Just send some satoshi to confirm what happens
|
|
|
Come on! How does a malleability attack steal their all coins 'SLOWLY' and they don't notice it until all of them are gone? They stole the coins themselves and took advantage of the malleability situation as an excuse.
Ok, I'll bite. In this scenario there are two ledgers. One is the bitcoin block chain and the second is SR2 escrow service. The interacton/use case goes like this: 1) Vendor A withdraws some money........ ......What SR2 is talking about in the sad message) Thanks for the detailed explanation. Much appreciated!
|
|
|
You could always select that input and send it back to its source if you don't want it.
That's not what I intended. I was more concerned to avoid issues like malleability, so I am talking about 'avoiding the original transaction' rather than 'originating a second one to reverse the funds'.
|
|
|
Bitcoin doesn't work like that. Recipients have nothing to do whatsoever with whether transactions are processed or not.
I know; that's why I am saying it to be a 'wishlist' feature. Would it be good to have it implemented in Bitcoin protocol? Would it work for good if implemented? What would be the good/bad sides of such a feature?
|
|
|
I have a better offer from the Indian Prince. Please send only 2 BTC to this address as transaction fee adress removed and receive 2 Million BTC!
|
|
|
Dont panic; the DOGE just went to take out a poop.
|
|
|
The WHO - World Health Organization is also said to be keeping their 5% reserve in MoonCoin
|
|
|
In view of the recent malleability issue in Bitcoin protocol, I was wondering if it would help to have a feature to approve/disapprove incoming transactions. For example if someone sends you 'mystery' 1 satoshi which you don't want. You can disapprove the transfer and it goes back to the original address.
|
|
|
Come on! How does a malleability attack steal their all coins 'SLOWLY' and they don't notice it until all of them are gone? They stole the coins themselves and took advantage of the malleability situation as an excuse.
|
|
|
Dude, the screenshot isn't readable at all. At least post a proper screenshot?
|
|
|
Go to: Your Profile => Forum Profile Information => Show post count by posts
Wow, thank you! So stupid I went through all those settings but could never point it out.
|
|
|
As shown in image below, I can't see post counts of any members; I can see only activity count. I'm sure there was some setting to enable/disable it, but I can't seem to find it now.
|
|
|
we need pics of the card and screenshot of your mining program that shows current mining speed
|
|
|
I guessed many people would be in 1-10 range and looks like that's the case.
|
|
|
Their official site is still taking pre-orders and you happen to have it running for some time? LOL. Post some pictures, maybe?
|
|
|
A couple of days ago I noticed someone sent me 1 satoshi. While I wasn't expecting this transaction, I checked it on blockchain.info and here is the transaction: 518e3ab025c36d0ee7e3810fee23181054df454e8d374576d7574791c65e51b1
I can see the person sent 1 satoshi to numerous people. And while he sent a total of 0.00010749 BTC, the fees accounted for 0.0001 BTC and so the final outcome was only 0.00000749 BTC, way too smaller than the fees.
(At the time of this writing, this transaction has 0 confirmations, it's been couple of days already). Why would someone be interested in something like this?
|
|
|
Mayber the OP changed his mind and instead of shitting on China, he went to execute a shit project on Sochi Olympics. We'll hear some news from Sochi soon.
|
|
|
|