There are speculations that Samuel Deebo might leave the 49ers, however there is no news on why he wants to leave or where he will be traded. Will it be as simple as he only want to leave California? If it is really his reason, I speculate that he might be moving somewhere in Texas hehehe. It might also be Nevada?



While we still don’t know the precise reason(s) for Samuel’s trade request, the fact that it’s gotten to this point counts as a failure, at some level, by the team. Unless the sole reason is he doesn’t want to be in San Francisco, the 49ers could have said or done something to keep the relationship from disintegrating to this point. And even if it’s as simple as Deebo not wanting to live and work in California and nothing more, his decision to disclose his desire to seek a trade suggests that there’s a level of animosity that shouldn’t exist between an NFL team and such an important player.

Source https://sports.yahoo.com/deebo-samuel-continues-intent-leaving-235904205.html

Defi and NFTs will not only be important elements in the cryptospace, I reckon Defi will be the main element that will serve as basic infrastructure for all digital items created in the cryptospace. This will include NFTs as mentioned and will also serve cryptocoins like Bitcoin, Ethereum, other altcoins and stablecoins. Defi can also serve casinos, DAOs and many other usecases.

Before I had a wider understanding about Defi, I thought it was only another new scam in the cryptospace that will be forgotten. This is because I thought Defi would try to serve real world assets of value that will be tokenized. I was clearly very wrong in this type of thinking. It was when I was beginning to witness the longterm cultural value of NFTs when I realized of Defi's importance as an infrastructure for anything with value in the cryptospace.

In any case, there are Defi projects in the cryptospace already serving NFTs to provide liquidity for them. I speculate they will be the next 10x - 100x projects.

Agreed, the smart contracts are immutable. I speculate that Tornadocash's statement is only for the purpose of protecting itself from the government. They make it appear that the sanctioned wallets are really blocked, however, everyone in the community knows this is impossible to do hehe.

The law will be in force, yes, however can it be enforced or will it create more problems for the government? Similar to what you were saying, no can enforce the ban on transactions that are happening privately.

Also, what can the treasury department do if those coins went to Tornado Cash for mixing?

Tornado Cash uses @chainalysis oracle contract to block OFAC sanctioned addresses from accessing the dapp.
Maintaining financial privacy is essential to preserving our freedom, however, it should not come at the cost of non-compliance.

Does anyone have any articles or other news that proves it is the North Korean hacking group Lazarus that has hacked Ronin or we only trust the sauces of the United States treasury department? I think that we should very skeptical of this until they show how they concluded that the Lazarus group was really the hacker.

For now, let's leave the discussion about it as this thread is for Ugas and Spence.

The question was really something that does not need an answer. It is a challenge on how the government of Thailand can enforce a ban on cryptocurrencies where a group of people can use it for ICOs, Defi and NFTs. Will sending digital art or gift card tokens also be banned? What is their definition of cryptocurrencies.

The government of Thailand would be creating more problems for themselves and they might not have the budget and the knowledge to solve these problems. I predict the removal of these restrictions in 3 years.