site with your documents then how you trust them with money is questionable.

The thing is that you agreed to some rules and cloudbet is far more trusted to doubt them and if you take my personal suggestion, give them your documents because they are here for years and although there have been problems sometimes, they have a good reputation.

If you are worried about them misusing your documents, you can just use a watermark or something if they allow that.