How do you eat piss? I was under the opinion that liquids are drunk and not eaten.. Yellow snow.
I trolled him because he seems worst person in the forum whatever he doing is to keep up in the forum. I will have you know that trolling—which is henceforth pointless spam—is disallowed on the forum. They will not play with the people who is small works make money but these other dt2 shits are eating shits and piss to stay off. Oh, like the DT2 account that you attempted to buy? |
|
|
|
Isn't this forum a clear example of power abuse by a few selected few ? Hello, cunt. Even if The Pharmacist and I still had the notion of tagging shitposters, it would be asinine to assume that all cases of shitposting would be abated immediately through this measure. Rather than assume that this instance is an example of power abuse, would it not be possible that it is merely a lack of omniscience/omnipresence? Forgo your pettiness and look for more 'shitposters' that are being accepted in campaigns managed by people of dignity. Then, we can continue the discussion. |
|
|
|
-snip snap- Unfortunately, you won't be able to do much about it. The voting process even in a " democratic" country usually isn't dissimilar to a prisoner's dilemma problem. Unless there is a severe tonal shift in the human nature of deciding things, we'll see the same steadfast deadlock of political stagnancy.
That being said, taxes are good and bad. Some parts of the budget are well-spent and the others are just spent. Everyone has their own opinions on this, which is where we get into problems. As for me, I'm with Carlin on this one. |
|
|
|
but I was paid by that site for 0.02 eth for a measly less than 20 number of posts That is $6. The signature campaign is offering up to more than 40x that amount. Suppose they pay out the lower-ranking participants that they accept right now, and will stop when they accept higher rank members. That means a lot of free traffic and assumed reliability, at least to start with. This hypothesis also mimics the standard protocol of a ponzi and/or con. |
|
|
|
Oh yeah, let us not forget:  Because I seriously doubt that there was any correlation to mine and Waffle argument and suchmoon deciding to tag me for something from 4 years ago  No. If you truly believe that suchmoon cares for pointless positive feedback and that they're going to tag you because of it, then you must think so little of DT members. I assume that a significant portion of users here have participated in a ponzi in the past, ignorant or not. However, you're starting to make like a cactus and prick out at people. Just as how Waffle was not calm when he felt indignant, you too act the same way. Two sides of a coin. |
|
|
|
|
I have been informed that the bounty campaign has ended and that payment will be sent soon.
The spreadsheets will also be updated shortly.
Locking the thread now.
|
|
|
|
Honestly man, I've been looking at your posts about jeremy and you're being a little bit of a massive fucking cunt. If you're going to throw a temper tantrum every time something doesn't go your way then you're no better than my 6 year-old nephew that cries when he doesn't get a chocolate bar at the market. Spitting out this crap just to fuel your bullshit vendetta is not exactly cool, especially when it pools over to three different threads. |
|
|
|
what about people who don't capitalise words properly as well? Nothing Is Worse Than Capital Case, Where I Personally Find It To Be Absolutely Disgusting And The Ultimate Eye-Sore When I'm Trying To Read Through A Paragraph. It Slows My Flow Of Reading So Much That I Would Rather Read Broken English Than Have To Deal With This Form Of Writing. At Least Then, I Can Go Through It Quickly Because I Know The Content Is Going To Be Worthless. |
|
|
|
Do you think the tokens are a good investment? Have you invested? I have both invested in the ICO and I have also been putting new investments in (via exchanges). Considering the fact that even right now, the lowest sell order is not even 60% of the token price, I am usually happy to pick some up. |
|
|
|
Thank you for the explanation. What is the buy-back price?
Pump and dump happens everywhere so no surprise if it happened here I suppose. The buyback price is the price at which Dean buys back your tokens. (Currently) it is calculated by having the profit distributed divided by all 100 million tokens and added to the initial price (0.0928). Due to this, it remains relatively stable across volatile markets which people have complained about (when it was peaking, but not the opposite). Buyback occurs every quarter. |
|
|
|
So people not exactly falling over themselves trying buy the Betking tokens then? Not much demand for these tokens is there? No, there isn't much of a demand on the exchanges. But how does this change anything about how the price is calculated? Despite having a low price on exchanges, the buyback price is still the same. There was a pump a while back when the price jumped to $2+ and then crashed down to half the initial token price. My assumption is that a lot of the volume right now consists of people who had taken part in it. |
|
|
|
The signed message isn't rock-solid evidence you're the original owner Did anybody manage to verify it? I tried to and it said that it wasn't valid. This was by using Electrum, by the way.
I might be doing something wrong with the whitespace characters (sometimes messages include those accidentally) |
|
|
|
I just check hitbtc showing Best Bid 700 Satoshies and Best Ask 900 Satoshies for 1 BKB and no trade for last 48 hours HitBTC price is not indicative of the buyback price, which is at almost 0.1 USD. Check the site: https://betking.io/bkb-buy-back |
|
|
|
Did investors get their money back or a ROI? Fact you are still operating is a good sign. Price is up 7% and will remain stable. |
|
|
|
What are you on about? there is no mention of theymos here of course theymos is not paying any attention to these cases because they are small, he would only take action if he thinks that he is in danger of being held liable by the court of law, until then don't wait for him to do anything. really sad
you don't usually see them tagging real scammers rather they are tagging whomever they want. The latter is true. I do tag who I want. If I didn't want to tag account traders then I wouldn't. The former is false. I do tag scammers. If you didn't cherry-pick data then you would see those cases. actmyname actually paid Blazed to get on his trust list. The reason I got onto DT is something that I did for myself. I didn't even expect anyone to care about it.  actmyname just recently started to tag more and more people for whatever they have done in the past to make it look like he is actively tagging scammers but that was just a stupid move to do. If you take the sample space for the age of the scam, then you'll see that it's quite evident that you would find older scams as opposed to newer scams. This is, however, assuming that your comment is correct. A lot of the feedback that I've been sending is in response to new threads that out shady activity whereas the bulk of my feedback was in February, which is a bit after my inclusion to DT. |
|
|
|
thanks, but your example is to special and obvious (with some research). it's not comparable to the average Joe. I can pull up some more users but if you're going to dismiss them with the whole no true scotsman "argument" then that's going to waste my time. |
|
|
|
>implying that the date of registration really means anything. in this case it means everything. And yeah, I registered in August 2015, I started my journey in about June 2015. You must be really smart to predict his response in advance. Even smarter than this user who joined in 2017. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976210
he looks more like a poor guy which was very late in Bitcoin and is trying very hard to make money even with his grandma. Do you own an address with at least 1 BTC? |
|
|
|
i cannot agree with you. for example the former bitmixer.io campaign was really the best campaign so far. it was automated with less effort than this campaign. (don't want to know the margin of the campaign manager here.) Automation leads to spam and if you're going to get someone to check for post quality, why not also have someone go 100% and manage posts as well? |
|
|
|
Tell me this is another of your jokes please? Bitfuckingconnect was an obvious scam from the beginning and they accepted to manage their scam regardless. From their "what is" page ( here) I don't see anything that can constitute as an 'obvious scam'. If they say somebody is a scammer people would believe them and when they don't say anything, people would think there is no scam so they would put their money on scams because nobody said anything to warn them. You mean people would still blindly gamble on shady sites because there's no red tag? I don't think so. even if he is tagged he could easily jump to another account and start managing with other accounts. Then that other account would have to either start from zero and manage only scams or be tagged when it's linked back to the original. |
|
|
|
first thing is reduce the amount to pay per post because the high amount let the participates act like slaves of the campaign manager. What? third thing ask yourselve if this forum is still the right place to waste such a high amount every week because this forum is mostly a place for trolls now and not for Bitcoin believers anymore. Considering the fact that it's still active and that ChipMixer buys ad slots on the forum, it must be working. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
